Amyloidosis of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is caused by the deposition of fibrils made of serum proteins into extracellular spaces. It is an uncommon disease with a poor prognosis, requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. Treatment for amyloid light chain (AL)-type amyloidosis involves supportive care as well as addressing any underlying plasma cell dyscrasias. We present the case of a 64-year-old female diagnosed with AL-type GI amyloidosis with associated monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Unfortunately, the treatment was initiated nine months after the initial presentation, and she died one month later. Awareness of GI amyloidosis may allow for faster diagnosis and treatment in future patients.
A common cause of gastrointestinal-related hospitalizations in the United States of America is acute pancreatitis (AP), with an annual incidence of up to 80 cases per 100,000 people. The incidence of AP in pregnancy varies and is approximately 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10,000 births due to the prevalence of obesity and gallstone-related conditions. Deciding on the timing of surgical intervention in acute biliary pancreatitis during pregnancy remains challenging, and there are no consensus recommendations. Gallstone pancreatitis has a high recurrence rate of up to 50% during the first trimester. A 30-year-old G3P2 at 34 weeks of gestation presented to the emergency room (ER) with recurrent intermittent sudden severe epigastric and right upper quadrant abdominal pain radiating to the back. She had no history of alcohol consumption, and lipid studies were normal on presentation. A right upper quadrant ultrasound scan showed cholelithiasis without signs of acute cholecystitis and a common bile duct diameter of 0.5 cm. However, her serum lipase level was 824, compared to normal levels on her previous ER visits. Other significant labs included elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) of 125 and mild transaminitis, with alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels of 84 and 57, respectively. She was admitted on account of suspected gallstone pancreatitis and was treated supportively with IV fluids and adequate pain control with opioids. A subsequent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed no obvious choledocholithiasis. After consultation with the obstetrics, gastroenterology, and general surgery teams, it was decided to defer cholecystectomy until after delivery. The patient was induced at 36 weeks of gestation, and she had an uneventful vaginal delivery. Two weeks later, she had an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with no complications.
OBJECTIVES: Many older adult patients want to be treated aggressively for reversible conditions, even when their current quality of life is limited; however, most standard living wills focus on the very end of life and provide little guidance to acute care providers (ACPs) should their older adult patient be admitted with a potentially treatable acute condition and temporarily lose capacity. We developed what we believe is a more informational and directive living will for this population. We sought to determine whether ACPs would find our pilot living will more helpful when caring for their older adult patients. METHODS: Convenience sample of members of the Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM). Respondents were asked to compare the pilot living will with their state form and then answer five attitudinal questions. RESULTS: In total, 125 providers from 39 states completed the survey: 86% indicated that the pilot living will better helped them understand their patients' general end-of-life preferences, 87.5% indicated the pilot living will would be more helpful in making specific treatment decisions for their patients, and 85% indicated the pilot living will would better facilitate end-of-life discussions with surrogates. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is possible to design a functional advanced directive that better reflects the wishes of the older adult patient who wants to be treated aggressively in selected clinical situations. By more clearly defining these wishes, acute providers (eg, hospitalists, intensivists) can make more informed, patient-centered recommendations to surrogates.
Advance Directives/psychology , Critical Illness , Decision Making , Living Wills/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Preference , Quality of Life , Aged , Female , Humans , Male
