Investigating Ontario dairy farmers motivations and barriers to the adoption of biosecurity and Johne's control practices.

For the control of Johne's disease (JD), management practices to minimize disease transmission must be implemented and maintained. Once infected, animals will enter a latent phase and will typically only manifest clinical symptoms years later. As young calves are the main susceptible group on farm, the observed effects of management practices geared toward minimizing their exposure to infective material may not be realized until years later. This delayed feedback limits the sustained implementation of JD control practices. Although quantitative research methods have demonstrated changes to management practices as well as their association with changes to JD prevalence, dairy farmers can offer insights into the current challenges relating to JD implementation and control. Thus, this study aims to use qualitative methods and in-depth interviews (n = 20) with Ontario dairy farmers who had previously been engaged in a Johne's control program to explore their motivations and barriers to the implementation of JD control practices and general herd biosecurity. A thematic analysis using inductive coding was completed generated the following 4 overarching themes: (1) the hows and whys of Johne's control, (2) barriers to general herd biosecurity, (3) barriers to Johne's control, and (4) overcoming barriers. Farmers no longer believed JD was an issue on their farm. Johne's was low on their list of concerns due to little public discourse, absence of animals displaying clinical signs, and no financial support for diagnostic testing. Producers who were still actively engaged in JD control cited animal and human health as their primary motivations. Financial support, targeted education, and promoting engagement through discourse may help encourage producers to reconsider their participation in JD control. Government and industry collaboration with producers may help to develop more effective biosecurity and disease control programs.

Management practices associated with Johne's bulk tank milk ELISA positivity.

Johne's disease (JD) control is often based on the culling of positive animals and the adoption of management practices that minimize exposure of young stock to the pathogen (Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis). Throughout 2010 to 2013, the province of Ontario, Canada, instituted a voluntary Johne's control program consisting of whole-herd testing and risk assessment. The JD risk assessment evaluated 5 management areas to characterize herd JD risk. Using a modified milk ELISA technique with an optical density cut-off of 0.089, province-wide bulk tank milk (BTM) testing was used to assess the prevalence of JD high-risk herds at the end of the control program and again 4 yr after its completion. Approximately 71% of Ontario bulk tanks were classified as positive in 2017 compared with roughly 46% in 2013. In 2019, the same JD risk assessment used in the original program was readministered on 180 Ontario dairy farms. Using this cross-sectional approach, logistic regression models were built using data from the original program risk assessment and follow-up risk assessment as well as the BTM ELISA results to determine management factors associated with the control of JD. We demonstrated that management of the maternity area is an important factor in the control of Johne's disease. Although it is believed that the highest risk group for JD infection is calves under 6 mo, the cleanliness scores of older heifers and their exposure to mature cow manure was significantly associated with JD control; farms with highly contaminated weaned and bred heifers and those that had exposure to mature cow manure were more likely to be unsuccessful in their JD control efforts. Careful management of young calves appears to be important for JD control, and this management should continue even after calves have left the maternity area.

Descriptive analysis of the changes in Johne's disease management practices on Ontario dairy farms through repeat risk assessment.

Johne's disease (JD) control is often based on the culling of positive animals and the adoption of management practices that minimize exposure of calves to the pathogen Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP). From 2010 to 2013, Ontario, Canada, instituted a voluntary Johne's control program consisting of whole-herd testing and a Risk Assessment and Management Plan (RAMP). The RAMP consisted of 38 questions that evaluated 5 different management areas to characterize herd risk for MAP introduction and within-herd spread. The RAMP produced a numerical score for each area, with higher scores associated with higher risk. The RAMP focused on animal purchases, calving management, calf management, and heifer and cow cleanliness and management. In the summer of 2019, the RAMP was repeated on 180 farms that had participated in the JD program of 2010 to 2013 and had bulk tank milk ELISA results from 2013 and 2017. This cross-sectional study demonstrated that many producers changed management practices over the 4- to 7-year period. Producers changed their cattle buying practices, with a reduction in purchasing from multiple sources and more herds refraining from buying in animals. However, overall scores were higher in 2019 than in 2013. The 2019 RAMP indicated that fewer farms were utilizing individual calving pens in 2019 than in 2013 (13% vs. 26%), yet more farms had policies in place to deal with sick or suspect JD cows entering the maternity area (92% vs. 74%). Management changes occurred over time, some of which represent increased risk (crowded maternity pens) and others decreased risk (closed herd, protocols in place for JD-positive cows) for MAP introduction and transmission. These results highlight the importance of frequent risk assessments and the documentation of changes to management practices on-farm as a means to assess herd disease risk more accurately.