Expert consensus on systemic therapy for plaque psoriasis with limited skin involvement in JAPAN: Results from a DELPHI study.

Our objective was to establish consensus on (1) which patients with plaque psoriasis and limited skin involvement (body surface area [BSA] <10%) are suitable for systemic treatment, and (2) a definition of 'topical therapy failure'. A steering committee refined 13 statements drawn from literature related to the study objectives. An independent panel of 45 clinical experts from Japan indicated their agreement to each statement using a 10-point Likert scale (Round 1; strong consensus, ≥70% of responses = 7-10 and median value ≥8). The steering committee reviewed Round 1 results and refined the statements for Round 2, as necessary. In Round 2, the panel indicated their agreement to each statement using a 3-point scale (strong consensus, ≥70% of responses and median value of 3) and were shown Round 1 responses before voting. Forty-five clinicians participated in Round 1 and 41 of those (91%) participated in Round 2. Consensus was achieved on the criteria of eligibility for systemic treatment among patients with limited skin involvement as disease involvement at special or difficult to treat areas, psoriasis-induced psychological distress, uncontrolled symptoms (e.g., scaling, bleeding, pruritus, insomnia) affecting their social life, psoriatic arthritis, or failure of topical therapy. Consensus on criteria for topical failure were persistent symptoms (e.g., itchiness, pain) and plaques, poor patient satisfaction with treatment, a need to increase medication quantity or application time after treatment with two topicals for 4 weeks; or if the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score of >3 or Physician Global Assessment Score of ≥2 after 8 weeks treatment. Our Delphi panel proposes criteria to help physicians identify patients with psoriasis and limited skin involvement who would benefit from systemic therapy and suggests a definition for topical therapy 'failure' which could indicate a move to systemic treatment is warranted.

An exploratory study of the efficacy and safety of amenamevir for the treatment of herpes zoster in patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs.

Amenamevir is an oral once-daily antiherpesvirus drug that can be administered without dose adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. There are currently no clinical data on immunocompromised patients with herpes zoster treated with amenamevir. Therefore, an exploratory study of the efficacy and safety of amenamevir against herpes zoster in patients with immunosuppression was conducted. Inclusion criteria included patients with acute herpes zoster receiving immunosuppressive drugs or those with malignant tumors or autoimmune diseases. Twenty-four patients were included and received amenamevir (400 mg once daily after meals) for up to 14 days. The primary end point of overall improvement in skin symptoms 7 days after treatment initiation (day 7) was 58.3% for "markedly improved" and 20.8% for "improved." The combined improvement rate was 79.2% (95% confidence interval, 57.8-92.9), and 20.8% of patients experienced "worsened" symptoms. The secondary end points of overall improvement in skin symptoms on day 14 and day 28 were 95.7% and 100%, respectively. The skin symptoms progressed during treatment, peaking on day 7, and then began to heal. By Kaplan-Meier estimation, the median periods to complete crusting and healing were both day 14. There were five adverse events with a possible causal relationship to amenamevir (bacterial skin infection, anemia, hyponatremia, headache, and abnormal liver function) in one of the 24 patients. Although the bacterial skin infection was severe, all events in this patient were reported to be either recovered or recovering. These findings indicate that amenamevir can be effective and safe in immunocompromised patients with herpes zoster. However, as worsening can happen around day 7, it is necessary to carefully monitor such patients and switch to other therapies such as intravenous acyclovir if necessary. Clinical trial identifier: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031190208.

Real-world safety and efficacy of biologics in elderly patients with psoriasis: A multicenter observational study.

Clinical trials of biologics have frequently excluded elderly patients, resulting in inadequate data on their safety and efficacy. Additionally, evidence of their safety and efficacy remains limited, despite some real-world studies. To assess the safety and efficacy of biologics in elderly patients with psoriasis, we compared these outcomes in younger patients using data from the West Japan Psoriasis Registry (WJPR). The WJPR consists of approximately 30 facilities in Western Japan, including various healthcare settings. This study enrolled 1395 patients who participated in the 2022 follow-up survey of the WJPR and were either using or had used biologics during the survey. These included 456 patients in the elderly group (≥65 years) and 939 patients in the younger group (<65 years). Treatment-ending adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 15.8% and 11.3% of elderly and younger patients, respectively. The incidence rate per 1000 patient-years (PY) for TEAEs was significantly higher in elderly patients than in younger patients (32.9 vs 23.2, p = 0.0234). Infectious diseases were more prevalent in the elderly group than the younger group; however, no significant difference in the frequency of infectious diseases was found between the two groups (p = 0.0807). Malignant neoplasms occurred significantly more frequently in the elderly group than in the younger group (p = 0.0169). Our results indicate a few concerns about infection when prescribing biologics to elderly patients. Biologics were effective for both elderly and younger patients. We found no significant differences in the proportion of patients with a body surface area score ≤3%, Physician's Global Assessment score 0/1, or Patient's Global Assessment score 0/1, as well as in the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Itch Numerical Rating Scale between the younger and the elderly groups. Overall, our results confirm the appropriateness of using biologics in elderly patients with regard to safety and efficacy.

Cendakimab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Cendakimab selectively targets interleukin (IL)-13, a type 2 cytokine implicated in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis, by inhibiting binding to its receptors (IL13R-α1 and IL13R-α2). Proof-of-concept work in AD supports using cendakimab for type 2 inflammatory diseases. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cendakimab compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe AD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging clinical trial was conducted from May 2021 to November 2022. Adult patients with moderate to severe AD and inadequate response to topical medications were enrolled at 69 sites in 5 countries (US [n = 26], Japan [n = 17], Canada [n = 9], Poland [n = 9], and Czech Republic [n = 8]). Data were analyzed between April 25, 2023, and October 16, 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous cendakimab, 360 mg, every 2 weeks; 720 mg, every 2 weeks; 720 mg, once weekly; or placebo. Main Outcome and Measure: Mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores from baseline to week 16. Hierarchical testing with multiplicity adjustment was performed for 720 mg, once weekly vs placebo, then 720 mg, every 2 weeks vs placebo, and then 360 mg, every 2 weeks vs placebo. Results: Overall, 221 patients were randomized, and 220 received study drug (95 women [43%]; mean [SD] age, 37.7 [13.9] years; 720 mg, once weekly [54 (24%)]; 720 mg, every 2 weeks [55 (25%)]; 360 mg, every 2 weeks [55 (25%)]; placebo [56 (26%)]). The primary efficacy end point was met for cendakimab, 720 mg, once weekly vs placebo (-84.4 vs -62.7; P = .003) but missed statistical significance for 720 mg, every 2 weeks (-76.0 vs -62.7; P = .06). The treatment effect for 360 mg, every 2 weeks (-16.3; nominal P = .03 vs placebo) was comparable with 720 mg, once weekly (-21.8); however, significance was not claimed because the hierarchical testing sequence was interrupted. Of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, 4 (7.4%) received 720 mg, once weekly; 2 (3.6%) 720 mg, every 2 weeks; 1 (1.8%) 360 mg, every 2 weeks; and 2 (3.6%) placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial indicated that cendakimab was effective, generally safe, and well-tolerated in patients with moderate to severe AD. The primary end point was met with a significant reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores with 720 mg, once weekly at week 16. Cendakimab demonstrated progressive AD improvement at all doses during 16 weeks of treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04800315.

Exploratory Efficacy Evaluation of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 32-Week Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, chronic dermatitis that greatly impacts functioning and quality of life and can be difficult to treat. Approved treatment options for PPP are limited, and many patients do not fully respond to current treatments. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks followed by an extension phase where all patients received apremilast through week 32. PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), modified PPPASI (which evaluates pustules and vesicles separately), and Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) total scores and subscores (erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales) were evaluated over 32 weeks of apremilast treatment. Achievement of ≥ 50% improvement in PPPASI (PPPASI-50) was evaluated at week 16 among baseline demographic and clinical characteristic subgroups. RESULTS: At week 16, improvements in total score and subscores for PPPASI, modified PPASI, and PPSI, as well as rates of PPPASI-50 were at least moderately greater with apremilast than placebo. Mean PPPASI total score decreased by - 68.3% from baseline to week 32 with continued apremilast treatment. At week 32, mean change from baseline in PPPASI/modified PPPASI subscores ranged from - 58.5% to - 77.0% with apremilast. At week 32, PPSI total score for physician and patient assessments decreased by - 51.3% and - 40.0%, respectively, with continued apremilast treatment. PPPASI-50 response at week 16 was greater with apremilast versus placebo in most demographic and baseline characteristic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in all PPPASI and PPSI total scores and subscores observed with apremilast over 16 weeks were maintained through 32 weeks in patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Rates of PPPASI-50 response at week 16 were mostly consistent across patient subgroups. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT04057937.

Deucravacitinib onset of action and maintenance of response in phase 3 plaque psoriasis trials.

AIM: In the global phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials, significantly greater proportions of deucravacitinib-treated patients met the coprimary endpoints (PASI 75, sPGA 0/1) at Week 16 versus placebo or apremilast-treated patients. This analysis evaluated onset of action and maintenance of response in patients randomized to deucravacitinib and placebo only. METHODS: Adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis at baseline were randomized 1:2:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib, or apremilast. Onset of action was determined through changes from baseline in mean PASI, BSA, BSA × sPGA, and DLQI. Maintenance of response was assessed using PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, sPGA 0/1, and sPGA 0 response rates through Week 52 in patients who were treated continuously with deucravacitinib, crossed over from placebo to deucravacitinib at Week 16, or received deucravacitinib and achieved PASI 75 by Week 24. RESULTS: Deucravacitinib showed significantly higher increases in mean percent change from baseline in PASI versus placebo by Week 1. Significant improvement versus placebo was observed in all other efficacy measures by Week 8. Efficacy with deucravacitinib was maintained through Week 52. CONCLUSION: Deucravacitinib displayed efficacy as early as 1 week and clinical responses were maintained over 52 weeks in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Safety and effectiveness of apremilast in Japanese patients with psoriatic disease: Results of a post-marketing surveillance study.

The safety and efficacy of apremilast in psoriatic disease has been demonstrated in clinical trials, including in Japanese patients. This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted after approval of apremalast in Japan in 2016 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the drug in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in routine clinical practice. Patients (enrolled between September 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019), were observed for 12 months after apremilast treatment initiation or until discontinuation or withdrawal. Safety was assessed by evaluating adverse reactions (ARs) and serious ARs. Effectiveness measures in PsO included the proportion of patients who achieved global improvement and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scores of 0/1 and the change from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) after 6 and 12 months treatment. The safety analysis set included 1063 patients (PsO, n = 992; PsA, n = 127). ARs and serious ARs were reported in 29.4% and 0.7% of patients, respectively; most occurred <1 month after apremilast initiation. There were no reports of fatal ARs, serious infections, hypersensitivity, or vasculitis. No new safety signals were identified. Among the key survey items, gastrointestinal disorders were the most common ARs (21.3%). In patients with PsO, after 6 and 12 months of treatment, effectiveness rates of achieving highly effective or effective global improvement of were 90.9% and 93.8%; PGA 0/1 was achieved by 42.7% and 58.1% of patients; mean decrease from baseline in total DLQI score was 4.2 (p < 0.0001) and 5.7 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Effectiveness was evaluated in a small number of patients with PsA for some measures; after 6 and 12 months of treatment, improvements were observed in global improvement effectiveness rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints score, Visual Analog Scale score, and DLQI score. We conclude that orally administered apremilast was well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with PsO and/or PsA enrolled in this post-marketing surveillance study.

Dose escalation of biologic treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan.

Patients receiving interleukin (IL)-inhibiting biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) may be treated with escalated doses to optimize outcomes. This study evaluated escalation prevalence in a Japanese claims analysis of patients with PsO diagnosis preceding IL-inhibiting biologic treatment and ≥1 post-induction maintenance claim (index date) with sufficient data availability from January 2014 to May 2022. Patients with non-persistence were excluded. Expected daily dose (EDD) was calculated as the recommended maintenance dose divided by the treatment interval. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 claims showing a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose (ADD) over the EDD (with sensitivities requiring ≥1 claim and ≥30%). Significant differences were tested using multivariable regressions. The study included 982 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 104), guselkumab (GUS; n = 207), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 159), risankizumab (RIS; n = 135), secukinumab (SEC; n = 215) and ustekinumab (UST; n = 196). Within 12 months, dose escalation was observed for all IL-inhibiting biologics other than GUS and RIS: 44.4% for UST, 37.2% for IXE, 3.4% for SEC and 1.4% for BRO. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, odds of dose escalation were significantly lower for all products relative to UST. In sensitivities, escalation was observed for all products except RIS.

Systemic therapy for psoriasis and the risk of cutaneous infections.

Systemic treatments are important for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis; however, they may occasionally cause adverse infectious events. Although the risk of severe infections with psoriatic treatments is well established, little is known about cutaneous infections. Therefore, we studied the frequency of cutaneous infections in patients with psoriasis who underwent biologic treatment. A total of 878 patients (237 females and 641 males) were analyzed in this follow-up survey conducted in 2020 and based on the Western Japan Psoriasis Registry. The observed skin phenotypes were psoriasis vulgaris (83.3%), pustular psoriasis (7.5%), and psoriatic arthritis (28.9%). The most frequently prescribed systemic drug was apremilast (11.3%), followed by ixekizumab (11.0%), risankizumab (10.9%), and secukinumab (10.4%). The incidence of cutaneous bacterial infections was 12 (1.37% of the total patients), with cellulitis being the most common (8/12, 67%). The incidence of viral infections was 11 (1.25%) including the most common, herpes zoster (9/11, 82%); and that of fungal infections was 45 (5.13%) including 33 (73%) and seven (16%) patients with trichophytosis and oral candidiasis, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that cutaneous bacterial infections were frequently observed in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-α (odds raio [OR] 9.917, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.069-47.572, p = 0.004) and interleukin (IL)-17 (OR 10.798, 95% CI 2.35-49.616, p = 0.002) inhibitor treatments. A history of otitis media and treatment with oral medications (OR 4.50, 95% CI 1.281-15.804, p = 0.019 and OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.141-12.679, p = 0.03 respectively) were associated with a higher ORs for cutaneous viral infections. Furthermore, age and use of IL-17 inhibitors were associated with elevated ORs for fungal infections. In conclusion, our study reveals that systemic therapies may increase the risk of cutaneous viral infections. Therefore, dermatologists should exercise caution in this regard.

A case of bullous pemphigoid following administration of anti-IL-31 receptor A antibody.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP), an autoimmune bullous dermatosis, occurs predominantly in older individuals. Nemolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL)-31 receptor A, is used to treat severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in Japan. However, it can cause several adverse events, such as exacerbation of AD, erythema, and eosinophilia. Herein, we describe a case of prurigo-type AD developing BP after nemolizumab administration. A 62-year-old man with prurigo-type AD and asthma presented with serious, refractory itching. After nemolizumab injection, his pruritus was relieved for 2 days. However, on day 3, erythema with blisters and erosions suddenly appeared throughout his body. Pathological examination showed typical BP and the patient's serum anti-BP180-NC16a antibody level was 882.5 U/mL. Oral prednisolone (PSL) was initiated and nemolizumab was never used again. Despite high-dose PSL, new blisters continued to develop, with a rapid elevation of anti-BP180-NC16a antibodies to 6930 U/mL. Adding high-dose cyclosporine and intravenous gamma globulin reduced new blister formation after 9 weeks, and PSL and cyclosporine were gradually tapered. Dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor antibody, was initiated after 16 weeks, resulting in continued remission without PSL and cyclosporine. The sudden occurrence of BP in this case suggested that the patient had occult BP before the nemolizumab initiation and that nemolizumab exacerbated BP and made it overt. Blocking the IL-31 pathway may exacerbate inflammation in AD or BP, resulting in the acceleration of blister formation. This may be countered by blocking the IL-4/13 pathway with dupilumab. To our knowledge, this is the first case of nemolizumab-exacerbated BP.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque, erythrodermic, or generalized pustular psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from an open-label, phase 3 trial.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in Japan for adult patients with plaque (PP), generalized pustular (GPP), and erythrodermic (EP) psoriasis who have had an inadequate response to conventional systemic therapies. This approval is based on results from the global phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials in which deucravacitinib was associated with significantly improved efficacy outcomes compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and results described here from POETYK PSO-4, an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial (NCT03924427), which evaluated the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily in adult Japanese patients with PP, GPP, or EP. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving a ≥75% reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1) with at least a two-point improvement from baseline at week 16. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. Efficacy responses, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded for up to 52 weeks. Seventy-four patients were treated (PP, n = 63; GPP, n = 3; EP, n = 8). At week 16, 76.2%, 66.7%, and 37.5% of patients with PP, GPP, and EP, respectively, had achieved PASI 75, and 82.5%, 0.0%, and 50.0% had achieved sPGA 0/1. Responses were overall maintained through week 52. AEs occurred in 74.6% of patients with PP, 100% of patients with GPP, and 87.5% of patients with EP. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis and acne. Rates of SAEs and discontinuations were low. There were no deaths. Deucravacitinib was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PP and in a limited number of patients with GPP or EP.

Deucravacitinib in plaque psoriasis: 2-year safety and efficacy results from the phase III POETYK trials.

BACKGROUND: In the phase III POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials, deucravacitinib, an oral selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, was well tolerated and efficacious over 1 year in patients with psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate deucravacitinib safety and efficacy over 2 years in patients participating in the phase III trials. METHODS: In the POETYK long-term extension (LTE), an ongoing phase IIIb open-label trial, adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who completed PSO-1 or PSO-2 receive deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameter abnormalities. Efficacy endpoints, including ≥ 75% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear), were evaluated in patients originally randomized to deucravacitinib, patients who crossed over from placebo at week 16 and patients who achieved PASI 75 at week 24 (peak efficacy). RESULTS: At data cutoff (1 October 2021), 1519 patients had received at least one dose of deucravacitinib; 79.0% and 39.9% had ≥ 52 weeks and ≥ 104 weeks of total deucravacitinib exposure, respectively. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 person-years were similar at 1 year and 2 years for any AEs (229.2 vs. 154.4, respectively), serious AEs (5.7 vs. 6.1), discontinuations (4.4 vs. 2.8), deaths (0.2 vs. 0.4), serious infections (1.7 vs. 2.6), herpes zoster (0.9 vs. 0.8), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.3 vs. 0.4), venous thromboembolic events (0.2 vs. 0.1) and malignancies (1.0 vs. 0.9). EAIRs for COVID-19 infections were higher at 2 years than at 1 year (5.1 vs. 0.5) owing to the peak of the global COVID-19 pandemic occurring during the LTE. No clinically meaningful changes from baseline or trends were observed over 2 years in haematological, chemistry or lipid parameters. Clinical responses were maintained in patients who received continuous deu-cravacitinib treatment from baseline [PASI 75: week 52, 72.4%; week 112, 79.7%; sPGA 0/1: week 52, 57.9%; week 112, 61.1% (as observed)]. Responses at week 52 were also maintained in placebo crossovers and in week-24 PASI-75 responders. CONCLUSIONS: Deucravacitinib maintained efficacy and demonstrated consistent safety with no new safety signals observed through 2 years.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition. Many available treatments for psoriasis are injected, but can be inadequate in terms of effectiveness, and/or cause serious side-effects. Deucravacitinib is a recently approved oral medicine that interferes with an enzyme involved in inflammation called 'tyrosine kinase 2' (TYK2). Deucravacitinib has been shown to improve psoriatic patches and symptoms (such as itching) through 1 year in two global clinical trials in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2). This study was an analysis of the safety and efficacy of deu­cravacitinib for up to 2 years. To do this, the researchers used data from approximately 1500 people who completed both trials and continued into an ongoing, long-term extension trial (POETYK LTE). Overall, there were no new side-effects, and the number, type and severity of side-effects, as well as the number of patients who stopped treatment because of these side-effects, remained low. The most frequent side-effects included common cold symptoms and COVID-19. Rates of shingles and serious side-effects were comparable to rates reported in the real world. Improvements in psoriasis symptoms seen at 1 year were maintained for up to 2 years in patients receiving deucravacitinib treatment from the start of PSO-1 or PSO-2, or who crossed over from placebo to deucravacitinib at 4 months. Long-term treatment with deucravacitinib improved psoriasis symptoms and resulted in mostly mild side-effects. The study findings suggest that deucravacitinib could be a well-tolerated and effective treatment for people with psoriasis.

Mature IL-36γ Induces Stratum Corneum Exfoliation in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis by Suppressing Corneodesmosin.

Loss-of-function sequence variations in the IL36RN gene encoding IL-36 receptor antagonist cause familial generalized pustular psoriasis, which begins shortly after birth and is difficult to treat, and its effects on the epidermis are unclear. This study investigated the involvement of IL-36 receptor agonists in the epidermal formation of generalized pustular psoriasis. We found that the IL-36 receptor agonists, especially mature IL-36γ, stimulated IL-8 and pro-IL-36γ production in the epidermis while downregulating the genes encoding epidermal cornified envelope-related proteins, for example, corneodesmosin. IL-36 receptor antagonist and monoclonal anti-IL-36γ antibodies counteracted the effect of mature IL-36γ on corneodesmosin in keratinocytes in a dose-dependent manner. In the epidermis of patients with generalized pustular psoriasis with IL36RN loss-of-function sequence variations, pro-IL-36γ was overproduced in the epidermis, and corneodesmosin protein expression was markedly decreased in the region of giant subcorneal pustules (Kogoj's spongiform pustules), with high neutrophil infiltration. IL-8 induced by mature IL-36γ stimulated the infiltration of several neutrophils in the epidermis. The newly produced pro-IL-36γ is cleaved to the mature form by neutrophil proteases. This newly produced mature IL-36γ was predicted to further suppress the gene expression of corneodesmosin, leading to significant stratum corneum exfoliation and formation of the pustules. Overall, our results elucidate the mechanism underlying the formation of Kogoj's spongiform pustules in generalized pustular psoriasis.

Real-World Discontinuation and Switching Patterns for Interleukin-Inhibitor Treatments in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) treated with interleukin (IL)-inhibitors may require treatment modification to achieve disease control. This study evaluated discontinuation and switching of IL-inhibitors for PsO patients in Japan. METHODS: Japan Medical Data Center claims (1/2005-5/2022) were used to identify patients with PsO diagnosis preceding a first IL-inhibitor claim (index date) with ≥ 6 months of eligibility prior. Treatment switch (claim for another biologic) and discontinuation (gap in care ≥ 150% of the days' supply of the preceding prescription) were assessed up to 24 months following initiation. Censored Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses calculated rates, and Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: The study included 1481 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 159), guselkumab (GUS; n = 360), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 279), risankizumab (RIS; n = 327), secukinumab (SEC; n = 366), tildrakizumab (n = 40; excluded due to limited data), and ustekinumab (UST; n = 262). At 12/24 months, 25.9%/38.6% of patients overall had discontinued their index IL-inhibitor and 13.5%/21.2% had switched to another biologic. Discontinuation at 12/24 months was lowest for RIS (11.2%/17.4%), followed by UST (17.9%/32.2%), IXE (27.0%/37.0%), GUS (29.8%/43.0%), SEC (35.6%/53.8%), and BRO (37.2%/47.2%). Switching showed a similar trend: RIS (5.7%/10.7%), UST (11.2%/19.9%), SEC (14.7%/25.7%), IXE (14.8%/21.5%), GUS (16.9%/23.2%), and BRO (19.7%/26.8%). HRs of discontinuation relative to RIS were 2.07 for UST, 2.59 for IXE, 2.70 for GUS, 3.65 for BRO, and 3.69 for SEC (all P ≤ 0.001). HRs of switching relative to RIS were 2.05 for IXE, 2.45 for GUS, 2.67 for SEC, 2.73 for UST, and 2.77 for BRO (all P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: Treatment modification of IL-inhibitors for PsO was commonly observed and could indicate insufficient disease control and/or incremental economic burden. Discontinuation and switching rates were lowest for RIS regardless of time point and adjustment for patient characteristics.

Expression of laminin332 γ2 at the invasive front is associated with tumor budding and poor prognosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Laminin332 is a glycoprotein consisting of α3/ß3/γ2 chains, of which the γ2 chain (Ln-γ2) is expressed in tumor cells at the invasive front in many types of malignant tumors. We have previously reported that Ln-γ2 is associated with tumor invasion of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in vivo and in vitro. Recently, tumor budding (TB; invasion patterns in small clusters of less than five cancer cells in the stroma at the invasive front) has been reported to be a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in cSCC. Based on these findings, we speculated that expression of Ln-γ2 is related to TB in cSCC and would be an invasive factor that causes lymph node metastasis. In this study, we investigated the relationship between Ln-γ2 expression and clinicopathological findings, including TB, in 102 cases of cSCC using immunohistochemistry. The results showed that high expression of Ln-γ2 at the invasive front correlated with a high TB score. In addition, high Ln-γ2 expression at the invasive front was also associated with lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis (death or recurrence), as in TB. Furthermore, we showed a positive association between Ln-γ2 expression at the invasive front and Yes-associated protein (YAP) expression in the Hippo pathway. Our results suggest that Ln-γ2 expression at the invasive front may have a role in TB formation via YAP and contribute to prognosis by causing lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis. The expression of Ln-γ2 would be useful for risk assessment of lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in routine practice of cSCC.

English version of Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis.

This is the English version of the Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The signaling pathway mediated by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 contributes to type 2 inflammatory responses and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. IL-31 is a cytokine mainly produced by activated T cells and is known to be involved in the pruritus of AD. Biologics for AD have been approved, including dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody that was approved for expanded use in AD in 2018. In 2022, nemolizumab, an anti-IL-31 receptor α antibody, was approved for pruritus of AD, and tralokinumab, an anti-IL-13 antibody, was approved for AD. Physicians who intend to use these drugs should sufficiently understand and comply with the contents of the guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to promote the optimal use of the drugs. In treatment with biologics, it is important to consider disease factors (activity and severity), treatment factors (dosage and administration as well as the efficacy and safety), and patients' background characteristics (age and comorbidities) and share this information with patients when choosing treatment options. This guidance was developed for board-certified dermatologists who specialize in treating AD, and for promoting the proper use of biologics, taking into account the variety of factors in individual patients.

Real-world retention rates and effectiveness of secukinumab in psoriasis: Results from a multicenter cohort study (RAILWAY).

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease with a high negative impact on patient's quality of life. Secukinumab, the first interleukin 17A inhibitor, has been used for the systemic treatment of psoriasis, but its long-term, real-world retention rates in Japan have not been fully investigated. In this multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective chart review study, the retention rate of secukinumab and its effectiveness among patients with psoriasis in Japan was evaluated up to 5 years. Data of patients who received secukinumab after December 26, 2014, were collected from medical charts obtained from seven sites, all certified for biologics use by the Japanese Dermatological Association. Patient characteristics, secukinumab retention, factors affecting secukinumab retention, reason for drug discontinuation, and effectiveness data were collected. The primary end point was secukinumab retention rate at week 52. A total of 123 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 27 patients discontinued secukinumab by week 52, yielding a 78.0% (95% confidence interval, 69.6-84.4) retention rate at week 52. For patients whose Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score was available, mean ± standard deviation PASI at baseline and at week 52 were 9.21 ± 7.37 and 1.4 ± 2.6, respectively. During the entire study period, "insufficient response" was the most common reason for discontinuation, and "history of biologics use" was a factor significantly associated with secukinumab discontinuation (hazard ratio, 1.72; p = 0.018). This study demonstrates the real-world retention rate and effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis in Japan for up to 5 years and provides clinical insights into psoriasis treatment strategies.