Mechanical forces exerted on floral primordia with a novel experimental system modify floral development in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Mechanical forces play a crucial role in plant development, including floral development. We previously reported that the phyllotactic variation in the staminate flowers of Ceratophyllum demersum may be caused by mechanical forces on the adaxial side of floral primordia, which may be a common mechanism in angiosperms. On the basis of this result, we developed a novel experimental system for analysis of the effects of mechanical forces on the floral meristem of Arabidopsis thaliana, aiming to induce morphological changes in flowers. In this experimental system, a micromanipulator equipped with a micro device, which is shaped to conform with the contour of the abaxial side of the young floral primordium, is used to exert contact pressure on a floral primordium. In the present study, we conducted contact experiments using this system and successfully induced diverse morphological changes during floral primordial development. In several primordia, the tip of the abaxial sepal primordium was incised with two or three lobes. A different floral primordium developed an additional sepal on the abaxial side (i.e., two abaxial sepals). Additionally, we observed the fusion of sepals in some floral primordia. These results suggest that mechanical forces have multiple effects on floral development, and changes in the tensile stress pattern in the cells of floral primordia are induced by the mechanical forces exerted with the micro device. These effects, in turn, lead to morphological changes in the floral primordia.

SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Responses in Vaccination and Infection during the Pandemic in 2020-2022.

To gain insight into how immunity develops against SARS-CoV-2 from 2020 to 2022, we analyzed the immune response of a small group of university staff and students who were either infected or vaccinated. We investigated the levels of receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific and nucleocapsid (N)-specific IgG and IgA antibodies in serum and saliva samples taken early (around 10 days after infection or vaccination) and later (around 1 month later), as well as N-specific T-cell responses. One patient who had been infected in 2020 developed serum RBD and N-specific IgG antibodies, but declined eight months later, then mRNA vaccination in 2021 produced a higher level of anti-RBD IgG than natural infection. In the vaccination of naïve individuals, vaccines induced anti-RBD IgG, but it declined after six months. A third vaccination boosted the IgG level again, albeit to a lower level than after the second. In 2022, when the Omicron variant became dominant, familial transmission occurred among vaccinated people. In infected individuals, the levels of serum anti-RBD IgG antibodies increased later, while anti-N IgG peaked earlier. The N-specific activated T cells expressing IFN γ or CD107a were detected only early. Although SARS-CoV-2-specific salivary IgA was undetectable, two individuals showed a temporary peak in RBD- and N-specific IgA antibodies in their saliva on the second day after infection. Our study, despite having a small sample size, revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers the expected immune responses against acute viral infections. Moreover, our findings suggest that the temporary mucosal immune responses induced early during infection may provide better protection than the currently available intramuscular vaccines.