Efficacy of ezetimibe for reducing serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels resistant to lifestyle intervention in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of ezetimibe and lifestyle intervention for treating patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and residual dyslipidemia via a combination of ezetimibe and lifestyle intervention. METHODS: Patients with NAFLD with residual dyslipidemia after a 6-month lifestyle intervention program were included. After completion of the 6-month program, the patients received p.o. administration of ezetimibe at 10 mg/day, in addition to lifestyle intervention, for 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients with NAFLD who had participated in the 6-month lifestyle intervention program between 2007 and 2012, 21 with residual dyslipidemia (10 males and 11 females) were enrolled. Median age was 58 years (range, 27-75), median bodyweight was 63.0 kg (range, 39.4-109.0), median body mass index was 25.4 kg/m2 (range, 18.2-37.1), median alanine aminotransferase was 23 IU/L (14-73), median high-density lipoprotein (HDL) was 58 mg/dL (range, 37-93), median triglycerides (TG) was 105 mg/dL (range, 42-216) and median low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was 153 (66-209) mg/dL. After 6 months of treatment with ezetimibe, serum LDL levels were improved in 15 of 20 (75%) patients (P = 0.0015), while no improvements were observed in the remaining five patient (25%). Ezetimibe was discontinued in one patient who developed skin rash. CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe is effective for treating residual dyslipidemia after lifestyle intervention in patients with NAFLD.

The pathological role of visceral fat accumulation in steatosis, inflammation, and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Our previous studies have indicated a close association between visceral fat accumulation and hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study investigated whether visceral fat accumulation was related to the pathogenesis and disease progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)/NAFLD. METHODS: First, a total of 550 subjects who underwent a health checkup and measurement of visceral fat accumulation, done with a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (X-SCAN; Owa Medical, Fukuoka, Japan), were included. The relationship between visceral fat accumulation and biochemical parameters was examined. Second, a total of 74 patients with NASH/NAFLD who underwent liver biopsy were reviewed. Visceral fat accumulation was determined by abdominal computed tomography. The association between visceral fat accumulation and the histopathological grade/stage determined by the NAFLD activity score and Brunt's classification was evaluated. RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between visceral fat accumulation and glucose, triglyceride, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT; r = 0.423, P < 0.01). In stepwise regression analysis, visceral fat area (VFA), serum triglyceride level, and serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level were selected as predictor variables for serum ALT level, in a continuous manner (serum ALT level = -1.359 + 0.143 × VFA + 0.046 × triglyceride + 0.059 × LDL, R(2) = 0.217, P < 0.001). In patients with NASH, there was no correlation between histological grade and the visceral fat volume. Visceral fat accumulation in patients with stage 3/4 advanced NASH was greater than that in patients with stage 1/2 early NASH (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that visceral fat accumulation plays a role in steatosis and fibrosis in the pathogenesis and prognosis of NAFLD.

Age-related fat deposition in multifidus muscle could be a marker for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Although nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with visceral obesity, the relationship between visceral fat accumulation and skeletal muscle steatosis in patients with NAFLD has not been established. We evaluated: (1) the relationship between multifidus muscular tissue steatosis, visceral fat accumulation, and biochemical data in a cross-sectional study, and (2) the influence of weight reduction on multifidus muscular tissue steatosis in a longitudinal study. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-three NAFLD patients were enrolled. Hepatic steatosis, visceral fat area, and the multifidus muscle/subcutaneous fat attenuation ratio (MM/F ratio) were evaluated by computed tomography. To evaluate how weight reduction produced by diet and exercise affected the MM/F ratio, changes in the MM/F ratio were compared between weight reduction and non-weight reduction groups. RESULTS: There was a gender difference in MM/F ratios. The MM/F ratio was significantly correlated with age (male r = 0.613, P < 0.01; female r = 0.440, P < 0.01). The MM/F ratio was positively correlated with visceral fat area (male: r = 0.262, P < 0.01; female: r = 0.214, P < 0.01). A decrease in the MM/F ratio, concomitant with reduced visceral fat accumulation, led to alleviation of hepatic steatosis in 20 patients with weight reduction, but not in 22 patients without weight reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The MM/F ratio was closely related to aging and visceral fat accumulation. The MM/F ratio was improved by weight reduction, indicating that fat accumulation in the multifidus muscle evaluated by computed tomography might be a therapeutic indicator of NAFLD.

A pilot trial of body weight reduction for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with a home-based lifestyle modification intervention delivered in collaboration with interdisciplinary medical staff.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate a 6-month home-based lifestyle modification intervention delivered in collaboration with physicians, hygienists, registered dietitians, and nurses. METHODS: Outpatients with NAFLD diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography were eligible for this study. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan evaluated liver fat deposition by the liver-spleen ratio (L/S ratio) and visceral fat accumulation as the visceral fat area (VFA; cm(2)). During the 6-month home-based lifestyle modification intervention, each patient was examined by physicians, nurses, hygienists, and registered dietitians, who provided individualized advice to the patients. Patients recorded their daily weight for self-control of weight with recommended diet and exercise regimens. RESULTS: Sixty-seven NAFLD patients were enrolled in this study and 22 patients (32.8%) completed the 6-month intervention. Nineteen of the 22 patients achieved significant improvements in body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, VFA, L/S ratio, and systolic blood pressure, with improved laboratory data. Overall, 39 patients withdrew from the intervention. The mean age of the patients who withdrew was 50.0 +/- 11.0 years, which was significantly younger than that of the patients who were followed up (60.1 +/- 10.1 years; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in body weight achieved by NAFLD patients during the 6-month intervention was associated with improved fat deposition and liver function. This intervention offers a practical approach for treating a large number of NAFLD patients with lifestyle modification therapy.

Hepatitis C virus infection enhances insulin resistance induced by visceral fat accumulation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To clarify the impact of visceral obesity on hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients, we examined the relationship between insulin resistance development and visceral fat accumulation. METHODS: We analyzed 87 HCV-infected patients with mild fibrosis (stage 1 or 2) in comparison with 125 sex- and age-matched patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The degree of visceral fat area (VFA; cm(2)) at the umbilical level was measured by abdominal computed tomography and divided into two grades: no visceral obesity, VFA<100 and visceral obesity, VFA>/=100. Insulin resistance was evaluated by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI). Pancreatic beta-cell function was evaluated by homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-beta). Serum soluble tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-receptors 1 and 2 and adiponectin were measured. RESULTS: Insulin resistance evaluated by HOMA-IR and QUICKI was correlated with visceral fat accumulation, and was higher in HCV patients than in NAFLD patients with visceral obesity. HOMA-beta was higher in HCV patients than in NAFLD patients for each VFA grade. Serum-soluble TNF-receptors 1 and 2 were higher in HCV patients than in NAFLD patients with visceral obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis C virus infection is a risk factor for development of insulin resistance, particularly in patients with visceral obesity.

Waist circumference correlates with hepatic fat accumulation in male Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but not in females.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Abdominal obesity, a component of metabolic syndrome, is a major risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In recent worldwide definitions of metabolic syndrome, waist measurement has been proposed as a simple and useful estimate of abdominal obesity, taking into account gender differences in waist circumference. The present cross-sectional study investigated the correlation of hepatic fat accumulation and waist circumference in Japanese NAFLD patients to determine if there are gender differences in this relationship. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 2111) who had at least one of two criteria for liver disease (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] level >30 IU/mL and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/ALT ratio <1) underwent abdominal ultrasonography. Patients positive for hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus or autoimmune antibodies and whose alcohol intake was >20 g/day were excluded. Patients with NAFLD underwent abdominal computed tomography. Hepatic fat accumulation was estimated by liver/spleen attenuation ratio (L/S ratio) and visceral adipose accumulation was measured as visceral fat area (VFA) at the umbilical level. RESULTS: Of the 221 NAFLD patients, 103 were females. In males, the relationship between L/S ratio and waist circumference was negative (r =-0.356, P < 0.01), and there was no correlation in the female group. The relationship between L/S ratio and VFA was negative in both groups (males: r = -0.269, P < 0.01; females: r = -0.319, P < 0.01). Subcutaneous fat area/total fat area ratio at the umbilical level was larger in females than in males (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In NAFLD patients, waist measurement is more susceptible to gender differences than VFA.