Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 6 de 6
1.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi ; 78(8): 856-863, 2022 Aug 20.
Article Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35858799

PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluated the visualization of pediatric coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images by using the 64-detector row CT scanner between the electrocardiogram-gated helical scan and non-electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. METHODS: From January 2015 to March 2019, 100 children who underwent CT angiography examination were retrospectively enrolled. Group A consisted of 50 patients with electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. Group B consisted of 50 patients with non-electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. All patients were scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner (LightSpeed VCT), and helical scans were acquired. The CT scanning parameters were 0.4-s rotation, 0.625-mm slice thickness, 0.24 (group A) helical pitch (beam pitch), 1.375 (group B) helical pitch (beam pitch), 80 kVp, and 50-300 mA (noise index 40). A retrospective method was used for electrocardiogram gated. To compare the radiation dose, CT volume dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) displayed on the console were recorded. The visualization scores of the coronary artery images were compared between each group. RESULTS: In group A, CTDIvol and DLP values were 6.74 (1.05-11.97) mGy and 79.87 (15.90-146.65) mGy·cm, respectively. In group B, CTDIvol and DLP values were 0.51 (0.39-0.95) mGy and 8.15 (6.30-17.50) mGy·cm, respectively. There were significant differences in CTDIvol and DLP values between both groups (p<0.05). The visualization rates for the proximal and distal coronary arteries were 88% and 54% for the right coronary artery, 84% and 58% for the left anterior descending artery, and 66% and 30% for the left circumflex branch in group A, respectively. The visualization rates for the proximal and distal coronary arteries were 52% and 0% for the right coronary artery, 56% and 0% for the left anterior descending artery, and 32% and 0% for the left circumflex branch in group B. CONCLUSION: In 64-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), the visualization rates for the proximal and distal coronary arteries were significantly higher in the electrocardiogram-gated scan, but the exposure dose was several times higher in the pediatric CCTA. For accurate diagnosis in pediatric coronary arteries, electrocardiogram-gated helical scan should be performed.


Coronary Vessels , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Child , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
2.
Article Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32814735

PURPOSE: To compare the radiation dose and image quality using the conventional method for performing the front and side scout view and a new method for performing the side scout view, and then correct the table height at the scan isocenter and perform the front scout view. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed fifty-six children who had underwent computed tomography (CT) examination between June 2014 and August 2018. We divided them into two groups. The conventional method was performed in 3 steps: 1. obtain the front scout view, 2. obtain the side scout view, and 3. main scan. Without table position correction, the new method was performed in 4 steps: 1. obtain the side scout view with table position correction, 2. patient correction at the scan isocenter, 3. obtain the front scout view, and 4. main scan. We used a 64-row CT scanner (LightSpeed VCT; GE Healthcare). Scan parameters were tube voltage 80 kV, automatic tube current modulation, noise index 16, slice thickness 5 mm, rotation time 0.4 s/rot, helical pitch 1.375, and reconstruction kernel standard. We recorded the volume dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) on the CT console and compared the radiation dose in both groups. To evaluate the image quality in both groups, the mean standard deviation of CT number (SD value) was measured within an approximately 5-10 mm2  circular region of interest. We measured the scan length of the pediatric patient and accuracy of pediatric positioning at the CT examination. A grid was displayed on the CT axial image, taken to evaluate the error from the scan isocenter during alignment, and the error between the height of half the body thickness and the scan isocenter was recorded. RESULTS: Scan lengths were median (minimum-maximum) values of 16.2 cm (10.8-21.5 cm) and 16.8 cm (11.5-23.0 cm). There were no significant differences in the scan length between both groups (p=0.47). In the group with table position correction, median (minimum-maximum) values for CTDIvol, DLP and SD value were 0.40 mGy (0.3-0.7 mGy), 7.6 mGyï½¥cm (4.4-11.5 mGyï½¥cm), and 24.0 HU (18.3-37.5 HU), respectively. In the group without the table position correction, median (minimum-maximum) values for CTDIvol, DLP and SD value were 0.40 mGy (0.3-0.6 mGy), 7.1 mGyï½¥cm (4.2-13.8 mGyï½¥cm), and 20.3 HU (11.3-28.8 HU), respectively. There were no significant differences in the CTDIvol and DLP values between both groups (p=0.42 and p=0.44, respectively); however, there were significant differences in the SD value in both groups (p<0.01). The error for the accuracy of pediatric positioning was 0 mm (0 to 0 mm) and 10 mm (-16 to+59 mm) using the conventional and new methods (p<0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested that the optimum image could be obtained during CT scan with automatic tube current modulation by using this potential new method (1. obtain the side scout view, 2. patient correction at the scan isocenter, 3. obtain the side scout view, and 4. main scan).


Noise , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Child , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
3.
Article Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31956188

PURPOSE: It is very important to manage the radiation dose of cardiovascular interventional (CVI) procedures. Overseas, the diagnostic reference levels for cardiac interventional procedures were established with the air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r) and the air kerma-area product (PKA). Although the Japan DRLs 2015 was established by the Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure (J-RIME), the Japan DRL for CVIs were established by fluoroscopic dose rates of 20 mGy/min at the patient entrance reference point with 20 cm thickness polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. In the present our study, we performed a questionnaire survey of indicated values of angiographic parameters in CVI procedures. METHODS: A nationwide questionnaire was sent by post to 765 facilities. Question focused on angiographic technology, exposure parameters and radiation doses as the displayed dosimetric parameters on the angiographic machine. RESULTS: The recovery rate was 22.8% at 175 out of 765 facilities. In total 1728 cases of the coronary angiography (CAG), 1703 cases of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 962 cases of the radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and 377 cases of pediatric CVI. The 75th percentile value of Ka,r, PKA, fluoroscopy time (FT) and number of cine images (CI) for CAG, PCI, RFCA and pediatric CVI were 702, 2042, 644, and 159 mGy, respectively, 59.3, 152, 81.3, and 14.9 Gy・cm2, respectively, 10.2, 35.6, 61.1, and 35.6 min, respectively and 1503, 2672, 722, and 2378 images, respectively. Our investigation showed that the angiographic parameters were different in several CVI procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The displayed dosimetric parameters on the angiographic machine in CVI procedures showed different values. We should classify the dosimetric parameters for each procedure.


Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Child , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Japan , Radiography, Interventional , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Article Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31434848

PURPOSE: A three-dimensional (3D) image from computed tomography (CT) angiography is a useful method for evaluation of complex anatomy such as congenital heart disease. However, 3D imaging requires high contrast enhancement for distinguishing between blood vessels and soft tissue. To improve the contrast enhancement, many are increasing the injection rate. However, one method is the use of fenestrated catheters, it allows use of a smaller gauge catheter for high-flow protocols. The purpose of this study was to compare the pressure of injection rate and CT number of a 24-gauge fenestrated catheter with an 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheter for i.v. contrast infusion during CT. METHODS: Between December 2014 and March 2015, 50 newborn patients were randomly divided into two protocols; 22-gauge conventional non-fenestrated catheter (24 newborn; age range 0.25-8 months, body weight 3.6±1.2 kg) and 24-gauge new fenestrated catheter (22 newborn; age range 0.25-12 months, body weight 3.3±0.9 kg). Helical scan of the heart was performed using a 64-detector CT (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare) (tube voltage 80 kV; detector configuration 64×0.625 mm, rotation time 0.4 s/rot, helical pitch 1.375, preset noise index for automatic tube current modulation 40 at 0.625 mm slice thickness). RESULTS: We compared the maximum pressure of injection rate, CT number of aortic enhancement, and CT number of pulmonary artery enhancement between both protocols. The median injection rate, CT number of aortic enhancement, and CT number of pulmonary artery enhancement were 0.9 (0.5-3.4) ml/s, 455.5 (398-659) HU, and 500.0 (437-701) HU in 22-gauge conventional non-fenestrated catheter and 0.9 (0.5-2.0) ml/s, 436.5 (406-632) HU, and 479.5 (445-695) HU in the 24-gauge fenestrated catheter, respectively. There are no significantly different between a 24-gauge fenestrated catheter and 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheters at injection rate and CT number. Maximum pressure of injection rate was lower with 24-gauge non-fenestrated catheters (0.33 kg/cm2) than 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheters (0.55 kg/cm2) (p<0.01Conclusion: A 24-gauge fenestrated catheter performs similarly to an 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheter with respect to i.v. contrast infusion and aortic enhancement levels and can be placed in most subjects whose veins are deemed insufficient for an 22-gauge catheter.


Computed Tomography Angiography , Contrast Media , Heart Diseases , Angiography , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Heart Diseases/congenital , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Article Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22821158

Computed tomography automatic exposure control (CT-AEC) technique is calculated from a localizer radiograph. When we perform neck and chest CT examination, at first, we acquire localizer radiograph and neck images by placing the arm in a lowered position. Next, the arm is raised for the chest scan. Therefore, the localizer radiograph and subject information are different in the chest scan. In this situation, the chest scan with the use of the CT-AEC causes radiation over-dose. The purpose of this study is to optimize the CT-AEC by controlling noise index (NI), and make a chest CT scan condition considering the position of the arms. We measured the image noise (SD) in the phantom by using CT-AEC. In addition, dose length product (DLP) was recorded. Moreover, we examined the correlation with the clinical images. The results of our experiments show that radiation dose can be reduced with the image quality kept by controlling NI.


Arm/physiology , Phantoms, Imaging , Posture , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Artifacts , Female , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage
6.
Article Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22449902

The management of the radiation dose is very important in interventional radiology (IVR), especially in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we measured entrance surface doses at the interventional reference point of 27 cardiac intervention procedures in 22 cardiac catheterization laboratories around Hiroshima, and compared these doses. Recently, for cardiac interventional radiology, the X-ray machines using flat-panel detectors (FPD) instead of image intensifiers (I.I.) is increasing; 13 systems used FPD and 14 systems used I.I. For fluoroscopy rate, the difference between laboratories was 9 times. For cineangiography rate, the difference between laboratories was 7 times. In addition, between both devices, the I.I. group is bigger than the FPD group. When comparing by the same condition, for the dose at the interventional reference point, no significant difference was detected between the FPD group and the I.I. group. This study shows that FPD is not available for reducing the radiation dose simply. Therefore, it is necessary that we think of the balance with image quality and radiation dose. The optimization of the devices and cardiac intervention procedures becomes very important.


Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Interventional , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
...