RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although nivolumab plus ipilimumab is the standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), its efficacy and safety in older patients remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for metastatic RCC in patients aged ≥ 75 years. METHODS: We enrolled 120 patients with metastatic RCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from August 2015 to January 2023. Objective response rates (ORRs) were compared between patients aged < 75 and ≥ 75 years. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were compared between the groups. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. RESULTS: Among the patients, 57 and 63 were classified as intermediate and poor risk, respectively, and one could not be classified. The median follow-up duration after the initiation of treatment was 16 months. The patient characteristics between the groups, except for age, were not significantly different. Intergroup differences in ORR (42% vs. 40%; p = 0.818), PFS (HR: 0.820, 95% CI 0.455-1.479; p = 0.510), and median OS (HR: 1.492, 95% CI 0.737-3.020; p = 0.267) were not significant. The incidence of adverse events (50% vs. 67%; p = 0.111) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab discontinuation due to adverse events was not significantly different between the groups (14% vs. 13%; p = 0.877). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab was comparable between patients with metastatic RCC aged < 75 and those ≥ 75 years with respect to their ORRs, PFS, OS, and adverse event rates.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Ipilimumab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We assessed clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with two upfront therapies. METHODS: The medical records of 301 patients with mCSPC treated with androgen deprivation therapy plus upfront abiraterone acetate (ABI) or docetaxel (DOC) between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses of risk factors for second progression were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients received upfront DOC, whereas 206 received upfront ABI. After PSM, the ABI group had a significantly better castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival than the DOC group [hazard ratio (HR), 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.82]. Second progression-free survival (PFS2) tended to be longer in the ABI group than in the DOC group, but the difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.33-1.22). No significant difference in overall survival (OS) was found between the two groups (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.42-2.03). In the subgroup analysis, upfront ABI had significantly favorable PFS2 in patients aged ≥ 75 years compared with upfront DOC (p = 0.038). Four risk factors for second progression (primary Gleason 5, liver metastasis, high serum alkaline phosphatase level, and high serum lactate dehydrogenase level) successfully stratified patients into three risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront ABI provided better CRPC-free survival than upfront DOC; however, no significant differences in PFS2 or OS were observed between the two groups. Personalized management based on prognostic risk factors may benefit patients with mCSPC treated with upfront intensified therapies.
Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Castración , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is a standard treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), a high rate of adverse events with a variety of grades remains a difficulty. OBJECTIVE: In this randomized, prospective, multicenter study, we examined whether levofloxacin, given after each intravesical instillation of BCG, could improve its tolerance in patients with intermediate- to high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without compromising its efficacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 106 Japanese patients (85 men and 21 women; age: median, 69.5 yr) with primary or recurrent NMIBC were randomized after transurethral resection to induce treatment with intravesical BCG plus levofloxacin (group 1) or BCG alone (group 2). INTERVENTION: Patients who underwent intravesical instillation of BCG were randomized with or without levofloxacin administration. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Adverse events were assessed using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0. Cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan-Meier methods were applied to estimate survival outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the groups. The completion rate of group 1 (85.5%) was not significantly lower than that of group 2 (76.5%; p = 0.321). There was no significant difference in the completion rate of patients with pollakisuria, painful micturition, gross hematuria, fever elevation, and others between the groups. The incidence of adverse events in patients with high-grade pollakisuria (7.3% vs 25.4%, p = 0.041) and fever (0% vs 9.1%, p = 0.034) was significantly lower in group 1. The 5-yr progression-free and cancer-specific survival rates were significantly better in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic levofloxacin administration may reduce the severity of adverse events and contribute to better outcomes from BCG intravesical therapy in patients with NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Levofloxacin administration seems to be a safe and effective therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin intravesical therapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Femenino , Vacuna BCG/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study investigated the impact of treatment intensification with upfront docetaxel (DOC) or abiraterone (ABI) plus prednisolone on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by comparing it with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or combined androgen blockade (CAB) using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: Outcomes from 278 CHAARTED high-volume patients receiving upfront DOC (92 patients) or upfront ABI (186 patients) were compared to those from 354 patients receiving ADT or CAB. PSM was conducted to assess castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPCFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After PSM, patient distributions between the three groups were well balanced. After 1:1 PSM, patients receiving upfront ABI had significantly better CRPCFS than those receiving ADT/CAB or upfront DOC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.27-0.56 vs. HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.82, respectively]. No significant difference in CRPCFS was observed between the upfront DOC and ADT/CAB groups (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.50-1.12). Patients receiving upfront DOC and upfront ABI had significantly better OS than those receiving ADT/CAB (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.0.30-0.98 vs. HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.84, respectively). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between upfront ABI and upfront DOC (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.34-2.06). CONCLUSION: The comparison of real-world retrospective cohorts showed that treatment intensification with upfront DOC or upfront ABI promoted better OS compared to ADT alone or CAB in patients with high-volume mCSPC after PSM. However, no difference in OS was observed between upfront DOC and upfront ABI.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Androstenos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Castración , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
We conducted a risk-adapted upfront docetaxel (DOC) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Here, we reported an interim analysis of the study. The study enrolled 68 patients with newly diagnosed mHSPC between 2016 and 2018. According to the presence of visceral metastasis, an EOD score ≥ 3, or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at 3 months of ≥ 1 ng/mL, patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups. Patients were treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without bicalutamide; those in the high-risk group received upfront treatment involving six cycles of DOC (70 mg/m2). Short-term treatment effect, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated. Fifty (73.5%) were classified in the high-risk group, and 46 (67%) received upfront ADT + DOC. In the ADT + DOC group, 43.5% (20/46) patients achieved a PSA level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL. PSA nadir and time to PSA nadir were 0.291 ng/mL and 288 days, respectively. In the ADT + DOC group, 76.1% (35/42) patients had adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥ 3. During a median follow-up of 18.5 months, 36.4% (8/22) patients in the ADT group and 43.5% (20/46) in the ADT + DOC group had CRPC. Two QOL scores including the physical status and appetite loss at 6 months significantly worsened in the ADT + DOC group but was resolved by 12 months. Upfront DOC achieved high PSA responses without long-term QOL deterioration. However, the short-term outcomes were limited. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the survival advantage.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We report a rare case of spermatic cord metastasis from colon cancer. A man in his 50s underwent extended right hemicolectomy for transverse colon cancer followed by resection of a peritoneal recurrence. After receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months, he became aware of a right inguinal mass. A spermatic cord tumor was noted on computed tomography(CT) and FDG/PET-CT. He underwent radical orchiectomy. The resected tumor was histologically compatible with the colon cancer. Although he received additional chemotherapy, right inguinal recurrence was resected 6 months after orchiectomy. Colon cancer is the second most common origin, after gastric cancer, of metastatic spermatic tumor. As several metastatic routes have been reported, peritoneal seeding is mostly suspected in this case.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Colon Transverso/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Enfermedades de los Genitales Masculinos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Cordón Espermático , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Colectomía , Colon Transverso/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Genitales Masculinos/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
There is limited information in the use of antitumor necrosis factor α, infliximab, in patients on hemodialysis. In Crohn's disease (CD), only 3 cases are reported.A 76-year-old man on hemodialysis for renal failure caused by immunoglobulin A nephropathy developed diarrhea and abdominal pains. A marked edema was observed in the pretibia and ankle. An increase of C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hypoalbuminemia, hypocholesterolemia, and moderate anemia was found. Ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) found wall thickness in the left colon. Sigmoidoscopy revealed multiple ulcers in the sigmoid colon and noncaseating epithelioid granuloma was found in the biopsy specimen. Barium enema study exhibited collar button signs and longitudinal ulcers in the left colon.A severe form of CD was diagnosed. Metronidazole seemed to decrease CRP but was ineffective in ameliorating diarrhea. Infliximab rather than steroid hormone was chosen for the treatment. Standard induction therapy with infliximab was initiated. Symptoms rapidly improved then disappeared. CD activity index decreased from 747 to a remission level of 134 after 2 infusions of infliximab. Scheduled maintenance infliximab therapy was administered after the induction therapy. Ultrasonography and CT showed a disappearance of the wall thickness of the colon. Adverse reactions were not observed.Infliximab was effective and safe in a patient with CD on hemodialysis. Our case has added additional literature in accordance with previous reports supporting infliximab as effective and safe in patients on hemodialysis.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Humanos , Infliximab , Masculino , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicacionesRESUMEN
A 35-year-old female, who had undergone Caesarean sections in 2000 and 2001, presented with repeated candida vaginitis and cystitis. She reported that a piece of gauze was excreted through the urethra in 2005. The patient visited an outpatient clinic, but no foreign body was identified by cystoscopy. She again visited the clinic in 2012 complaining of miction pain, and a calcified mass was identified in the bladder. The patient was then referred to our hospital. During a transurethral operation, crushed stones, which included the gauze, were removed from the bladder. We concluded that remnant gauze left in the abdominal cavity during the previous pelvic surgery, had migrated into the bladder and formed a calcified mass.