Survival and neurological outcome after bystander versus lay responder defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A sub-study of the BOX trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bystander defibrillation is associated with increased survival with good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Dispatch of lay responders could increase defibrillation rates, however, survival with good neurological outcome in these remain unknown. The aim was to compare long-term survival with good neurological outcome in bystander versus lay responder defibrillated OHCAs. METHODS: This is a sub-study of the BOX trial, which included OHCA patients from two Danish tertiary cardiac intensive care units from March 2017 to December 2021. The main outcome was defined as 3-month survival with good neurological performance (Cerebral Performance Category of 1or 2, on a scale from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (death or brain death)). For this study EMS witnessed OHCAs were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 715 patients, a lay responder arrived before EMS in 125 cases (16%). In total, 81 patients were defibrillated by a lay responder (11%), 69 patients by a bystander (10%) and 565 patients by the EMS staff (79%). The 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was 65% and 81% in the lay responder and bystander defibrillated groups, respectively (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In patients with OHCA, 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was higher in bystander defibrillated patients compared with lay responder defibrillated patients.

Voided Urinary Microbiota Is Stable Over Time but Impacted by Post Void Storage.

Background: New sensitive techniques have revealed a thriving bacterial community in the human urinary tract, challenging the perception that urine in healthy humans is sterile. While the functional role of this urinary microbiota is unknown, dysbiosis has been linked to urgency urinary incontinence and risk of urinary tract infections. When comparing studies, it is crucial to account for possible confounders introduced due to methodological differences. Here we investigated whether collection and storage conditions had any impact on the urinary microbial composition. Results: For comparison of different storage conditions, midstream urine was collected from five healthy adult female donors and analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Samples stored at -80 and -20°C, but not 4°C, were found to be comparable to freshly handled voided urine. Using the same methods, the daily or day-to-day variation in urinary microbiota was investigated in 19 healthy donors, including four women, five men, five girls, and five boys. Apart from two male adult donors, none of the tested conditions gave rise to significant differences in alpha and beta diversities between individuals. Conclusion: The composition of voided urinary microbiota was found to be effectively maintained by freezing, but not storage at 4°C. In addition, we did not observe any intrapersonal daily or day-to-day variations in microbiota composition in women, girls or boys. Together our study supports present methodologies that can be used in future studies investigating the urinary microbiota.