Post-Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin with Regional Hyperthermia for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Non-pCR after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-Institute Experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with triple-negative primary breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual invasive carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have poor prognosis. Proven adjuvant approaches to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve outcome in patients with non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) are limited. METHODS: From our institutional registry, a consecutive case series of patients with operable, unilateral, primary invasive noninflammatory early TNBC of stage I-IIIB and pathologically verified residual cancer cells (no pathological complete response) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy underwent adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combined with regional hyperthermia. For quality assurance, we analyzed feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of all treated patients. Outcome was evaluated for the entire group of patients as well as for the subgroups of patients with or without lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0/ cN+). RESULTS: From August 2012 to January 2019, we offered this treatment to 53 patients at our center as part of routine care. The median follow-up was 38 months. The majority of patients (64.2%) had cT2 tumors at baseline. Twenty-four patients (45%) were clinically node positive as evaluated by sonography. Thirty-nine patients (74%) had grade 3, and 14 patients (26%) had grade 2 tumors. Forty-one patients (76%) showed a regression grade 1 according to Sinn. Patients received a median of six treatment cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (range 1-6) combined with 12 applications of regional hyperthermia (median 12, range 2-12). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years was 57.5%. In patients with no lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0), DFS at 3 years was significantly higher than in initially node-positive (cN+) patients (80 vs. 31%; p = 0.001). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 81.6%. In patients with no lymph node involvement at baseline (cN0), OS at 3 years was significantly higher than in node-positive (cN+) patients (93 vs. 70.4%; p = 0.02). Overall, grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and anemia (4%). CONCLUSION: After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes, addition of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in combination with regional hyperthermia was safe and effective in TNBC patients with non-pCR.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with regional hyperthermia as second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: There is no standard second-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) after gemcitabine (G) failure. Cisplatin (Cis)-based chemotherapy has shown activity in APC. It is proven that cytotoxicity of G and Cis is enhanced by heat exposure at 40° to 42°C. Therefore G plus Cis with regional hyperthermia (RHT) might be beneficial for patients with G-refractory APC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 23 patients with advanced (n = 2) or metastatic (n = 21) pancreatic cancer with relapse after G mono first-line chemotherapy (n = 23). Patients had received G (day 1, 1000 mg/m(2)) and Cis (day 2 and 4, 25 mg/m(2)) in combination with RHT (day 2 and 4, 1 h) biweekly for 4 months. We analysed feasibility, toxicity, time to second progression (TTP2), overall survival (OS) and clinical response. RESULTS: Between October 1999 and August 2008 23 patients were treated. Haematological toxicity was low with no grade 4 event. Hyperthermia-associated toxicity consisted of discomfort because of bolus pressure (3%), power-related pain (7%) or position-related pain (17%). Median TTP1 was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-9.2), median TTP2 was 4.3 months (95%CI: 1.2-7.4) and OS 12.9 months (95%CI: 9.9-15.9). The disease control rate in 16 patients with available CT scans was 50%. CONCLUSION: We show first clinical data of G plus Cis with RHT being clinically active in G-pretreated APC with low toxicity. A prospective controlled phase II second-line clinical trial (EudraCT: 2005-003855-11) and a randomised phase III adjuvant clinical trial offering this treatment (HEAT; EudraCT: 2008-004802-14) are currently open for recruitment.

Modified vaccinia virus Ankara delivers a robust surrogate marker for immune monitoring to sarcoma cells even if cells are being exposed to chemotherapy and heat treatment.

PURPOSE: Adding hyperthermia to chemotherapy improved the clinical outcome of patients with high risk soft tissue sarcoma. Further improvement might be possible if combined with vaccination strategies. As no sarcoma-associated antigens are known, the ectopic expression of a surrogate marker for which immune monitoring tools are available, is envisaged. We tested surrogate marker transfer into sarcoma cells in vitro using modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), which has well established clinical safety. We examined its robustness against standard sarcoma treatment modalities, such as ifosfamide and hyperthermia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We transduced sarcoma cell lines and primary tumour cells from sarcoma patients with MVA encoding the human tyrosinase gene (MVA-hTyr). Kinetics of tyrosinase expression and the potency to activate tyrosinase-specific cytotoxic T cells were assessed. In addition cells were exposed to chemotherapy and heat, imitating the clinical setting. RESULTS: Tyrosinase was ectopically expressed in sarcoma cells. Infected cells presented tyrosinase epitopes for T cell recognition even if exposed to ifosfamide/heat. CONCLUSIONS: As sarcoma patients receive surgery up front or after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy/hyperthermia, tumour material is generally available. Our data document that primary sarcoma cells can be infected with MVA-hTyr in vitro and antigen presentation is not affected by ifosfamide or heat treatment. Infected cells can serve as a source for vaccine preparation. MVA-hTyr infection of tumour cells lacking defined antigens is a feasible system to introduce a robust surrogate marker to provide an immune monitoring marker for assessing the induction of antigen-specific T cell activation.

Differential capacity of chaperone-rich lysates in cross-presenting human endogenous and exogenous melanoma differentiation antigens.

The goal of immune-based tumor therapies is the activation of immune cells reactive against a broad spectrum of tumor-expressed antigens. Vaccines based on chaperone proteins appear promising as these proteins naturally exist as complexes with various protein fragments including those derived from tumor-associated antigens. Multi-chaperone systems are expected to have highest polyvalency as different chaperones can carry distinct sets of antigenic fragments. A free-solution isoelectric focusing (FS-IEF) technique was established to generate chaperone-rich cell lysates (CRCL). Results from murine systems support the contention that CRCL induce superior anti-tumor responses than single chaperone vaccines. We established an in vitro model for human melanoma to evaluate the capacity of CRCL to transfer endogenously expressed tumor antigens to the cross-presentation pathway of dendritic cells (DC) for antigen-specific T cell stimulation. CRCL prepared from human melanoma lines contained the four major chaperone proteins Hsp/Hsc70, Hsp90, Grp94/gp96 and calreticulin. The chaperones within the melanoma cell-derived CRCL were functionally active in that they enhanced cross-presentation of exogenous peptides mixed into the CRCL preparation. Superior activity was observed for Hsp70-rich CRCL obtained from heat-stressed melanoma cells. Despite the presence of active chaperones, melanoma cell-derived CRCL failed to transfer endogenously expressed melanoma-associated antigens to DC for cross-presentation and cytotoxic T cell (CTL) recognition, even after increasing intracellular protein levels of tumor antigen or chaperones. These findings reveal limitations of the CRCL approach regarding cross-presentation of endogenously expressed melanoma-associated antigens. Yet, CRCL may be utilized as vehicles to enhance the delivery of exogenous antigens for DC-mediated cross-presentation and T cell stimulation.

Radiochemotherapy in combination with regional hyperthermia in preirradiated patients with recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Encouraging results of phase II studies combining chemotherapy with radiotherapy have been published. In this study, the results of a multimodal salvage therapy including radiochemotherapy (RCT) and regional hyperthermia (RHT) in preirradiated patients with recurrent rectal cancer are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients enrolled had received previous pelvic irradiation (median dose 50.4 Gy). The median time interval between prior radiotherapy and the onset of local recurrence was 34 months. The combined treatment consisted of reirradiation with a median dose of 39.6 Gy (30.0-45.0 Gy), delivered in fractions of 1.8 Gy/day. 5-fluorouracil was given as continuous infusion 350 mg/m(2)/day five times weekly, and RHT (BSD-2000 system) was applied twice a week within 1 h after radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was local progression-free survival (LPFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival, symptom control, and toxicity. RESULTS: 24 patients (median age 59 years) with a previously irradiated locally recurrent adenocarcinoma of the rectum were enrolled. The median LPFS was 15 months (95% confidence interval 12-18 months] with a median follow-up of 27 months (16-37 months). The overall 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 87% and 30%, respectively. Pain was the main symptom in 17 patients. Release of pain was achieved in 12/17 patients (70%). No grade 3 or 4 hematologic or skin toxicity occurred. Grade 3 gastrointestinal acute toxicity was observed in 12.5% of the patients. Paratumoral thermometry revealed a homogeneous distribution of temperatures. CONCLUSION: RCT combined with RHT is an efficient salvage therapy showing high efficacy with acceptable toxicity and can be recommended as treatment option for this unfavorable group of preirradiated patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Gene expression profiling in sarcomas.

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant mesenchymal tumors of difficult classification. There is considerable variability in both histological appearance and responsiveness to therapy. Their overall poor clinical prognosis is reflected by the fact that >65% of patients suffering retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma die within 5 years [Heslin MJ, et al. Prognostic factors associated with long-term survival for retroperitoneal sarcoma: implications for management. J Clin Oncol 1997;15(8):2832-9]. A greater understanding of the biology of sarcomas is needed in order to increase the potential for identifying new therapeutic targets and strategies. Microarray analysis permits a global approach to gene expression analysis of thousands of genes at the same time and has proven to be useful for further molecular characterization of tumor tissue and cell lines. This article provides a comprehensive review of possible new biomarkers identified in gene expression studies of sarcomas. These markers give new insight into the pathogenesis of sarcomas, such as malignant fibrous histiocytoma [Lee YF, et al. Molecular classification of synovial sarcomas, leiomyosarcomas and malignant fibrous histiocytomas by gene expression profiling. Br J Cancer 2003;88(4):510-5], allow a further subclassifcation of tumors like calponin-positive and calponin-negative leiomyosarcoma, or may help to predict treatment responsiveness and prognosis in patients based on an individual gene expression pattern. In some studies candidate targets for possible new treatment strategies were identified. For instance newly identified markers such as ERBB2 [Allander SV, et al. Expression profiling of synovial sarcoma by cDNA microarrays: association of ERBB2, IGFBP2, and ELF3 with epithelial differentiation. Am J Pathol 2002;161(5):1587-95] and EGFR [Nielsen TO, et al. Molecular characterization of soft tissue tumours: a gene expression study. Lancet 2002;359(9314):1301-7] might lead to the possible therapeutic use of Trastuzumab, Gefitinib or Cetuximab in synovial sarcoma, comparable to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI (Gleevec) that is the standard treatment today of CD117-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Efficacy of consolidation high-dose chemotherapy with ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (HD-ICE) followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue in chemosensitive patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (MSTS) is poor even after response to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. We report phase II data of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) rescue in patients with MSTS responding to AI-G chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2002, 55 patients with MSTS were prospectively treated with 4 cycles of AI-G (doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 6 g/m(2) with G-CSF support). Responders received 2 further cycles of AI-G with collection of PBSCs. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide 12 g/m(2), carboplatin 1.2 g/m(2) and etoposide 1.2 g/m(2) (HD-ICE) followed by reinfusion of PBSCs. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 55 patients (38%) were assessed as responders (3 complete response, 18 partial response). All but 2 patients refusing treatment received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC rescue leading to grade IV hematologic toxicity without severe infections in all patients. No toxic death occurred. After a median follow-up time of 30 months, the median progression-free time was 12 months and survival time was 22 months for the entire group. By intent-to-treat analysis the probability of 5-year progression-free survival was significantly higher for patients allocated to HD-ICE compared to patients receiving second-line chemotherapy after failure of AI-G (14 vs. 3%; p = 0.003). The estimated 5-year overall survival between the 2 groups was different (27% vs. not reached) but did not reach significance (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: HD-ICE is feasible and promising in patients with chemosensitive MSTS. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to further define the role of HD-ICE as consolidation treatment in these patients.

Melanoma-associated antigen tyrosinase but not Melan-A/MART-1 expression and presentation dissociate during the heat shock response.

Heat shock has been shown to have pleiotropic effects on tumor physiology besides a direct cytotoxic effect. In the present study, we address the question whether heat shock treatment has an impact on the antigenicity of human melanoma cells and their specific recognition by cytotoxic lymphocytes. The heat shock response was induced by treating the cells with two different thermal isoeffect doses, which resulted in equivalent clonogenic survival, mimicking doses achieved during clinical hyperthermia treatment of tumors. Antigen expression and immune recognition by cytotoxic T cells was studied using the human melanoma cell lines 624.38-MEL, SK-MEL23, WM115 and WM266-4, which naturally express, process and present tyrosinase and Melan-A/melanoma antigen recognized by T cells (MART)-1-derived peptides in the context of HLA-A2 molecules. We demonstrate that during the heat shock response following the two thermal doses, heat shock protein 70 (Mr 72 kDa) (HSP70) was induced with differential kinetics; tyrosinase protein and mRNA levels dissociated with a significant increase in tyrosinase protein and a decrease in transcript levels. A similar dissociation was not observed for Melan-A/MART-1. Furthermore, tyrosinase-specific T-cell recognition did not correlate with changes in HSP70 and antigen protein levels. These results suggest that caution has to be taken when considering protein levels as a marker for the antigenic status of a tumor. Moreover, these results document the maintenance of immunological homeostasis during recovery from heat treatment, thus challenging the view that tumor cells subjected to heat shock become resistant to CTL recognition.