Effect of tofacitinib on clinical and laboratory findings in severe and resistant patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of a strong Janus kinase inhibitor, tofacitinib, in individuals suffering from severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pneumonia are not definite well. METHODS: In this non-randomized and non-blinded trial, a total of 52 Iranian patients with severe COVID-19 associated with decreased oxygen saturation, elevated C-reactive protein, and/or persistent fever were included. A total of 52 patients were included in this study. Tofacitinib was administered to 29 patients (55.8%) in addition to the standard care treatments, whereas 23 patients (44.2%) were treated with the standard of care alone (mostly antiviral agents and corticosteroids). Tofacitinib was administered at a dose of 5 mg twice daily for up to 10 days. The primary outcomes were mortality rate, oxygen saturation level, CT findings, rate of breath, heart rate, and level of consciousness. Inflammatory cytokines and blood biomarkers were considered as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Death from any cause through day 14 occurred in 51.7% of the tofacitinib group and 65.2% of the control group. There was no significant difference in lung radiographic findings between the intervention and control groups at the first day of the study and after the study period. However, a significant decrease was observed in the extent of lung tissue involvement in the intervention group after administration of tofacitinib. Regarding cell and blood biomarkers, a significant decrease in the CPK levels in the intervention group and Hct and ACE levels in the control group was observed after fourteen days of the study. Moreover, a significant increase in SGOT and ferritin values was detected in the control group 14 days after the beginning tofacitinib administration. Comparing control and intervention groups, there was a significant difference in hemoglobin, SGOT, LDH, ferritin, and ACE values between groups before the intervention, while after fourteen days of the study, no significant difference was found. In case of DHEAS and TSH levels, a significant decrease was seen in the intervention group compared to the control after the study period. No other significant improvement was detected in other outcomes of the tofacitinib group compared to the control. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of tofacitinib combined with corticosteroids, is not effective enough to treat severe COVID-19 patients and the use of this medication should be considered before the disease deterioration.

Association between DLCO index and the severity of heart failure: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in heart failure has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate DLCO variation in different systolic and diastolic heart failure stages. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study on 51 patients with systolic (reduced LVEF) or diastolic (preserved LVEF) chronic heart failure (CHF). All patients underwent a standard DLCO test. The associations between the severity of heart failure and reduced carbon monoxide transfer factor (TLCO), carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO), and alveolar volume (VA) were investigated. Data were analysed using SPSS software version 16. p-Values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 59.29 ± 14.91 years, with 72% of the study population being male. Systolic heart failure was observed in 47% of patients, diastolic heart failure in 18%, and a mixed systolic and diastolic pattern in 35%. There were significant differences between TLCO percentage in patients with CHF types and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes (p = 0.042). Overall, an ejection fraction (EF) of less than 25% correlated with 3%, 53%, and 0.78 declines in TLCO, KCO%, and KCO index, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of statistically significant differences between DLCO indices and CHF severity, decreased DLCO parameters correlated with reduced EF. Therefore, DLCO testing might be helpful to predict HF severity.

Infliximab and Intravenous Gammaglobulin in Hospitalized Severe COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to the cytokine storm syndrome which may cause acute respiratory failure syndrome and death. Our aim was to investigate the therapeutic effects of infliximab, intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIg) or combination therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 disease admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: In this observational research, we studied 104 intubated adult patients with severe COVID-19 infection (based on clinical symptoms, and radiographic or CT scan parameters) who were admitted to the ICU of a multispecialty hospital during March 2020 in Tehran, Iran. All cases received standard treatment regimens as local protocol (Oseltamivir + hydroxychloroquine + lopinavir/ritonavir or sofosbuvir or atazanavir ± ribavirin). The cases were grouped as controls (n = 43), infliximab (n = 27), IVIg (n = 23) and combination (n = 11). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between controls and treatment groups in terms of underlying diseases or the number of underlying diseases. The mean age (SD) of cases was 72.42 (16.06) in the control group, 64.52 (12.965) in IVIg, 63.40 (17.57) in infliximab and 64.00 (11.679) in combination therapy; (P = 0.047, 0.031 and 0.11, respectively). Also, 37% in the infliximab group, 26.1% in IVIg, 45.5% in combination therapy, and 62.8% in the control group expired (all P < 0.05). Hazard ratios were 0.31 in IVIg (95% CI: 0.12-0.76, P = 0.01), 0.30 in infliximab (95% CI: 0.13-0.67, P = 0.004), 0.39 in combination therapy (95% CI: 0.12-1.09, P = 0.071). CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this study, it seems that infliximab and IVIg, alone or together, in patients with severe COVID-19 disease can be considered an effective treatment.

Troponin is a useful marker in clinical decision making in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infections.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global pandemic. The disease manifestations ranges from a mild common cold to severe disease and death. It has a higher mortality rate in people with a history of comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and can also contribute to cardiac injury. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between troponin levels as a cardiac marker and adverse outcomes in this disease. METHODS: The study sample included 438 patients hospitalized with COVID-19; however, the troponin data of 6 patients were not available. The need to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and death were considered the adverse outcome in patients with COVID-19. Troponin levels were checked in all patients on day 1 and day 3 of hospitalization. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether there was an independent association between the adverse outcomes and troponin enzyme in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 61.29 ± 15.84 years. Among the 432 patients tested on day 1 of hospitalization, 24 patients (5.6%) tested positive (Troponin 1), and among the 303 patients tested on day 3, 13 patients (4.3%) tested positive (Troponin 2). Based on our results, Troponin 1 showed an independent association with both death (3.008 [95%CI = 1.091-8.290]; P = 0.033) and need for ICU admission (8.499 [95%CI = 3.316-21.788]; P < 0.001) in multiple logistic regression analysis. Moreover, the status of Troponin 2 had an independent significant association with both death (4.159 [95%CI = 1.156-14.961]; P = 0.029) and ICU admission (7.796 [95%CI = 1.954-31.097]; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Troponin showed a significant association with adverse outcomes in people who were hospitalized with COVID-19. The periodical assessment of this enzyme from the time of hospitalization may improve the clinical decision making of clinicians.

The effects of air pollution on acute respiratory conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Air pollution and its potential health effects are very important worldwide. It is particularly problematic in densely populated cities of developing countries that suffer from a lack of both short- and long-term programmes for air pollution control. We decided to study the short-term effects of air pollution on lung health by assessing the relationship between the levels of six air pollutants and emergency visits for asthma and COPD exacerbations in Tehran, Iran. METHODOLOGY: We monitored the daily attendances for acute respiratory conditions (asthma attacks and COPD exacerbations) to the emergency departments of five major hospitals together with the daily concentrations of six major pollutants during a 5-month period in Tehran. The association between these acute respiratory conditions and the levels of air pollutants was determined by multiple stepwise regression. RESULTS: A correlation was observed between the number of hospital admissions for asthma and the weekly mean concentration of nitrogen dioxide (P < 0.05). The 3-day and 10-day mean concentrations of sulphur dioxide were also found to be directly associated with the number of asthma admissions during this period (P < 0.05). No direct correlation was observed for other variables. CONCLUSION: This study further emphasizes the deleterious effects of air pollution on respiratory health in major populated cities such as Tehran and suggests that increased attention needs to be given to urgent control of air pollution problems.