Prevalence and Financial Burden of Digestive Diseases in a Commercially Insured Population.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Digestive diseases represent a diverse group of clinical conditions that impact the population. Their heterogeneity in classification, presentation, acuity, chronicity, and need for drug therapy presents a challenge when comparing and contrasting the burden associated with these conditions. Prior studies use an outdated classification system and aggregate costs at the population level or focus on specific diseases, limiting the ability to characterize the overall landscape. Our aim was to provide the most up-to-date assessment of cost, utilization, and prevalence associated with digestive diseases. METHODS: We examined digestive disease claims and payment data for a commercially insured adult population between 2016 and 2018 to provide a comprehensive summary of costs, utilization, and prevalence across 38 conditions. Outcome variables included point prevalence and relative prevalence, annualized all-cause medical and drug costs, digestive disease-specific average medical cost, digestive disease-specific cost per fill, and utilization by clinical setting and by clinical condition. RESULTS: A total of 7,297,435 individuals with a digestive disease diagnosis were included in the study. The point prevalence of having a digestive disease in the total population was 24%. Annualized total costs by clinical category ranged from $10,038 (eosinophilic esophagitis) to $107,007 (hepatitis C), with medical costs accounting for most of the expenditures in a majority of conditions. Annualized total costs for common conditions included $39,653 for alcoholic liver disease, $42,554 for acute pancreatitis, $62,735 for Crohn's disease, $13,948 for functional gastrointestinal disorders, $53,214 for nonalcoholic cirrhosis, and $36,441 for ulcerative colitis. Average cost of inpatient stays ranged from $12,218 (noninfectious gastroenteritis/colitis) to $78,259 (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis). Outpatient visits ranged from $784 (gastrointestinal infection) to $4629 (gallbladder and biliary tract disease). Average drug cost per fill ranged from $83 (gastroesophageal reflux disease) to $1458 (hepatitis C). A total of 27,429,046 clinical encounters occurred across all conditions during the study period, with 90% taking place as outpatient visits. Abdominal pain was the single largest contributor to outpatient visits and emergency department to home encounters. Inpatient stays were considerably more heterogeneous, with no condition accounting for more than 12% (gallbladder and biliary tract disease) of the total. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate digestive diseases are common, heterogeneous in cost and utilization, and collectively exact a significant financial burden on the U.S. adult population.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Eravacycline in Bacteremic Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection: A Pooled Analysis from the IGNITE1 and IGNITE4 Studies.

Background: Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic that was evaluated for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in two phase 3 clinical trials. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the clinical cure and microbiologic response at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit and the safety of eravacycline in patients with cIAI and baseline bacteremia who received eravacycline versus comparators. Patients and Methods: Pooled data of patients with bacteremia from the Investigating Gram-Negative Infections Treated with Eravacycline (IGNITE) 1 and IGNITE4 studies were analyzed. All patients were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to receive eravacycline 1 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours, ertapenem 1 g intravensouly every 24 hours (IGNITE1), or meropenem 1 g intravenously every eight hours (IGNITE4) for four to 14 days. Blood and intra-abdominal samples were collected from all patients at baseline. Clinical outcome and microbiologic eradiation at the TOC visit (28 days after randomization) and safety in the microbiologic-intent-to-treat population (micro-ITT) were assessed. Results: Of 415 patients treated with eravacycline and 431 treated with carbapenem comparators, concurrent bacteremia was identified in 32 (7.7%) and 31 (7.2%) patients, respectively. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar among treatment groups. In the micro-ITT population, the pooled clinical response at the TOC visit for eravacycline was 28 of 32 (87.5%) and was 24 of 31 (77.0%) for comparators among the subgroup with baseline bacteremia (treatment difference 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.5 to 17.4). At TOC, microbiologic eradication of pathogens isolated from blood specimens occurred for 34 of 35 (97.1%) pathogens with eravacycline and 35 of 36 (97.2%) pathogens with comparators. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between treated groups and similar to that observed in the non-bacteremic population. Conclusion: Eravacycline demonstrated a similar clinical outcome and microbiologic eradication rate as comparator carbapenems in patients with cIAI and associated secondary bacteremia. Future clinical trials of cIAI should report outcomes of this important clinical cohort (cIAI with concurrent bacteremia) given their high risk for adverse outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline in Obese Patients: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data From the IGNITE1 and IGNITE4 Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of obesity worldwide merits an examination of the efficacy and safety profiles of agents dosed by weight. METHODS: Data for patients (n = 1037) were obtained from the pooled IGNITE1 and IGNITE4 randomized double-blind trials in which patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections received eravacycline 1 mg/kg (actual body weight [ABW]) every 12 hours or comparator (ertapenem 1 g every 24 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours) intravenously. This post hoc analysis evaluated clinical cure rates, adverse events, and drug discontinuation rates stratified by body mass index (BMI) categories of BMI >40 kg/m2 (Obese, Class III), BMI 35-39.9 kg/m2 (Obese, Class II), BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2 (Obese, Class I), BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 (Overweight), BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 (Healthy weight), and BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (Underweight). RESULTS: Clinical cure rates were high across BMI categories and ranged from 82% to 94% in the eravacycline group and 88.5%-100% in the comparator group. Similar cure rates were observed among eravacycline-treated healthy weight (126/134; 94%), overweight (127/146; 87%), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2; 110/129; 85.3%) patients. In the comparator group, a similar proportion of patients demonstrated clinical response (healthy weight [132/145; 91%], overweight [130/144; 90.3%], and obese [115/129; 89.1%]). Of the treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred in eravacycline-treated obese patients, a larger proportion were gastrointestinal-related (ie, nausea and vomiting); however, discontinuation rates were low and similar between eravacycline and carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrates the therapeutic utility and acceptable safety profile of eravacycline dosed by ABW in obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m2).

An Evaluation of Treatment Patterns and Associated Outcomes Among Adult Hospitalized Patients With Lower-Risk Community-Acquired Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: How Often Are Expert Guidelines Followed?

BACKGROUND: Expert guidelines discourage use of antipseudomonal ß-lactams and fluoroquinolones in lower-risk patients with community-acquired complicated intra-abdominal infection (CA cIAI). Compliance with these recommendations across US hospitals is unclear. This study sought to determine treatment patterns and associated outcomes among adult hospitalized lower-risk patients with CA cIAI. METHODS: A study using data from the Premier Healthcare Database (10/2015-12/2017) was performed. Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years; hospitalized; had a cIAI at admission; and received antibiotics within the first 4 hospital days. Patients were excluded if they were high risk, were transferred from another health care facility, had a recent hospital admission, or received dialysis within 30 days of admission. Empiric antibiotic treatment patterns and associated outcomes were quantified. RESULTS: Overall, 46 722 (66%) patients with cIAIs met the lower-risk CA IAI study criteria. Among lower-risk CA IAI patients, the mean (SD) age was 53.4 (18.2) years, and 71% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0. The most common diagnosis was acute appendicitis with peritonitis (59.7%). Among lower-risk CA IAI patients, 54% received piperacillin/tazobactam, 20% received a fluoroquinolone (FQ), 11% received ceftriaxone, and 7% received ampicillin/sulbactam. Overall, the median hospital length of stay was 4 days and median costs were $12 345 USD. Nearly 90% of patients were discharged home, and <1% died. Outcomes were similar across all empiric treatments received. CONCLUSIONS: Overuse of antipseudomonal ß-lactams and fluoroquinolones was commonplace among lower-risk CA IAI patients. These findings can serve as the basis for an antimicrobial stewardship initiative in hospitals aspiring to reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Eravacycline: a new treatment option for complicated intra-abdominal infections in the age of multidrug resistance.

Aim: Recently approved for use in complicated intra-abdominal infection, eravacycline is a novel fluorocycline with broad spectrum of activity against resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This manuscript is a pooled analysis of two Phase III trials. Clinical efficacy: Clinical cure rates were 86.8% for eravacycline versus 87.6% for ertapenem, and 90.8% for eravacycline versus 91.2% for meropenem in the Intent to Treat (micro-ITT) populations, and 87.0% for eravacycline versus 88.8% ertapenem, and 92.4 versus 91.6% for meropenem in the Modified Intent to Treat (MITT) populations. Safety: Eravacycline is well tolerated, with lower rates of nausea, vomiting and diarrhea than other tetracyclines. Conclusion: Eravacycline is an effective new option for use in complicated intra-abdominal infections, and in particular, for the treatment of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase- and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae-expressing organisms.

Mass Balance and Drug Interaction Potential of Intravenous Eravacycline Administered to Healthy Subjects.

Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline that is approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in adult patients. We report results from three studies in healthy subjects that investigated the distribution, metabolism, and excretion of intravenous (i.v.) eravacycline and the effect of a CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (rifampin) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of i.v. eravacycline. In the mass balance study, the majority of total radioactivity from [14C]eravacycline was recovered in the feces, suggesting biliary/fecal elimination is the major route of excretion for eravacycline and its metabolites after IV administration. The volume of distribution (217 liters) was greater than that of extracellular fluid, which suggests distribution beyond the central compartment. In the drug-drug interaction studies, mean area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to the last time point (AUC0-t ) and half-life were increased approximately 30% to 40% after a concomitant dose of i.v. eravacycline and itraconazole and clearance (CL) was decreased. A reduction in total eravacycline exposure (AUC) of approximately 25% to 35% and an increase in CL of approximately 50% occurred with concomitant eravacycline and rifampin treatment. The dose of eravacycline should be increased to 1.5 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h when coadministered with a strong CYP3A inducer.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of Eravacycline.

Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic with in vitro activity against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The pharmacokinetics (PK), urinary excretion, and safety/tolerability of intravenous (i.v.) eravacycline were evaluated in single- and multiple-ascending-dose studies. Healthy subjects received single i.v. doses of 0.1 to 3 mg/kg of body weight or 10 days of treatment with 0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg every 24 h (q24h) over 30 min, 1.5 mg/kg q24h over 60 min, or 1 mg/kg q12h over 60 min. After single doses, total exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) and the maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of eravacycline increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner. After multiple doses, steady state was achieved within 5 to 7 days. Accumulation ranged from approximately 7% to 38% with the q24h dosing regimens and was 45% with 1 mg/kg q12h. Eravacycline was generally well tolerated, with dose-related nausea, infusion site effects, and superficial phlebitis that were mild or moderate occurring. These results provide support for the 1-mg/kg q12h regimen used in clinical studies of eravacycline.