Solid oral medications' suitability for use in enteral feeding tubes.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of specific data about the efficacy and safety of medications administered via feeding tubes, although there is a general awareness that not all drug formulations are suitable. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To overview the current situation with solid medications administered through feeding tubes in the Tartu University Hospital intensive care units. To evaluate the availability of information on the suitability of drug formulations for administration via feeding tubes. DESIGN: This was a descriptive retrospective document analysis study. METHODS: During visits to the intensive care units, medication data for current patients were collected from paper medical charts and nurses. In addition, package information leaflets, summaries of product characteristics, and two practical handbooks were used for evaluating the medicines' suitability for administration via feeding tubes. A request for information was also sent to manufacturers or marketing authorization holders. RESULTS: In 3 months, data were collected from 113 intensive care patients' medical charts. A total of 306 medication administrations via feeding tubes were documented and analysed, 67% of which were solid oral dosage forms. Exactly 91.2% of these were conventional tablets. After the analysis of information availability, 88% of the medications were classified as suitable for administration via feeding tubes, but only 48% had the manufacturer-provided information. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the information about the suitability of formulations administration through a feeding tube is not readily available for almost half of the medications. The manufacturers seem to have the relevant information, but it is not always added to their medications' official information, putting these patients at higher risk for errors. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study shows that if there is no clear statement about administration through feeding tubes on official manufacturers' information, this should be sought directly from manufacturers or marketing authorization holders, and the data could be incorporated into local guidelines.

Factors Facilitating and Hindering Development of a Medication Use Review Service in Eastern Europe and Iran-Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study.

Polypharmacy is a common issue in patients with chronic diseases. Eastern-European countries and Iran are exploring possibilities for implementing the Medication Use Review (MUR) as a measure for optimizing medication use and ensuring medication safety in polypharmacy patients. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the development of the community pharmacy sector and map facilitators and barriers of MUR in Eastern Europe and Iran. The representatives of the framework countries received a questionnaire on community pharmacy sector indicators, current and future developments of pharmacies, and factors encouraging and hindering MUR. To answer the questionnaire, all representatives performed document analysis, literature review, and qualitative interviews with key stakeholders. The socio-ecological model was used for inductive thematic analysis of the identified factors. Current community pharmacist competencies in framework countries were more related to traditional pharmacy services. Main facilitators of MUR were increase in polypharmacy and pharmaceutical waste, and access to patients' electronic list of medications by pharmacists. Main barriers included the service being unfamiliar, lack of funding and private consultation areas. Pharmacists in the framework countries are well-placed to provide MUR, however, the service needs more introduction and barriers mostly on organizational and public policy levels must be addressed.