Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ; 18(1): 2233253, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37463336

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: It can be challenging to research aspects of people's health behaviour, attitudes, and emotions due to the sensitive nature of these topics. We aimed to develop a novel methodology for discussing sensitive health topics, and explore the effectiveness in focus groups using prostate cancer and screening as an example. METHOD: We developed a fictitious case and employed it as a projective technique in focus groups on prostate cancer and screening. The participants were men and their partners who lived in Denmark. RESULTS: The technique encouraged emotional and cognitive openness in focus group discussions about the risk of prostate cancer, the benefits and harms of screening, and decision-making about screening. It appeared that using the fictitious case allowed the participants to personally distance themselves from the topic, project emotions onto the case, and thereby openly talk about their emotions. CONCLUSION: This article presents a methodological contribution to communication about sensitive topics in focus groups, using prostate cancer screening as an example. Further refinement of the methodology is needed to enable participants to transfer improvements in knowledge to their own decision about screening.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Grupos Focales , Toma de Decisiones , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA