MELD EXCEPTION POINTS PROVIDE AN ENOURMOUS ADVANTAGE FOR RECEIVING A LIVER TRANSPLANT IN BRAZIL.

BACKGROUND: Current policy for listing to liver transplant (LT) may place cirrhotic patients without MELD exception points (CIR) in a disadvantageous position if compared to patients enlisted with appealed MELD scores - patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or special conditions other than hepatocellular carcinoma (SPE). Transplant rates, delisting, and waitlist mortality of CIR, HCC, and SPE candidates were compared. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to counterweight the listing rate and speed of listing of HCC, SPE, and CIR patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the outcomes of patients enlisted for SPE to those of HCC and CIR. In several countries worldwide, SPE patients also receive appealed MELD scores in a similar way of HCC patients. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients listed for LT in a single institution were evaluated. The first cohort (C1, n=180) included all patients enlisted on August 1st, 2008, and all additional patients listed from this date until July 31st, 2009. The second cohort (C2, n=109) included all patients present on the LT list on October 1st, 2012, and all additional patients listed from this date until May 2014. RESULTS: In both cohorts, HCC patients had a higher chance of receiving a LT than CIR patients (C1HR =2.05, 95%CI=1.54-2.72, P<0.0001; C2HR =3.17, 95%CI =1.83-5.52, P<0.0001). For C1, 1-year waiting list mortality was 21.6% (30.0% for CIR vs 9.5% for HCC vs 7.1% for SPE) (P<0.001). For C2, 1-year waiting list mortality was 13.3% (25.7% for CIR, 8.3% for HCC, and 4.0% for SPE) (P<0.001). Post-transplant survival was similar among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to CIR, SPE and HCC patients had lower wait list mortality. CIR patients had the highest waitlist mortality and the lowest odd of LT. Current LT allocation system does not allow equitable organ allocation.

Os critérios especiais de pontuação MELD proporcionam uma enorme vantagem a pacientes listados para transplante de fígado no Brasil / Meld exception points provide an enourmous advantage for receiving a liver transplant in brazil

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Current policy for listing to liver transplant (LT) may place cirrhotic patients without MELD exception points (CIR) in a disadvantageous position if compared to patients enlisted with appealed MELD scores - patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or special conditions other than hepatocellular carcinoma (SPE). Transplant rates, delisting, and waitlist mortality of CIR, HCC, and SPE candidates were compared. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to counterweight the listing rate and speed of listing of HCC, SPE, and CIR patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the outcomes of patients enlisted for SPE to those of HCC and CIR. In several countries worldwide, SPE patients also receive appealed MELD scores in a similar way of HCC patients. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients listed for LT in a single institution were evaluated. The first cohort (C1, n=180) included all patients enlisted on August 1st, 2008, and all additional patients listed from this date until July 31st, 2009. The second cohort (C2, n=109) included all patients present on the LT list on October 1st, 2012, and all additional patients listed from this date until May 2014. RESULTS: In both cohorts, HCC patients had a higher chance of receiving a LT than CIR patients (C1HR =2.05, 95%CI=1.54-2.72, P<0.0001; C2HR =3.17, 95%CI =1.83-5.52, P<0.0001). For C1, 1-year waiting list mortality was 21.6% (30.0% for CIR vs 9.5% for HCC vs 7.1% for SPE) (P<0.001). For C2, 1-year waiting list mortality was 13.3% (25.7% for CIR, 8.3% for HCC, and 4.0% for SPE) (P<0.001). Post-transplant survival was similar among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to CIR, SPE and HCC patients had lower wait list mortality. CIR patients had the highest waitlist mortality and the lowest odd of LT. Current LT allocation system does not allow equitable organ allocation.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: É possível que política atual de inclusão no transplante de fígado (LT) esteja colocando os pacientes cirróticos sem pontos de exceção MELD (CIR) em uma posição desvantajosa se comparados aos pacientes listados com escores de critério especial MELD - pacientes com carcinoma hepatocelular (HCC) ou outras condições especiais (SPE). As taxas de transplante, exclusão e mortalidade de lista de espera de candidatos com CIR, HCC e SPE foram comparadas. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo é comparar a taxa de listagem e também a velocidade de listagem de pacientes listados pelas três possíveis categorias de listagem no Brasil (HCC, SPE e CIR). Há muito poucos estudos prévios comparando os desfechos de pacientes listados por SPE ao desfecho de pacientes com HCC e também ao desfecho de pacientes não priorizados (CIR). Em muitos países, pacientes listados para transplante de fígado com SPE são priorizados para transplante em um modo similar ao que ocorre com pacientes com HCC. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliadas duas coortes de pacientes listados para LT em uma única instituição. A primeira coorte (C1, n=180) incluiu todos os pacientes listados em 1º de agosto de 2008 e todos os pacientes adicionais listados dessa data até 31 de julho de 2009. A segunda coorte (C2, n=109) incluiu todos os pacientes presentes na LT em 1º de outubro de 2012 e todos os pacientes listados dessa data até maio de 2014. RESULTADOS: Em ambas as coortes, os pacientes com CHC tiveram uma chance maior de receber uma LT do que os pacientes com CIR (C1HR =2,05, CI95% =1,54-2,72, P<0,0001; C2HR =3,17, CI95% =1,83-5,52, P<0,0001). Para C1, a mortalidade na lista de espera em um ano foi de 21,6% (30,0% para CIR vs 9,5% para HCC vs 7,1% para SPE) (P<0,001). Para C2, a mortalidade na lista de espera em um ano foi de 13,3% (25,7% para CIR, 8,3% para HCC e 4,0% para SPE) (P<0,001). A sobrevida pós-transplante foi semelhante entre os três grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Comparados aos pacientes CIR, os pacientes SPE e HCC, apresentaram menor mortalidade na lista de espera. Os pacientes com CIR tiveram a maior mortalidade na lista de espera e a menor probabilidade de LT. O atual sistema de alocação de LT não permite alocação equitativa de órgãos.

The Evaluation of Medication Adherence in Patients Infected With HCV Receiving Protease Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

Adherence to treatment is essential for hepatitis C cure. Studies show the complexity of the treatment due to side effects, many pills, and rigor in the schedules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to treatment with protease inhibitor in patients with hepatitis C. It is a longitudinal, observational, prospective pilot study with patients with hepatitis C genotype 1. Bimonthly consultations and biweekly calls for 20 weeks were performed. Evaluation methods for adherence were Measure of Adherence to Treatment score, patient report, count pills, and sustained virological response. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Mean age was 54.0 ± 8.72 years; 50% were men, educational level was 7.9 ± 3.89 years for the study, and intake of pills was 2.2 ± 1.60 per day. Adverse events reported were fatigue (90.9%), muscular pain (72.7%), and nausea (68.2%). In total, 71.4% of patients took 100% of medications and were classified as having a high degree of adherence to treatment. The sustained virological response was not significant in relation to the high or low adherence degree. Measure of Adherence to Treatment score is a good instrument to measure adherence to protease inhibitor treatment. The adherence of patients undergoing long-term and complex treatments improves when the multidisciplinary team follows up every 7-15 days. The patient's access to the team through additional phone calls or medical/nursing appointment is essential to improve adherence.

Population-based HIV prevalence and associated factors in male-to-female transsexuals from Southern Brazil.

This study assessed HIV prevalence and associated factors in 284 male-to-female transsexuals from southern Brazil. Seroprevalence was 25 %. Seroprevalence was higher and associated with older age, residence in the metropolitan area, history of diagnosis of other STDs, and reported history of sex work. The year of diagnosis showed no significant relationship with the prevalence of HIV nor the fact of being in a stable relationship, a history of drug use, years of education, and race/ethnicity. The odds of HIV infection compared with the general Brazilian population was 55.55 (95 % CI 38.39-80.39). Changes in the views of the vulnerable groups to HIV/AIDS in Brazil and efforts in the construction of strategies of prevention and in the guarantee of human rights are required.