Botulinum neurotoxin as early treatment in acute-onset lesional hemiballism.

BACKGROUND: Hemiballism (HB) and hemichorea (HC) are the most frequent secondary movement disorders, usually caused by cerebrovascular diseases. In only a minority of cases, these involuntary movements are not self-limited, and they may severely compromise patients' quality of life, so that symptomatic treatments are required. Typical and atypical neuroleptics as well as tetrabenazine are considered therapies of choice. However, anecdotal reports of antiseizures medications and botulinum neurotoxin injection effectiveness have been described. METHODS: We described a case of severely disabling acute-onset lesional HB/HC, where high dosage of first- and second-line therapies was contraindicated due to patient's comorbidities. RESULTS: After botulin neurotoxin (BoNT) injections in his left upper limb muscles (biceps brachii, triceps brachii, teres major, and deltoid), the patient experienced gradual reduction of hyperkinetic movements. The gradual discontinuation of topiramate (TPM) did not worsen the clinical picture. DISCUSSION: The reduction of hyperkinetic movements led to rhabdomyolysis resolution as well as cutaneous injuries healing with renal function improvement, so that the patient was able to be eligible for rehabilitation, which was prevented by HB/HC itself. The clinical improvement was consistent with BoNT pharmacokinetic. The administration of BoNT early after the onset of lesional HB/HC remarkably modified the clinical management and drove toward comorbidities resolution and rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: The present case highlights the effectiveness of unconventional therapeutic options in disabling acute onset lesional HB/HC when first-line therapies are contraindicated. Particularly, this report may encourage BoNT application in the early stage of movement disorder emergencies.

Validity of the Microsoft Kinect™ in assessing spatiotemporal and lower extremity kinematics during stair ascent and descent in healthy young individuals.

Stair negotiation is one of the most challenging, yet frequently encountered, locomotor tasks in daily life. This study is the first attempt to investigate the capacity of the Kinect™ sensor to assess stair negotiation spatiotemporal and sagittal plane kinematic variables. The goal of this study was to examine the validity of the Kinect™ v2 sensor in assessing lower extremity kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters in healthy young individuals; and to demonstrate its potential as a low-cost stair gait analysis tool. Twelve healthy participants ascended and descended a 3-step custom-built staircase at their preferred speed, as spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics were extracted simultaneously using the Kinect™ and a three-dimensional motion analysis. Spatiotemporal measures included gait speed, swing phase time, and double stance time. Kinematic outcomes included hip, knee, and ankle joint angles in the sagittal plane. Consistency (ICC2,1) and absolute agreement (ICC3,1) between the two systems were assessed using separate interclass correlations coefficients. In addition, ensemble curves and associated 90% confidence intervals (CI90) were generated for the hip, knee, and ankle kinematics to enable between system comparisons throughout the gait cycle. Results showed that the Kinect™ has the potential to be an effective clinical assessment device for sagittal plane hip and knee joint kinematics and for some spatiotemporal parameters during the stair gait negotiation.

Neuromuscular recovery in ACL reconstruction with Bone-Tendon-Patellar-Bone and Semitendinosus-Gracilis autograft.

OBJECTIVE: Several different types of grafts have been used in ACL rupture. The purpose of the study was to compare the recovery of lower limbs muscle strength and proprioception in athletes, who underwent ACL reconstruction with Bone-Patellar-Tendon-Bone (BPTB) versus semitendinosus and gracilis (HS) autografts. METHODS: We enrolled 30 male amateur athletes. Each patient was evaluated by isokinetic test, triaxial accelerometer test and balance test with stabilometric platform. Isokinetic test evaluated quadriceps and hamstrings Peak Torque. Accelerometer test evaluated squat jump test (SJT) and stiffness test (ST). The recording on the balance platform was performed with open and closed eyes and evaluated medio-lateral and anterior-posterior pathways. RESULTS: 30 patients were selected (15 in group BPTB and 15 in group HS). In SJT we noticed a statistically significant difference in height of jump in the involved side in favour of Group BPTB (p=0.037) and not significant difference in the other parameters. In the ST, we did not observe significant statistical differences in the parameters of the test. The stabilometric platform data and isokinetic peak torque parameters did not show a significant difference. DISCUSSION: Little high quality researches are available to help determine when patients can safely return to full activity and sport. Included evaluation criteria were a combination of factors regarding knee motion, muscles strength and neuromuscular function. CONCLUSION: In our study, despite a not full recovery of explosive strength in HS group , the balance and the other parameters after one year are comparable between the two graft. In our findings there isn't clinical difference between the two grafts. We suggest that the evaluation of explosive strength and proprioception are the priority parameters in neuromuscular recovery after ACL reconstruction.

Microsoft Kinect can distinguish differences in over-ground gait between older persons with and without Parkinson's disease.

Gait patterns differ between healthy elders and those with Parkinson's disease (PD). A simple, low-cost clinical tool that can evaluate kinematic differences between these populations would be invaluable diagnostically; since gait analysis in a clinical setting is impractical due to cost and technical expertise. This study investigated the between group differences between the Kinect and a 3D movement analysis system (BTS) and reported validity and reliability of the Kinect v2 sensor for gait analysis. Nineteen subjects participated, eleven without (C) and eight with PD (PD). Outcome measures included spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics. Ankle range of motion for C was significantly less during ankle swing compared to PD (p=0.04) for the Kinect. Both systems showed significant differences for stride length (BTS (C 1.24±0.16, PD=1.01±0.17, p=0.009), Kinect (C=1.24±0.17, PD=1.00±0.18, p=0.009)), gait velocity (BTS (C=1.06±0.14, PD=0.83±0.15, p=0.01), Kinect (C=1.06±0.15, PD=0.83±0.16, p=0.01)), and swing velocity (BTS (C=2.50±0.27, PD=2.12±0.36, p=0.02), Kinect (C=2.32±0.25, PD=1.95±0.31, p=0.01)) between groups. Agreement (RangeICC =0.93-0.99) and consistency (RangeICC =0.94-0.99) were excellent between systems for stride length, stance duration, swing duration, gait velocity, and swing velocity. The Kinect v2 can was sensitive enough to detect between group differences and consistently produced results similar to the BTS system.

Diagnosis and treatment of pain in plexopathy, radiculopathy, peripheral neuropathy and phantom limb pain. Evidence and recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain on Neurorehabilitation.

Pain may affect all aspects of social life and reduce the quality of life. Neuropathic pain (NP) is common in patients affected by plexopathy, radiculopathy, mononeuropathy, peripheral neuropathy. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a painful sensation that is common after amputation, and its pathophysiological mechanisms involve changes in the peripheral and central nervous system. Given the lack of conclusive evidence and specific guidelines on these topics, the aim of the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain on Neurorehabilitation (ICCPN) was to collect evidence and offer recommendations to answer currently open questions on the assessment and treatment of NP associated with the above conditions and PLP. When no evidence was available, recommendations were based on consensus between expert opinions. Current guidelines on the assessment and pharmacological treatment of NP can be applied to plexopathy, radiculopathy, mononeuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, while evidence for invasive treatments and physical therapy is generally poor because of the low quality of studies. Treatment of PLP is still unsatisfactory. Data on the functional outcome and impact of pain on neurorehabilitation outcome in these conditions are lacking. In most cases, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended to offer a better outcome and reduce side effects. High quality studies are requested to address the unmet needs in this field.

Evaluation of strength muscle recovery with isokinetic, squat jump and stiffness tests in athletes with ACL reconstruction: a case control study.

BackgroundThe anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture accounting for about 50% of all knee ligament injuries. The rehabilitation program requires a long time to rebuild muscle strength and to reestablish joint mobility and neuromuscular control. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the muscle strength recovery in athletes with ACL reconstruction. MethodsWe enrolled soccer atlethes, with isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture treated with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft artroscopic reconstruction. Each patients were evaluated comparing operated and controlateral limb by isokinetic test and triaxial accelerometer test. Isokinetic movements tested were knee flexion-extension with concentric-concentric contraction. Accelerometer test were Squat Jump Test (SJT)  and Stiffness Test (ST). Results17 subjects were selected, there was no significant difference in isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings results in strength and endurance values. Parameters of ST were comparable between the operated and unoperated side. In SJT a significant statistical difference was in height of jump (p=0,02) no statistical difference was evidenced in the other measures.ConclusionCurrently complete recovery of symmetric explosive strength seems to be an important parameter for evaluating the performance after ACL reconstruction and the symmetry in test results jump could be associated with an adequate return to sports. In our study the explosive strenght is lower in the limb operated than the healthy one. Explosive strength recovery with pliometric training should be included in the post-surgical rehabilitation protocol and its measurement should be performed to assess the full recovery before the restart of sport activities.

Isokinetic strength test and functional outcomes in proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate.

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of many shoulder outcome scales in subjects with rotator cuff pathology or instability symptoms, it can be problematic to select an instrumental evaluation in the shoulder trauma population. In this study we evaluated patients with proximal humeral fractures treated with internal fixation with a locking plate, analyzing the recovery of strength with an isokinetic test and its correlation with clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS: We enrolled 46 individuals (17 men, 29 women). The evaluation included a structured interview, measurement of ROM, isokinetic strength test and Constant-Murley and QuickDASH scores. The isokinetic test was performed in flexion/extension and external/internal rotation of the operated shoulder in comparison with the contralateral side and concentric contractions in all movements. The parameter tested was peak torque. RESULTS: In the operated shoulder values we noticed a statistically significant correlation between the QuickDASH and Constant-Murley score. QuickDASH showed a significant correlation with flexion isokinetic strength, partial correlation with extension isokinetic values and no correlation with external/internal rotation values. In addition, we found a correlation between the Constant-Murley score and all the isokinetic strength parameters. Comparing the operated shoulder and the contralateral, in Neer type 2 fractures there was no significant difference in all the isokinetic peak torque values; in Neer type 3 and type 4, there was a significant statistical difference in both flexion peak torque values and no significant difference in the other movements. CONCLUSIONS: The isokinetic test can give objective data on strength recovery and could help the surgeon's clinical evaluation to assess the functional recovery of the operated shoulder over time. We believe that the isokinetic test and Constant-Murley score could act as a reference in the evaluation of post-surgical outcome of proximal humeral fractures. Furthermore, the type of fracture could be a post-surgical limb recovery predictor and the shoulder flexion force could be the best functionality recovery indicator.