Core outcomes in nerve surgery: development of a core outcome set for brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries.

OBJECTIVE: When considering traumatic brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries, iatrogenic nerve injuries, and nontraumatic nerve injuries, brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Despite this, data synthesis and comparison of available studies are difficult. This is at least in part due to the lack of standardization in reporting and a lack of a core outcome set (COS). Thus, there is a need for a COS for adult brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries (COS-BPUE). The objective of this study was to develop a COS-BPUE using a modified Delphi approach. METHODS: A 5-stage approach was used to develop the COS-BPUE: 1) consortium development, 2) literature review to identify potential outcome measures, 3) Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion, 4) Delphi survey to develop definitions, and 5) consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. The study followed the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. RESULTS: The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 23 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 13 countries. The final COS-BPUE consisted of 36 data points/outcomes covering demographic, diagnostic, patient-reported outcome, motor/sensory outcome, and complication domains. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 24 months, with the consensus optimal time points for assessment being preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-BPUE should serve as a minimum set of data that should be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on adult brachial plexus and upper extremity nerve injuries. Incorporation of this COS should help improve consistency in reporting, data synthesis, and comparability, and should minimize outcome reporting bias.

Core outcomes in nerve surgery: development of a core outcome set for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

OBJECTIVE: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is common, affecting 1%-6% of the population. Despite this, there remains a lack of consensus regarding optimal treatment. This is primarily due to the difficulty one encounters when trying to assess the literature. Outcomes are inconsistently reported, which makes comparing studies or developing meta-analyses difficult or even impossible. Thus, there is a need for a core outcome set (COS) for UNE (COS-UNE) to help address this problem. The objective of this study was to utilize a modified Delphi method to develop COS-UNE. METHODS: A 5-stage approach was utilized to develop COS-UNE: stage 1, consortium development; 2, literature review to identify potential outcome measures; 3, Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion; 4, Delphi survey to develop definitions; and 5, consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. The study followed the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. RESULTS: The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 21 participants, all neurological surgeons representing 11 countries. The final COS-UNE consisted of 22 data points/outcomes covering the domains of demographic characteristics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor/sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 6 months, with the consensus optimal timepoints for assessment identified as preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors identified consensus data points/outcomes and also provided definitions and specific scales to be utilized to help ensure that clinicians are consistent in their reporting across studies on UNE. This COS should serve as a minimum set of data to be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on UNE. The authors hope that clinicians evaluating ulnar neuropathy will incorporate this COS into routine practice and that future studies will consider this COS in the design phase.

Appendiceal neurofibroma in a patient with neurofibromatosis 1 and recurrent abdominal infections from ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case report.

Appendiceal neurofibromas are exceedingly rare, with neither experimental nor observational data to support evidence-based diagnosis or treatment. We describe the case of a 52-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) complicated by aqueductal stenosis and resultant hydrocephalus needing a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). She presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and was found to have abnormalities in the right hemiabdomen on cross-section imaging, also a Staphylococcus epidermidis growth at the distal portion of the VPS. She was initially treated with two rounds of intravenous antibiotics and VPS removal without improvement. She ultimately underwent an appendectomy, which revealed pathologic evidence of NF. The appendectomy was key to ruling out malignancy, addressing further symptoms and preventing future malignant transformation. This case highlights the importance of including appendiceal neurofibromas in the differential diagnoses of abdominal pain in patients with NF1.

Foraminal Origin of the Dorsal Scapular Nerve: An Anatomical Study.

BACKGROUND: Although distal dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) anatomy has been well characterized, a paucity of literature exists detailing its proximal origin. To our knowledge, this is the first study examining DSN origin and its anatomy relative to the C5 nerve root, which may help localize pathology and provide insight into timing of DSN or C5 nerve root clinical and electrophysiological recovery. METHODS: Eighteen cadaveric dissections were performed using a posterior-midline approach. Calipers were used for DSN branching and course characterization with statistical analysis completed for the following measurements: DSN diameter, C5 nerve root diameter, distance of DSN branch-point from the C5 ganglion, dural edge, and posterior foraminal tubercle (intra-vs. extraforaminal origin), as well as C5 root-SC branch-point distance. RESULTS: Average/mean measurements (standard error) were as follows: DSN diameter: 3.7 mm (0.3 mm), C5 nerve root diameter: 6.2 mm (0.5 mm), DSN origin to C5 DRG: 12.4 mm (1.9 mm) distal, DSN origin to dural edge: 19. 6mm (1.8 mm), DSN origin to C5 root origin: 23.3 mm (2.2 mm), DSN origin to the posterior foraminal tubercle: 2.3 mm (2.5 mm) proximal/intraforaminal (first branch from C5 in all cases, and the majority [12 of 18, 67%] of DSNs originating from the C5 spinal nerve root within the foramen). CONCLUSIONS: The C5 nerve root contributed to the DSN in all specimens that originated from the proximal, intraforaminal, C5 nerve root in the majority of specimens. As the first C5 nerve branch, surgeon knowledge of this proximal DSN pattern will help localize lesional pathology, as well as may help monitor clinical and electrophysiological recovery.

Foraminal Ligaments Tether Upper Cervical Nerve Roots: A Potential Cause of Postoperative C5 Palsy.

Background Nerve root tethering upon dorsal spinal cord (SC) migration has been proposed as a potential mechanism for postoperative C5 palsy (C5P). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this relationship by anatomically comparing C5-C6 nerve root translation before and after root untethering by cutting the cervical foraminal ligaments (FL). Objective The aim of this study is to determine if C5 root untethering through FL cutting results in increased root translation. Methods Six cadaveric dissections were performed. Nerve roots were exposed via C4-C6 corpectomies and supraclavicular brachial plexus exposure. Pins were inserted into the C5-C6 roots and adjacent foraminal tubercle. Translation was measured as the distance between pins after the SC was dorsally displaced 5 mm before and after FL cutting. Clinical feasibility of FL release was examined by comparing root translation between standard and extended (complete foraminal decompression) foraminotomies. Translation of root levels before and after FL cutting was compared by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results Significantly more nerve root translation was observed if the FL was cut versus not-cut, p = 0.001; no difference was seen between levels, p = 0.33. Performing an extended cervical foraminotomy was technically feasible allowing complete FL release and root untethering, whereas a standard foraminotomy did not. Conclusion FL tether upper cervical nerve roots in their foramina; cutting these ligaments untethers the root and increases translation suggesting they could be harmful in the context of C5P. Further investigation is required examining the value of root untethering in the context of C5P.

Late Cervical Spinal Cord Herniation Resulting from Post-Traumatic Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord herniation (SCH) is often described as occurring spontaneously in the thoracic spine, with few cases of cervical SCH reported as a late complication of traumatic brachial plexus avulsion. We present 2 cases of nerve root avulsion and pseudomeningocele formation, resulting in delayed cervical SCH and neurologic deterioration. CASE DESCRIPTION: Case 1: A 37-year old man presented with progressive leg weakness 2 years after experiencing traumatic C8 and T1 root avulsions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed previously documented C8-T1 nerve avulsions with new SCH in a T1 pseudomeningocele. A C7-T1 costotransversectomy and C4-T4 instrumented fusion were completed, allowing SCH reduction and patch graft repair of the dural defects without the need for adhesiolysis. At last follow-up, the patient's leg weakness had resolved. Case 2: A 32-year old man presented with progressive right arm numbness, weakness, and signs of myelopathy 9 years after experiencing C8 and T1 root avulsions. MRI showed previously documented root avulsions and new SCH with extensive and compressive pseudomeningocele formation. A C7 transpedicular approach with C5-T1 instrumented fusion was completed for dural repair. A large pseudomeningocele was found and drained on drilling the C7 pedicle, and adhesiolysis was required at the spinal cord avulsion site to reduce the SCH and allow patch graft repair. At last follow-up, the patient's right arm weakness was improving, although numbness persisted. CONCLUSIONS: SCH is a rare cause of delayed neurologic deterioration after brachial plexus avulsion, with few case reports describing its occurrence. We present 2 cases of this complication and describe its successful surgical treatment through dural repair after instrumented fusion.