Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 47(1): 104021, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37951744

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify all reported cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the literature and present a similar case of CRAO from our clinic. METHODS: PubMed database was searched for studies reporting RAO in individuals with PFO. Relevant data were tabulated and reviewed. We estimated each case's Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score. RESULTS: 23 cases of CRAO (n=10; including ours), BRAO (n=10), and CILRAO (n=3) were reviewed. Most cases were under 50 years of age (78.3%). The reported predisposing factors were: hypertension (26.1%), migraine (17.3%), smoking (13.0%), recent immobilization (13.0%), strenuous exertion (8.7%), pregnancy (8.7%), and diabetes (4.3%). A high RoPE score (≥7; suggestive of paradoxical embolism via PFO) was estimated for 71.4% of patients. In most cases, the neurological and cardiovascular examinations, laboratory studies, and imaging were unremarkable, except for the PFO±atrial septal aneurysm (present in 21.7%). In only 28.6% of cases, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (± saline contrast) could visualize the PFO; transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was necessary to detect the PFO in 71.4%. Approximately one-half of the patients underwent percutaneous closure of the PFO; no complications or subsequent acute ischemic events ensued. The visual prognosis was poorer for CRAO than for BRAO or CILRAO. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis, acute management, and ensuring urgent initiation of stroke workup in cases with RAO or transient monocular vision loss are crucial. Clues to a possible paradoxical embolism as the cause include the absence of known cardiovascular risk factors, young age, migraine, recent immobility, vigorous exercise, and pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Paradójica , Foramen Oval Permeable , Trastornos Migrañosos , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Embolia Paradójica/diagnóstico , Embolia Paradójica/epidemiología , Embolia Paradójica/etiología , Foramen Oval Permeable/complicaciones , Foramen Oval Permeable/diagnóstico , Foramen Oval Permeable/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/etiología , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana/epidemiología , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 21(1 Pt 1): 108-20, 1998 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9474655

RESUMEN

Amiodarone was introduced 30 years ago as an antianginal agent and subsequently has been used as an antiarrhythmic agent. This drug was initially used for patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias; however, currently it is being used broadly for rate and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. At first, amiodarone was primarily used by cardiologists and today it is used throughout the medical profession. Amiodarone therapy can potentially result in a wide range of adverse effects. The majority of these adverse effects are dose related and reversible. The following is a review of the adverse effects and drug interactions of amiodarone along with recommendations for identification and management of these adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Amiodarona/efectos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Amiodarona/administración & dosificación , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...