Review article: Practical considerations for fluid resuscitation in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Standard clinical methods of assessing volume and providing resuscitation are not always applicable to patients with advanced or decompensated cirrhosis. Despite this being well known from a clinical perspective, there remains relatively little evidence to guide clinicians though fluid management in patients with cirrhosis and, often, multi-organ system dysfunction. AIMS: This review summarises the current understanding of the circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis, modalities for assessing volume status, and considerations for fluid selection. It additionally provides a practical approach to fluid resuscitation. METHODS: We review current literature on cirrhosis pathophysiology in steady-state and shock, clinical implications of fluid resuscitation, and strategies to assess intravascular volume. Literature reviewed here was identified by the authors through PubMed search and review of selected papers' references. RESULTS: Clinical management of resuscitation in advanced cirrhosis remains relatively stagnant. Although several trials have attempted to establish the superior resuscitative fluid, the lack of improvement in hard clinical outcomes leaves clinicians without clear guidance. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of consistent evidence for fluid resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis limits our ability to produce a clearly evidence-based protocol for fluid resuscitation in cirrhosis. However, we propose a preliminary practical guide to managing fluid resuscitation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Further studies are needed to develop and validate volume assessment tools in the specific context of cirrhosis, while randomised clinical trials of protocolized resuscitation may improve care of this patient population.

Modulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in active and latent tuberculosis by coexistent Strongyloides stercoralis infection.

Helminth infections are known to induce modulation of both innate and adaptive immune responses in active and latent tuberculosis (TB). However, the role of helminth infections in modulating systemic cytokine responses in active and latent tuberculosis (LTB) is not known. To define the systemic cytokine levels in helminth-TB coinfection, we measured the circulating plasma levels of Type 1, Type 2, Type 17, other pro-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines in individuals with active TB (ATB) with or without coexistent Strongyloides stercoralis (Ss) infection by multiplex ELISA. Similarly, we also measured the same cytokine levels in individuals with LTB with or without concomitant Ss infection in a cross-sectional study. Our data reveal that individuals with ATB or LTB and coexistent Ss infection have significantly lower levels of Type 1 (IFNγ, TNFα and IL-2) and Type 17 (IL-17A and IL-17F) cytokines compared to those without Ss infection. In contrast, those with ATB and LTB with Ss infection have significantly higher levels of the regulatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGFß), and those with LTB and Ss infection also have significantly higher levels of Type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13) as well. Finally, those with LTB (but not ATB) exhibit significantly lower levels of other pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFNα, IFNß, IL-6, IL-12 and GM-CSF). Our data therefore reveal a profound effect of Ss infection on the systemic cytokine responses in ATB and LTB and indicate that coincident helminth infections might influence pathogenesis of TB infection and disease.