Incidental Finding Prevalences in 3-Tesla Brain and Spine MRI of Military Pilot Applicants.

INTRODUCTION: Incidental findings in brain and spine MRI are common. In aerospace medicine, pilot selection may be affected by improved sensitivity of modern MRI devices. We investigated the occurrence of medically unfit rates caused by incidental findings in military pilot applicants using a 3-Tesla scanner as compared to the outcomes of a lower field strength 1-Tesla device based on similar screening protocols.METHODS: A total of 3315 military pilot applicants were assessed by a standardized German Air Force Imaging Screening Protocol and retrospectively subdivided into two cohorts, one of which was assessed by 1-Tesla MRI (2012-2015; N 1782), while in the second cohort (2016-2019; N 1808), a 3-Tesla MRI was used. Cohorts were statistically analyzed relating to three entities of incidental findings: 1) intervertebral disc displacements, 2) intracerebral vessel malformations, and 3) other abnormal findings in the brain.RESULTS: Pooled prevalences of incidental findings in medically unfit applicants significantly increased by use of 3-Tesla MRI as compared to lower resolution 1-Tesla MRI. Regarding the spine, prevalences more than doubled (1.46 vs. 4.99%; P < 0.05) for intervertebral disc displacements. Similarly, prevalences of cerebral vessel malformations as well as other abnormal CNS incidental findings considerably increased by use of 3-Tesla MRI (0.28 vs. 1.67%; P < 0.05, and 5.12 vs. 9.80%; P < 0.05). Effect sizes and correlations were substantial in all conditions analyzed (Cohens d > 0.8; Pearsons r > 0.75).CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a strong dependency of incidental cerebrospinal findings on image resolution and sensitivity of MRI devices used for screening, which is enhanced by refined imaging protocols and followed by increased medical unfit rates in prospective aviators. Adjusted strategies in the assessment of such lesions are needed to redefine their natural history and physiological impact, and to optimize screening protocols for future pilot selection.Snksen S-E, Khn SR, Nobl H-J, Knopf H, Ehling J, Jakobs FM, Frischmuth J, Weber F. Incidental finding prevalences in 3-Tesla brain and spine MRI of military pilot applicants. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(3):146152.

Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Targeted Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with ultrasound-fusion-targeted biopsy of the prostate intends to increase diagnostic precision, which has to be clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by ultrasound-fusion-guided perineal biopsy in 99 male patients with elevated prostate-specific-antigen and previous negative standard biopsy-procedures. RESULTS: In 33/99 patients (33%) no malignancy could be confirmed by histopathology. Low-grade carcinomas (Gleason-Score 6+7a) were found in 42/66 (64%) and high-grade carcinomas (Gleason-Score ≥7b) in 24/66 (36%) men. A high-grade carcinoma corresponded to PI-RADS 4 or 5 (suspected malignancy) in 21/24 cases, which accounted for a sensitivity of 88% and negative-predictive-value of 85% (p=0.002). Differentiation between high-/low-grade carcinomas (Gleason-Score ≤7a vs. ≥7b) by means of PI-RADS related to a sensitivity of 88% and a negative-predictive-value of 70% (p=0.74). CONCLUSION: The results support the view that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion-guided biopsy promotes considerably higher detection rates of clinically relevant prostate malignancies than do conventional diagnostic procedures. With regard to differentiation between high- and low-grade carcinomas, no significant difference was demonstrated.

[Diagnostic significance of multiparametric MRI combined with US-fusion guided biopsy of the prostate in patients with increased PSA levels and negative standard biopsy results to detect significant prostate cancer - Correlation with the Gleason score. Korrelation mit dem Gleason Score]. / Diagnostischer Stellenwert der multiparametrischen MRT mit gezielter Fusionsbiopsie der Prostata bei Patienten mit PSA-Anstieg und negativer Stanzbiopsie zur Detektion klinisch signifikanter Prostatakarzinome. Korrelation mit dem Gleason Score.

AIMS: To increase diagnostic precision and to reduce overtreatment of low-risk malignant disease, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) combined with ultrasound (US) fusion guided biopsy of the prostate were performed. METHODS: In 99 male patients with increased PSA plasma levels and previous negative standard biopsy procedures, mpMRI was carried out followed by US fusion guided perineal biopsy. PI-RADS-Data (PS) of mpMRI and histopathological Gleason score (GS) were categorized and statistically compared. RESULTS: Lesions in 72/99 (73 %) of patients were determined to be suspect of malignancy, based on a PS 4 or 5. In 33/99 (33 %) of patients, malignancy could not be confirmed by histopathology. With regard to the remaining 66 patients with previous negative biopsy results, 42 (64 %) were diagnosed with a low-grade carcinoma (GS 6, 7a) and 24 (36 %) with a high-grade carcinoma (GS ≥ 7b). The proportion of corresponding results in mpMRI (PS 4-5) when a high-grade carcinoma had been detected, was 21/24 (88 %), which related to a sensitivity of 88 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 85 % (p = 0,002). In addition, 35 of 42 patients (83%), graded PS 4-5 in mpMRI, were diagnosed with low-grade carcinoma-positive (p < 0,001). Sensitivity to differentiation between low- and high-grade carcinomas (GS ≤ 7a vs. ≥ 7b) by means of PS was 88 % with a NPV of 70 % (p = 0,74). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that mpMRI combined with US-fusion guided biopsy is able to detect considerably higher rates of clinically relevant prostate malignancies compared to conventional diagnostic procedures. However, no statistical significance could be shown regarding the differentiation between high- and low-grade carcinomas. It is hoped that the hybrid methods PSMA-PET/CT or PSMA-PET/MRI will lead to the next optimization step in the differentiation between high- and low-grade carcinomas which so far has been unsatisfactory.

Diagnostic performance of 68Gallium-PSMA-11 PET/CT to detect significant prostate cancer and comparison with 18FEC PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: Radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has proven to be a highly accurate method to detect recurrence and metastases of prostate cancer, but only sparse data is available about its performance in the diagnosis of clinically significant primary prostate cancer. METHODS: We compared 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in 25 patients with 18FEC PET/CT in 40 patients with suspected prostate carcinoma based on an increased PSA level.The PET/CT results were compared with the histopathologic Gleason Score (GS) of biopsies. RESULTS: The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT revealed highly suspect prostatic lesions (maximum standardized uptake value/SUVmax >2.5) in 21/25 patients (84%), associated with GS≥6 (low-grade/high-grade carcinoma). Two histopathologic non-malignancy-relevant cases (GS<6) had PSMA-SUVmax ≤2.5; all histopathologic high-grade cases (GS≥7b) showed PSMA-SUVmax >12.0 which further increased with rising GS. There were 2 false positives and no false negative findings for high-grade prostate cancer using a cut off-level for SUVmax of 2.5.In contrast, the 18FEC PET/CT showed suspected malignant lesions in 38/40 patients (95%), which included 3 lesions with GS<6. The mean SUVmax values did not differ with different GS. There were 11 false positives and 1 false negative for detection of high-grade prostate cancer (cut off 2.5).By means of ROC analysis a SUVmax of 5.4 was found to be an optimal cut off-level to distinguish between low- and high-grade carcinoma in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (AUC=0.9692; 95% CI 0.9086;1.0000;SD(AUC)=0.0309)). Choosing a cut off-level of SUVmax5.4, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was able to distinguish between GS ≤7a/≥7b with a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 100%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 67%, and an efficiency of 88% (p<0.001).The ROC analysis revealed a SUVmax 6.5 as an optimal cut off-level to distinguish between low- and high-grade carcinoma in 18FEC PET/CT (AUC=0.7470; 95% CI 0.5919;0.9020;SD(AUC)=0.0791) with a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 92%; but the efficiency was only 70% and the NPV 50% (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic precision and is likely to help to reduce overtreatment of low-grade malignant disease as well as detect the foci of the highest Gleason pattern. Both methods (68Ga-PSMA-11,18FEC) were suitable to detect primary prostate cancer, but the excellent image quality, the higher specificity and the good correlation of positive scans with GS are advantages of 68Ga-PSMA-11.