Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Drugs Aging ; 41(3): 219-238, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386164

RESUMEN

The number of older individuals receiving a kidney transplant as replacement therapy has significantly increased in the past decades and this increase is expected to continue. Older patients have a lower rate of acute rejection but an increased incidence of death with a functioning graft. Several factors, including an increased incidence of infections, post-transplant malignancy and cardiovascular comorbidity and mortality, contribute to this increased risk. Notwithstanding, kidney transplantation is still the best form of kidney replacement therapy in all patients with chronic kidney disease, including in older individuals. The best form of immunosuppression and the optimal dose of these medications in older recipients remains a topic of discussion. Pharmacological studies have usually excluded older patients and when included, patients were highly selected and their numbers insignificant to draw a reasonable conclusion. The reduced incidence of acute rejection in older recipients has largely been attributed to immunosenescence. Immunosenescence refers to the aging of the innate and adaptive immunity, accumulating in phenotypic and functional changes. These changes influences the response of the immune system to new challenges. In older individuals, immunosenescence is associated with increased susceptibility to infectious pathogens, a decreased response after vaccinations, increased risk of malignancies and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Chronic kidney disease is associated with premature immunosenescent changes, and these are independent of aging. The immunosenescent state is associated with low-grade sterile inflammation termed inflammaging. This chronic low-grade inflammation triggers a compensatory immunosuppressive state to avoid further tissue damage, leaving older individuals with chronic kidney disease in an immune-impaired state before kidney transplantation. Immunosuppression after transplantation may further enhance progression of this immunosenescent state. This review covers the role of immunosenescence in older kidney transplant recipients and it details present knowledge of the changes in chronic kidney disease and after transplantation. The impact of immunosuppression on the progression and complications of an immunosenescent state are discussed, and the future direction of a possible clinical implementation of immunosenescence to individualize/reduce immunosuppression in older recipients is laid out.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosenescencia , Trasplante de Riñón , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Anciano , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Rechazo de Injerto , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 14: 89, 2013 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23597045

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing controversy concerning optimum anticoagulation and buffering in continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH). Regional anticoagulation with trisodium citrate also acting as a buffer in the replacement fluid has several advantages and disadvantages over prefilter citrate administration alone. We analysed a large cohort of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) treated by the former method and hypothesized that it is safe and efficacious. METHODS: Patients admitted at the intensive care unit with AKI and a high bleeding risk, without exclusion of liver disease, treated by CVVH with citrate in a custom-made replacement solution were prospectively included. Patient and CVVH characteristics, including citrate accumulation, were evaluated in outcome groups. A standardized mortality rate (SMR) was calculated using the simplified acute physiology score II. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included; metabolic control was adequate and did not differ between outcome groups, apart from lower pH/bicarbonate in non-survivors. Citrate accumulation was proven in 9% and was timely identified. These patients had about threefold higher plasma transaminases and higher CVVH dose and mortality. The hospital mortality was 60% with a SMR of 1.1 (95% confidence interval 0.90-1.40): age and hyperlactatemia, rather than CVVH-characteristics and citrate accumulation, predicted mortality in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: In critically ill, patients with AKI at high risk of bleeding, CVVH with citrate-containing replacement solution is safe and efficacious. The risk for citrate accumulation is 9% and best predicted by levels of transaminases. It carries, when citrate is discontinued, no attributable mortality.


Asunto(s)
Citratos/administración & dosificación , Soluciones para Hemodiálisis/administración & dosificación , Hemofiltración/métodos , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Citratos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Soluciones para Hemodiálisis/efectos adversos , Hemofiltración/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
ASAIO J ; 57(1): 48-52, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21084966

RESUMEN

In continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), the delivery of replacement fluid in pre- or postdilution mode remains the subject of controversy. We compared both modes in terms of filter life, dose, and azotemic control. All patients admitted to the intensive care units of a university hospital between November 2004 and December 2006 receiving CVVH and systemic anticoagulation with heparin were retrospectively studied. Thirty-six patients treated by CVVH in predilution and 27 in postdilution mode were studied, with 132 filters in the former and 111 in the latter. The filter life [median ± interquartile range (IQR)] was 24 ± 38 hours and 29 ± 46 hours (p = 0.58) in the pre- and postdilution modes, respectively. Although the fall in creatinine and urea depended on the dose, 19% greater delivered dose in the post- than predilution mode did not impact on azotemic control. In critically ill, heparinized patients on CVVH, filter life and azotemic control are similar in pre- and postdilution modes and underscore the clinical applicability of the predilution mode.


Asunto(s)
Azotemia/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Hemofiltración/métodos , Lesión Renal Aguda/sangre , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Azotemia/sangre , Creatinina/sangre , Hemofiltración/instrumentación , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Urea/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA