Association of Cannabis Use Disorder With Hospitalizations for Pulmonary Embolism and Subsequent in-Hospital Mortality in Young Adults: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the increase in popularity of cannabis and its use and the lack of large-scale data on cannabis use and venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism (PE), we used a nationally representative cohort of young adults (aged 18-44 years) to compare the odds of admissions and in-hospital mortality of PE with and without cannabis use disorder (CUD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Identified patients with PE using the National Inpatient Sample (2018) were compared for baseline, comorbidities, and outcomes. Multivariable regression analysis, adjusted for covariates, was used to compare the odds of PE in young patients with CUD (CUD+) versus those without (CUD-) and those with prior venous thromboembolism. Propensity score-matched analysis (1:6) was also performed to assess in-hospital outcomes. A total of 61 965 (0.7%) of 8 438 858 young adult admissions in 2018 were PE related, of which 1705 (0.6%) had CUD+. On both unadjusted (odds ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71-0.90]; P<0.001) and adjusted regression analyses, the CUD+ cohort had a lower risk of PE admission. The CUD+ cohort had fewer routine discharges (58.3% versus 68.3%) and higher transfers to short-term (7.9% versus 4.8%) and nursing/intermediate care (12.6% versus 9.5%) (P<0.001). The PE-CUD+ cohort of in-hospital mortality did not differ from the CUD- cohort. Propensity score-matched (1:6) analysis revealed comparable mortality odds with higher median hospital stay and cost in the CUD+ cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults with CUD demonstrated lower odds of PE hospitalizations without any association with subsequent in-hospital mortality. The median hospital stay of the CUD+ cohort was longer, they were often transferred to other facilities, and they had a higher cost.

Examining prevalence and predictors of pulmonary hypertension in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a population-based analysis in the United States.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) often complicates idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a progressive parenchymal lung disease. We investigated predictors of PH in IPF hospitalizations in the United States. We identified IPF hospital- izations with or without PH using the National Inpatient Sample (2018) and relevant ICD-10-CM codes. We com- pared demographics, comorbidities, PH prevalence, and its multivariable predictors adjusted for confounders among patients with IPF. In 2018, 30,335 patients from 30,259,863 hospitalizations had IPF, of which 8,075 (26.6%) had PH. Black (41%), Hispanic (21.3%), and female (28.7%) patients had higher rates of PH compared to white patients (25%). The IPF-PH cohort was hospitalized more often in urban teaching (77.7% vs. 72.2%), Midwest, and West hospitals vs. non-PH cohort. Comorbidities including congestive heart failure (2.08 [1.81-2.39]), valvular disease (2.12 [1.74-2.58]), rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular disease (1.32 [1.08-1.61]) predicted higher odds of PH. The PH-IPF cohort was less often routinely discharged (35.4%) and more likely to be transferred to intermediate care facilities (22.6%) and home health care (27.1%) (P < 0.001). The PH-IPF group had higher rates of all-cause mortality (12.3% vs. 9.4%), cardiogenic shock (2.4% vs. 1%), dysrhythmia (37.6% vs. 29%), and cardiac arrest (2.7% vs. 1.5%) vs. non-PH cohort (all P < 0.001). Patients with PH-IPF also had longer hospital stays (9 vs. 8) and a higher median cost ($23,054 vs. $19,627, P < 0.001). Nearly 25% of IPF hospitalizations with PH were linked to higher mortality, extended stays, and costs, emphasizing the need to integrate demographic and comorbidity predictors into risk stratification for improved outcomes in patients with IPF-PH.

Impact Of body Mass Index on Cardiopulmonary Outcomes of COVID-19 Hospitalizations Complicated by Severe Sepsis.

Background: Body Mass Index (BMI) has a significant impact on Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patient outcomes; however, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular outcomes in patients with severe sepsis have been poorly understood. Our study aims to explore and provide insight into its association. Methods: This is an observational study looking at the impact of BMI on COVID-19-severe sepsis hospitalizations. The primary outcomes are adjusted odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality, respiratory failure, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which include acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and acute ischemic stroke. The secondary outcome was healthcare resource utilization. Coexisting comorbidities and patient features were adjusted with multivariable regression analyses. Results: Of 51,740 patients with severe COVID-19-sepsis admissions, 11.4% were overweight, 24.8% had Class I obesity (BMI 30-34.9), 19.8% had Class II obesity (BMI 35-39.9), and 43.9% had the categorization of Class III obesity (BMI >40) cohorts with age>18 years. The odds of MACCE in patients with class II obesity and class III obesity (OR 1.09 and 1.54; 95CI 0.93-1.29 and 1.33-1.79) were significantly higher than in overweight (p < 0.001). Class I, Class II, and Class III patients with obesity revealed lower odds of respiratory failure compared to overweight (OR 0.89, 0.82, and 0.82; 95CI 0.75-1.05, 0.69-0.97, and 0.70-0.97), but failed to achieve statistical significance (p = 0.079). On multivariable regression analysis, all-cause in-hospital mortality revealed significantly higher odds in patients with Class III obesity, Class II, and Class I (OR 1.56, 1.17, and 1.06; 95CI 1.34-1.81, 0.99-1.38, and 0.91-1.24) vs. overweight patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with Class II and Class III obesity had significantly higher odds of MACCE and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19-severe sepsis admissions.