Female Immunity Protects from Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Cancer susceptibility and mortality are higher in males, and the mutational and transcriptomic landscape of cancer differs by sex. The current assumption is that men are at higher risk of epithelial cancers as they expose more to carcinogens and accumulate more damage than women. We present data showing women present with less aggressive primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and early strong immune activation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We explored clinical and molecular sexual disparity in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients with primary cSCC (N = 738, N = 160), advanced-stage cSCC (N = 63, N = 20) and FVB/N mice exposed to equal doses of DMBA, as well as in human keratinocytes by whole-exome, bulk, and single-cell RNA sequencing. RESULTS: We show cSCC is more aggressive in men, and immunocompetent women develop mild cSCC, later in life. To test whether sex drives disparity, we exposed male and female mice to equal doses of carcinogen, and found males present with more aggressive, metastatic cSCC than females. Critically, females activate cancer immune-related expression pathways and CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltration independently of mutations, a response that is absent in prednisolone-treated animals. In contrast, males increase the rate of mitosis and proliferation in response to carcinogen. Women's skin and keratinocytes also activate immune-cancer fighting pathways and immune cells at UV radiation-damaged sites. Critically, a compromised immune system leads to high-risk, aggressive cSCC specifically in women. CONCLUSIONS: This work shows the immune response is sex biased in cSCC and highlights female immunity offers greater protection than male immunity.

Global and mitosis-specific interobserver variation in mitotic count scoring and implications for malignant melanoma staging.

AIMS: Staging is the gold standard for predicting malignant melanoma outcome but changes in its criteria over time indicate ongoing evolution. One notable recent change from the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual was removal of mitotic count. We explore the extent to which this feature is limited by interobserver error in order to find ways to improve its fitness for use should it be revisited in future staging versions. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a cohort of 476 patients with melanoma ≤1.0 mm, a mitotic count of 0 versus 1 was significant for metastasis-free survival, but not melanoma-specific or overall survival. In 10 melanomas that were 0.9-1.0 mm thick, the mitotic count intraclass correlation coefficient for histopathologists was 0.58 (moderate agreement). Uniquely, we also assessed agreement for specific putative mitotic figures, identifying precise reasons why specific mitotic figures qualified for scoring or elimination. A kappa score was 0.54 (moderate agreement). We also gathered data on other staging features. Breslow thickness had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.41 (moderate agreement) and there was a systematic difference between histopathologists among cases (P = 0.04). Every case had a range that crossed the AJCC8 0.8-mm pT1a/pT1b staging boundary. Ulceration was only identified in two of the 10 cases. For ulceration, kappa agreement score was 0.31 (fair). CONCLUSION: This study supports the removal of mitotic count from staging, but shows that its scoring is substantially affected by interobserver variation, suggesting that more prescriptive guidelines might have a beneficial impact on its prognostic value.