Adherence to prophylactic treatment in adult patients with severe hemophilia in Poland.

INTRODUCTION: Patient adherence to a prophylactic regimen is important for optimal benefit of hemophilia treatment. Despite a growing number of adults with hemophilia in Poland receiving secondary prophylaxis, data on adherence to the regimen are limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess adherence to secondary prophylaxis in Polish adults with severe hemophilia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited in 18 hemophilia treatment centers in Poland. Adherence to prophylaxis was assessed with the Validated Hemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale Prophylaxis (VERITAS­Pro) questionnaire. RESULTS: Data on 270 men on the prophylactic regimen (median [interquartile range, IQR] age, 37 [18-75] years; mean [SD], 38.2 [13.3] years) were analyzed. Median (IQR) VERITAS­Pro score for the study population was 36 (24-76) years; mean (SD), 37.7 (9.9) years, indicating general adherence to the prophylactic regimen. The median subscale scores ranged from 4 for Dosing to 8 for Planning (means, 5.6 and 7.7, respectively). The most pronounced difference in the subscale scores between adherent and nonadherent patients was recorded for Dosing (median, 4 vs 10; mean, 5.3 vs 9.3) and Remembering (median, 5 vs 11; mean, 5.7 vs 10.7). The overall adherence rate was 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high rate of adherence to hemophilia prophylaxis by Polish adults. Problems with the management of clotting factor stocks and remembering about the injection of the clotting factor were identified as potential barriers to adherence in adults with hemophilia in Poland.

Six molecular patterns leading to hemophilia A phenotype in 18 females from Poland.

INTRODUCTION: Female hemophilia is an intriguing rare disorder and few larger reports on its genetic etiology are available. While historically the diagnosis was satisfactorily reached by factor VIII activity assays, the clinical and potentially therapeutic heterogeneity of female hemophilia calls for comprehensive molecular diagnosis in each case. Currently, the genetic investigations are not a part of routine, state-funded, diagnostics in Poland, and thus molecular epidemiological data are missing. AIM: We set out to perform a comprehensive genetic analysis of Polish females with hemophilia A. PATIENTS/METHODS: Eighteen females with hemophilia A (including 2 with severe and 5 with moderate hemophilia phenotype) consented for genetic diagnostics. To establish F8 mutations, we used next-generation sequencing of a panel of genes associated with hematological disorders, standard assays for recurrent intragenic F8 inversions and MLPA when deletions were suspected. When appropriate we also used karyotyping, genomic microarrays and X chromosome inactivation assays. RESULTS: While abnormally skewed X-chromosome inactivation combined with a F8 variant on the active allele was, as expected, the most common genetic etiology, a number of other genetic scenarios were unraveled. This included: misdiagnosis (molecular diagnosis of vWd), Turner syndrome, compound heterozygosity and androgen insensitivity syndrome (a phenotypical 46,XY female with a novel androgen receptor gene mutation). We report 3 novel F8 mutations. CONCLUSION: Every case of female hemophilia warrants full genomic diagnostics, as this may change the diagnosis or reveal broader morbidity than a coagulation disorder (Turner syndrome, androgen insensitivity, or cardiovascular morbidity that we described previously in a SHAM syndrome carrier).