Public acceptability of COVID-19 control measures in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Malaysia: A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Several countries have implemented control measures to limit SARS-CoV-2 spread, including digital contact tracing, digital monitoring of quarantined individuals, and testing of travelers. These raise ethical issues around privacy, personal freedoms, and equity. However, little is known regarding public acceptability of these measures. METHODS: In December 2020, we conducted a survey among 3635 respondents in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Malaysia to understand public perceptions on the acceptability of COVID-19 control measures. FINDINGS: Hong Kong respondents were much less supportive of digital contact tracing and monitoring devices than those in Malaysia and Singapore. Around three-quarters of Hong Kong respondents perceived digital contact tracing as an unreasonable restriction of individual freedom; <20% trusted that there were adequate local provisions preventing these data being used for other purposes. This was the opposite in Singapore, where nearly 3/4 of respondents agreed that there were adequate data protection rules locally. In contrast, only a minority of Hong Kong respondents viewed mandatory testing and vaccination for travelers as unreasonable infringements of privacy or freedom. Less than 2/3 of respondents in all territories were willing to be vaccinated against COVID-19, with a quarter of respondents undecided. However, support for differential travel restrictions for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals was high in all settings. INTERPRETATION: Our findings highlight the importance of sociopolitical context in public perception of public health measures and emphasize the need to continually monitor public attitudes toward such measures to inform implementation and communication strategies.

Incidence and Determinants of Acute Mountain Sickness in Mount Kinabalu, Malaysia.

Background: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is the most common type of high-altitude sickness. The incidence of AMS varies by mountain location, trail characteristics, and study design. The lack of local epidemiology data has driven us to investigate the incidence and severity of AMS and its associated factors at Mount Kinabalu, Malaysia. Methods: A cohort study was conducted to collect data from climbers after days 1 (3272 m) and 2 (4095 m) of ascent. A self-administered questionnaire was used to explore climbers' demographic and climb characteristics, history of AMS, alcohol exposure, and AMS prevention measures. The Lake Louis score 2018 was used to assess the presence and severity of AMS (cutoff ≥3). Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the factors associated with the development of AMS on day 2. Results: Data from 345 climbers were analyzed. The incidence of AMS was 23.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.5%-28.7%) and 21.7% (95% CI 17.5%-26.3%) on days 1 and 2, respectively. The majority were mild cases. Experiencing AMS on day 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 12.88; 95% CI 6.71-24.75), alcohol consumption (OR = 3.73; 95% CI 1.66-8.39), receiving guide advice on day 1 (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.93), and age (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99) were significant determinants of AMS at Mount Kinabalu. Gender, history of AMS, past exposure to high altitude, ascending time, water intake, acetazolamide use, physical fitness, pulse rate, and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) were not associated with AMS at Mount Kinabalu. Conclusion: Future analysis with age strata is required to ascertain the association of age with AMS. Our research has signposted a strong call for collaborative efforts to improve the provision of hiking advice and discourage alcohol sales to mitigate the risk of AMS among Mount Kinabalu climbers.