Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Retina ; 42(4): 816-821, 2022 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35350052

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To characterize vision-related malpractice litigation involving prisoners. METHODS: Retrospective legal database review using the Westlaw database was performed to identify vision-related malpractice lawsuits involving prisoners in the United States from 1914 to 2020. Main outcomes and measurements were allegations of malpractice, verdicts, and settlements. RESULTS: Sixty-four vision-related malpractice lawsuits involving prisoners were identified. Mean defendant age was 49 years (range, 28-74 years). Fifty-seven percent of the defendants were ophthalmologists and 43% were optometrists. The cases were most commonly from the South and Midwest (n = 19 [30%] for each). Allegations of malpractice included inadequate medical care or treatment refusal (n = 21 [33%]), failure to treat fully leading to continued suffering (n = 18 [28%]), and delay in treatment or referral (n = 17 [27%]). Retina-related diagnoses were most common (n = 18 [28%]). Forty-six (72%) cases were closed, 14 (22%) were open, and four (6.3%) were partially closed. Only two (3.1%) cases were decided in favor of the plaintiff. The most common reason for an unsuccessful suit was lack of deliberate indifference by the eye care professional (n = 21 [46%]). CONCLUSION: The most common reasons for vision-related malpractice brought forth by prisoners were inadequate or incomplete eye care and treatment refusal. Retina was the most commonly involved subspecialty. However, the success rate of these suits was extremely low.


Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Oftalmólogos , Prisioneros , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(6)2020 Jun 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522719

RESUMEN

This paper has two main purposes: (1) to report a rare case of paediatric gliosarcoma that invaded the surrounding orbit and (2) to demonstrate chlorpromazine injection as a potential treatment option for blind, painful eye caused by tumour invasion. A 12-year-old man who presented with headaches was found to have glioblastoma multiforme and it was excised and treated with radiation and chemotherapy. Seven months later, the tumour recurred as gliosarcoma, a rare variant of glioblastoma multiforme containing distinct gliomatous and sarcomatous components. In spite of treatment, the tumour progressed and eventually invaded into the right orbit. He subsequently developed a proptotic, blind, painful eye and was treated with retrobulbar chlorpromazine injection, which provided immediate symptomatic relief.


Asunto(s)
Ceguera , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Clorpromazina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Ocular , Glioblastoma , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Órbita , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Ceguera/diagnóstico , Ceguera/etiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Niño , Dolor Ocular/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Ocular/etiología , Resultado Fatal , Glioblastoma/patología , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/fisiopatología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagen , Órbita/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA