RESUMEN
To determine the increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to the general population in Korea. Using data from the National Health Insurance Service database spanning 2008 to 2018, incident SLE patients aged 18 years and above were selected along with a 1:4 age- and sex-matched control group. The crude incidence rate (IR) of MACE was calculated as the number of events per 1000 person-years and the IR ratio (IRR) for MACE was adjusted using generalized estimating equations. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk differences of overall MACE and its composites based on age and sex stratification. The study included 8568 SLE patients and 34,272 controls. The cumulative IR of MACE per 1000 person-years in SLE patients and controls were 4.08 and 1.30, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, SLE patients had a higher risk of MACE compared to the general population (adjusted IRR of 2.40 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-3.05]), with no gender differences observed. The increased risk of MACE in SLE patients was highest in the 18-39 age group (IRR 11.70, 95% CI 5.95-23.01) and gradually decreased with age. The increased risk of ischemic stroke (IRR 2.41, 95% CI 1.84-3.15) and myocardial infarction (IRR 2.19, 95% CI 1.30-3.68) in SLE patients was comparable. The risk of MACE in SLE patients is 2.40 times higher than that of the general population, with a higher relative risk observed in younger individuals.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , República de Corea/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct healthcare cost progression from before to after systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis and to compare healthcare costs by disease severity. METHODS: Patients with incident SLE diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance database. Annual direct healthcare costs for 5 years before and after SLE were estimated and compared with those of age-, sex-, and calendar month-matched (1:4) controls, without SLE. Direct healthcare costs were compared by disease severity of SLE using regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 11 173 patients with SLE and 45 500 subjects without SLE, annual direct healthcare costs per person increased in the year before SLE diagnosis and peaked in the first year after diagnosis. They were 7.7-fold greater in the SLE patients than in the subjects without SLE ($5,871 vs $759). Severe SLE was associated with 3.284-fold (95% CI 3.075-3.507) higher annual costs than mild SLE during the year after diagnosis. Older age (age 60-79 years), lupus nephritis, interstitial lung diseases, and comorbidities such as avascular necrosis and chronic kidney disease were associated with higher annual direct healthcare costs (times [95% CI]) in the first year after diagnosis; aged 60-69, 1.119 [1.034-1.211], aged 70-79, 1.470 [1.342-1.611], 1.794 [1.711-1.881], 1.435 [1.258-1.638], 6.208 [4.541-8.487], and 1.858 [1.673-2.064], respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE incurred significantly high direct healthcare costs than subjects without SLE during the first year after diagnosis. Disease severity, older age, major organ involvements and comorbidities were associated with increased healthcare costs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) between patients with early-onset lupus nephritis (EOLN) and those with delayed-onset LN (DOLN). METHODS: This retrospective study of incident cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) used nationwide Korean claims databases and data from 2008 through 2018. We divided LN patients into two groups: the EOLN group (with LN onset within 12 months of SLE diagnoses) and the DOLN group (with LN onset later than 12 months after SLE diagnoses). Patients were observed from the date of LN diagnosis to the development of ESRD, death, or the last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to predict hazard ratios (HRs) for progression to ESRD with death as a competing risk. RESULTS: We identified 3779 incident SLE patients who developed LN during follow-up: 60 % (n = 2281) had EOLN, and 40 % (n = 1489) had DOLN. Sixty-nine patients with EOLN (3.0 %) and 29 patients with DOLN (1.9 %) progressed to ESRD. After adjusting for confounders, the ESRD risk associated with EOLN was comparable to the risk associated with DOLN (HR 1.10, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 2.11). In the subgroup of patients on aggressive immunosuppressive therapy (670 with EOLN and 179 with DOLN), the ESRD risk was higher in the DOLN group (HR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.11 to 6.10). CONCLUSION: The risk of ESRD was comparable between patients with EOLN and DOLN. However, among patients on aggressive immunosuppressive therapy, compared with EOLN, DOLN was associated with a higher risk of progression to ESRD.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Nefritis Lúpica , Humanos , Nefritis Lúpica/complicaciones , Nefritis Lúpica/epidemiología , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is a prognostic marker in various diseases that represents patients' inflammation and nutritional status. Here, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CAR in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from eight tertiary hospitals in Korea from 2006-2021. The patients were divided into quartiles according to CAR levels at the time of CRRT initiation. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of CAR on in-hospital mortality. The mortality prediction performance of CAR was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). RESULTS: In total, 3995 patients who underwent CRRT were included, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 67.3% during the follow-up period. The 7-day, 30-day, and in-hospital mortality rates increased toward higher CAR quartiles (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, the higher quartile groups had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (quartile 3: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.43, P < 0.001; quartile 4: aHR, 1.22, 95% CI, 1.07-1.40, P = 0.003). CAR combined with APACHE II or SOFA scores significantly increased the predictive power compared to each severity score alone for the AUC, NRI, and IDI (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A high CAR is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients requiring CRRT. The combined use of CAR and severity scores provides better predictive performance for mortality than the severity score alone.
RESUMEN
Background: Few comparative studies on the effects of immunosuppressants in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy have been conducted. Methods: Data from 489 patients who received conservative treatment or immunosuppressants were retrospectively analyzed by propensity score matching. Primary outcomes were complete or partial remission (CR or PR) of proteinuria, and secondary outcomes were renal survival and infection. Results: Of the 489 patients, 357 (73.0%) received immunosuppressants. Propensity score matching identified 82 patients from the conservative group and 82 patients in the immunosuppressant group. CR or PR at 12 months was significantly higher in the immunosuppressant group compared with the conservative group for the total population (p = 0.002) and the propensity score-matched population (p = 0.02). The use of immunosuppressants was significantly more effective with respect to achieving a CR or PR at 12 months in patients from the total population who were aged <65 years or female, or who had a proteinuria level of ≥4.0 g/g or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.05). Renal survival was similar between patients receiving immunosuppressants and conservative treatment in both the total and matched populations. The immunosuppressant group (21.8%) had a significantly higher incidence of infections compared with the conservative group (13.6%) for the total population (p = 0.03), but statistical significance disappeared in the matched population (p > 0.99). Conclusion: The remission rate was significantly higher in the immunosuppressant group than in the conservative group, particularly in the subgroup of patients who were young or female, or those with heavy proteinuria loads or good renal function.
RESUMEN
Background: Incidence of depression increases in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We evaluated the association between depression and mortality among older patients with ESKD, which has not been studied previously. Methods: This nationwide prospective cohort study included 487 patients with ESKD aged >65 years, who were categorized into minimal, mild-to-moderate, and severe depression groups based on their Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scores. Predisposing factors for high BDI-II scores and the association between the scores and survival were analyzed. Results: The severe depression group showed a higher modified Charlson comorbidity index value and lower serum albumin, phosphate, and uric acid levels than the other depression groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed a significantly lower survival in the severe depression group than in the minimal and mild-to-moderate depression groups (p = 0.011). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that severe depression was an independent risk factor for mortality in the study cohort (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.91; p = 0.041). Additionally, BDI-II scores were associated with modified Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.009) and serum albumin level (p = 0.004) in multivariate linear regression. Among the three depressive symptoms, higher somatic symptom scores were associated with increased mortality. Conclusion: Severe depression among older patients with ESKD increases mortality compared with minimal or mild-to-moderate depression, and patients with concomitant somatic symptoms require careful management of their comorbidities and nutritional status.
RESUMEN
Rationale & Objective: The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a marker of inflammation and a predictor of mortality in a variety of diseases. However, the effectiveness of PLR as a predictor of mortality in patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) is uncertain. We evaluated the association between the PLR and mortality in critically ill patients with severe AKI who underwent continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: A total of 1,044 patients who underwent CKRT in a single center, from February 2017 to March 2021. Exposures: PLR. Outcomes: In-hospital mortality. Analytical Approach: The study patients were classified into quintiles according to the PLR values. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between PLR and mortality. Results: The PLR value was associated with in-hospital mortality in a nonlinear manner, showing a higher mortality at both ends of the PLR. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed the highest mortality with the first and fifth quintiles, whereas the lowest mortality occurred with the third quintile. Compared with the third quintile, the first (adjusted HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.44-2.62; P < 0.001) and fifth (adjusted HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.18-2.18; P = 0.002) quintiles of the PLR group had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate. The first and fifth quintiles showed a consistently increased risk of 30- and 90-day mortality rates compared with those of the third quintile. In the subgroup analysis, the lower and higher PLR values were predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with older age, of female sex, and with hypertension, diabetes, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Limitations: There may be bias owing to the single-center retrospective nature of this study. We only had PLR values at the time of initiation of CKRT. Conclusions: Both the lower and higher PLR values were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with severe AKI who underwent CKRT.
RESUMEN
Background: The C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is a more effective prognostic indicator than CRP or albumin alone in various diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the CAR for mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Methods: A total of 924 patients who underwent their first kidney transplantation at Kyungpook National University Hospital during 2006-2020 were enrolled and classified into quartile (Q) groups according to their pretransplant CAR values. A Cox regression analysis was conducted to analyze the hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality. Results: Fifty-nine patients died during the posttransplant period (mean, 85.2±44.2 months). All-cause mortality (Q1, 3.0%; Q2, 4.8%; Q3, 7.8%; Q4, 10.0%; P for trend <0.001) and infection-related mortality increased linearly with an increase in CAR (P for trend=0.004). The Q3 and Q4 had higher risks of all-cause mortality than Q1 after adjusting for confounding factors (Q3 adjusted HR [aHR] 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-5.99, P=0.041; Q4 aHR 3.09, 95% CI 1.31-7.27, P=0.010). Q4 was also independently associated with infection-related mortality (aHR 5.83, 95% CI 1.27-26.8, P=0.023). The area under the curve of the CAR for all-cause and infection-related mortality was higher than that of CRP or albumin alone. There was no association between CAR and death-censored graft failure or acute rejection. Conclusions: A higher pretransplant CAR increases the risk of posttransplant mortality, particularly infection-related, in KTRs. Pretransplant CAR can be an effective and easily accessible predictor of posttransplant mortality.
RESUMEN
Optimal preparation is recommended for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease to minimize complications during dialysis initiation. This study evaluated the effects of planned dialysis initiation on survival in patients undergoing incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Patients newly diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease who started dialysis were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study in Korea. Planned dialysis was defined as dialysis therapy initiated with permanent access and maintenance of the initial dialysis modality. A total of 2892 patients were followed up for a mean duration of 71.9 ± 36.7 months and 1280 (44.3%) patients initiated planned dialysis. The planned dialysis group showed lower mortality than the unplanned dialysis group during the 1st and 2nd years after dialysis initiation (1st year: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.72; P < 0.001; 2nd year: aHR 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.98, P = 0.037). However, 2 years after dialysis initiation, mortality did not differ between the groups. Planned dialysis showed a better early survival rate in hemodialysis patients, but not in peritoneal dialysis patients. Particularly, infection-related mortality was reduced only in patients undergoing hemodialysis with planned dialysis initiation. Planned dialysis has survival benefits over unplanned dialysis in the first 2 years after dialysis initiation, especially in patients undergoing hemodialysis. It improved infection-related mortality during the early dialysis period.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Diálisis Renal , Estudios Prospectivos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , República de Corea/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Females are known to have a better survival rate than males in the general population, but previous studies have shown that this superior survival is diminished in patients on dialysis. This study aimed to investigate the risk of mortality in relation to sex among Korean patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). A total of 4994 patients with kidney failure who were receiving dialysis were included for a prospective nationwide cohort study. Cox multivariate proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between sex and the risk of cause-specific mortality according to dialysis modality. During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the death rate per 100 person-years was 6.4 and 8.3 in females and males, respectively. The female-to-male mortality rate in patients on dialysis was 0.77, compared to 0.85 in the general population. In adjusted analyses, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower for females than males in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.87, P < 0.001). No significant differences in the risk of cardiovascular and infection-related deaths were observed according to sex. The risk of mortality due to sudden death, cancer, other, or unknown causes was significantly lower for females than males in the entire population (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.78, P < 0.001), in patients on HD (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90, P = 0.003), and in patients on PD (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.70, P < 0.001). The survival advantage of females in the general population was maintained in Korean dialysis patients, which was attributed to a lower risk of noncardiovascular and noninfectious death.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00931970.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Corea (Geográfico)/epidemiología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The 2017 Korean guideline on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommended beta-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy for patients hospitalized with severe pneumonia, and beta-lactam monotherapy for mild-to-moderate pneumonia. However, antibiotic treatment regimen for mild-to-moderate CAP has never been evaluated for Korean patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, study patients were selected from three evaluation periods (October 1 to December 31, 2014; April 1 to June 30, 2016; October 1 to December 31, 2017) of the National Quality Assessment Program for CAP management and the National Health Insurance data on the selected patients was extracted from 1 year before the first patient enrollment and 1 year after the last patient enrollment at each evaluation period for the analysis of risk adjustment and outcomes. The survival rates between beta-lactam plus macrolide (BM) groups and beta-lactam monotherapy (B) were compared using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis after propensity score matching by age, gender, confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure at age of 65 years or older (CURB-65), and Charlson comorbidity index for risk adjustment. The differences between autumn and spring season were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 30,053 patients were enrolled. Mean age and the male-to-female ratio were 64.7 ± 18.4 and 14,197:15,856, respectively. After matching, 2,397 patients in each group were analyzed. The 30-day survival rates did not differ between the BM and B groups (97.3% vs. 96.5%, P = 0.081). In patients with CURB-65 ≥ 2, the 30-day survival rate was higher in the BM than in the B group (93.7% vs. 91.0%, P = 0.044). Among patients with CURB-65 ≥ 2, the 30-day survival rate was higher in the BM than in the B group (93.3% vs. 88.5%, P = 0.009) during autumn season, which was not observed during spring (94.2% vs. 94.1%, P = 0.986). CONCLUSION: Beta-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy shows potential as an empirical therapy for CAP with CURB-65 ≥ 2, especially in autumn.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía Bacteriana , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Estaciones del Año , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The waiting time for deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) is increasing. We evaluated DDKT prognosis according to the pretransplant dialysis vintage. A total of 4117 first-time kidney transplant recipients were enrolled from a prospective nationwide cohort in Korea. DDKT recipients were divided into tertiles according to pretransplant dialysis duration. Graft failure, mortality, and composite were compared between DDKT and living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients. Pretransplant dialysis vintage was longer annually in DDKT recipients. In the subdistribution of the hazard model for the competing risk, the first tertile did not show an increased risk of graft failure compared with LDKT recipients; however, the second and third tertile groups had an increased risk of graft failure compared to LDKT recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69-7.63; P < 0.001; aHR 2.37; 95% CI 1.06-5.33; P = 0.037). All DDKT groups showed a significantly higher risk of patient death than LDKT, with the highest risk in the third tertile group (aHR 11.12; 95% CI 4.94-25.00; P < 0.001). A longer pretransplant dialysis period was associated with a higher risk of the composite of patient death and graft failure in DDKT recipients. DDKT after a short period of dialysis had non-inferior results on graft survival compared with LDKT.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal , Donadores Vivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
Background: We investigated factors associated with the selection of a dialysis modality for elderly patients compared to younger patients. Methods: This study included 2,514 incident dialysis patients from a Korean multicenter prospective cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data to analyze factors associated with the chosen dialysis modality. Differences in these factors were compared between the elderly (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients. Results: Of the enrolled patients, 1,746 (69.5%) and 768 (30.6%) selected hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), respectively. The percentage of PD was higher in younger patients than in elderly patients (37.1 vs. 16.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that planned dialysis (p < 0.001), employment status (p < 0.001), and independent economic status (p = 0.048) were independent factors for selecting PD, whereas peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.038) and tumor (p = 0.010) were factors for selecting HD in the younger group. In the elderly group, planned dialysis (p < 0.001) and congestive heart failure (CHF; p = 0.002) were associated with choosing PD; however, tumor (p = 0.006) was associated with choosing HD. A two-way ANOVA showed that planned dialysis and CHF showed a significant interaction effect with age on modality selection. Conclusions: As the age of patients with chronic kidney disease increased, HD was more frequently selected compared to PD. Dialysis planning and CHF interacted with age in selecting dialysis modalities in elderly patients. Elderly patients were less affected by socioeconomic status than younger patients.
RESUMEN
The impact of pretransplant and posttransplant alcohol consumption on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is uncertain. Self-reported alcohol consumption was obtained at the time of transplant and 2 years after transplant in a prospective cohort study. Among 907 KTRs, 368 (40.6%) were drinkers at the time of transplant. Compared to non-drinkers, alcohol consumption did not affect the risk of death-censored graft failure (DCGF), biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), cardiovascular events, or all-cause mortality. Compared to persistent non-drinkers, the development of DCGF, BPAR, cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, or posttransplant diabetes mellitus was not affected by the alcohol consumption pattern (persistent, de novo, or stopped drinking) over time. However, de novo drinkers had a significantly higher total cholesterol (p < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (p = 0.005) compared to persistent non-drinkers 5 years after transplant, and had significantly higher total cholesterol levels (p = 0.002) compared to the stopped drinking group 7 years after transplant, even after adjusting for the use of lipid-lowering agents, age, sex, and body mass index. Although pretransplant and posttransplant alcohol consumption were not associated with major outcomes in KTRs during the median follow-up of 6.0 years, a new start of alcohol use after KT results in a relatively poor lipid profile. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02042963.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Trasplante de Riñón , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Colesterol , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Lípidos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have not been investigated in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with diabetes. We evaluated the impact of SGLT2i in a multicenter cohort of diabetic KTRs. METHODS: A total of 2083 KTRs with diabetes were enrolled from 6 transplant centers in Korea. Among them, 226 (10.8%) patients were prescribed SGLT2i for >90 d. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, death-censored graft failure (DCGF), and serum creatinine doubling. An acute dip in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 10% was surveyed after SGLT2i use. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up of 62.9 ± 42.2 mo, the SGLT2i group had a lower risk of primary composite outcome than the control group in the multivariate and propensity score-matched models (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.78; P = 0.006 and adjusted hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.85; P = 0.013, respectively). Multivariate analyses consistently showed a decreased risk of DCGF and serum creatinine doubling in the SGLT2i group. The overall eGFR remained stable without the initial dip after SGLT2i use. A minority (15.6%) of the SGLT2i users showed acute eGFR dip during the first month, but the eGFR recovered thereafter. The risk factors for the eGFR dip were time from transplantation to SGLT2i usage and mean tacrolimus trough level. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i improved a composite of all-cause mortality, DCGF, or serum creatinine doubling in KTRs. SGLT2i can be used safely and have beneficial effects on preserving graft function in diabetic KTRs.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Trasplante de Riñón , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Creatinina , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease has been increasing, but the outcomes of kidney transplants (KT) remain poorly understood in elderly patients. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of elderly KT recipients and analyzed the impact of elderly donors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent KT between 2000 and 2019. KT recipients were divided into four groups according to a combination of recipient and donor age (≥60 or <60 years); elderly recipients: old-to-old (n = 46) and young-to-old (n = 83); young recipients: old-to-young (n = 98) and young-to-young (n = 796). We compared the risks of mortality, graft failure, and acute rejection between groups using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of delayed graft function, graft failure, and acute rejection was not different among groups. Annual mean tacrolimus trough level was not lower in elderly recipients than young recipients during 10-year follow-up. Mortality was significantly higher in elderly recipients (p = 0.001), particularly infection-related mortality (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, old-toold and young-to-old groups had increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14- 7.32; p = 0.03; aHR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.51-6.20; p = 0.002). However, graft failure and acute rejection risks were not increased in elderly recipients. CONCLUSION: In elderly recipients, graft survival and acute rejection-free survival were not inferior to those of young recipients. However, mortality, especially risk of infection-related death, was increased in elderly recipients. Thus, low immunosuppression intensity might help decrease mortality in elderly recipients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Predicting early mortality is important in patients undergoing continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), especially in the first 48 h. This study aimed to determine the predictive performance of the Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS) II, the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores for early mortality in patients receiving CKRT. METHODS: Data from patients with acute kidney injury receiving CKRT were consecutively and retrospectively obtained at a tertiary medical center between August 2017 and March 2021. The outcomes included 48-h and 7-day mortality. The scoring systems were evaluated via discrimination at the time of CKRT initiation (using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC]) and calibration (via Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit C statistics). RESULTS: Among eligible 652 patients, 95 (14.6%) and 212 (32.5%) died within 48 h and within 7 days, respectively. The AUROC for SAPS II (0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.77, p = 0.016 vs. APACHE II score, p = 0.044 vs. SOFA score) was significantly higher than that of the APACHE II (0.66, 95% CI: 0.60-0.72) and SOFA scores (0.66, 95% CI: 0.60-0.72) for 48-h mortality. However, no significant differences in the AUROCs for SAPS II, APACHE II, and SOFA scores for 7-day mortality were observed. The calibration of the SAPS II for 48-h and 7-day mortality was adequate (p = 0.507 and p = 0.141, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive performance of SAPS II for mortality within the first 48 h was superior to that of the APACHE II and SOFA scores in patients with acute kidney injury receiving CKRT.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Puntuación Fisiológica Simplificada Aguda , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The smoking status of kidney transplant recipients and living donors has not been explored concurrently in a prospective study, and the synergistic adverse impact on outcomes remains uncertain. The self-reported smoking status and frequency were obtained from recipients and donors at the time of kidney transplantation in a prospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study (NCT02042963). Smoking status was categorized as "ever smoker" (current and former smokers collectively) or "never smoker." Among 858 eligible kidney transplant recipients and the 858 living donors, 389 (45.3%) and 241 (28.1%) recipients were considered ever smokers at the time of transplant. During the median follow-up period of 6 years, the rate of death-censored graft failure was significantly higher in ever-smoker recipients than in never-smoker recipients (adjusted HR, 2.82; 95% CI 1.01-7.87; P = 0.048). A smoking history of >20 pack-years was associated with a significantly higher rate of death-censored graft failure than a history of ≤20 pack-years (adjusted HR, 2.83; 95% CI 1.19-6.78; P = 0.019). No donor smoking effect was found in terms of graft survival. The smoking status of the recipients and donors or both did not affect the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection, major adverse cardiac events, all-cause mortality, or post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Taken together, the recipient's smoking status before kidney transplantation is dose-dependently associated with impaired survival.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Fumar/efectos adversosRESUMEN
We evaluated the temporal trend of preemptive kidney transplantation (KT) and the effect of pretransplant dialysis duration on post-transplant outcomes. This was a nationwide cohort study of the first-time 3392 living donor KT (LDKT) recipients (2014-2019). The annual changes in proportion of preemptive KT, factors associated with preemptive KT, and post-transplant outcomes were analyzed. Preemptive KT was performed in 816 (24.1%) patients. Annual trend analysis revealed gradual decrease in preemptive KT over time (P = 0.042). Among the underlying causes of preemptive KT, the proportion of diabetes increased and that of glomerulonephritis decreased during the study period. Glomerulonephritis as the primary renal disease was a predictor of preemptive KT. Patients with pretransplant dialysis >6 months showed increased graft failure risk than preemptive KT in the subdistribution of hazard model for competing risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-5.87; P = 0.031) and in propensity score-matched analysis (aHR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.02-5.92; P = 0.034); however, pretransplant dialysis ≤6 months showed comparable graft survival with preemptive KT in both analyses. Preemptive KT declined over successive years, associated with an increase in diabetes and a decrease in glomerulonephritis as underlying causes of KT. Short period of dialysis less than 6 months does not affect graft survival compared with preemptive KT; however, longer dialysis decreases graft survival.