Contemporary multimodal approach to diagnosis and treatment of vascular graft and endograft infections.

Vascular graft and endograft infections (VGEIs) are a feared complication because of their morbidity, cost, and mortality. Despite broad and varying strategies, as well as limited evidence, societal guidelines do exist. The objective of this review was to supplement current guidelines with emerging and multimodal techniques for treatment. An electronic search was performed using PubMed with specific search terms from 2019 to 2022 in which VGEIs were described or analyzed in the carotid, thoracic aorta, abdominal, or lower extremity arteries. A total of 12 studies were collected from the electronic search. Articles describing all of the anatomic areas were present. The incidence of VGEIs depends on the anatomic location, varying from <1% to 18%. Gram-positive bacteria are the most common organism. Referral of patients with VGEIs to centers of excellence is paramount, as is pathogen identification, preferably from direct sampling techniques. The MAGIC (Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration) criteria have been endorsed for all VGEIs and validated for aortic VGEI. They are well supplemented with additional diagnostic techniques. Treatment must be individualized, although the goal should be the removal of infected material with appropriate revascularization. VGEIs remain a devastating complication, despite changing or improving medical surgical techniques in vascular surgery. Prophylactic measures, early diagnosis, and patient-specific therapy remain the cornerstones of treatment for this feared complication.

Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Testing and Rehabilitation for Aortic Dissection Patients: A SCOPING REVIEW.

OBJECTIVE: Although physical exercise has established benefits for long-term cardiovascular health, concern regarding further aortic events has limited the evidence for exercise among aortic dissection (AD) patients. The objective was to perform a scoping review of the current concepts and gaps in the literature regarding the benefit and safety of cardiovascular testing and rehabilitation among post-AD patients. REVIEW METHODS: A scoping review of the literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Eligibility criteria included any studies with AD in relation to exercise rehabilitation or testing and physical or mental health. Electronic databases were queried for relevant studies (last queried, November 1, 2021). RESULTS: Six observational studies were included with a total of 381 patients with AD, all of whom underwent surgical intervention. Study heterogeneity prevented data synthesis and a formal systematic review, although four dominant themes emerged: cardiovascular-related outcomes, aorta-related outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and serious adverse events. Patients with AD have reduced baseline physical capacity and QoL. Rehabilitation programs may increase both physical status and QoL. Rates of serious adverse rates are minimal yet poorly defined. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of apparent benefits from cardiovascular testing and rehabilitation for patients with AD who have undergone intervention, this scoping review highlights the need for increased comparative research specific to exercise among patients with AD and outcomes such as mortality and reinterventions.