American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the Workup and Treatment of Local Intraprostatic Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Local intraprostatic radiorecurrence of prostate cancer (IPR-PC) can be associated with an aggressive natural history and impact long-term disease-specific survival. While appropriate local salvage intervention can be curative, best practices for workup and local salvage of intraprostatic recurrence are poorly defined. The American Radium Society (ARS) Genitourinary Appropriate Use Criteria Committee sought to develop evidence-based recommendations to address this gap. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve a comprehensive set of relevant peer-reviewed articles on four topics relevant to the workup and treatment of IPR-PC. The literature was evaluated and summarized by three investigators, and clinical variants were created for each of the four topics. The ARS Genitourinary AUC multidisciplinary expert panel voted on the most appropriate procedures for each variant, and a modified Delphi approach was used to summarize recommendations. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The panel concluded that radiographic staging via prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude patients with metastatic disease and identify the local extent of radiorecurrence. Biopsy is required before local salvage to avoid excessive toxicity in patients whose radiographic recurrence represents a treatment effect. Consideration of local salvage is preferred in lieu of noncurative hormonal manipulation alone, although shared decision-making is critical. Salvage reirradiation approaches are recommended to limit toxicity. Hormonal therapy may be beneficial for radiosensitization when radiotherapeutic salvage is pursued, but only of short duration, and classic androgen deprivation therapies are preferred over novel hormonal agents. Focal salvage should be pursued when confidence in focal recurrence can be confirmed via multiple radiographic and tissue sampling modalities, although the toxicity associated with whole-gland salvage appears to be very tolerable. Several radiotherapeutic salvage regimens exist, most of which can be carried out in six or fewer fractions. The data informing this guideline are limited to individuals initially treated with conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy and with workup for recurrence before the PSMA PET era. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This consensus guideline provides evidence-based guidance on the appropriate procedures for workup and treatment of IPR-PC. Prospective evidence to enrich these guidelines is eagerly anticipated. PATIENT SUMMARY: We summarize evidence for the best workup and treatment for patients with local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. A panel of experts evaluated previous studies and voted on the procedures that should be performed and those that should be avoided. This guideline is a useful tool for helping doctors to discuss the best treatment options that maximize the chance of cure while minimizing side effects.

Testosterone Recovery Following Androgen Suppression and Prostate Radiotherapy (TRANSPORT): A Pooled Analysis of Five Randomized Trials from the Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials in Cancer of the Prostate (MARCAP) Consortium.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Time to testosterone recovery (TR) following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists varies widely. We evaluate TR kinetics and the oncological impact of an effective castration period in patients receiving definitive radiotherapy and ADT for prostate cancer. METHODS: We obtained individual patient data from randomized controlled trials of radiotherapy with ADT and prospectively collected serial testosterone data from the MARCAP Consortium. We estimated the times to noncastrate TR (>1.7 nmol/l) and nonhypogonadal TR (>8.0 nmol/l) were estimated for each prescribed ADT duration, and developed corresponding nomograms. The association between effective castration period and metastasis-free survival (MFS) for any given ADT duration was evaluated via multivariable Cox regression. We conducted cubic spline analyses to assess nonlinear associations. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We included 1444 men from five trials in the analysis, of whom 115 received 4 mo, 880 received 6 mo, 353 received 18 mo, 36 received 28 mo, and 60 received 36 mo of ADT. Times to noncastrate TR and to nonhypogonadal TR varied considerably by ADT duration. Higher baseline testosterone and lower age were associated with a higher likelihood of TR (p < 0.001 for both). Effective castration period was not linearly associated with MFS for any ADT duration on Cox regression. Cubic spline analysis revealed that the optimal effective castration period for an MFS benefit was 10.6 mo for men who received 6 mo of ADT and 18 mo for men who received 18 mo of ADT. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Time to TR varies according to the ADT duration, baseline testosterone, and age. The relationship between effective castration period and MFS may be nonlinear, with a longer effective castration period being helpful for men receiving 6 mo of ADT.

Combination clomiphene citrate and anastrozole duotherapy improves semen parameters in a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort of infertile men.

In men with impaired semen parameters, empiric medical therapies such as clomiphene citrate, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), and anastrozole, a selective aromatase inhibitor, are often employed. The effects of jointly administering these agents on semen parameters are not well understood. Here, we describe the findings of our multi-center, retrospective cohort study of men with idiopathic primary or secondary infertility. Twenty-one men were treated with combination therapy (anastrozole and clomiphene) and 69 men were treated with monotherapy (anastrozole). Patients with pre-treatment normozoospermia and recent or current exogenous testosterone therapy were excluded. Baseline and post-treatment semen and sex hormone parameters were compared among groups. The median follow-up duration was 91 days [interquartile range (IQR), 64-117 days]. Following treatment, 43% of men in the combination therapy group demonstrated normozoospermia, compared to 25% in the monotherapy group. Furthermore, men in the combined group demonstrated marked improvements in total motile sperm count (TMSC) [11.3 vs. 2.1 million (M), P=0.03]. There were no significant differences in hormone levels among the two groups following treatment. Combination therapy with clomiphene citrate and anastrozole was associated with modest benefits in post-treatment semen parameters, when compared to anastrozole monotherapy. These benefits may contribute to improvements in pregnancy outcomes with less invasive assisted reproductive technologies, such as intrauterine insemination (IUI). Future investigations with larger sample sizes and prospective study designs are necessary.

Testosterone and luteinizing hormone predict semen parameter improvement in infertile men treated with anastrozole.

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient factors associated with a clinically significant improvement in semen parameters among infertile men treated with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. DESIGN: Multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two Tertiary Academic Medical Centers. PATIENTS: A total of 90 infertile men treated at 2 tertiary academic medical centers who met inclusion criteria and obtained pretreatment and posttreatment semen analyses. INTERVENTION: Prescription of anastrozole (median 3 mg/wk). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Upgrade in the World Health Organization sperm concentration category (WHO-SCC). Univariate logistic regression, multivariable logistic regression, and partitioning analyses were performed to identify statistically significant patient factors capable of predicting treatment response. RESULTS: With anastrozole treatment, 46% (n = 41/90) of men responded favorably with a WHO-SCC upgrade, and 12% (n = 11/90) experienced a downgrade. Responders exhibited lower pretreatment levels of luteinizing hormone (LH, 4.7 vs. 8.3 IU/L) and follicle-stimulating hormone (4.7 vs. 6.7 IU/mL), higher pretreatment levels of testosterone (T, 356 vs. 265 ng/dL), and similar baseline level of estradiol (E2, 73% vs. 70% with detectible level). Baseline semen parameters differed, with anastrozole responders demonstrating higher baseline semen concentration (3.6 vs. 0.3 M/mL) and higher total motile sperm counts (3.7 vs. 0.1 M). Anastrozole therapy converted 29% (n = 26/90) of the cohort to normozoospermia and enabled intrauterine insemination access in 31% (n = 20/64) of previously ineligible patients. Interestingly, neither body mass index nor the baseline E2 level or E2-T ratio was associated with WHO-SCC upgrade. Multivariable logistic regression revealed the T-LH ratio (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.03) and baseline nonazoospermia (odds ratio: 9.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-78.9) to be statistically significant predictors of WHO-SCC upgrade (area under receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.77). The final user-friendly partitioning model consisting of the T-LH ratio ≥100 and baseline non-azoospermia was 98% sensitive and 33% specific for WHO-SCC upgrades (area under the curve: 0.77). CONCLUSION: Anastrozole therapy decreases serum E2 levels, increases serum gonadotropins, and clinically improves semen parameters in half of men with idiopathic infertility. Nonazoospermic infertile men with T-LH ratios ≥100 are likely to benefit from anastrozole treatment irrespective of baseline E2 level or E2-T ratio. Men with azoospermia rarely respond to anastrozole and should be counseled on alternative treatments.

Contemporary Evaluation of Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Radiotherapy Dose, Field Size, and Use of Hormone Therapy.

Studies have provided high-level evidence on various aspects of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, including field design, dose and fractionation, and additional hormonal therapy regimens. For patients with higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at SRT, addition of hormonal therapy and pelvic nodal radiation will improve PSA-based endpoints. By contrast, dose escalation is not supported by level 1 evidence in this setting.

The role of adaptive planning in margin-reduced, MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy to the prostate bed following radical prostatectomy: Post-hoc analysis of a phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We examined the interfractional variations of clinical target volumes (CTVs), planning target volumes (PTVs), and organs-at-risk (OARs) in patients receiving MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the prostate bed and evaluated the potential role of adaptive planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 31 patients received 30-34 Gy in five fractions to the prostate bed on a phase II clinical trial. OARs, CTVs, and PTVs were retrospectively contoured on daily pretreatment MRIs (n = 155). Geometric comparisons were made between initial planning contours and daily pretreatment contours. Predicted treatment plans for each fraction were evaluated using the following constraints: CTV V95%>93%, PTV V95%>90%, bladder Dmax < 36.7 Gy, bladder V32.5 Gy < 35%, rectum Dmax < 36.7 Gy, rectum V27.5 Gy < 45%, rectum 32.5 Gy < 30%, and rectal wall V24Gy < 50%. Adaptive planning was simulated for all fractions that failed to meet these criteria. Plans were then re-evaluated. RESULTS: Median change in volume was 0.48% for CTV, -24.5% for bladder, and 6.95% for rectum. Median DSC was 0.89 for CTV, 0.79 for bladder, and 0.76 for rectum. 145/155 fractions (93.5%) met CTV V95%>93%. 75/155 fractions (48.4%) failed at least one OAR dose constraint. Overall, 83/155 fractions (53.5%) met criteria for adapting planning. This affected 24/31 patients (77.4%). Following adaptive planning, all fractions met CTV V95%>93% and PTV V95%>90% and 120/155 fractions (77.4%) met all OAR constraints. CONCLUSION: Due to significant interfractional variations in anatomy, a majority of fractions failed to meet both target volume and OAR constraints. However, adaptive planning was effective in overcoming these anatomic changes. Adaptive planning should be routinely considered in prostate bed SBRT.

Multimodality Therapies for Localized Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multimodality therapy including radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy are frequently deployed in the management of localized prostate cancer. We sought to perform a critical appraisal of the most contemporary literature focusing on the multimodality management of localized prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Men who are ideal candidates for multimodality therapy include those with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, high-risk disease, and very high-risk disease. Enhancements in both systemic agents (including second-generation antiandrogens) as well as localized therapies (such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and brachytherapy) are refining the optimal balance between the use of systemic and local therapies for localized prostate cancer. Genomic predictors are emerging as critical tools for more precisely allocating treatment intensification with multimodality therapies as well as treatment de-intensification. Close collaboration among medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists will be critical for coordinating evidence-based multimodality therapies when clearly indicated and for supporting shared decision-making in areas where the evidence is mixed.

Cannabis and male sexual health: contemporary qualitative review and insight into perspectives of young men on the internet.

INTRODUCTION: Cannabis use is increasing across the United States, yet its short- and long-term effects on sexual function remain controversial. Currently, there is a paucity of studies exploring the relationship between cannabis and men's health. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the available literature on cannabis and men's health and provide insight into lay perceptions of this topic. METHODS: We performed a qualitative PubMed review of the existing literature on cannabis and men's health according to the PRISMA guidelines. Separately, we analyzed relevant themes in online men's health forums. We utilized a Google cloud-based platform (BigQuery) to extract relevant posts from 5 men's health Reddit forums from August 2018 to August 2019. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of the posts and quantitatively analyzed them using natural language processing and a meaning extraction method with principal component analysis. RESULTS: Our literature review revealed a mix of animal and human studies demonstrating the negative effects of cannabis on semen parameters and varying effects on erectile function and hormone levels. In our analysis of 372 686 Reddit posts, 1190 (0.3%) included relevant discussion on cannabis and men's health. An overall 272 posts were manually analyzed, showing that online discussions revolve around seeking answers and sharing the effects of cannabis on various aspects of sexual health and quality of life, often with conflicting experiences. Quantitative analysis revealed 1 thematic cluster related to cannabis, insecurity, and mental/physical health. CONCLUSIONS: There is a limited number of quality human studies investigating the effects of cannabis on men's health. Men online are uncertain about how cannabis affects their sexual health and seek more information. As the prevalence of cannabis use increases, so does the need for research in this area.

Temporal Changes of Clomiphene on Testosterone Levels and Semen Parameters in Subfertile Men.

PURPOSE: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is prescribed off-label in men to improve testosterone and sperm parameters, but the duration of treatment needed to reach maximal benefit remains unclear. Our objective was to examine temporal effects of CC on total testosterone (TT) and semen analysis (SA) using longitudinal follow-up data in treated men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed an IRB-approved database of men treated with CC (25 mg q.d. or 50 mg q.o.d.) from January 2016 through May 2021. We identified patients with 3, 6, 9, and 12 month follow-up data for TT and 3, 6, and 9 month follow-up SA. Mean absolute changes in TT and sperm concentration compared to baseline were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals. Men with prior genitourinary procedures or hormone therapy were excluded. Paired t-tests were used to compare TT and sperm concentration at each time point to baseline (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: One hundered thirty-four men received CC, mean age 37.7 years (SD 6.7, range 24-52). TT at all follow-ups (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) were available for 25 men, and SA at 3, 6, and 9 months for 26 men. Baseline TT was 358±145 ng/dL and sperm concentration was 13±17.2 M/mL. Significant improvement in TT was identified at 3 months (62.7 ng/dL, 95% CI: 0.49-125.0, p=0.048), additional benefit at 6 months (181.8 ng/dL, 95% CI: 114.1-249.5, p<0.01), and plateau at 9 and 12 months. Improvement in sperm concentration was first observed at 9 months (20.7 M/mL, 95% CI: 10.2-31.2, p<0.01). Semen volume and sperm motility did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of treatment with clomiphene may impact testosterone and sperm concentration, and the historical 3 month milestone may be insufficient for clinical and research evaluation. Men taking CC may experience plateau in TT at 6 months and first benefit in sperm concentration at 9 months.

Initial gonadotropin levels and sperm parameters differentiate the response to clomiphene citrate in subfertile men.

Background: Efficacy of clomiphene citrate (CC) in the treatment of male subfertility remains unclear, with inconsistent results in the literature and limited guidance from professional organizations. We sought to stratify the response to clomiphene in men based on their initial gonadotropins and semen parameters. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 234 patients from an academic center who took CC for subfertility. Patients with pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up total testosterone (TT) and semen analyses were included. Patients with previous hormone therapy, genitourinary surgery, prior success in conceiving pregnancy, or only one semen analysis were excluded. Primary outcomes were magnitudes of improvement in TT and semen parameters at 3 months. Student's t-test (alpha =0.05) was used for univariate analyses; multivariable linear regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results: One hundred and thirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four percent of patients experienced improvement in sperm concentration after 3 months of CC treatment, 13% decreased, and 53% showed no change. Using a pre-treatment TT cutoff of 300 ng/dL and gonadotropin thresholds of 7 miU/mL, initial TT did not affect magnitude of improvement in semen parameters, while lower initial gonadotropins showed statistical improvement across all outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed pre-treatment follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was inversely correlated with improvement in TT [odds ratio (OR): 2.64e-05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32e-09 to 5.28e-01, P=0.04] and sperm concentration (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 5.70e-02 to 8.48e-01, P=0.03). We also provide initial gonadotropin cutoffs that suggest statistical benefit from CC use. Conclusions: Men with lower gonadotropin levels may expect greater degree of improvement in both hormone and semen parameters with use of CC. Men with azoospermia do not benefit based on semen analyses alone. Degree of non-azoospermia does not affect magnitude of improvement. CC had decreasing efficacy at higher initial gonadotropin levels. These data may provide guidance in stratifying and counseling men for CC treatment.