Application of radiomics model based on ultrasound image features in the prediction of carpal tunnel syndrome severity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to develop and validate a radiomics model based on ultrasound image features for predicting carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) severity. METHODS: This retrospective study included 237 CTS hands (106 for mild symptom, 68 for moderate symptom and 63 for severe symptom). There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of age, gender, race, etc. The data set was randomly divided into a training set and a test set in a ratio of 7:3. Firstly, a senior musculoskeletal ultrasound expert measures the cross-sectional area of median nerve (MN) at the scaphoid-pisiform level. Subsequently, a recursive feature elimination (RFE) method was used to identify the most discriminative radiomic features of each MN at the entrance of the carpal tunnel. Eventually, a random forest model was employed to classify the selected features for prediction. To evaluate the performance of the model, the confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and F1 values were calculated and plotted correspondingly. RESULTS: The prediction capability of the radiomics model was significantly better than that of ultrasound measurements when 10 robust features were selected. The training set performed perfect classification with 100% accuracy for all participants, while the testing set performed accurate classification of severity for 76.39% of participants with F1 values of 80.00, 63.40, and 84.80 for predicting mild, moderate, and severe CTS, respectively. Comparably, the F1 values for mild, moderate, and severe CTS predicted based on the MN cross-sectional area were 76.46, 57.78, and 64.00, respectively.. CONCLUSION: This radiomics model based on ultrasound images has certain value in distinguishing the severity of CTS, and was slightly superior to using only MN cross-sectional area for judgment. Although its diagnostic efficacy was still inferior to that of neuroelectrophysiology. However, this method was non-invasive and did not require additional costs, and could provide additional information for clinical physicians to develop diagnosis and treatment plans.