Effectiveness of paraffin bath therapy for the symptoms and function of hand diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Paraffin bath therapy is noninvasive and is widely used in various hand diseases. Paraffin bath therapy is easy to use, has fewer side effects, and can be applied to various diseases with different etiologies. However, there are few large-scale studies of paraffin bath therapy, and there is insufficient evidence of its efficacy. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of paraffin bath therapy for pain relief and functional improvement in various hand diseases through a meta-analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: We searched for studies using PubMed and Embase. Eligible studies were selected based on the following criteria: (1) patients with any diseases of the hand; (2) comparison between paraffin bath therapy and no paraffin bath therapy; and (3) sufficient data on changes in the visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, pulp-to-pulp pinch strength, or Austrian Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand index before and after paraffin bath therapy. Forest plots were drawn to visualize the overall effect. Jadad scale score, I2 statistics, and subgroup analyses were used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of five studies included 153 patients who were treated and 142 who were not treated with paraffin bath therapy. The VAS were measured in all 295 patients included in the study, while the AUSCAN index was measured in the 105 patients with osteoarthritis. Paraffin bath therapy significantly reduced the VAS scores (mean difference [MD], -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.93 to -0.60). In osteoarthritis, paraffin bath therapy significantly improved grip and pinch strength (MD -2.53; 95% CI 0.71-4.34; MD 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.83) and reduced the VAS and AUSCAN scores (MD -2.61; 95% CI -3.07 to -2.14; MD -5.02; 95% CI -8.95 to -1.09). DISCUSSION: Paraffin bath therapy significantly reduced the VAS and AUSCAN scores, and improved grip and pinch strength in patients with various hand diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Paraffin bath therapy is effective for alleviating pain and improving function in hand diseases, thereby improving quality of life. However, owing to the small number of patients included in the study and its heterogeneity, a further large-scale, well-structured study is needed.

Predictive Factors for Lateral Hinge Fracture in Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported that lateral hinge fracture (LHF) has a negative effect on bone healing at the osteotomy site after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCDFO). However, limited evidence exists in the literature regarding the predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO. HYPOTHESIS: A large medial closing gap and a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area would increase plain radiography-based and/or computed tomography (CT)-based LHF in MCDFO. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 67 knees of 53 patients (mean age, 37.4 ± 16.9 years) who underwent MCDFO between May 2009 and June 2021. The surgical indications for MCDFO were genu valgum deformity combined with either lateral compartment osteoarthritis or recurrent patellar dislocation. The presence of LHF was evaluated based on immediate postoperative plain radiography and CT scans. The predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: LHFs were identified in 21 knees (31.3%) through plain radiography and in 40 knees (59.7%) through CT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the medial closing gap and lateral hinge position were predictive factors for plain radiography- and CT-based LHF after MCDFO. Controlling for other variables, we found that an increase in the medial opening gap by 1 mm increased the likelihood of plain radiography-based LHF by a factor of 1.805 (95% CI, 1.291-2.525; P = .001) and CT-based LHF by 1.333 (95% CI, 1.003-1.772; P = .048). Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area increased the likelihood of plain radiography-based LHF by a factor of 9.870 (95% CI, 2.179-44.720; P = .003) and CT-based LHF by 5.686 (95% CI, 1.124-28.754; P = .036). CONCLUSION: A large medial closing gap and lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area are associated with LHF in MCDFO. Care should be taken to prevent LHF in MCDFO with a large medial closing gap. Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area should be avoided to decrease the incidence of LHF in MCDFO.

Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy significantly contributes to the severity of neurogenic intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (LFH) is a known contributor to lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). However, the clinical significance and quantitative role of LFH compared to other components, such as disc bulging and facet hypertrophy, have not yet been examined. We investigated the correlation between the quantitative radiological factors, clinical symptoms, and outcomes in patients with LSCS. In total, 163 patients diagnosed with single-level (L4-L5) stenosis were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to claudication severity: >100 m for mild (n = 92) and < 100 m for severe (n = 71). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to quantify back and leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores, and Macnab criteria were evaluated as clinical factors 6 months after treatment. We measured the baseline canal cross-sectional area, ligamentum flavum (LF) area, disc herniation area, dural sac area, fat area, and LF thickness using MRI. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the association between radiologic and clinical factors. Additionally, further comparative analyses between the types of surgeries were performed. Among various radiologic factors, the baseline LF thickness (odds ratio [OR] 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.41) was the only major contributing factor to the severity of claudication in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The types of surgery (decompression alone vs fusion) did not significantly differ in terms of their clinical outcomes, including back and leg VAS, ODI, SF-36 PCS, and satisfaction with the MacNab classification. LF thickness is a major factor contributing to claudication severity.