Epidemiology of focal onset seizures in children aged >1 month to 4 years in Europe, United States, and Canada: A literature review.

The present study aims to report the currently available epidemiology of focal onset seizures in children aged >1 month to 4 years with the help of a literature review. The terms 'seizure*' OR 'epilepsy' combined with pediatric and epidemiology terms were used to search Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science up to November 16, 2021. Due to the scarcity of epidemiology data on focal onset seizures, the incidence and prevalence were estimated using the proportion of focal onset seizures in epilepsy patients from the most recently published articles. The estimated annual incidence per 100,000 children of focal onset seizures in children of 0-4 years of age ranged from 25.1 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 18.9-32.7) in the United Kingdom to 111.8 in the United States. The estimated period prevalence of focal onset seizures in children 0-4 years of age ranged from 0.15 % (99 % CI 0.13-0.18) in Canada to 0.61 % in the United States. Neurodevelopmental outcomes and psychiatric disorders were the most commonly reported comorbidities in children with epilepsy of age 0-4 years. Presence of focal onset seizures in children with different epilepsy syndromes needs to be thoroughly considered in the treatment planning of this population of interest.

Epidemiology, real-world treatment and mortality of patients with status epilepticus in Germany: insights from a large healthcare database.

Status epilepticus is a life-threatening emergency, and to date, few studies have reported on its long-term treatment and outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the incidence, the treatment and outcomes, the healthcare resource utilization and the costs of status epilepticus in Germany. Data from 2015 to 2019 were obtained from German claims (AOK PLUS). Patients with ≥1 status epilepticus event and no event in the preceding 12 months (baseline) were included. A subgroup of patients with an epilepsy diagnosis during baseline was also analysed. Of the 2782 status epilepticus patients (mean age = 64.3 years; 52.3% female), 1585 (57.0%) were previously diagnosed with epilepsy. The age- and sex-standardized incidence was 25.5 cases/100 000 persons in 2019. The mortality rate after 12 months was 39.8% overall (19.4% and 28.2% after 30 and 90 days, respectively) and 30.4% in the epilepsy patient subgroup. Factors associated with higher mortality were age, comorbidity status, presence of brain tumours and an acute stroke. An epilepsy-related hospitalization at onset of or 7 days prior to the status epilepticus event as well as prescription of antiseizure medication during baseline was associated with a better survival rate. Overall, 71.6% of patients (85.6% in the epilepsy subgroup) were prescribed with out-patient antiseizure medication and/or rescue medication within 12 months. All patients sustained on average 1.3 status epilepticus-related hospitalizations (20.5% had more than one) during a mean follow-up period of 545.2 days (median 514 days); total direct costs including in-patient and out-patient status epilepticus treatments were 10 826€ and 7701€ per patient-year overall and for the epilepsy patient subgroup, respectively. The majority of status epilepticus patients received an out-patient treatment in line with epilepsy guidelines, and patients previously diagnosed with epilepsy have a higher likelihood to receive it. The mortality in the affected patient population is high; risk factors were older age, higher comorbidity burden, the presence of brain tumours or an acute stroke.

Relative importance of clinical outcomes and safety risks of antiseizure medication monotherapy for patients and physicians: Discrete choice experiment eliciting preferences in real-world study "VOTE".

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to elicit patients' preferences for attributes characterizing antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy options before treatment consultation, and to explore the trade-offs patients consider between treatment efficacy and risks of side effects. Further objectives were to explore how treatment consultation may affect patient preferences, to elicit physicians' preferences in selecting treatment, and to compare patient and physician preferences for treatment. METHODS: This prospective, observational study (EP0076; VOTE) included adults with focal seizures requiring a change in their ASM monotherapy. Patients completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey before and after treatment consultation. Physicians completed a similar survey after the consultation. The DCE comprised 12 choices between two hypothetical treatments defined by seven attributes. The conditional relative importance of each attribute was calculated. RESULTS: Three hundred ten patients (mean [SD] age = 46.8 [18.3] years, 52.3% female) were enrolled from eight European countries, of whom 305 completed the survey before consultation and 273 completed the survey before and after consultation. Overall, this preference study in patients who intended to receive a new ASM monotherapy suggests that patient preferences were ordered as expected, with better outcomes being preferred to worse outcomes; patients preferred a higher chance of seizure freedom, lower risk of developing clinical depression, and fewer severe adverse events; avoiding moderate-to-severe "trouble thinking clearly" was more important than avoiding any other side effect. There were qualitative differences in what patients and physicians considered to be the most important aspects of treatment for patients; compared with patients, physicians had a qualitatively stronger preference for greater chance of seizure freedom and avoiding personality changes. Patients' preference weights were qualitatively similar before and after treatment consultation. SIGNIFICANCE: For patients, seizure freedom and avoiding trouble thinking clearly were the most important treatment attributes. Physicians and patients may differ in the emphasis they place on specific attributes.

Treatment Patterns and Resource Utilization of Pregnant Women with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases or Psoriasis in Germany: A Claims Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled inflammatory disease activity can impact pregnancy outcomes and the health of the mother and child. This retrospective claims database analysis assessed treatment patterns before, during, and after pregnancy among women with inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD; axial spondyloarthritis [axSpA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], and rheumatoid arthritis [RA]) or psoriasis (PSO) in Germany. METHODS: Data were extracted from the BARMER sickness fund (2013-2017). Pregnant women (18-45 years) with documented IRD or PSO diagnoses were compared with age-matched controls from the same database for the analysis of patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and pharmacological treatment during pregnancy. Reported measures included the proportion of women with pharmacological prescriptions or hospitalization/new prescription of corticosteroids or biologics in the 180 days before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and 180 days after delivery. Pre-specified prescription categories (such as disease-specific drugs [not including biologics]) were identified by anatomical therapeutic chemical classification codes. Extrapolated values to the German statutory health insurance population are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 2702 pregnant women with IRD (axSpA: 1063; PsA: 660; RA: 979) and 6527 with PSO were identified. The proportion of women with IRD receiving prescriptions for disease-specific drugs reduced during pregnancy and remained stable after delivery (before: 15.0%; during: 9.0%; after: 9.7%). The proportion of women with PSO receiving prescriptions for disease-specific drugs was low (before: 0.6%; during: 0.3%; after: 0.1%). The proportion of women with hospitalization/new prescription of corticosteroids or biologics decreased during pregnancy, compared with pre-pregnancy, and increased after delivery in women with IRD (before: 9.0%; during: 5.1%; after: 11.1%) and PSO (before: 3.5%; during: 1.9%; after: 2.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in pharmacological treatment during pregnancy was observed for women with IRD in Germany. Many women with IRD did not return to pre-pregnancy treatments after delivery, despite signs of disease exacerbation, such as hospitalization and initiation of treatment with corticosteroids/biologics, in this period.

Osteoporotic fractures and subsequent fractures: imminent fracture risk from an analysis of German real-world claims data.

PURPOSE: In osteoporosis, prior fracture is a strong predictor of subsequent fracture. This study aimed to assess the imminent risk of subsequent fracture following an initial fracture in osteoporosis patients in Germany, and to identify clinical and demographic characteristics that are independently associated with subsequent fracture risk. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational cohort study using German real-world claims data, male and female patients aged ≥ 50 years with osteoporosis who experienced an initial ("index") hip/femur, vertebral, forearm/wrist/hand or shoulder/upper arm fracture between 2010 and 2014 were included. The incidence and timing of subsequent fractures during a 1-year follow-up period were analyzed. Independent risk factors for subsequent fracture were identified by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 18,354 patients (mean age: 77 years; standard deviation: 9.8) were included. Of these, 2918 (15.9%) suffered a subsequent fracture during the 1-year follow-up period. The incidence of subsequent fracture was higher following an index vertebral fracture (18.0%) than after an index forearm/wrist/hand fracture (14.1%) or index hip/femur fracture (12.1%). Subsequent 1-year fracture incidence was generally higher in older patients. Index fracture type, age, epilepsy/use of antiepileptics, and heart failure were all independently associated with subsequent fracture risk. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis patients in Germany are at imminent risk of subsequent fracture during the first year following an initial fracture. They should be targeted for immediate post-fracture treatment to reduce the risk of further fractures, especially in the presence of specific risk factors such as old age or index vertebral fracture.

Poststroke epilepsy incidence, risk factors and treatment: German claims analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe incidence, risk factors, and treatment of poststroke epilepsy (PSE) in Germany based on claims data. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of claims data from a German public sickness fund (AOK PLUS). Patients with acute stroke hospitalizations from January 01, 2011 and December 31, 2015 (index hospitalization) were followed for 12-72 months. Outcomes included incidence of PSE (patients with ≥2 seizure claims [during/after index hospitalization], or ≥1 seizure claim after index hospitalization), multivariate Cox-regression analyses of time to seizure claim and death after index stroke hospitalization discharge, and antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. RESULTS: Among 53 883 patients with stroke (mean follow-up of 829.05 days [median 749]), 6054 (11.24%) had ≥1 seizure claim (mean age 73.95 years, 54.18% female). 2130 (35.18%) patients had a seizure claim during index hospitalization (indicative of acute symptomatic seizures). Estimated incidence of PSE (cases/1000 patient-years) was 94.49 within 1 year. Risk of seizure claim following hospital discharge was higher in patients with hemorrhagic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] =1.13; p <.001) vs those with cerebral infarction. Seizure claim during index hospitalization was a risk factor for seizure claims after hospital discharge (HR =6.97; p <.001) and early death (HR =1.78; p <.001). In the first year of follow-up, AEDs were prescribed in 73.75% of patients with seizure claims. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of PSE was in line with previous studies. Hemorrhagic stroke and seizure claim during index hospitalization were risk factors for seizure claims after hospital discharge. Most patients with seizure claims received AED treatment.

Epidemiology and Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis in Germany: A Real-World Evidence Study.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (PSO) are chronic inflammatory diseases that have a substantial impact on patients' health. This retrospective database study aimed to assess the epidemiology, comorbidities, diagnosis and treatment patterns of RA, PsA and PSO in the German population. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Deutsche Forschungsdatenbank für Abrechnungsinformationen der Krankenversicherung database from 2012 to 2016 for patients aged ≥ 18 years holding full health coverage in the reporting year at least. Diagnoses were defined according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes. Reported outcomes included prevalence and incidence rates, pre-defined comorbidities, diagnosing and treating physicians, and treatment exposure. A subgroup analysis was performed for women of childbearing age (females aged 18-45 years). RESULTS: The prevalence rates of RA, PsA and PSO in Germany were consistent over the study period; by 2016 they were 0.4%, 0.3% and 2.1%, respectively, and in women of childbearing age they were 0.2%, 0.2% and 1.5%, respectively. RA, PsA and PSO were predominantly observed among patients aged > 45 years. RA and PsA were more prevalent in women, while PSO had an approximately equal gender distribution. Depressive episodes were the most frequently reported comorbidity in 2016 (RA: 25.7%; PsA: 25.1%; PSO: 17.8%), and this was similar in women of childbearing age (RA: 20.5%; PsA: 23.4%; PSO: 16.3%). Approximately 50% of patients with RA and PsA and 6% of patients with PSO were receiving systemic treatment in 2016, of which methotrexate (RA: 38.4%; PsA: 30.2%; PSO: 2.2%) was most common. Biologic therapies were the least frequently used treatment options (RA: 28.9%; PsA: 20.9%; PSO: 1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides key epidemiological information for patients with RA, PsA and PSO, including in women of childbearing age, in Germany and highlights common comorbidities and that patients were likely receiving insufficient treatment for these diagnoses.

Estimated epidemiology of osteoporosis diagnoses and osteoporosis-related high fracture risk in Germany: a German claims data analysis.

In 2016, an estimated 143,967 female and 25,315 male patients had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, accounting for 4.44% of the German population. Due to an aging population, an increase in the number of osteoporosis patients and osteoporotic fractures can be expected, posing a substantial burden on healthcare systems. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is one of the most prevalent diseases in developed countries, mainly affecting older adults. It leads to decreased bone mass, bone microarchitecture deterioration, and increased risk of fracture. This epidemiological study investigated the prevalence and incidence of osteoporosis diagnoses and assessed the number of osteoporosis patients who are at high risk of vertebral/femoral fracture. METHODS: We analyzed German claims data (AOK PLUS) covering 2010-2016. All included patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis (ICD-10 M80.*/M81.*). Vertebral/femoral and other fractures were identified based on respective ICD-10 codes. Patient numbers were extrapolated to the entire German population, based on patient age and gender. RESULTS: In 2016, 169,282 patients (143,967 females and 25,315 males) had prevalent osteoporosis, 25,996 (20,425 females and 5571 males) of which were newly diagnosed that year. Extrapolated prevalence for Germany was 3.61 million patients (4.44% of the German population). Extrapolated incidence was 0.62 million patients. Of patients with prevalent osteoporosis, 13,613 experienced an incident vertebral/femoral fracture in 2016 (German extrapolation: 258,957 patients). Of these, 36.88% received an osteoporosis treatment that year. CONCLUSION: Our study identified a high number of prevalent and incident patients with osteoporosis claims in Germany. The increasing age of the German population will likely lead to a significant increase in the number of patients with osteoporosis over the next decades. Treatment of osteoporosis patients with high fracture risk, especially those with a recent vertebral/femoral fracture, should be of particular focus, as a substantial proportion does not receive a guideline-based treatment.

Effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide as add-on therapy in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy: Results from a prospective, noninterventional study in European clinical practice (VIBES).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide added to one or two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), and to evaluate patients' global impression of change and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study with a 6-month observation period (EP0045; NCT02276053). Eligible patients (≥16 years old) had active BTRE secondary to low-grade glioma (World Health Organization grade 1 and 2) and were receiving treatment with one or two AEDs at baseline. Lacosamide was initiated by the treating physician in the course of routine clinical practice. Primary outcomes were 50% responders (≥50% reduction in focal seizure frequency from baseline) and Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at month 6. Secondary outcomes included seizure-free status and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at month 6, change in QoL (5-Level EuroQol-5 Dimension Quality of Life Assessment) and symptom outcomes (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor) from baseline to month 6, and Kaplan-Meier estimated 6-month retention on lacosamide. Safety variables included adverse drug reactions (ADRs). RESULTS: Patients were recruited from 24 sites in Europe. Ninety-three patients received lacosamide (mean [standard deviation] age = 44.5 [14.7] years; 50 [53.8%] male; median baseline focal seizure frequency = five seizures/28 days [range = 1-280]), of whom 79 (84.9%) completed the study. At 6 months, 66 of 86 (76.7%) patients were 50% responders and 30 of 86 (34.9%) were seizure-free. Improvements on PGIC were reported by 49 of 76 (64.5%) patients. Based on CGIC, 52 of 81 (64.2%) patients improved. QoL and symptoms outcome measures remained stable. Kaplan-Meier estimated 6-month retention rate was 86.0% (N = 93). Fifteen (16.1%) patients reported ADRs; four (4.3%) had ADRs leading to discontinuation (N = 93). SIGNIFICANCE: Results of this prospective, noninterventional study suggest that add-on lacosamide is effective and generally well tolerated in patients with BTRE.

Changes in drug load during lacosamide combination therapy: A noninterventional, observational study in German and Austrian clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: Effects of antiepileptic drug (AED) load changes in patients with focal seizures have not been well evaluated. METHODS: SP1065 (NCT01673282) was a noninterventional, prospective, observational study conducted in a clinical practice setting. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with focal seizures were enrolled within 7 days of being prescribed adjunctive lacosamide. Observation period was ~6 months. Drug load was assessed using percentage change in ratio of actual prescribed dose and World Health Organization defined daily dose (DDD) for concomitant AEDs and all AEDs (including lacosamide). Subgroups were defined for patients with at least one concomitant sodium channel-blocking AED (SCB [+]) and those without (SCB [-]). RESULTS: A total of 311 patients were assessed for safety, 302 for measurement of drug load, and 240 for effectiveness. Ratio of AED dose to DDD decreased for concomitant AEDs (-9.6%) and increased for all AEDs (including lacosamide; 15.5%). Median reduction in focal seizure frequency per 28 days was 100% (range: -100, 2275.8). 70.4% and 61.7% of patients had a ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency, respectively; 50.8% became seizure-free. In the SCB (+) subgroup (n = 149), ratio of AED dose to DDD decreased for concomitant AEDs (-15.0%) and increased for all AEDs (10.7%). In the SCB (-) subgroup (n = 153), ratio of AED dose to DDD decreased for concomitant AEDs (-4.4%) and increased for all AEDs (20.2%). Fifty-seven patients (18.3%) reported ADRs, most commonly dose >400 mg/d (7.1%). Seventeen patients (5.5%) had ADRs leading to discontinuation. SIGNIFICANCE: Addition of lacosamide resulted in reduction of concomitant AED drug load regardless of whether concomitant AEDs were SCB (+) or SCB (-). These results indicate that addition of lacosamide in patients with focal seizures could allow clinicians to withdraw or reduce the dose of less well-tolerated or less effective AEDs.

A noninterventional study evaluating the effectiveness of rotigotine and levodopa combination therapy in younger versus older patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: PD0013 was a 6-month noninterventional study in clinical practice comparing effectiveness/tolerability of rotigotine+levodopa in younger (<70 years) vs. older (≥70 years) Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. METHODS: Patients previously received levodopa for ≥6 months as monotherapy/in combination with another dopamine-agonist (DA). Primary variable: Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part-II change from baseline to end-of-observation-period (EOP). RESULTS: 91 younger/99 older patients started rotigotine; 68 younger/62 older patients completed the study. Most switched from levodopa+another DA. Addition of rotigotine as first DA was more common in older patients (20.2% vs.15.4%). Mean ± SD rotigotine-exposure: 6.1 ± 3.4 mg/24h younger vs. 4.9 ± 2.4 mg/24h older. Eleven patients changed levodopa dose. At EOP, improvement in mean UPDRS-II was greater in younger patients (p = 0.0289). UPDRS-II responder-rate (≥20% decrease in UPDRS-II score) was higher in younger patients (42.3% vs. 25.9%). Improvement across age groups was similar on PD Sleep Scale-2 and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and discontinuations because of ADRs, were more common among older patients. There were no new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Despite low rotigotine doses, when added to levodopa/switched from levodopa+another DA, rotigotine led to greater improvement in UPDRS-II in younger patients (<70 years). Individual patient data revealed clinically meaningful improvements in UPDRS-II in both groups.

Real life pharmaceutical treatment patterns for adult patients with focal epilepsy in Germany: a longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of recently approved anti-epileptic drugs.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment of adults suffering from focal epilepsies (FE) in Germany. Of special interest was the number and percentage of the patients 16 years and older receiving no treatment with an AED, treatment with one AED (monotherapy), treatment with more than one AED, and treatment with a novel AED. The definition for "novel" was newly approved at the time of market entry since 2006 (last 10 years): eslicarbazepine (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), perampanel (PER), and retigabine (RTG). Methods: The analysis was based on a claims data set covering the years 2007 to 2014, provided by AOK PLUS, a German statutory health insurance. Two patient samples were defined: (1) prevalent patients suffering from FE (at least one in- or outpatient diagnosis of FE and at least one prescription of an AED), and (2) incident FE patients (first in- or outpatient diagnosis of FE without any previous diagnoses/AED prescriptions in the preceding 6 months). Patient observation started at date of first observed inpatient or outpatient focal epilepsy diagnosis within the analyzed period. Each patient was classified as a "no AED therapy", "AED monotherapy" or "more than one AED therapy". Patients were analyzed by number and type of concomitantly prescribed AEDs in yearly tranches (no, one, two, three, four, more than four AEDs; novel versus non-novel AEDs). Results: A total of 34,422 patients diagnosed with FE aged 16 year or older (mean age 59.6 years, 48.7% female) were identified. The mean follow-up period was 1,891 days (5.2 years) since first confirmed diagnosis. The percentage of prevalent patients diagnosed with FE who received one AED (monotherapy) was stable overall and ranged between a minimum of 66.2% (2007) and a maximum of 68.9% (2010). The percentage of patients who received two AEDs ranged from 23.6% (2012) to 25.8% (2007). The remaining patients received therapies with three (6.0% in 2010 to 6.7% in 2007), four (1.0% in 2010 to 1.2% in 2009) or more than four AEDs (0.1% in 2014 to 0.3% in 2013). Between 8.1%-16.6% (2007; 2014) of the patients received no AED therapy in the observed period. In the first year after the diagnosis of FE (incident patients), 9.7% of patients didn't receive any AED therapy. Of those treated with at least one AED, 80.0% received one AED (monotherapy) only, 17.0% received therapy with two AEDs, 2.6% with three AEDs, 0.3% with four AEDs, and 0.1% with >4 AEDs during the respective observation time window and remained stable throughout the four-year follow-up period. Of prevalent patients with a diagnosis of FE, 1,889 (5.5%) received at least one prescription of a novel AED during the observation period; 98.6% of these patients received the novel AED in combination with at least one other AED. Of those patients, 269 (14.2%) received >1 novel AED. The analysis of the patients receiving novel AEDs by the time from the first confirmed diagnosis of FE until the prescription of a novel AED resulted in a mean duration of 4.0 years (SD 2.0) for ESL, 3.6 years (SD 2.2) for LCM, 5.7 years (SD 1.2) for PER, and 4.6 years (SD 0.8 years) for RTG. The mean number of AEDs prescribed before the novel AEDs were 3.2 for ESL, 2.4 for LCM, 5.0 for PER and 5.2 for RTG. Conclusions: Most patients aged 16 years or older, suffering from focal seizures, received AED monotherapy. Novel AEDs were prescribed in a small proportion of patients (<6%) and relatively late in the treatment course. These results are consistent with the recommendations of the German Society for Epileptology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Epileptologie, DGfE) which suggests a number of monotherapy options - these options do not include the novel AEDs described in this study.

Rotigotine's effect on PLM-associated blood pressure elevations in restless legs syndrome: An RCT.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, interventional trial was conducted to investigate the effects of rotigotine patch on periodic limb movement (PLM)-associated nocturnal systolic blood pressure (SBP) elevations. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe restless legs syndrome (RLS) were randomized to rotigotine (optimal dose [1-3 mg/24 h]) or placebo. Continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) assessments were performed during polysomnography at baseline and at the end of 4-week maintenance. Primary outcome was change in number of PLM-associated SBP elevations (defined as slope of linear regression ≥2.5 mm Hg/beat-to-beat interval over 5 consecutive heartbeats [≥10 mm Hg]). Additional outcomes were total SBP elevations, PLM-associated and total diastolic BP (DBP) elevations, periodic limb movements index (PLMI), and PLM in sleep arousal index (PLMSAI). RESULTS: Of 81 randomized patients, 66 (37 rotigotine, 29 placebo) were included in efficacy assessments. PLM-associated SBP elevations were significantly reduced with rotigotine vs placebo (least squares mean treatment difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] -160.34 [-213.23 to -107.45]; p < 0.0001). Rotigotine-treated patients also had greater reduction vs placebo in total SBP elevations (-161.13 [-264.47 to -57.79]; p = 0.0028), PLM-associated elevations (-88.45 [-126.12 to -50.78]; p < 0.0001), and total DBP elevations (-93.81 [-168.45 to -19.16]; p = 0.0146), PLMI (-32.77 [-44.73 to -20.80]; p < 0.0001), and PLMSAI (-7.10 [-11.93 to -2.26]; p = 0.0047). Adverse events included nausea (rotigotine 23%; placebo 8%), headache (18% each), nasopharyngitis (18%; 8%), and fatigue (13%; 15%). CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation is required to determine whether reductions in nocturnal BP elevations observed with rotigotine might modify cardiovascular risk. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with moderate to severe RLS, rotigotine at optimal dose (1-3 mg/24 h) reduced PLM-associated nocturnal SBP elevations.

Significant association between systolic and diastolic blood pressure elevations and periodic limb movements in patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: A new and unique methodology was developed to evaluate the association between periodic limb movements (PLMs) and nocturnal blood pressure (BP) excursions in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: All data were collected at baseline of the ENCORE (Effects of Neupro on Cardiovascular Observations in Patients with Restless Legs Syndrome) study, a placebo-controlled polysomnographic study of rotigotine in patients with idiopathic RLS. Continuous beat-by-beat BP and heart rate assessments were performed during a full night of polysomnography. All BP elevations occurring with and without PLMs were systematically identified and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients (n = 89) had a mean total of 508.9 ± 405.7 PLMs, 788.4 ± 261.9 systolic BP elevations, and 349.7 ± 242.9 diastolic BP elevations during the night. Higher time-adjusted frequencies of systolic BP elevations [mean difference (95% confidence interval, CI): 543.0 (487.2, I); p <0.0001] and diastolic BP elevations (205.8 (169.3, I); p <0.0001) were observed with PLMs than without PLMs. A peak in the frequency of PLM onset coincided with BP elevation onset. CONCLUSION: Our methodology allowed the first evaluation of the total number of nocturnal PLM-associated BP elevations occurring in patients with RLS. Our data clearly indicate an interdependence between BP elevations and PLMs, and they have clinical relevance as BP variability is a potential cardiovascular risk factor.

Survival of the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) in the gastrointestinal tract given in combination with oral mesalamine to healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Mesalamine and the probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) are both effective agents for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. A combined therapy may have more than additive efficacy. However, mesalamine may have antimicrobial effects on EcN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 48 healthy volunteers took EcN in a run-in phase for 17 days (5-50 x 10(9) viable bacteria od). If stool samples became positive for EcN, volunteers received combination treatment with EcN plus either mesalamine (1500 mg twice a day) or placebo for 1 week. Fecal samples were further tested for EcN in 2- to 3-day intervals until a maximum of 48 weeks after treatment. Patient diaries, blood, and urine were checked to assess safety, compliance, and tolerance. RESULTS: During run-in, viable EcN were detected in 45 of the 48 volunteers (94%); 2 volunteers were positive before taking EcN. From days 1 to 7 of combination treatment (n = 40), the number of EcN-positive volunteers varied between 70% and 80% in the mesalamine group and between 85% and 95% in the placebo group. Differences between the groups were not significant (normal approximation: day 3, P > 0.15; day 5, P > 0.25; day 7, P > 0.076). At treatment discontinuation, 16 of 20 volunteers in the mesalamine group and 15 of 20 volunteers in the placebo group were EcN positive, whereas this figure dropped continuously up to week 12 after discontinuation (mesalamine, 7 of 20; placebo, 4 of 20). No differences between the groups were seen with regard to tolerance and safety. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of EcN and mesalamine has no significant effect on the survival of EcN in healthy volunteers.