Incidence of Central Nervous System Relapse in Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Implications for Central Nervous System Prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon type of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. PMBCL shares some clinical and biologic features with nodular sclerosis classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is exceedingly rare in cHL. Therefore, it may be expected that CNS relapse in PMBCL is also uncommon. Herein, we examined the incidence of CNS relapse in patients with PMBCL treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single center analysis included 154 patients with newly diagnosed PMBCL seen at Mayo Clinic. The CNS relapse rate was calculated using a competing risk model, with death considered as a competing risk. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 39 months, 3 patients experienced CNS relapse, all associated with systemic relapse. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse for the entire cohort was 1.43% (95% CI, 0.3%-4.6%) at 1 year and 2.21% (95% CI, 0.6%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. For those who did not receive CNS prophylaxis (n = 131), the incidence was 0.85% (95% CI, 0.1%-4.2%) at 1 year and 1.80% (95% CI, 0.3%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. All 3 patients who experienced CNS relapse had R-CHOP as frontline therapy; 2 patients did not receive any CNS prophylaxis, while 1 patient received intrathecal CNS prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: The risk of CNS relapse in PMBCL appears to be very low after treatment with standard chemoimmunotherapy, suggesting routine CNS prophylaxis is not necessary.

Neurologic Clinical, Electrophysiologic, and Pathologic Characteristics of Primary vs Secondary Neurolymphomatosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neurolymphomatosis (NL) is characterized by lymphomatous infiltration of the peripheral nervous system presenting as the initial manifestation of a lymphoma (primary NL [PNL]) or in relapse of a known lymphoma (secondary NL [SNL]). This report details and compares the neurologic clinicopathologic characteristics of these 2 groups. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed NL in nerve between January 1, 1992, and June 31, 2020. Patient clinical characteristics, neurologic examination, imaging studies, EMG, and nerve biopsy data were collected, analyzed, and compared between PNL and SNL. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were identified (34 PNL and 24 SNL). Time from neurologic symptom onset to diagnosis was longer in PNL at 18.5 months compared with 5.5 months in SNL (p = 0.01). Neurologic symptoms were similar in both patient groups and included primarily sensory loss (98%), severe pain (76%), and asymmetric weakness (76%). A wide spectrum of EMG-confirmed different neuropathy patterns were observed, but patients with SNL had increased numbers of mononeuropathies (n = 8) compared with PNL (n = 1, p = 0.01). MRI studies detected NL more frequently (86%) compared with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET CT imaging studies (60%) (p = 0.007). Nerve biopsies revealed B-cell lymphoma (PNL n = 32, SNL n = 22), followed by T-cell lymphoma (PNL n = 2, SNL n = 2), with increased demyelination in both groups and increased axonal degeneration (p = 0.01) and multifocal myelinated fiber loss (p = 0.04) significant in SNL vs PNL. Identifying SNL resulted in patient treatment modifications but a worse prognosis compared with PNL (p = 0.025). DISCUSSION: While PNL and SNL are both primarily painful and asymmetric neuropathies with axonal and demyelinating features on EMG and nerve biopsy, SNL presents somewhat differently than PNL with fulminant, asymmetric often mononeuropathies better detected on MRI than FDG-PET/CT. The focal pattern of SNL is likely a result of residual cancer cells that evaded initial chemotherapy, which does not cross the blood-nerve barrier, and these cells can later recur and result in fulminant disease. Although still resulting in a poorer prognosis, identifying SNL is important because this changed treatment and management in every SNL case.

Deep generative model of the distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesion in infants: assessment of synthetic images.

Background: The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is a distinctive fracture highly specific to infant abuse. To increase the size and diversity of the training CML database for automated deep-learning detection of this fracture, we developed a mask conditional diffusion model (MaC-DM) to generate synthetic images with and without CMLs. Purpose: To objectively and subjectively assess the synthetic radiographic images with and without CMLs generated by MaC-DM. Materials and Methods: For retrospective testing, we randomly chose 100 real images (50 normals and 50 with CMLs; 39 infants, male = 22, female = 17; mean age = 4.1 months; SD = 3.1 months) from an existing distal tibia dataset (177 normal, 73 with CMLs), and generated 100 synthetic distal tibia images via MaC-DM (50 normals and 50 with CMLs). These test images were shown to 3 blinded radiologists. In the first session, radiologists determined if the images were normal or had CMLs. In the second session, they determined if the images were real or synthetic. We analyzed the radiologists' interpretations and employed t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding technique to analyze the data distribution of the test images. Results: When presented with the 200 images (100 synthetic, 100 with CMLs), radiologists reliably and accurately diagnosed CMLs (kappa = 0.90, 95% CI = [0.88-0.92]; accuracy = 92%, 95% CI = [89-97]). However, they were inaccurate in differentiating between real and synthetic images (kappa = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.03-0.07]; accuracy = 53%, 95% CI = [49-59]). The t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding analysis showed substantial differences in the data distribution between normal images and those with CMLs (area under the curve = 0.996, 95% CI = [0.992-1.000], P < .01), but minor differences between real and synthetic images (area under the curve = 0.566, 95% CI = [0.486-0.647], P = .11). Conclusion: Radiologists accurately diagnosed images with distal tibial CMLs but were unable to distinguish real from synthetically generated ones, indicating that our generative model could synthesize realistic images. Thus, MaC-DM holds promise as an effective strategy for data augmentation in training machine-learning models for diagnosis of distal tibial CMLs.

Deep learning MR reconstruction in knees and ankles in children and young adults. Is it ready for clinical use?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of accelerated Turbo Spin Echo sequences using deep-learning (DL) reconstructions compared to conventional sequences in knee and ankle MRIs of children and young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB-approved prospective study consisting of 49 MRIs from 48 subjects (10 males, mean age 16.4 years, range 7-29 years), with each MRI consisting of both conventional and DL sequences. Sequences were evaluated blindly to determine predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity of DL sequences using conventional sequences and knee arthroscopy (if available) as references. Physeal patency and appearance were evaluated. Qualitative parameters were compared. Presence of undesired image alterations was assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of abnormal findings in the knees and ankles were 11.7% (75/640), and 11.5% (19/165), respectively. Using conventional sequences as reference, sensitivity and specificity of DL sequences in knees were 90.7% and 99.3%, and in ankles were 100.0% and 100.0%. Using arthroscopy as reference, sensitivity and specificity of DL sequences were 80.0% and 95.8%, and of conventional sequences were 80.0% and 97.9%. Agreement of physeal status was 100.0%. DL sequences were qualitatively "same-or-better" compared to conventional (p < 0.032), except for pixelation artifact for the PDFS sequence (p = 0.233). No discrete image alteration was identified in the knee DL sequences. In the ankle, we identified one DL artifact involving a tendon (0.8%, 1/125). DL sequences were faster than conventional sequences by a factor of 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In knee and ankle MRIs, DL sequences provided similar diagnostic performance and "same-or-better" image quality than conventional sequences at half the acquisition time.

Day 100 Recovery of Absolute Number of Inhibitory KIR2DL2 and Activating NKp30 Natural Killer Cells Predicts Survival Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphomas.

The infusion autograft absolute number of inhibitory killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) 2DL2 and activating natural killer (NK)p30 cells are predictors of clinical outcomes in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT). To assess if the long-term recovery of these NK cell subsets still holds clinical relevance, we set up to investigate their prognostic ability at day 100 post-APBHSCT. This was a retrospective single-institution study including 107 patients from our prior phase III trial who had a clinical assessment at day 100 post-APBHSCT. The median follow-up from day 100 was 168.19 months (interquartile range: 156.85-181.28 months). Patients with day 100 inhibitory KIR2DL2 < 0.08 cells/µL and activating NKp30 ≥ 0.19 cells/µL experienced superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A multivariate analysis revealed both the day 100 inhibitory KIR2DL2 [OS: HR = 1.449, 95%CI, 1.231-1.895, p < 0.013; and PFS: HR = 2.069, 95%CI, 1.134-3.775, p < 0.021] and activating NKp30 [OS: HR = 4.985, 95%CI, 2.614-9.506, p < 0.0001; and PFS: HR = 4.661, 95%CI, 2.598-8.393, p < 0.0001] were independent predictors for OS and PFS. Inhibitory KIR2DL2 and activating NKp30 NK cells at day 100 are prognostic immune biomarkers in lymphoma patients treated with APBHSCT.

Outcomes of patients with R/R B-cell NHL and limited (<5 sites) pre-CART disease bridged with or without radiotherapy.

ABSTRACT: Unirradiated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) have a predominant localized pattern of relapse, the significance of which is heightened in individuals with limited/localized disease before CART. This study reports on the outcomes of patients with R/R NHL and limited (<5 involved sites) disease bridged with or without radiotherapy. A multicenter retrospective review of 150 patients with R/R NHL who received CART with <5 disease sites before leukapheresis was performed. Bridging treatment, if any, was administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. Study end points included relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival. Before CART infusion, 48 patients (32%) received bridging radiotherapy (BRT), and 102 (68%) did not. The median follow-up was 21 months. After CART infusion, BRT patients had higher objective response (92% vs 78%; P = .046) and sustained complete response rates (54% vs 33%; P = .015). Local relapse in sites present before CART was lower in the BRT group (21% vs 46%; P = .003). BRT patients had improved 2-year RFS (53% vs 44%; P = .023) and 2-year EFS (37% vs 34%; P = .039) compared with patients who did not receive BRT. The impact of BRT was most prominent in patients who had ≤2 pre-CART involved disease sites, with 2-year RFS of 62% in patients who received BRT compared with 42% in those who did not (P = .002). BRT before CART for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) R/R NHL improves response rate, local control, RFS, and EFS without causing significant toxicities.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Fit Patients With Late Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma That Responded to Salvage Chemotherapy.

The standard of care (SOC) for fit patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ≥12 months after completing frontline therapy is salvage chemotherapy (ST) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, this strategy may not be optimal for patients with certain clinical characteristics. We retrospectively studied 151 patients with DLBCL that relapsed ≥12 months after R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like frontline therapy who underwent ST and ASCT at Mayo Clinic between July 2000 and December 2017 or the University of Iowa between April 2003 and April 2020. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median time from frontline therapy completion to 1st relapse was 26.9 months. The median line of ST was 1 (range 1-3), and 17 (11%) patients required >1 line of ST. Best response before ASCT was partial response (PR) in 60 (40%) and complete response (CR) in 91 (60%) patients. The median age at ASCT was 64 yr (range 19-78), and 36 (24%) patients were of ≥70 yr. The median follow-up after ASCT was 87.3 months. The median PFS and OS were 54.5 and 88.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS based on the age at ASCT (including patients aged ≥70-78 yr), sex, transplant era, time to relapse, LDH, extranodal site involvement, and central nervous system/nerve involvement at relapse. However, patients with advanced-stage relapse had inferior PFS than those with early-stage relapse (median 45.3 versus 124.7 months, P = .045). Patients who required > 1 line of ST, compared to those requiring 1 line, had significantly inferior PFS (median 6.1 versus 61.4 months, P < .0001) and OS (17.8 versus 111.7 months, P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in survival in patients who achieved PR versus CR, though numerically inferior in the former, with median PFS of 38.9 versus 59.3 months (P = .23) and median OS of 78.3 versus 111.7 months (P = .62). Patients achieving CR after 1 line of ST had excellent post-ASCT outcomes, with median PFS of 63.7 months. In conclusion, survival after ASCT was unfavorable in patients with late relapsed DLBCL (≥12 months) who required more than 1 line of ST to achieve PR or CR, and such patients should be treated with alternative therapies. Conversely, survival was favorable in patients who required only 1 line of ST, supporting the current clinical practice of ASCT consolidation in these patients. Moreover, outcomes were favorable in patients aged ≥70 to 78 yr at ASCT, similar to younger patients, highlighting the safety and feasibility of this approach in such patients.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, despite being a potentially curative therapy in relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), remains underutilized in older patients due to limited clinical data. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy in older patients with RR LBCL in the real-world setting. Patients aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy at 7 US institutions were included in this multicenter, retrospective, observational study. In total, 226 patients were included. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89). Best objective and complete response rates were 86% and 62%, respectively. Median follow-up after infusion was 18.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months, with 6- and 12-month PFS estimates of 54% and 44%, respectively. The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 10.9% at day 180, primarily due to infections, and not impacted by the age groups. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 7% and 26%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no significant difference in PFS was seen regardless of the age groups or CAR-T type, whereas ECOG PS ≥2, elevated LDH, bulky disease, advanced stage, extranodal involvement, the need for bridging therapy, and prior bendamustine exposure were associated with shorter PFS. These findings support the use of CAR-T in older patients, including those aged ≥80 years. The age at CAR-T therapy did not influence safety, survival, and NRM outcomes. Older patients should not be excluded from receiving CAR-T therapy solely based on their chronological age.

Measuring synovial thickness on knee MRI in pediatric patients with arthritis: is contrast necessary?

BACKGROUND: The use of contrast-enhanced imaging has long been standard for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments of synovitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, advancements in MRI technology have allowed for reliable identification of synovium without contrast. OBJECTIVE: To assess the equivalence of unenhanced MRI with contrast-enhanced MRI in evaluating synovial thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an institutional review board approved, retrospective study performed in a tertiary children's hospital. Pediatric JIA patients under 21 years old were included who underwent knee MRI scans (1.5 T or 3 T) without and with contrast between January 2012 and January 2022. Two radiologists independently measured synovial thickness at 6 knee sites on contrast-enhanced and unenhanced sequences. Numerical measurements and ordinal scores based on juvenile idiopathic arthritis magnetic resonance imaging scoring (JAMRIS) system were recorded, and tests of equivalence were conducted, as well as between-reader and within-reader reliability by concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). All tests were considered significant at the 5% level. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies from 35 patients (25 females, median age 14 years; interquartile range 7 to 15.7) were included. Equivalence was demonstrated at each of the 6 sites for both continuous measurements (P-values < 0.05) and ordinal scores (P-values < 0.05) based on the average over readers. Within-reader reliability was moderate to high (CCC 0.50-0.89), except for the cruciate ligaments site. Averaged over the 6 sites, reliability between readers was low for unenhanced (CCC 0.47, with 95% CI: [0.41, 0.53]) and moderate for contrast-enhanced (CCC 0.64, with 95% CI: [0.59, 0.69]) sequences. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced knee MRI is equivalent to contrast-enhanced MRI in assessment of synovial thickness using conventional MRI sequences. Contrast material helped improve inter-reader reliability.

Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.

What is this summary about? People diagnosed with a disease called large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may experience return, or early relapse, of their disease within the first year after receiving and responding to their first (first-line) treatment regimen. Others may have primary refractory disease, meaning that the disease either did not respond to first-line treatment at all or only responded for a very brief period. Second (second-line) treatment includes immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, which has the potential to cure LBCL. However, if the disease does not respond to immunotherapy, people cannot receive ASCT, and less than 30% of people are cured.Therefore, new second-line treatment options are required, such as CAR T cell therapy, which uses a person's own genetically engineered lymphocytes, also called T cells, to fight their lymphoma. In this article, we summarize the key results of the phase 3 TRANSFORM clinical study that tested if liso-cel, a CAR T cell treatment, can safely and effectively be used as a second-line treatment for people with early relapsed or primary refractory (relapsed/refractory) LBCL.A total of 184 adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL who were able to receive ASCT were randomly treated with either liso-cel or standard of care (SOC) as second-line treatment. SOC included immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.What were the key takeaways? Almost all (97%) people in the liso-cel group completed treatment, whereas 53% of people in the SOC group did not complete treatment, mostly due to their disease not responding or relapsing, and therefore they were not able to receive ASCT. People who received liso-cel as a second-line treatment lived longer without the occurrence of an unfavorable medical event or worsening of the disease and had a better response to treatment than those who received SOC as second-line treatment. People who received liso-cel reported side effects that researchers considered to be manageable, and that were known to occur with CAR T cell treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the TRANSFORM study support the use of liso-cel as a more effective second-line treatment compared with SOC that is safe for people with relapsed/refractory LBCL.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03575351 (TRANSFORM study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Serial Evaluation of Preimmunization Antibody Titers in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.

Antibody titers and the potential need for immunization have not been formally studied in recipients of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T). Prior studies have shown that CD19-targeted CAR-T can induce persistent B cell aplasia but preserve plasma cells for humoral response. Aiming to assess the immune repertoire and antibody titer status of CAR-T recipients, we conducted a retrospective study of immune cell recovery and antibody titers to vaccines in anti-CD19 CAR-T recipients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. In our cohort of 95 CAR-T recipients, almost one-half had low CD4 T and B cell counts prior to CAR-T that remained persistently low post-CAR-T. Prior to CAR-T, the seronegative rate was lowest for tetanus and highest for pneumococcus irrespective of prior transplantation status (within 2 years of CAR-T). At 3 months post-CAR-T, overall seronegativity rates were similar to pre-CAR-T rates for the prior transplantation and no prior transplantation groups. For patients who received IVIG, loss of seropositivity was seen for hepatitis A (1 of 7; 14%). No seroconversion was noted for pneumococcus. For patients who did not receive IVIG, loss of seropositivity was seen for pneumococcus (2 of 5; 40%) and hepatitis A (1 of 4; 25%). CAR-T recipients commonly experience T cell and B cell lymphopenia and might not have adequate antibody titers against vaccine-preventable diseases despite IVIG supplementation. Loss of antibody titers post-CAR-T is possible, highlighting the need for revaccination. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are needed to inform the optimal timing of immunization post-CAR-T.

Patterns of progression after immune checkpoint inhibitors for Hodgkin lymphoma: implications for radiation therapy.

ABSTRACT: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable response rates in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Still, most patients eventually progress. Patterns of progression after ICIs are not well described and are essential to defining the role of local therapies in combination with ICIs. We identified patients who received ICIs for HL between 2013 and 2022. Fludeoxyglucose-18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) before initiating ICI and at progression on/after ICI were reviewed, and areas of active HL were recorded. An exploratory analysis of treatable progression included patients with ≤5 sites of disease on pre-ICI FDG-PET and progression only at pre-ICI sites. Ninety patients were identified; 69 had complete records, and of these, 32 (52%) had relapsed at ICI initiation, 17 (25%) were refractory, and 16 (23%) received ICI as first-line therapy. Forty-five of 69 patients had ≤5 sites of disease (limited) on pre-ICI FDG-PET. Patients with >5 sites of disease had a higher risk of progression, and every site of disease >5 sites conferred an additional 1.2x higher chance of progression. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 41 of 69 patients had progressed on/after ICIs (cumulative incidence 66.4%), and of these, 22 of 41 patients progressed only at pre-ICI sites (cumulative incidence 39.4%). In an exploratory analysis, the cumulative incidence of a treatable progression among 45 patients with limited disease was 34%. The cumulative incidence of any progression among this cohort was 58.9%. More than one-third of patients with limited disease before ICIs experienced progression only at pre-ICI sites of disease. These patients could be candidates for radiation during or after ICIs.

Autologous stem cell transplant in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that responded to salvage chemotherapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is the new standard of care in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there may still be a role for salvage chemotherapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in certain circumstances (e.g., lack of resources for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, chemosensitive relapses). We retrospectively studied 230 patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL who underwent ST and ASCT. The median line of ST was one (range, 1-3). Best response before ASCT was complete response in 106 (46%) and partial response in 124 (54%) patients. The median follow-up after ASCT was 89.4 months. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.1 and 43.3 months, respectively. Patients relapsing between 6 to 12 months after frontline therapy had a numerically better median PFS (29.6 months) and OS (88.5 months). Patients who required one line of ST, compared to those requiring more than one line, had a better median PFS (37.9 vs. 3.9 months; P=0.0005) and OS (68.3 vs. 12.0 months; P=0.0005). Patients who achieved complete response had a better median PFS (71.1 vs. 6.3 months; P<0.0001) and OS (110.3 vs. 18.9 months; P<0.0001) than those in partial response. Patients who achieved complete response after one line of ST had the most favorable median PFS (88.5 months) and OS (117.2 months). Post-ASCT survival outcomes of patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL appeared reasonable and were particularly favorable in those who required only one line of ST to achieve complete response before ASCT, highlighting the role of this procedure in select patients with chemosensitive disease.

Pralatrexate injection combined with CHOP for treatment of PTCL: results from the Fol-CHOP dose-finding phase 1 trial.

ABSTRACT: Pralatrexate is a folate antagonist that selectively enters cells expressing reduced folate carrier type 1 and competitively inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, leading to interruption of RNA synthesis, DNA replication, and apoptosis. This phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pralatrexate in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen (part 1) and the response and pharmacokinetics of 6 cycles of this combination (CHOP + Folotyn 30 mg/m2 [Fol-CHOP]) in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). In part 1, on days 1 and 8 of each cycle, patients were treated with 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 mg/m2 of pralatrexate in combination with CHOP, per dose escalation, in 5 sequential cohorts. No patients experienced DLTs in cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The pralatrexate dose of 30 mg/m2 was selected to be combined with CHOP for part 2 and administered to 33 additional patients in the expansion cohort. At the MTD, the Fol-CHOP regimen was generally well tolerated in patients with PTCL, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 83.9% (20 complete response and 6 partial response), as assessed by treating investigators. Thirty-five patients (67.3%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common of which were anemia (21.2%), neutropenia (19.2%), febrile neutropenia (11.5%), fatigue, mucosal inflammation, nausea, and vomiting (7.7% each). In conclusion, Fol-CHOP was found to be a safe and effective treatment for newly diagnosed PTCL and deemed worthy of further investigation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02594267.

Day 100 Natural Killer Cell/CD14+HLA-DRDIM ratio and survival in lymphoma post-autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The infusion of autograft Natural Killer Cells (NKC)/CD14+ HLA-DRDIM ratio is a predictor of survival in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT). This study evaluated if the Day 100 NKC/CD14+ HLA-DRDIM ratio still functions as a prognostic immune-biomarker. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-institution, cohort analysis including 107 patients in this study that had clinical assessment at Day 100 post-APBHSCT from our prior phase III trial. We evaluated the prognostic ability of the Day 100 NKC/CD14+ HLA-DRDIM ratio to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox regression model for outcome analysis and survival by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The median follow-up from day 100 was 94.7 months (range 4.83-158.1 months) for the entire cohort. Patients with a Day 100 NKC/CD14+ HLA-DRDIM ratio ≥1.67 experienced better OS and PFS versus those with a Day 100 NKC/CD14+ HLA-DRDIM ratio <1.67: median OS was not reached versus 49.7 months, the 5-year OS rates were 91% (95% CI, 81%-96%) versus 40% (95% CI, 27%-55%), p < .0001, respectively; and median PFS was not reached versus 23.5 months, the 5-year PFS rates were 66% (95% CI, 55%-81%) versus 21% (95% CI, 15%-40%), p < .0001, respectively. Day 100 NKC/CD14+ HLA-DRDIM ratio was an independent predictor for OS and PFS in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Day 100 NKC/CD14+ HLA-DRDIM ratio is a prognostic immune-biomarker in lymphoma patients post- APBHSCT.

An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma patients in the United States.

AIMS: This economic evaluation of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) versus previous standard of care (SOC; salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue) in the second line (2L) large B-cell lymphoma population is an update of previous economic models that contained immature survival data. METHODS: This analysis is based on primary overall survival (OS) ZUMA-7 clinical trial data (median follow-up of 47.2 months), from a United States (US) payer perspective, with a model time horizon of 50 years. Mixture cure models were used to extrapolate updated survival data; subsequent treatment data and costs were updated. Patients who remained in the event-free survival state by 5 years were assumed to have achieved long-term remission and not require subsequent treatment. RESULTS: Substantial survival and quality of life benefits were observed despite 57% of patients in the SOC arm receiving subsequent cellular therapy: median model-projected (ZUMA-7 trial Kaplan-Meier estimated) OS was 78 months (median not reached) for axi-cel versus 25 months (31 months) for SOC, resulting in incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) difference of 1.63 in favor of axi-cel. Incrementally higher subsequent treatment costs were observed in the SOC arm due to substantial crossover to cellular therapies, thus, when considering the generally accepted willingness to pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY in the US, axi-cel was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $98,040 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Results remained consistent across a wide range of sensitivity and scenario analysis, including a crossover adjusted analysis, suggesting that the mature OS data has significantly reduced the uncertainty of axi-cel's cost-effectiveness in the 2L setting in the US. Deferring treatment with CAR T therapies after attempting a path to transplant may result in excess mortality, lower quality of life and would be an inefficient use of resources relative to 2L axi-cel.

A Quantum Model of Trust Calibration in Human-AI Interactions.

This exploratory study investigates a human agent's evolving judgements of reliability when interacting with an AI system. Two aims drove this investigation: (1) compare the predictive performance of quantum vs. Markov random walk models regarding human reliability judgements of an AI system and (2) identify a neural correlate of the perturbation of a human agent's judgement of the AI's reliability. As AI becomes more prevalent, it is important to understand how humans trust these technologies and how trust evolves when interacting with them. A mixed-methods experiment was developed for exploring reliability calibration in human-AI interactions. The behavioural data collected were used as a baseline to assess the predictive performance of the quantum and Markov models. We found the quantum model to better predict the evolving reliability ratings than the Markov model. This may be due to the quantum model being more amenable to represent the sometimes pronounced within-subject variability of reliability ratings. Additionally, a clear event-related potential response was found in the electroencephalographic (EEG) data, which is attributed to the expectations of reliability being perturbed. The identification of a trust-related EEG-based measure opens the door to explore how it could be used to adapt the parameters of the quantum model in real time.

Same but different: The latency of a shared expectation signal interacts with stimulus attributes.

Predictive coding theories assert that perceptual inference is a hierarchical process of belief updating, wherein the onset of unexpected sensory data causes so-called prediction error responses that calibrate erroneous inferences. Given the functionally specialised organisation of visual cortex, it is assumed that prediction error propagation interacts with the specific visual attribute violating an expectation. We sought to test this within the temporal domain by applying time-resolved decoding methods to electroencephalography (EEG) data evoked by contextual trajectory violations of either brightness, size, or orientation within a bound stimulus. We found that following ∼170 ms post stimulus onset, responses to both size violations and orientation violations were decodable from physically identical control trials in which no attributes were violated. These two violation types were then directly compared, with attribute-specific signalling being decoded from 265 ms. Temporal generalisation suggested that this dissociation was driven by latency shifts in shared expectation signalling between the two conditions. Using a novel temporal bias method, we then found that this shared signalling occurred earlier for size violations than orientation violations. To our knowledge, we are among the first to decode expectation violations in humans using EEG and have demonstrated a temporal dissociation in attribute-specific expectancy violations.