Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med ; 5(1): e000511, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31191968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In the literature on proximal hamstring avulsions, only two studies report the outcomes of non-surgically treated patients. Our objective was to compare subjective recovery after surgical and non-surgical treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions in a middle-aged cohort. METHODS: We included 47 patients (33 surgically and 14 non-surgically treated) with a mean (SD) age of 51 (±9) years in a retrospective cohort study. Follow-up time mean (SD) of 3.9 (±1.4) years. The outcome variables were the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and questions from the Proximal Hamstring Injury Questionnaire. Outcome variables were adjusted in regression models for gender, age, American Society of Anestesiologits (ASA) classification and MRI findings at diagnosis. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics showed no differences except for the MRI result, in which the surgically treated group had a larger proportion of tendons retracted ≥ 2 cm. The mean LEFS score was 74 (SD±12) in the surgically treated cohort and 72 (SD±16) in the non-surgically treated cohort. This was also true after adjusting for confounders. The only difference in outcome at follow-up was the total hours performing physical activity per week, p=0.02; surgically treated patients reported 2.5 hours or more (5.2 vs 2.7). CONCLUSION: This study on middle-aged patients with proximal hamstring avulsions was unable to identify any difference in patient-reported outcome measures between surgically and non-surgically treated patients. The vast majority of patients treated surgically had complete proximal hamstring avulsions with ≥ 2 cm of retraction. We conclude that to obtain an evidence-based treatment algorithm for proximal hamstring avulsions studies of higher scientific level are needed.

2.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 26(10): 2875-2882, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29188336

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare acute ACL reconstruction (ACLR) within 8 days of injury with delayed reconstruction after normalized range of motion (ROM), 6-10 weeks after injury. It was hypothesized that acute ACL reconstruction with modern techniques is safe and can be beneficial in terms of patient-reported outcomes and range of motion. METHODS: Sample size calculation indicated 64 patients would be required to find a 5° difference in ROM at 3 months. Seventy patients with high recreational activity level, Tegner level 6 or more, were randomized to acute (within 8 days) or delayed (6-10 weeks) ACLR between 2006 and 2013. During the first 3 months following surgery patients were contacted weekly by SMS and asked 'How is your knee functioning?', with answers given on a Visual-Analog Scale (0-10). ROM was assessed after 3 months by the rehab physiotherapist. Patient-reported outcomes, objective IKDC and manual stability measurements were collected by an independent physiotherapist not involved in the rehab at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 3-month follow-up, 91% of the patients were assessed with no significant differences in flexion, extension or total ROM demonstrated between groups. At the 6-month follow-up, the acute group had significantly less muscle atrophy of the thigh muscle compared to the contralateral leg. Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the acute group passed or were close to passing the one leg hop test (47 versus 21%, p = 0.009). No difference was found between the groups in the other clinical assessments. Additionally, no significant difference between the groups was found in terms of associated injuries. CONCLUSION: Acute ACLR within 8 days of injury does not appear to adversely affect ROM or result in increased stiffness in the knee joint when compared to delayed surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Artropatías/epidemiología , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Adulto , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
3.
J Strength Cond Res ; 23(3): 972-8, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19387378

RESUMEN

A few studies have shown that eccentric exercise is effective for prevention and treatment of muscle injuries. Most earlier studies on eccentric exercises have used training with advanced equipment. Forward lunges are considered eccentric exercises, and they may be performed without any equipment. These exercises are commonly used by sprint runners. We performed a prospective, randomized, 6-week training study comparing the effects of walking or jumping forward lunges on hamstring and quadriceps strength and function. Thirty-two soccer players were included in the study. The forward lunge training was done as an addition to ordinary soccer training twice a week for 6 weeks. The outcome was measured by the maximal hamstring and quadriceps strength tests and by functional tests with 1-leg hop tests and 30-m sprint runs. Overall muscle pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale score, and local pain was estimated with an algometer. Whereas the walking lunge improved hamstring strength, the jumping lunge resulted in sprint running improvements. Algometer testing showed a general increase in the pain detection thresholds of all subjects, including the controls. Thus, precautions should be taken when algometers are used for temporal studies of pain. Walking and jumping forward lunges can be used for improving hamstring strength and running speed in young soccer player. The findings may have relevance when designing protocols for prevention and rehabilitation of muscle injuries.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Extremidad Inferior/fisiología , Movimiento/fisiología , Fútbol/fisiología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Suecia , Caminata/fisiología
4.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 30(15): 1777-85, 2005 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094281

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of patients with chronic low back pain in primary care setting. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the health care resource use, productivity loss, and health-related quality of life of patients with chronic low back pain in Sweden. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the clinical and economic importance of chronic LBP, the overall burden of the disease is not well documented. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on patients' socio-demographics, disease-related healthcare resource use during the past 6 months, inability to work during the previous 3 months, and quality of life at the time of the study visit were collected using questionnaires completed during an outpatient visit. Patient recruitment and data collection was performed at 14 primary care centers in Sweden. Patients over 18 years of age with chronic LBP present at least 50% of the days during the previous 3 months were included. Regression analysis was used to investigate factors associated with variation in costs. RESULTS: Based on a sample of 302 patients, the total annual direct costs for chronic LBP per patient were estimated at 3,100 Euros, or 2,900 United States dollars, in 2002 prices, constituting 15% of the total annual LBP costs per patient. The indirect costs (mainly productivity loss because of lost work days) were estimated at 17,600 Euros (16,600 United States dollars) per patient, or 85% of the total LBP costs per patient. Direct and indirect costs were positively correlated with disease severity, disease duration, and female gender. The mean Roland & Morris score was 12.2, and the Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short Form physical and mental summary component scores were 35.2 and 41.6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Sweden, the indirect costs for chronic LBP appear to be substantially higher than the direct costs for pharmaceuticals, medical visits, physiotherapy, andhospitalizations. The high indirect costs indicate that more effective treatments for chronic LBP could potentially lead to cost savings even if the therapy costs were higher.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia
5.
Am J Sports Med ; 32(6): 1499-503, 2004 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15310577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of sports massage is very common in the athletic community. However, only a few studies have shown any therapeutic effect of massage. HYPOTHESIS: Sports massage can improve the recovery after eccentric exercise. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Sixteen subjects performed 300 maximal eccentric contractions of the quadriceps muscle bilaterally. Massage was given to 1 leg, whereas the other leg served as a control. Subjects were treated once daily for 3 days. Maximal strength was tested on a Kin-Com dynamometer, and functional tests were based on 1-leg long jumps. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: There was a marked loss of strength and function of the quadriceps directly after exercise and on the third day after exercise. The massage treatment did not affect the level or duration of pain or the loss of strength or function following exercise. CONCLUSION: Sports massage could not improve the recovery after eccentric exercise.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Masaje , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Dolor/prevención & control , Adulto , Traumatismos en Atletas/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Pierna/fisiología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA