Prognostic impact of secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass grafting-insights from the TiCAB trial.

OBJECTIVES: There are disparities in the adherence to guideline-recommended therapies after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We therefore sought to evaluate the effect of guideline-adherent medical secondary prevention on 1-year outcome after CABG. METHODS: Data were taken from the randomized 'Ticagrelor in CABG' trial. From April 2013 until April 2017, patients who underwent CABG were included. For the present analysis, we compared patients who were treated with optimal medical secondary prevention with those where 1 or more of the recommended medications were missing. RESULTS: Follow-up data at 12 months were available in 1807 patients. About half (54%) of them were treated with optimal secondary prevention. All-cause mortality [0.5% vs 3.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.14 (0.05-0.37), P < 0.01], cardiovascular mortality [0.1% vs 1.7%, HR 0.06 (0.01-0.46), P = 0.007] and major adverse events [6.5% vs 11.5%, HR 0.54 (0.39-0.74), P < 0.01] were significantly lower in the group with optimal secondary prevention. The multivariable model for the primary end point based on binary concordance to guideline recommended therapy identified 3 independent factors: adherence to guideline recommended therapy [HR 0.55 (0.39-0.78), P < 0.001]; normal renal function [HR 0.99 (0.98-0.99), P = 0.040]; and off-pump surgery [HR 2.06 (1.02-4.18), P = 0.045]. CONCLUSIONS: Only every second patient receives optimal secondary prevention after CABG. Guideline adherent secondary prevention therapy is associated with lower mid-term mortality and less adverse cardiovascular events after 12 months.

Atrial appendage closure in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: industry-independent single-centre study.

AIMS: To evaluate outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in a consecutive, industry-independent registry associated with periprocedural success and complications during long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: For this analysis, we included patients who underwent transcatheter LAAC from January 2014 to December 2019 at the University Heart Center in Lübeck, Germany, and compared patients with presence of CHF defined as patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%), patients with a mid-range LVEF (LVEF 41-49%), patients with diastolic dysfunction and preserved LVEF (LVEF ≥ 50%), and patients with right-sided heart failure and impaired right ventricular function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion < 17) to patients undergoing LAAC with no CHF. Primary endpoints were defined as periprocedural complications, and complications during long-term follow-up presented as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). A total of 300 consecutive patients underwent LAAC. Of these, 96 patients in the CHF group were compared with 204 patients in the non-CHF group. Implantation success was lower in CHF group in comparison with non-CHF group (99.5% vs. 96%, P = 0.038); otherwise, there were no differences in periprocedural complications between groups. Patients with CHF showed a significantly higher incidence of MACCE rate (31.9% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.002) and more deaths (24.2% vs. 7%, P ≤ 0.001) during long-term follow-up. In Cox multivariable regression analysis, CHF was an independent predictor of mortality after LAAC implantation at long-term follow-up (hazard ratio 3.23, 95% confidence intervals 1.52-6.86, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of LAAC devices in patients with non-valvular AF and CHF is safe. The increased mortality in patients with CHF compared with patients without CHF during the long-term follow-up is mainly attributed to comorbidities associated with CHF.

Comparison between Amulet and Watchman left atrial appendage closure devices: A real-world, single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Data reporting a head-to-head comparison between Amulet and Watchman devices are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the Watchman™ versus Amulet™ left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices in a consecutive, industry-independent registry. METHODS: Patients who underwent LAAC using Watchman or Amulet devices from January 2014 to December 2019 at the University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany were included in the present analysis. Primary endpoints included periprocedural complications (in-hospital death, pericardial tamponade, device embolization, stroke, major bleeding and vascular access complications), and complications during long-term follow-up (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, thromboembolism, device thrombus, bleeding and death). RESULTS: After matching the patients for age (±5 years), gender, CHA2DS2Vasc score (±1) and HASBLED score (±1), each of the Watchman and the Amulet groups included 113 patients. Patients in the Amulet group had significantly more periprocedural complications (2.7% vs 10.6%, p = 0.029; respectively) and more major bleeding complications (0% vs 5.3%, p = 0.029; respectively). During long-term follow-up, the rate of events was comparable between the Watchman and Amulet groups (18.3% versus 20.8%, p = 0.729; respectively). CONCLUSION: Amulet LAAC device was associated with increased periprocedural complications as compared to Watchman LAAC device. On long-term follow-up, both devices showed comparable efficacy and safety.

Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential beneficial effect of preoperative face-to-face group education after colonic surgery in a pre-existing ERAS pathway environment. METHODS: Patients were randomized to cohorts for 3 weeks to either the standard preoperative counseling by the colorectal surgeon and the nurse practitioner (control group) or to the additional group education (intervention group). Patients scored EORTC-QLQ-info25 after the preoperative information was completed and the EORTC-QLQ-30 and EORTC-QLQ-29 prior to surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: A significantly better level of information was scored considering the expectations and patient involvement in the intervention group. This coincided with a significant reduction of the in-hospital stay, enhanced return to the preoperative global health status, and persistent improved body image after surgery. CONCLUSION: By investing in the preoperative group education patients develop more realistic expectations resulting in a perceived improved quality of life and body image 1 month after operation coinciding with a statistically significant reduction in duration of in-hospital stay in this study.

Impact of Morphine Treatment on Infarct Size and Reperfusion Injury in Acute Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Current evidence regarding the effect of intravenous morphine administration on reperfusion injury and/or cardioprotection in patients with myocardial infarction is conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of morphine administration, on infarct size and reperfusion injury assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in a large multicenter ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. In total, 734 STEMI patients reperfused by primary percutaneous coronary intervention <12 h after symptom onset underwent CMR imaging at eight centers for assessment of myocardial damage. Intravenous morphine administration was recorded in all patients. CMR was completed within one week after infarction using a standardized protocol. The clinical endpoint of the study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 12 months after infarction. Intravenous morphine was administered in 61.8% (n = 454) of all patients. There were no differences in infarct size (17%LV, interquartile range [IQR] 8-25%LV versus 16%LV, IQR 8-26%LV, p = 0.67) and microvascular obstruction (p = 0.92) in patients with versus without morphine administration. In the subgroup of patients with early reperfusion within 120 min and reduced flow of the infarcted vessel (TIMI-flow ≤2 before PCI) morphine administration resulted in significantly smaller infarcts (12%LV, IQR 12-19 versus 19%LV, IQR 10-29, p = 0.035) and reduced microvascular obstruction (p = 0.003). Morphine administration had no effect on hard clinical endpoints (log-rank test p = 0.74) and was not an independent predictor of clinical outcome in Cox regression analysis. In our large multicenter CMR study, morphine administration did not have a negative effect on myocardial damage or clinical prognosis in acute reperfused STEMI. In patients, presenting early ( ≤120 min) morphine may have a cardioprotective effect as reflected by smaller infarcts; but this finding has to be assessed in further well-designed clinical studies.

[Lemierre syndrome - a frequently overlooked infectious disease]. / Das Lemierre-Syndrom ­ eine häufig übersehene Infektionserkrankung.

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: We report the case of a 30 years old man presenting with cough and a sore throat. The physical examination showed a painful neck, a scleral icterus, inflammation of the posterior pharyngeal wall and tonsils. INVESTIGATIONS: Initial laboratory studies revealed an increase in white blood cells, a pronounced reduction of platelets, an elevated CRP and renal failure. Ultrasound examination of his neck showed a thrombosis of the jugular vein. Blood cultures were drawn and led to the identification of fusobacterium necrophorum. DIAGNOSIS: Lemierre's Syndrom accompanied by purulent abscess-forming thrombophlebitis of the right external jugular vein. TREATMENT AND COURSE: Antibiotic therapy was started with ceftazidime plus levofloxacin and was adjusted to ampicillin plus clindamycin. As resistance to ampicillin was detected, therapy was readjusted to meropenem. Inflammation, renal parameters, transaminases and bilirubin decreased. The patient improved clinically and was discharged after 19 days in hospital. CONCLUSION: The Lemierre's Syndrome is a rare and often underdiagnosed septic disease followed on pharyngeal infections leading to purulent thromboplebitis of small veins. An appropriate antibiotic therapy is mandatory for a successful treatment of this disease.

Randomized trial of ticagrelor vs. aspirin in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: the TiCAB trial.

AIMS: The antiplatelet treatment strategy providing optimal balance between thrombotic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unclear. We prospectively compared the efficacy of ticagrelor and aspirin after CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned in double-blind fashion patients scheduled for CABG to either ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or 100 mg aspirin (1:1) once daily. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, and stroke 12 months after CABG. The main safety endpoint was based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification, defined as BARC ≥4 for periprocedural and hospital stay-related bleedings and BARC ≥3 for post-discharge bleedings. The study was prematurely halted after recruitment of 1859 out of 3850 planned patients. Twelve months after CABG, the primary endpoint occurred in 86 out of 931 patients (9.7%) in the ticagrelor group and in 73 out of 928 patients (8.2%) in the aspirin group [hazard ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.62; P = 0.28]. All-cause mortality (ticagrelor 2.5% vs. aspirin 2.6%, hazard ratio 0.96, CI 0.53-1.72; P = 0.89), cardiovascular death (ticagrelor 1.2% vs. aspirin 1.4%, hazard ratio 0.85, CI 0.38-1.89; P = 0.68), MI (ticagrelor 2.1% vs. aspirin 3.4%, hazard ratio 0.63, CI 0.36-1.12, P = 0.12), and stroke (ticagrelor 3.1% vs. 2.6%, hazard ratio 1.21, CI 0.70-2.08; P = 0.49), showed no significant difference between the ticagrelor and aspirin group. The main safety endpoint was also not significantly different (ticagrelor 3.7% vs. aspirin 3.2%, hazard ratio 1.17, CI 0.71-1.92; P = 0.53). CONCLUSION: In this prematurely terminated and thus underpowered randomized trial of ticagrelor vs. aspirin in patients after CABG no significant differences in major cardiovascular events or major bleeding could be demonstrated. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01755520.

A randomized, parallel group, double-blind study of ticagrelor compared with aspirin for prevention of vascular events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft operation: Rationale and design of the Ticagrelor in CABG (TiCAB) trial: An Investigator-Initiated trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with coronary artery disease undergoing coronary bypass surgery, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) currently represents the gold standard of antiplatelet treatment. However, adverse cardiovascular event rates in the first year after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) still exceed 10%. Graft failure, which is predominantly mediated by platelet aggregation, has been identified as a major contributing factor in this context. Therefore, intensified platelet inhibition is likely to be beneficial. Ticagrelor, an oral, reversibly binding and direct-acting P2Y12 receptor antagonist, provides a rapid, competent, and consistent platelet inhibition and has shown beneficial results compared with clopidogrel in the subset of patients undergoing bypass surgery in a large previous trial. HYPOTHESIS: Ticagrelor is superior to ASA for the prevention of major cardiovascular events within 1 year after CABG. STUDY DESIGN: The TiCAB trial (NCT01755520) is a multicenter, phase III, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial comparing ticagrelor with ASA for the prevention of major cardiovascular events within 12 months after CABG. Patients undergoing CABG will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or ASA 100 mg once daily. The study medication will be started within 24 hours after surgery and maintained for 12 months. The primary end point is the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization at 12 months after CABG. The sample size is based on an expected event rate of 13% of the primary end point within the first 12 months after randomization in the control group, a 2-sided α level of .0492 (to preserve the overall significance level of .05 after planned interim analysis), a power of 0.80%, 2-sided testing, and an expected relative risk of 0.775 in the active group compared with the control group and a dropout rate of 2%. According to power calculations based on a superiority design for ticagrelor, it is estimated that 3,850 patients should be enrolled. SUMMARY: There is clinical equipoise on the issue of optimal platelet inhibition after CABG. The TiCAB trial will provide a pivotal comparison of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared with ASA after CABG.

Impact of Initial Culprit Vessel Flow on Infarct Size, Microvascular Obstruction, and Myocardial Salvage in Acute Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Data on the impact of initial Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow in the culprit coronary artery on myocardial damage after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. Aim of this multicenter study was, therefore, to elucidate the impact of TIMI flow grade before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on infarct size (IS), myocardial salvage index (MSI), and microvascular obstruction (MVO) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with STEMI. We enrolled 738 patients with STEMI reperfused by primary PCI within 12 hours after symptom onset at 8 centers. Impaired coronary flow was defined as an initial coronary TIMI flow grade ≤1, whereas preserved coronary flow was defined as an initial coronary TIMI flow grade ≥2. CMR was performed in median 3 days (interquartile range 2 to 4 days) after infarction using a standardized infarction protocol. IS, MVO, and MSI were determined in central core laboratory-masked analyses. The primary clinical end point of the study was the time to major adverse cardiac events defined as death, reinfarction, and new onset of heart failure within 12 months after infarction. TIMI flow ≤1 before PCI was present in 507 patients (68.7%) and was significantly associated with larger IS (19% left ventricular [LV] vs 9% LV; p <0.001), less MSI (0.46 vs 0.65; p <0.001), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (49% vs 55%; p <0.001), and a higher extent of MVO (0.6% LV vs 0.0% LV; p <0.001). Moreover, TIMI flow before PCI was identified as an independent predictor of IS, MVO, and MSI. However, there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac event rates between groups (6.1% vs 7.5%; p = 0.48). In conclusion, TIMI flow pre-PCI is reversely associated with myocardial injury and is an independent predictor of myocardial damage assessed by CMR.

Vascular effects of paclitaxel following drug-eluting balloon angioplasty in a porcine coronary model: the importance of excipients.

AIMS: The vascular effects of drug- eluting balloon (DEB) deployment in the absence of coronary stents have not been characterised. This study evaluated potential vascular effects of paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons using different excipients in the absence of additional stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total 45 porcine arteries were treated with paclitaxel-coated DEBs using four different excipients (all 3.0 µg/mm2): A) iopromide (n=9), B) ATEC excipient (n=8), C) BTHC excipient (n=10), D) lecithine excipient (n=10). Uncoated bare angioplasty balloons served as controls (n=8). Histology, histomorphometry, and quantitative angiography analysis were performed 28 days following intervention. Tissue concentrations of paclitaxel were measured in selected animals using BTHC excipient (n=39 arteries) and reached maximum concentrations of 165 ng/mg 30 min after delivery in coronary target tissue. There were no differences in efficacy endpoints using histomorphology or quantitative angiography between groups. In contrast, however, treatment with DEBs using BTHC excipient or iopromide was associated with increased fibrin deposition and inflammation indicating delayed vascular healing. DEBs using lecithin excipient or uncoated angioplasty balloons did not induce any comparable vascular effects. CONCLUSIONS: Effective excipients are necessary to accomplish successful balloon facilitated paclitaxel delivery, which is associated with delayed vascular healing as a sign of successful drug transfer. The potential of DEBs to diminish restenosis following angioplasty may be insufficient in the absence of additional stents.

Intraventricular stent loss after interventional treatment of a coronary dissection--a case report.

The introduction of stents for treatment of coronary lesions markedly improved the outcome of coronary interventions. We report on a female patient who was admitted to our hospital with acute coronary syndrome and stent loss into the left ventricle during coronary intervention performed in another hospital. Stent loss is a very rare but potentially lethal complication of a stent implantation.

Candesartan cilexetil: an update.

INTRODUCTION: Candesartan cilexetil is one of the most often-used first-line drugs regarding the management of arterial hypertension. Moreover, this drug has proven its effectiveness in chronic heart failure and exerts beneficial effects in diabetes, stroke, dementia and atrial fibrillation. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the use of candesartan cilexetil in Phase II and Phase III trials and their implications for clinical usage in the treatment of arterial hypertension and heart failure. The usage of candesartan cilexetil in patients with stroke, migraine or atrial fibrillation, hypertrophy obstructive or nonobstructive cardiomyopathy and diabetic or non diabetic renal diseases will be discussed. Relevant publications were identified by an extensive Medline search. EXPERT OPINION: Candesartan cilexetil is a highly effective ARB for the treatment of arterial hypertension and heart failure. Also, recent trials have suggested beneficial effects in diabetic patients, patients with nondiabetic renal diseases, stroke, migraine and atrial fibrillation.

Drug eluting balloons for the treatment of coronary artery disease: What can we expect?

Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent an enhancement of the therapeutic repertoire for the interventional cardiologist. The therapeutic concept of DEBs is promising, notably on the basis of initial studies in patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). At present, however, a number of questions regarding long-term efficacy and safety remain, specifically in indications other than diffuse ISR. The results of the evaluation of different substances, balloon systems and clinical indications will determine the long-term success of DEBs.

Anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary angiography and interventions.

The administration of heparins (unfractionated or fractionated) represents the current standard as anticoagulant treatment during percutaneous coronary intervention in different clinical settings (elective cases and acute coronary syndrome). Since the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is expected to range between 0.1 and 5%, the application of an appropriate anticoagulant agent has become a mandatory issue. This review will provide current pathophysiological insights of HIT as well as contemporary alternative anticoagulant strategies during PCI in patients with or at risk of HIT.

Antiplatelet effects of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel are not attenuated in patients receiving atorvastatin or simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary artery stenting.

AIMS: To test prospectively whether the antiplatelet effect of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is attenuated in patients receiving atorvastatin and simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary artery stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood samples were obtained at least 2 h after receiving 100 mg aspirin and 600 mg clopidogrel and prior to coronary stenting from 90 patients without statin therapy and 90 patients with statin (atorvastatin and simvastatin) therapy for at least 4 weeks. Maximal and residual platelet aggregation was evaluated with optical aggregometry in response to ADP (5 and 20 micromol/l). Surface expression of IIb/IIIa (CD61) and P-selectin (CD62) was assessed with whole blood flow-cytometry at baseline and following stimulation (5 and 20 micromol/l ADP). Inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was not impaired in the presence of concomitant statin therapy. Moreover, patients with and without statin therapy did not differ in respect to all flow-cytometric parameters obtained. CONCLUSION: The antiplatelet effect of a high, 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is not diminished in patients receiving atorvastatin and simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary stenting.

Loading with 600 mg clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease with and without chronic clopidogrel therapy.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether further suppression of platelet function can be achieved with clopidogrel beyond that provided by currently recommended loading and maintenance doses. We performed a comparative assessment of the antiplatelet effects of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel given to patients with and without chronic clopidogrel therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Those eligible for this prospective study were aspirin-treated patients with suspected or documented coronary artery disease admitted to hospital for coronary angiography. Two series of 20 consecutive patients each were assessed in this study. The first series included patients who had never received clopidogrel (first-use group); the second series included patients on chronic therapy with a daily dose of 75 mg clopidogrel for > or =1 month (chronic therapy group). Blood samples were drawn before and 6 hours after oral administration of 600 mg clopidogrel for aggregometry and flow cytometry studies. In the first-use group, loading with 600 mg clopidogrel inhibited ADP 5 micromol/L-induced platelet aggregation from 90+/-9% to 51+/-19% (P<0.001). In the chronic therapy group, loading with 600 mg clopidogrel yielded further inhibition of ADP 5 micromol/L-induced platelet aggregation in addition to that achieved by the maintenance dose of 75 mg/d, from 52+/-14% to 33+/-12% (P<0.001). In both groups, 600 mg clopidogrel loading significantly inhibited ADP-induced expression of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa and P-selectin receptors. CONCLUSIONS: Further platelet inhibition can be achieved with clopidogrel in addition to that provided by currently recommended loading and maintenance doses. Higher doses may be warranted after assessment of their clinical efficacy and safety.