Experimental magnesium phosphate cement paste increases torque of trochanteric fixation nail advanced™ blades in human femoral heads.

BACKGROUND: The use of polymethylmethacrylate cement for in-situ implant augmentation has considerable disadvantages: it is potentially cytotoxic, exothermic and non-degradable. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to develop a magnesium phosphate cement which meets the requirements for in-situ implant augmentation as an alternative. Secondly, this experimental cement was compared to commercial bone cements in a biomechanical test set-up using augmented femoral head blades. METHODS: A total of 40 human femoral heads were obtained from patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. After bone mineral density was quantified, specimens were assigned to four treatment groups. A blade of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced™ was inserted into each specimen and augmented with either Traumacem™ V+, Paste-CPC, the experimental magnesium phosphate cement or no cement. A rotational load-to-failure-test (0° to 90°) was performed. FINDINGS: A conventional two-component magnesium phosphate cement failed in-situ implant augmentation consistently due to filter pressing. Only a glycerol-based magnesium phosphate paste was suitable for the augmentation of femoral head blades. While the blades augmented with Traumacem™ V+ yielded the highest maximum torque overall (22.1 Nm), the blades augmented with Paste-CPC and the magnesium phosphate paste also showed higher maximum torque values (15.8 and 12.8 Nm) than the control group (10.8 Nm). INTERPRETATION: This study shows for the first time the development of a degradable magnesium phosphate cement paste which fulfills the requirements for in-situ implant augmentation. Simultaneously, a 48% increase in stability is demonstrated for a scenario where implant anchorage is difficult in osteoporotic bone.

Augmentation of suture anchors with magnesium phosphate cement - Simple technique with striking effect.

BACKGROUND: Suture anchors have a large field of application in orthopedic trauma surgery like the refixation of patellar, quadriceps and Achilles tendon or the treatment of rotator cuff tears. The fixation of suture anchors in osteoporotic bone is difficult, a problem that becomes increasingly relevant in the elderly. METHODS: Two types of suture anchors: 1.) Titanium CorkScrew Fast Track II with a knotted eyelet and 2.) polyether ether ketone (PEEK) SwiveLock C with a knotless eyelet were chosen for evaluation in open cell bone blocks with densities of 5-20 pcf supplied by Sawbones AB. A pilot hole of 7 mm diameter and 20 mm depth was drilled in the bone blocks and filled with an experimental drillable magnesium phosphate cement (powder: 92.5 wt% Mg3(PO4)2, 7.5 wt% MgO, liquid: 25 wt% phytic acid (C6H18O24P6)). Anchors were then inserted into the cement and allowed to cure for 24 h (37 °C, 100% humidity) before pullout testing was conducted with a material testing machine. Suture anchors inserted in the blocks after predrilling and tapping served as control. RESULTS: Through augmentation with magnesium phosphate cement pullout strength and stiffness of the suture anchors could be significantly increased in all bone blocks up to 22-fold. CorkScrew anchors failed by rupture of the eyelet with higher pullout strengths, whereas no failure of SwiveLock C anchors could be observed when reinforced with additional FibreWire at the tip. CONCLUSIONS: We present a simple technique, whereby pullout strength of suture anchors can be significantly increased in bone with compromised density. The experimental resorbable and drillable magnesium phosphate cement proved to be effective in resisting tensile load, dispersing in the adjacent bone, and thus increasing the bone-anchor contact surface. Therefore, the experimental magnesium phosphate cement is a promising candidate for clinical application in the numerous scenarios mentioned.

Experimental Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Cement Is a Promising Alternative to Conventional Bone Cements.

Clinically used mineral bone cements lack high strength values, absorbability and drillability. Therefore, magnesium phosphate cements have recently received increasing attention as they unify a high mechanical performance with presumed degradation in vivo. To obtain a drillable cement formulation, farringtonite (Mg3(PO4)2) and magnesium oxide (MgO) were modified with the setting retardant phytic acid (C6H18O24P6). In a pre-testing series, 13 different compositions of magnesium phosphate cements were analyzed concentrating on the clinical demands for application. Of these 13 composites, two cement formulations with different phytic acid content (22.5 wt% and 25 wt%) were identified to meet clinical demands. Both formulations were evaluated in terms of setting time, injectability, compressive strength, screw pullout tests and biomechanical tests in a clinically relevant fracture model. The cements were used as bone filler of a metaphyseal bone defect alone, and in combination with screws drilled through the cement. Both formulations achieved a setting time of 5 min 30 s and an injectability of 100%. Compressive strength was shown to be ~12-13 MPa and the overall displacement of the reduced fracture was <2 mm with and without screws. Maximum load until reduced fracture failure was ~2600 N for the cements only and ~3800 N for the combination with screws. Two new compositions of magnesium phosphate cements revealed high strength in clinically relevant biomechanical test set-ups and add clinically desired characteristics to its strength such as injectability and drillability.

The Influence of Iodine-Impregnated Incision Drapes on the Bacterial Contamination of Scalpel Blades in Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a disastrous and feared complication in arthroplasty. Over the past decades, surgeons have tried to lower infection rates through all sorts of improvements. At present, it is impossible to reduce the risk to zero. As the contamination of surgical instruments and the surgical field has been identified as a remaining gap prone for infection, scalpel blades among others have become a focal point of several studies. This study is the first to compare the effect of adhesive incision drapes on contamination rates of scalpel blades in primary arthroplasty of the hip and knee. METHODS: A total of 344 microbiologic blade culture results from 2 study groups with and without drape usage and 1 group with known PJI were analyzed and compared to histopathologic and microbiologic tissue results. RESULTS: In 78% of all positive cultures, the bacteria were part of the local skin flora. The contamination rate for the skin blades with a drape was 3.81% vs 12.19% without drape usage. A significant difference was determined between positive skin blade culture results incision drape usage (P = .031). The different pathogens likely responsible for the PJI correlated with the deep blade cultures (P ≤ .01). The overall contamination rate of surgical blades (1.37%) is comparatively low to the results obtained from other surgical equipment in literature. None of those blade-positive patients developed a surgical site infection during 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Iodine-impregnated incision drapes are able to reduce surgical skin blade contamination. Further studies may be needed to assess the relationship between blade contamination and surgical site infections.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Promising Different Bone Substitutes in a Clinically Relevant Test Set-Up.

(1) Background: Bone substitutes are essential in orthopaedic surgery to fill up large bone defects. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare diverse bone fillers biomechanically to each other in a clinical-relevant test set-up and to detect differences in stability and handling for clinical use. (2) Methods: This study combined compressive strength tests and screw pullout-tests with dynamic tests of bone substitutes in a clinical-relevant biomechanical fracture model. Beyond well-established bone fillers (ChronOSTM Inject and Graftys® Quickset), two newly designed bone substitutes, a magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) and a drillable hydrogel reinforced calcium phosphate cement (CPC), were investigated. (3) Results: The drillable CPC revealed a comparable displacement of the fracture and maximum load to its commercial counterpart (Graftys® Quickset) in the clinically relevant biomechanical model, even though compressive strength and screw pullout force were higher using Graftys®. (4) Conclusions: The in-house-prepared cement allowed unproblematic drilling after replenishment without a negative influence on the stability. A new, promising bone substitute is the MPC, which showed the best overall results of all four cement types in the pure material tests (highest compressive strength and screw pullout force) as well as in the clinically relevant fracture model (lowest displacement and highest maximum load). The low viscosity enabled a very effective interdigitation to the spongiosa and a complete filling up of the defect, resulting in this demonstrated high stability. In conclusion, the two in-house-developed bone fillers revealed overall good results and are budding new developments for clinical use.

How safe is minimally invasive pedicle screw placement for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures?

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of patients who underwent minimally invasive posterior instrumentation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in patients with unstable thoracic and lumbar spine fractures using the conventional fluoroscopy technique. Although wound infection, haematoma, and new neurological deficit due to screw malplacement remain a common source of morbidity, estimates of their rates of occurrence remain relatively limited. METHODS: 2052 percutaneous pedicle screws in 433 consecutive patients were evaluated. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was based on evaluation of axial 3-mm slice computed tomography scans. Morbidity and mortality data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 2029 of 2052 screws (99%) had a good or excellent position. 5 screws (0.2%) showed a higher grade violation of the medial pedicle wall. Seven patients (1.8%) needed revision due to screw malposition (3 pat.), surgical site infection, postoperative haematoma, implant failure (2 pat.), and technical difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive transpedicular instrumentation is an accurate, reliable, and safe procedure to treat thoracic and lumbar spine fractures.

Bone substitute first or screws first? A biomechanical comparison of two operative techniques for tibial-head depression fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate a drillable and injectable bone substitute (calcium phosphate cement) and the operative technique enabled by the drillable option in a new biomechanical fracture model for tibial depression fractures in synthetic bones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral depression fractures of the tibial plateau (AO 41-B2, Schatzker III) were created in a biomechanical fracture model in three different synthetic bones (Sawbone 3401, Synbone 1110/1116). Reproducible fractures were generated employing Synbone 1110, which exhibited a comparable strength to human osteoporotic bones and was used for the further experiments. After reduction of the fractures, the stabilization was performed with two different operative techniques. In group 1, first an osteosynthesis with four screws was performed and then the metaphyseal defect was filled up with calcium phosphate cement (Norian drillable). In group 2, initially the filling up with Norian drillable was done enabling a complete filling of the defect, followed by placing of the screws. Displacement under cyclic loading with 250 N for 3,000 cycles, stiffness, and maximum load in load-to-failure tests were determined. RESULTS: A comparison of the two operative techniques of stabilization showed a distinctly lower displacement and higher stiffness for group 2 when the defect was filled up first. For the maximum load, no significant differences could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: A complete filling of the defect by first applying the calcium phosphate cement significantly reduces the secondary loss of reduction of the depression fracture fragment under cyclic loading with a clinically relevant partial weight bearing. The beneficial effects of drillable calcium phosphate cement may also be transferable to defects other than tibial-head depression fractures.