Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy and Safety of a Romiplostim Biosimilar in Chronic Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patients.

Romiplostim (Nplate®, Amgen Inc.) is an orphan drug approved for the treatment of chronic refractory immune thrombolytic purpura (ITP) in adult and pediatric patients. Limited availability of pharmacokinetic (PK) data and large inter- and intra-subject variability in PK and platelet response is a challenge in the clinical development of a romiplostim biosimilar. We compared pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD)/efficacy, and safety of a romiplostim biosimilar with Nplate in 24 patients with ITP following a single 3 µg/kg dose, and assessed efficacy of the romiplostim biosimilar at a titrated dose range of 1-5 µg/kg in 50 patients with ITP. The PK of the romiplostim biosimilar did not differ compared to the PK of Nplate, and PD/efficacy responses were similar between the products following the single dose. The romiplostim biosimilar showed historically comparable PD/efficacy with Nplate over 8 weeks when treated at the titrated dose range. It was well tolerated in both the studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-021-01431-y.

A review of use errors reported in human factor validation studies of biological combination products.

Drug-device combination products should be safe and effective for intended uses by intended users under intended use environment during human factor (HF) studies. All known use errors and use-related problems should be considered during design of device and use-related risk analysis. Availability of such information in a compiled manner is scarce. This review compiles information of use errors reported during HF validation studies of biological combination products (drug + device) approved by USFDA's Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research between 21 June 2011 and 31 December 2019. Information regarding product, indication, type of devices, use errors, root causes and mitigation strategies were collected from published documents. Total 280 use errors were reported during HF validation studies of 39 devices across 5 categories. Overall approach and methodology for use error data collection during HF validation studies was in line with the US FDA recommendations. Performance of participants for critical and essential tasks was evaluated during HF validation studies via simulated use assessment, knowledge task assessment and interview. The root causes for use errors reported during HF validation studies were identified and use errors were mitigated by suitable corrective measures. Instructions for use clarification/improvement and labelling improvement were the most common mitigation strategies implemented across devices.

Denosumab biosimilar in postmenopausal osteoporotic women: A randomized, assessor-blind, active-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study assessed the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and immunogenicity profiles of denosumab-biosimilar and denosumab-reference in postmenopausal osteoporotic women from India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, assessor-blind, active-control, multicenter trial, 114 patients were randomly allocated to receive denosumab-biosimilar (n = 58) or denosumab-reference (n = 56) at a subcutaneous dose of 60 mg every 6 months, for a year. Vitamin D and oral calcium were given daily. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) change was the primary end point. RESULTS: Of 114 randomized patients, 111 (denosumab-biosimilar, n = 56; denosumab-reference, n = 55) completed the study. All 114 patients were part of safety and immunogenicity analyses, 110 (denosumab-biosimilar, n = 56; denosumab-reference, n = 54) were part of efficacy analysis, and 20 (denosumab-biosimilar, n = 10; denosumab-reference, n = 10) were part of PK analysis. The bone mineral density (BMD) (lumbar spine) percent change at 1 year with denosumab-biosimilar and denosumab-reference (7.22 vs. 7.62; difference:-0.40; 95% confidence interval: -5.92, 5.12) showed no statistically relevant difference. Likewise, alkaline phosphatase (bone-specific) and PK parameters also did not show statistically relevant differences. Adverse events were reported in 44.83% of patients on denosumab-biosimilar versus 33.93% of patients on denosumab-reference; most events were mild or moderate and not related to the study drugs. No patients showed anti-denosumab antibody positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab-biosimilar and denosumab-reference showed biosimilarity in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Availability of denosumab-biosimilar provides a treatment alternative for patients.

Safety and efficacy of Razumab™ (world's first biosimilar ranibizumab) in wet age-related macular degeneration: a post-marketing, prospective ASSET study.

BACKGROUND: Razumab™ (world's first biosimilar ranibizumab) is approved for several macular disorders including wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of biosimilar ranibizumab in wet AMD. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, rAnibizumab bioSimilar Safety Efficacy postmarkeTing (ASSET) study enrolled patients aged ≥ 50 years with wet AMD having best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 20/40 and 20/320. The patients received intravitreal biosimilar ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and immunoreactivity after 6 months. The efficacy endpoints were the proportion of patients who lose fewer than 15 letters, increase in BCVA, change in central retinal thickness (CRT), and change in Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) score, from baseline to 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 126 enrolled patients, majority (95.24%) of the patients received all 6 doses of biosimilar ranibizumab (total 3 mg). Nineteen AEs were reported (n = 16; 12.7%); majority (78.9%) were mild. There were no serious AEs reported, except one AE of death which was unrelated to the study drug. None of the patients discontinued the study due to an AE. The most common ocular AE was increase in intraocular pressure (4 events) and non-ocular AE was pyrexia (5 events). A total of 7.9% (10/126) patients prior to dosing and 7.1% (9/126) patients post-treatment were positive for anti-ranibizumab antibodies. No AEs suggestive of immunogenicity were noted. At 24-weeks, 97.60% patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 125) and 97.41% patients in the per-protocol (PP) population (N = 116) lost < 15 letters from baseline visual acuity. In the ITT and PP populations, 31.20% and 32.76% patients, respectively, showed improved visual acuity by ≥ 15 letters. Significant improvements in BCVA (mean difference: 8.8, 9.2, p < 0.001 for ITT, PP) and VFQ-25 (8.5, 9.2, p < 0.001 for ITT, PP) were seen; CRT reduced significantly (125 µm, 119.3 µm, p < 0.001 for ITT, PP). CONCLUSION: Razumab™ (world's first biosimilar ranibizumab) was well-tolerated without new safety concerns and significantly improved visual acuity in wet AMD patients. Trial registration CTRI/2016/03/006739. Registered 18 March 2016-Prospectively registered, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=13141&EncHid=&userName=2016/03/006739.

Regulatory Approval Scenario of Biosimilars in Pediatric Patients in the United States and European Union.

Regulatory agencies of the USA and European Union (EU) have introduced multiple guidelines in the last decade to standardize and accelerate biosimilar development. As a result, a large number of biosimilars are being approved in the USA and EU. In the present review, we identified the biosimilars and their corresponding reference biologics approved for pediatrics in the USA and EU, and then assessed their approval details. In the USA, a biosimilar applicant needs to submit an initial pediatric study plan under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA). We found that the PREA requirements of a pediatric assessment for biosimilars were waived where the reference biologics were not approved for one or more pediatric age groups for an indication. The PREA requirements of a pediatric assessment were deferred if the indication was under orphan drug exclusivity or a pediatric formulation was not available. Excluding the waiver and deferral scenarios, biosimilars were approved for the same pediatric indications as those of the reference biologics based on scientific justification extrapolation from the pediatric information of the reference biologics to biosimilars. The applicants were asked to submit a pediatric assessment in the deferred indication and/or develop a dedicated formulation that can ensure accurate dose delivery in pediatric population, as applicable. In the EU, pediatric assessments were not required for biosimilars; hence, all biosimilars (except rituximab) have been approved for the same indications as those of the reference biologics. Biosimilar developers need to be aware of the possible requirement of a pediatric study plan, development of pediatric drug delivery devices, and requirement of human factor studies for a device, to avoid delay in approval of biosimilars in the USA.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Immunogenicity, and Multiple-Dose Immunogenicity of INTP5 (Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar) Versus Reference Pegfilgrastim in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: INTP5 has been developed as a pegfilgrastim biosimilar. Single-dose, crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of INTP5 (pegfilgrastim biosimilar) with reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®, pegfilgrastim-ref) and a multiple-dose, parallel-group study compared the immunogenicity of INTP5 with pegfilgrastim-ref in healthy subjects as part of a complete clinical development plan. METHODS: In the PK/PD study, subjects received a single subcutaneous 6 mg dose of INTP5 and pegfilgrastim-ref (N = 142) separated by a 6-week washout period. The primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve measured from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum measured serum concentration (Cmax) of pegfilgrastim and area under the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) versus time curve from time zero to t (AUEC0-t) and maximum measured ANC (Emax) of baseline non-adjusted ANCs. In the immunogenicity study, subjects received two 6 mg doses of INTP5 (N = 100) or pegfilgrastim-ref (N = 100) separated by 21 days. The primary endpoints were incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The primary PK endpoints [AUC0-∞ (90% CI 108.59-123.11) and Cmax (106.24-118.99)] and the primary PD endpoints [AUEC0-t (99.07-102.32) and Emax (100.24-104.25)] met the acceptance criteria of 80-125%. The incidence of ADAs was 10.6% in the INTP5 arm and 9.0% in the pegfilgrastim-ref arm. The 90% CI for risk difference of the ADA incidence between INTP5 and pegfilgrastim-ref was 1.64% (- 5.40 to 8.68) and was within the 10% margin. No neutralizing antibodies were reported. Immunogenicity did not impact PK/PD parameters and subjects with aberrant PK/PD/safety did not show immunogenicity concerns. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar with INTP5 and pegfilgrastim-ref in both studies. The most common AEs were musculoskeletal pain and headache. CONCLUSION: INTP5 showed PK/PD equivalence with pegfilgrastim-ref following a single dose, no clinically meaningful difference in the immune response following multiple doses, and a comparable safety profile.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single­dose, pharmacokinetic bioequivalence study of INTP24 and bevacizumab in healthy adult men.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence and to compare safety of INTP24 (bevacizumab biosimilar) with that of US-bevacizumab and EU-bevacizumab in healthy male subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study, male subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a single 1 mg/kg intravenous infusion of either INTP24, US-bevacizumab, or EU-bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was area under serum concentration (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞). Secondary endpoints were AUC from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), maximum concentration (Cmax), other PK parameters, immunogenicity, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 117 subjects (39/group) were dosed; 113 subjects (37, 37, and 39 in INPT24, US-bevacizumab, and EU-bevacizumab groups, respectively) completed the study and were included in the PK analysis. Baseline demographics were similar across the three groups. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) of geometric mean ratios (GMR) of ln-transformed AUC0-∞ and Cmax of INTP24 relative to US-bevacizumab and EU-bevacizumab were within the acceptance range of 80%-125% (INTP24 vs. US-bevacizumab, 96.55-112.51% and 99.16-112.79%: INTP24 vs. EU-bevacizumab, 94.84-110.17% and 96.32-109.28%). The 90% CIs of GMRs for AUC0-t was also within 80-125% for INTP24 vs. US-bevacizumab and INTP24 vs. EU-bevacizumab. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar across the three groups. Twenty-one (17.95%) subjects experienced at least one AE and 9 (7.69%) were ADA positive. One treatment-related serious adverse event (varicella zoster infection) was reported in INTP24 group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated PK bioequivalence of INTP24 to US-bevacizumab and EU-bevacizumab in healthy male subjects and showed similar safety and immunogenicity profiles across the treatment groups.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Insulin Tregopil in Relation to Premeal Dosing Time, Between Meal Interval, and Meal Composition in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral insulin tregopil in relation to premeal dosing time, between-meal interval, and meal composition type in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study consisting of 3 sequential cohorts. In Cohort 1, insulin tregopil administered 10 to 20 minutes before a meal resulted in optimal postmeal exposure and demonstrated better postprandial glucose-lowering effect (glucose area under concentration-time curve [AUC]) compared to the 30-minute group. In Cohort 2, insulin tregopil pharmacokinetic exposure (plasma AUC) showed a progressive increase through 4, 5, and 6 hours of between-meal interval. The 6-hour between-meal interval resulted in better absorption of insulin tregopil in comparison to 4- and 5-hour intervals. However, no significant differences were observed in pharmacodynamic parameters except for higher glucose AUC0-180min in the insulin tregopil 4-hour group during the afternoon meal as compared to the morning meal. In Cohort 3, a high-fiber meal had the least impact on insulin tregopil absorption and resulted in the highest reduction in plasma glucose levels in the afternoon. A high-fat meal reduced insulin tregopil absorption in the afternoon meal; however, pharmacodynamic response was not diminished significantly. Insulin tregopil has a rapid onset of action of approximately 10 minutes and, when administered 10 to 20 minutes before a meal, demonstrated up to 13% to 18% reduction in blood glucose levels compared to baseline. A 5-hour between-meal interval minimizes the impact of a meal on absorption of subsequent (afternoon) insulin tregopil dose, and the pharmacodynamic response of insulin tregopil is not altered by meal composition. Insulin tregopil was well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Insights into human factor studies conducted for US FDA-approved biological combination products.

Introduction: With increasing use of biological products and devices, importance of human factor (HF) studies is increasing. The HF study ensures safe and effective use of the device by intended users, for intended uses, under intended use environments.Areas covered: This review compiles information of HF studies conducted for biological combination products (biological products plus device) approved by US FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research between 21 June 2011 and 31 December 2018. Information regarding product, indication, device type, administration frequency, and various aspects related to HF studies was collected from published documents.Expert opinion: Learnings from HF studies and known use-related problems of similar devices should be incorporated in the design of the device and the HF validation study. User profile, group, subgroup, and sample size are important aspects of the HF validation study. Early engagement with US FDA can be helpful to integrate the HF program with the overall device development program. It may not be possible to eliminate all use errors or risks for the device. Any residual risk after an HF validation study should be evaluated, and benefits of the device use should outweigh the residual risk.Abbreviations: BCP: biological combination product; BLA: Biological License Application; CDER: Center of Drug Evaluation and Research; FDA: Food and Drug Administration; FDC: Food Drug and Cosmetic; HCP: healthcare professional; HF: human factor; IFU: instructions for use; NDA: New Drug Application; PFS: pre-filled syringe; PHS: Public Health Service; PI: prescribing information; US: United States.

An update on the animal studies conducted for biosimilar approvals - Regulatory requirement vs actual scenario.

Nonclinical animal studies are considered as an integral part of biosimilar development program to demonstrate similarity and safety. We have compiled, reviewed and summarized animal studies conducted for European Medicines Agency (EMA) and United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) submission from 2006 till December 2018. The commonest animal studies conducted included repeat-dose toxicity study along with toxicokinetic, local tolerance and immunogenicity assessments, while the least common included primary pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, safety pharmacology and single-dose toxicity studies. Animal studies were designed based on pharmacology of the drug, disease condition and innovator studies. Studies mostly used EU-sourced reference products as a comparator. For biosimilars approved both in the US and European Union (EU), similar data packages were submitted to these regions. Despite the regulatory guidelines allowing waiver of animal studies based on analytical data, animal studies have been conducted for almost all the approved biosimilars in the US and EU. There is an increasing need to re-assess the relevance of animal studies to support regulatory approval of biosimilars. Stepwise assessment for biosimilarity and conducting animal studies only if required at the right instance based on residual uncertainties may assist in optimizing animal study requirement for biosimilar development.

Impact of Insulin Tregopil and Its Permeation Enhancer on Pharmacokinetics of Metformin in Healthy Volunteers: Randomized, Open-Label, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study.

Oral insulin tregopil (IN-105; a new drug under development) may be coadministered with oral antidiabetic drugs, such as metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for optimal glycemic control. IN-105 has sodium caprate excipient, a permeation enhancer, for enhancing absorption in the stomach and increasing bioavailability via an oral route. Sodium caprate may increase bioavailability of metformin by a similar mechanism. Therefore, it was necessary to study the effect of IN-105 on pharmacokinetics (PKs) of metformin. In this randomized, open-label, cross-over study, metformin was administered to healthy volunteers receiving IN-105/placebo under fed/fasting conditions. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio of the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf ; fasting and fed) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax ; fed) of metformin were within 0.80-1.25 acceptance range. Under fasting conditions, the upper bound margin of Cmax was just beyond this range (i.e., 1.27) and was concluded as functionally not relevant. There was no clinically significant effect of sodium caprate/IN-105 on PKs of metformin under fasting/fed conditions, and it was safe.

FOXP1 negatively regulates tumor infiltrating lymphocyte migration in human breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: FOXP1, a transcriptional regulator of lymphocyte development, is abnormally expressed in some human tumors. This study investigated FOXP1-mediated regulation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in untreated primary breast cancer (BC). METHODS: FOXP1 expression was analyzed in tissues from primary untreated breast tumors, BC cell lines and the METABRIC gene expression BC dataset. Cytokine and chemokine expression and lymphocyte migration in response to primary tumor supernatants (SN) was compared between FOXP1hi and FOXP1lo primary BC. FINDING: FOXP1 expression was higher in estrogen receptor positive compared to negative BC. FOXP1hi tumors were significantly associated with lower TIL and fewer tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) compared to FOXP1lo BC. Silencing FOXP1 in BC cell lines positively impacted cytokine and chemokine expression with the inverse effect associated with overexpression. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL13, CX3CL, CCL20, IL2, IL21, GZMB and IFNG expression decreased while IL10 and TGFß increased in FOXP1hi compared to FOXP1lo primary BC. Lymphocyte migration using primary BC supernatants detected decreased mobility toward FOXP1hi supernatants. FOXP1lo BC expresses higher levels of chemokines driving TIL migration. The METABRIC gene expression dataset analysis show FOXP1 expression is associated with unfavorable BC outcomes. INTERPRETATION: These data identify FOXP1 as an important negative regulator of immune responses in BC via its regulation of cytokine and chemokine expression. FUND: Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS 3.4513.12F) and Opération Télévie (7.4636.13F and 7.4609.15F), Fonds J.C. Heuson and Fonds Lambeau-Marteaux.

Bevacizumab for eye diseases - Legal, regulatory, and ethical overview.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and pegaptanib are approved treatments for certain eye diseases that occurs especially in the elderly. These drugs are mostly inaccessible due to their high cost. Bevacizumab is a VEGF inhibitor, approved for cancer treatment. Being a cheaper alternative, it is extensively used off-label as an intravitreal injection for the treatment of eye diseases. In this article, we have analyzed similarities and differences between bevacizumab and ranibizumab, and potential long-term safety concerns with off-label use of bevacizumab. We also analyzed legal, regulatory, and ethical background of off-label use and provided recommendations to resolve this issue. Based on the extensive clinical data, actions taken, and recommendations provided by agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, International Council of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom and Thailand regulatory agency, intravitreal bevacizumab has adequate evidence for controlled licensing. Claiming better safety for ranibizumab at the expense of nonaffordability cannot be considered a positive risk-benefit scenario. Intravitreal bevacizumab is being used and will continue to be used off-label, if not regulatory controlled. Licensing will ensure the availability of intravitreal bevacizumab to the patients with eye diseases, without any legal or ethical concerns for the clinicians, and will also assist in generating long-term safety data. Safest delivery formulation and dosage form should be considered for approval. Both the regulatory agency and technical experts should join and take critical decision, which will be a big step forward to making a cost-effective drug available to the public.

Feasibility of developing reliable gene expression modules from FFPE derived RNA profiled on Affymetrix arrays.

The reliability of differential gene expression analysis on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) expression profiles generated using Affymetrix arrays is questionable, due to the high range of percent-present values reported in studies which profiled FFPE samples using this technology. Moreover, the validity of gene-modules derived from external datasets in FFPE microarray expression profiles is unknown. By generating matched gene expression profiles using RNAs derived from fresh-frozen (FF) and FFPE preserved breast tumors with Affymetrix arrays and FF/FFPE RNA specific amplification-and-labeling kits, the reliability of differential expression analysis and the validity of gene modules derived from external datasets were investigated. Specifically, the reliability of differential expression analysis was investigated by developing de-novo ER/HER2 pathway gene-modules from the matched datasets and validating them on external FF/FFPE gene expression datasets using ROC analysis. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of module scores between matched FFPE/frozen datasets was used to measure the reliability of gene-modules derived from external datasets in FFPE expression profiles. Independent of the array/amplification-kit/sample preservation method used, de-novo ER/HER2 gene-modules derived from all matched datasets showed similar prediction performance in the independent validation (AUC range in FFPE dataset; ER: 0.93-0.95, HER2: 0.85-0.91), except for the de-novo ER/HER2 gene-module derived from the FFPE dataset using the 3'IVT kit (AUC range in FFPE dataset; ER: 0.79-0.81, HER2: 0.78). Among the external gene modules considered, roughly ~50% gene modules showed high concordance between expression profiles derived from matching FF and FFPE RNA. The remaining discordant gene modules between FF and FFPE expression profiles showed high concordance within matching FF datasets and within matching FFPE datasets independently, implying that microarrays still require improved amplification-and-sample-preparation protocols for deriving 100% concordant expression profiles from matching FF and FFPE RNA.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence study of a pegfilgrastim biosimilar INTP5 in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: This study compared pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity profiles of INTP5 (a potential pegfilgrastim biosimilar) with that of Neulasta®. METHODS: In this randomised, assessor-blind, crossover study, 344 healthy subjects received single subcutaneous dose of both INTP5 and Neulasta at 3 mg/0.3 ml (n = 172) or 6 mg/0.6 ml (n = 172) dose. The primary endpoints were AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax of pegfilgrastim; and AUEC0-t and Emax of absolute neutrophil count (ANC). RESULTS: All 344 subjects dosed were included in the safety and immunogenicity analyses, and 292 subjects in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. At 6 mg dose, test to reference ratio (90% CI) of AUC0-t was 105.65% (99.60-112.06%), AUC0-∞ was 105.72% (99.55-112.28%) and Cmax was 103.62% (98.19-109.35%); while test to reference ratio (95% CIs) of ANC AUEC0-t was 100.79% (97.75-103.92%) and Emax was 98.70% (95.52-101.98%). Both the primary endpoints met the bioequivalence criteria (CIs within 80-125%). Similarly, at 3 mg dose, these endpoints were within the acceptance range of 80-125%. CD34+ profiles were similar and 95% CIs were within acceptance range at both doses. Adverse events were reported in 54 (15.7%; 8.72% in INTP5 vs. 8.39% in Neulasta) subjects; most events were mild. The incidences of anti-drug antibodies were low and similar between INTP5 and Neulasta and no neutralising antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence was established between INTP5 and Neulasta following 3 and 6 mg doses. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar between INTP5 and Neulasta.

CD73 Promotes Resistance to HER2/ErbB2 Antibody Therapy.

Expression of the ectonucleotidase CD73 by tumor cells, stromal cells, and immune cells is associated in cancer with immune suppression. In this study, we investigated the role of CD73 on the activity of the anti-HER2/ErbB2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab. In a prospective, randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating the activity of trastuzumab, high levels of CD73 gene expression were associated significantly with poor clinical outcome. In contrast, high levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 were associated with improved clinical outcome. In immunocompetent mouse models of HER2/ErbB2-driven breast cancer, CD73 expression by tumor cells and host cells significantly suppressed immune-mediated responses mediated by anti-ErbB2 mAb. Furthermore, anti-CD73 mAb therapy enhanced the activity of anti-ErbB2 mAb to treat engrafted or spontaneous tumors as well as lung metastases. Gene ontology enrichment analysis from gene-expression data revealed a positive association of CD73 expression with extracellular matrix organization, TGFß genes, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) transcription factors and hypoxia-inducible-factor (HIF)-1 gene signature. Human mammary cells treated with TGFß or undergoing EMT upregulated CD73 cell-surface expression, confirming roles for these pathways. In conclusion, our findings establish CD73 in mediating resistance to trastuzumab and provide new insights into how CD73 is regulated in breast cancer. Cancer Res; 77(20); 5652-63. ©2017 AACR.

Biology of breast cancer during pregnancy using genomic profiling.

Breast cancer during pregnancy is rare and is associated with relatively poor prognosis. No information is available on its biological features at the genomic level. Using a dataset of 54 pregnant and 113 non-pregnant breast cancer patients, we evaluated the pattern of hot spot somatic mutations and did transcriptomic profiling using Sequenom and Affymetrix respectively. We performed gene set enrichment analysis to evaluate the pathways associated with diagnosis during pregnancy. We also evaluated the expression of selected cancer-related genes in pregnant and non-pregnant patients and correlated the results with changes occurring in the normal breast using a pregnant murine model. We finally investigated aberrations associated with disease-free survival (DFS). No significant differences in mutations were observed. Of the total number of patients, 18.6% of pregnant and 23% of non-pregnant patients had a PIK3CA mutation. Around 30% of tumors were basal, with no differences in the distribution of breast cancer molecular subtypes between pregnant and non-pregnant patients. Two pathways were enriched in tumors diagnosed during pregnancy: the G protein-coupled receptor pathway and the serotonin receptor pathway (FDR <0.0001). Tumors diagnosed during pregnancy had higher expression of PD1 (PDCD1; P=0.015), PDL1 (CD274; P=0.014), and gene sets related to SRC (P=0.004), IGF1 (P=0.032), and ß-catenin (P=0.019). Their expression increased almost linearly throughout gestation when evaluated on the normal breast using a pregnant mouse model underscoring the potential effect of the breast microenvironment on tumor phenotype. No genes were associated with DFS in a multivariate model, which could be due to low statistical power. Diagnosis during pregnancy impacts the breast cancer transcriptome including potential cancer targets.

Treatment failure with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may experience treatment failure due to adverse effects or a lack of efficacy/resistance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prescription patterns, the incidence and reasons for failure, and the time to treatment failure of DMARDs in RA patients. METHODS: The medical records of patients visiting the Rheumatology Clinic were scrutinised retrospectively in order to extract the relevant data, including demographics, clinical and laboratory investigations and drug usage, for analysis. RESULTS: More than 60% of the 474 eligible patients were started on a combination of DMARDs. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (79.7%) and methotrexate (MTX) (55.6%) were the most common DMARDs prescribed initially. There was a significant difference in survival times among the various treatment groups (p ≤ 0.001). Adverse effect was the main reason for treatment failure of sulfasalazine (SSZ) (88.9%) and MTX (75%), while addition or substitution DMARDs was more common for those taking HCQ (72.2%). Adverse event was reported as the most significant predictor of treatment failure. The most commonly reported adverse effects were bone marrow suppression and hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: A combination of DMARDs was used to initiate therapy in more than 60% of RA patients, with HCQ and MTX being prescribed most frequently. Adverse effects accounted mainly for treatment failures with MTX and SSZ, while lack of efficacy was responsible for major treatment failures with HCQ.

Causes of DMARD withdrawal following ADR within 6 months of initiation among Indian rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The present study was conducted in Indian rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients prescribed disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to determine the incidence and type of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) leading to their withdrawal in the initial 6 months of therapy. This was considered important as pharmacogenetic variations in the pattern of RA in different populations and genetic differences in efficacy and safety to drugs demand separate studies to be conducted in different populations. Hospital records were used to identify 1,000 consecutive patients with RA fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria and having at least 6-month follow-up. Age, gender, duration of arthritis, drug usage and ADR-related drug withdrawal were recorded from the charts. Most of the patients were put on single DMARD. Combined use of DMARD was less frequent and non-use of DMARD was common; however, disease control was good. The commonest DMARD used in our hospital was hydroxychloroquine 444 (44%) and the commonest combination used was methotrexate with hydroxychloroquine by 55 (6%). Sulphasalazine use showed preference to young and males. Supportive drugs used were NSAIDs by 883 (88%), corticosteroids by 646 (65%), paracetamol by 594 (59%) and amitriptyline by 88 (9%). Incidence of ADR-related DMARD withdrawal was maximum with leflunomide 2/15 (13.33%) followed by methotrexate 9/116 (7.76%), sulphasalazine 6/185 (3.24%), chloroquine 3/131 (2.29%) and hydroxychloroquine 8/444 (1.8%). Severity and symptomatology of disease, genetic pattern of patients, financial status, previous experience of the clinicians and patients, availability of drugs, patient expectations and compliance were the main factors that lead to a difference in pattern of therapy in our patients compared to other population.