Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 46(4): 1668-1678, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35296929

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We previously proposed a novel method for detecting a rupture of a breast implant using high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS). We therefore conducted this retrospective, observational study to describe its feasibility in making a preoperative diagnosis of rupture of the device in patients receiving an implant-based augmentation mammaplasty. METHODS: We initially evaluated the medical records of the patients who had received primary or secondary augmentation mammaplasty using a breast implant at other hospitals for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes between August 31, 2017, and August 31, 2020. The patients underwent breast US using the Aplio i600 (Canon Medical System, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan) system with a 7-18 MHz linear transducer. Through a retrospective review of the patients' medical records, we analyzed their baseline and clinical characteristics. Then, we compared an agreement between preoperative diagnosis of rupture on HRUS and findings at reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients with rupture (55 breasts) were evaluated for the performance of ultrasound in making a diagnosis of rupture. This showed that they were unaware of rupture but they were diagnosed with it on ultrasound. Preoperatively, there were no cases of rupture in 110 left breasts (80.9%) and 107 right breasts (78.7%), which exactly matched to the number of breasts without rupture on HRUS. Moreover, preoperatively, there were 26 (19.1%) and 29 cases (21.3%) of rupture in the left and right breast, respectively, which exactly matched to the number of breasts with rupture on HRUS. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients who are suspected of having rupture of a breast implant should be stringently evaluated for presence of rupture and, if any, its scope using HRUS. Moreover, we propose that surgeons consider using HRUS in making a preoperative diagnosis of rupture of a breast implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Mamoplastia , Cirujanos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Estética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Falla de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(2)2022 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35208589

RESUMEN

Central venous cannulation (CVC) is a procedure that is frequently performed to facilitate resuscitation, nutritional support and long-term vascular access. It may often cause mechanical complications during placement of a cannula in association with the anatomical relationship with central veins. A 68-year-old man visited our medical institution with a chief complaint of foreign-body-induced esophageal perforation. This patient presented with bleeding of the superior vena cava due to an iatrogenic injury to it during the CVC in the right internal jugular vein. Our case indicates that it would be mandatory to insert a cannula at an optimal depth considering the anatomical relationship between the central veins during the CVC.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Vena Cava Superior , Anciano , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Vena Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...