Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 35(9): 1549-56, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27255221

RESUMEN

The aims of this study were to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) in our area, to analyze the molecular mechanisms involved in cephalosporins resistance, and to undertake molecular typing of our NG strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the Etest. The genes penA, mtrR, penB, and ponA were studied. Molecular typing was performed by N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing. Of 329 strains analyzed in 2013, none showed high-level cephalosporin resistance, but 8.2 % had resistance to cefixime [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) > 0.125 µg/mL] and 0.6 % to ceftriaxone (MIC > 0.125 µg/mL). Azithromycin resistance was documented in 4.3 % and ciprofloxacin resistance in 49.2 %. Among 48 strains with an MIC ≥ 0.125 µg/mL to cefixime, 58.3 % showed the penA mosaic pattern XXXIV, 98 % a Leu → Pro substitution at position 421 of the ponA gene, 100 % amino acid changes at positions 101 and 102 of the PorB1b porin, and 87.5 % of strains an adenine deletion in the promoter region of the MtrC-D-E efflux pump. A significant difference between strains with and without decreased cephalosporin susceptibility (MIC ≥ 0.125 µg/mL) was observed for these four genes. Of the 48 strains with an MIC ≥ 0.125 µg/mL to cefixime, 43.8 % belonged to the genogroup G1407 and 27.1 % belonged to the genogroup G2400. A significant association of G1407 with decreased susceptibility (MIC ≥ 0.125 µg/mL) and G2992 with susceptibility was found, and also between G1407 and mosaic pattern XXXIV and between G2400 and A501T substitution in penA. The NG resistance rate in our area is higher than the median of Europe. We have detected the emergence of G2400, which may be a source of antimicrobial resistance.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Resistencia a las Cefalosporinas , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Mutación , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Pruebas Antimicrobianas de Difusión por Disco , Femenino , Variación Genética , Gonorrea/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tipificación Molecular , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 83(4): 341-3, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26323884

RESUMEN

Gonorrhea is a public health problem. Fast diagnostics is necessary. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of culture with that of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in gonococcal infection. This is a study comparing the results of Neisseria gonorrhoeae detection by culture versus PCR from July to December 2012. Molecular diagnosis was performed by real-time PCR using the Versant CT/GC DNA 1.0 assay. In the 768 specimens, 96.9% the results were concordant. In 3.1%, the results were discordant, being PCR-positive and culture-negative in 21 cases and PCR-negative and culture-positive in 3. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for culture were 86.2%, 99.8%, 99.2%, and 96.7%, and for PCR, 98.7%, 100%, 100% and 99.7%, respectively. In laboratories where antimicrobial susceptibility is monitored, an effective approach would be to perform culture in addition to PCR in symptomatic patients.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(5): 1511-8, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24574284

RESUMEN

In Catalonia, a screening protocol for cervical cancer, including human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing using the Digene Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay, was implemented in 2006. In order to monitor interlaboratory reproducibility, a proficiency testing (PT) survey of the HPV samples was launched in 2008. The aim of this study was to explore the repeatability of the HC2 assay's performance. Participating laboratories provided 20 samples annually, 5 randomly chosen samples from each of the following relative light unit (RLU) intervals: <0.5, 0.5 to 0.99, 1 to 9.99, and ≥10. Kappa statistics were used to determine the agreement levels between the original and the PT readings. The nature and origin of the discrepant results were calculated by bootstrapping. A total of 946 specimens were retested. The kappa values were 0.91 for positive/negative categorical classification and 0.79 for the four RLU intervals studied. Sample retesting yielded systematically lower RLU values than the original test (P<0.005), independently of the time elapsed between the two determinations (median, 53 days), possibly due to freeze-thaw cycles. The probability for a sample to show clinically discrepant results upon retesting was a function of the RLU value; samples with RLU values in the 0.5 to 5 interval showed 10.80% probability to yield discrepant results (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.86 to 14.33) compared to 0.85% probability for samples outside this interval (95% CI, 0.17 to 1.69). Globally, the HC2 assay shows high interlaboratory concordance. We have identified differential confidence thresholds and suggested the guidelines for interlaboratory PT in the future, as analytical quality assessment of HPV DNA detection remains a central component of the screening program for cervical cancer prevention.


Asunto(s)
Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , ADN Viral/genética , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Pruebas de ADN del Papillomavirus Humano/métodos , Humanos , Ensayos de Aptitud de Laboratorios/métodos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , España , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Frotis Vaginal/métodos
4.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 50(4): 233-7, 1992.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1456501

RESUMEN

The Meia method is an enzymo-immunoassay involving fluorometric detection, which is used in the Abbott IMx automatic analyzer. The purpose of this report was to analyse the Meia Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibody and Rubella IgG antibody assays, following ECCLS guidelines for the analysis of laboratory kits. The results showed that between-run imprecision for Rubella IgG was close to 15%; for Toxoplasma IgG the percentage was 13%. The mean recovery for Rubella IgG was 104% and 94% for Toxoplasma IgG. The carry-over for Rubella IgG was 0.64% and 0.26% for Toxoplasma IgG which, in both cases, was less than the analytical variability. Both Meia and Elisa showed a linear relationship in the analytical range of the method. Comparing Meia with the Elisa method, constant and proportional differences were found for IgG Rubella and proportional differences for IgG Toxoplasma. The Meia method has many positive analytical features to recommend and it can easily be used in a multidisciplinary laboratory, needing only a small number of serum samples.


Asunto(s)
Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Inmunoglobulina G/análisis , Virus de la Rubéola/inmunología , Toxoplasma/inmunología , Animales , Automatización , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/normas , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Comité de Profesionales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA