Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 10 years' real-world clinical experience with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone.

Treatment with rituximab plus a regimen of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has proven efficacy in clinical trials. The present study investigated its application in clinical practice. This single-center, retrospective database analysis included patients with DLBCL treated at the Slovenian Institute of Oncology Ljubljana between 2004 and 2013. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed according to International Prognostic Index (IPI) and revised IPI (R-IPI) categories. Overall, 573 patients with DLBCL were included in the study (median follow-up, 45.3 months; range, 0.1-143.0). Patients were categorized as IPI 'low' (n=170; 30%), 'low-intermediate' (n=134; 23%), 'high-intermediate' (n=129; 23%) and 'high' (n=140; 24%) risk. R-IPI groups were indicated with 'very good' (n=59; 10%), 'good' (n=245; 43%) and 'poor' (n=269; 47%) prognosis. Ten-year OS and PFS rates were 51 and 72%, respectively; median OS was 124 months and median PFS was not reached. Ten-year OS rates were 80 and 87% in low-risk and 'very good' prognosis groups, respectively, and 30 and 37% in high-risk and poor prognosis patients, respectively. This analysis of patients with DLBCL indicated that many patients treated with R-CHOP and R-CHOP-like regimens in the real-world setting have excellent outcomes.

Outcomes of Treatment in Slovene Follicular Lymphoma Patients.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients has dramatically improved over the last 2 decades by introduction of rituximab in combination chemotherapy and into maintenance setting. We retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes in Slovene FL patients in the era of rituximab and compared them to the results reported by pivotal clinical studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients with FL treated in Slovenia between 2000 and 2010 with a median follow-up of 5.7 years were included in our retrospective analysis. One hundred ninety-three (69%) received systemic treatment (ST). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.7 years, the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates for the whole series were 77% and 53%, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) for 193 FL patients treated with ST was 37%. Patients treated with rituximab chemotherapy had a significantly better OS than patients treated with chemotherapy alone, with a 5-year OS of 79% versus 53% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.67; P = .001). Adding rituximab to the first-line chemotherapy significantly improved PFS compared to chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.26; 95% CI 0.18-0.36; P < .001). Maintenance rituximab after immunochemotherapy in first-line treatment reduced the risk for progression by 61% and significantly prolonged the time to progression (HR, 0.39; 95% CI 0.20-0.73; P < .003). CONCLUSION: The outcomes in our routinely treated FL patients confirm the benefit of adding rituximab to chemotherapy and are comparable to the results of pivotal clinical studies. The outcome of our FL patients was improved in terms of both PFS and OS.

A single-center study of treatment outcomes and survival in patients with primary gastric lymphomas between 1990 and 2003.

Primary gastric lymphomas are the most common extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and are divided into indolent (low grade) and aggressive (high grade) types. They are mainly the disease of middle age, with a male predominance reported by most of the studies. For several years, surgery played a central role in diagnosis, staging, and treatment of this entity, yet recently there has been a move away from a surgical approach to conservative treatment. To determine the role of surgery as the initial treatment modality, we performed this retrospective single-center research on 245 patients with primary gastric lymphoma who were treated according to our protocol between 1990 and 2003. The patients' characteristics, distribution of histological types, treatment results, and disease-specific survival were followed. According to the histology, 59.2% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL), 26.1% MALT lymphoma, 9.8% mixed lymphoma (indolent and aggressive at the same time), while other types were infrequent. In total, 161 patients (65.7%) were treated with surgical resection as the initial treatment, which was then followed or not by additional therapy (chemotherapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, radiotherapy) depending on the histological type of lymphoma and the extent of residual disease after surgery. In 84 patients (34.3%), the treatment approach was conservative. The selection of treatment (chemotherapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, radiotherapy or Helicobacter pylori eradication only) was based on the histological type of lymphoma, considering also the patients' physical condition. The disease-specific survival in the group of patients who underwent surgery was statistically significantly better than in patients who were treated conservatively (p=0.049). At 5 years, it was 96.9% for the group treated with surgery and 89.8% in patients treated conservatively. However, the results were biased, as the patients who were treated conservatively were either in a worse performance status or presented with a more extensive disease. Similarly, in the DLCL type the disease-specific survival was better in the surgically treated group (97.2%) than in the conservatively treated patients (89.2%). The difference was barely significant (p=0.046) and again the results have to be considered with caution due to the selection of patients in a worse performance status or with a more extensive disease for conservative treatment. In the MALT lymphoma and mixed lymphoma types, there were no differences in the disease-specific survival between both treatment groups. Regarding the statement that for conservative treatment patients were selected who were unsuitable for the resection on account of concomitant diseases or due to the fact that the process was inoperable, we believe that the conservative approach gives comparable outcomes to the approach including initial surgery. The existing evidence thus no longer justifies surgery as the standard initial treatment and preference should be given to conservative treatment approaches.