MICy: a Novel Flow Cytometric Method for Rapid Determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration.

Early initiated adequate antibiotic treatment is essential in intensive care. Shortening the length of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) can accelerate clinical decision-making. Our objective was to develop a simple flow cytometry (FC)-based AST that produces reliable results within a few hours. We developed a FC-based AST protocol (MICy) and tested it on six different bacteria strains (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Enterococcus faecalis) in Mueller-Hinton and Luria-Bertani broth. We monitored the bacterial growth by FC to define the optimal time of AST. All bacteria were tested against 12 antibiotics and the MIC values were compared to microdilution used as reference method. McNemar and Fleiss' kappa inter-observer tests were performed to analyze the bias between the two methods. Susceptibility profiles of the two methods were also compared. We found that FC is able to detect the bacterial growth after 4-h incubation. The point-by-point comparison of MICy and microdilution resulted in exact match above 87% (2642/3024) of all measurements. The MIC values obtained by MICy and microdilution agreed over 80% (173/216) within ±1 dilution range that gives a substantial inter-observer agreement with weighted Fleiss' kappa. By using the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, we defined susceptibility profiles of MICy that were identical to microdilution in more than 92% (197/213) of the decisions. MICy resulted 8.7% major and 3.2% very major discrepancies. MICy is a new, simple FC-based AST method that produces susceptibility profile with low failure rate a workday earlier than the microdilution method. IMPORTANCE MICy is a new, simple and rapid flow cytometry based antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) method that produces susceptibility profile a workday earlier than the microdilution method or other classical phenotypic AST methods. Shortening the length of AST can accelerate clinical decision-making as targeted antibiotic treatment improves clinical outcomes and reduces mortality, duration of artificial ventilation, and length of stay in intensive care unit. It can also reduce nursing time and costs and the spreading of antibiotic resistance. In this study, we present the workflow and methodology of MICy and compare the results produced by MICy to microdilution step by step.

The efficacy of virtual distance training of intensive therapy and anaesthesiology among fifth-year medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) brought several challenges in medical education. The aim of our study was to investigate whether virtual distance trainings (VDT) organized during the COVID-19 pandemic at our university were effective in replacing in-person bed-side education in intensive therapy and anaesthesiology among fifth-year medical students, both from students' and instructors' perspectives. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study consisting of three parts: a 20-item students' questionnaire filled out by students participating in VDT, a 22-item instructors' questionnaire filled out by instructors taking part in virtual distance education and a 20-item knowledge test completed by students participating in VDT, as well as by students visiting bed-side trainings (BT) during the same semester, before COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaires focused on effectiveness, content, self-preparedness, technical background and interactivity of VDT. Instructors' and students' responses given to the common questions, as well as the knowledge test results were compared. Mann-Whitney U test was used for group comparisons and binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the influence of previous health-care experience on students' feeling of self-preparedness. RESULTS: One hundred thirthen students (response rate {RR}: 68%) and 29 instructors (RR: 97%) filled out the questionnaires. The majority of students found our VDT useful and effective; however, a considerable number of participants felt disadvantaged by taking VDT instead of BT sessions and would recommend keeping virtual distance education methods combined with BT. Instructors found VDT overall effective and deemed the transfer of their knowledge satisfactory; however, they described worse interactivity and contact with students during virtual sessions compared to in-person teaching. Instructors showed a clearer consensus that VDT should not replace BT in the future, while students' answers were more divided in this regard. Previous health-care experience did not influence students' feeling of self-preparedness. One hundred and twenty-seven students (56 after VDT {RR: 34%}; 71 after BT {RR: 67%}) completed the end-of-semester knowledge test. Students attending VDT performed better than students visiting BT (median score VDT:83.5 vs BT:77.3; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual distance learning incorporating virtual practice sessions was effective in maintaining continuous education of intensive therapy and anaesthesiology among fifth-year medical students during the COVID-19 outbreak.