Onset Time and Characteristics of Postprocedural Bleeding after Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Postprocedural bleeding is a major adverse event after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but the optimal surveillance time after endoscopy is unclear. In this study, we determined onset time and characteristics of postprocedural bleeding events. METHODS: We retrospectively screened patients who underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions at three German hospitals between 2010 and 2019 for postprocedural bleeding events using billing codes. Only patients who required re-endoscopy were included for analysis. For identified patients, we collected demographic data, clinical courses, characteristics of colorectal lesions, and procedure-related variables. Factors associated with late-onset bleeding were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From a total of 6,820 patients with eligible billing codes, we identified 113 cases with postprocedural bleeding after endoscopic mucosal (61.9%) or snare resection (38.1%) that required re-endoscopy. The median size of the culprit lesion was 20 mm (interquartile range 14-30 mm). The median onset time of postprocedural bleeding was day 3 (interquartile range: 1-6.5 days), with 48.7% of events occurring within 48 h. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrates that a continued intake of antiplatelet drugs (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 0.89-10.12, p = 0.025) and a flat morphology of the colorectal lesion (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.08-8.01, p = 0.031) were associated with an increased risk for late postprocedural bleeding (>48 h), whereas intraprocedural bleeding was associated with a decreased risk (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.50, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant postprocedural bleeding can occur up to 18 days after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but was predominantly observed within 48 h. Continued intake of antiplatelet drugs and a flat polyp morphology are associated with risk for late postprocedural bleeding.

The role of the multidisciplinary tumor board after endoscopic resection of malignant tumors: is it worth it?

OBJECTIVES: The value of multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer patients is well known. Most of the current evidence focuses on advanced cancer cases, whereas little is known about the effect of MTBs on early tumors, especially after endoscopic resection. The aim of our study is to evaluate the value of the MTB after endoscopic resection of malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all endoscopically resected malignant tumors in our department between 2011 and 2019, focusing on the existence of an MDT recommendation after endoscopic resection, the MDT adherence to the current guidelines, and the implementation of the recommendation by the patients. RESULTS: We identified 198 patients fulfilling our inclusion criteria, of whom 168 (85%) were discussed in the MDT after endoscopic resection. In total, 155 of the recommendations (92%) were in accordance with the current guidelines, and 147 (88%) of them were implemented by the patients. The MDT discussion itself did not influence the overall survival, whereas the implementation of the MTB recommendation was associated with a significantly better prognosis. Deviations of the MDT recommendation from the guidelines had no effect on the overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The discussion of endoscopically resected malignant tumors in the MTB is crucial for the treatment of patients with this type of cancer, since the implementation of the MTB recommendation, even if it deviates from the current guidelines, improves the prognosis.

Removable Transduodenal Bypass: Development of a New Endoscopic Concept.

Introduction: Obesity and obesity-related disease such as diabetes mellitus type 2 are a permanently rising concern worldwide. Current effective therapeutic options mostly include medication and surgery, but there is a lack of effective treatment options between medication and surgery. Previously, devices such as EndoBarrier® have been placed on the market. However, high complication rates, especially liver abscesses, were seen in patients after implantation of the device. Nevertheless, duodenal lining seems to be an effective therapy for type 2 diabetes in obese patients and can lead to weight loss. Methods: A new removable transduodenal bypass was developed and tested on a porcine model. In this course, the device evolved in its mechanism and handling. The device is designed to avoid typical complications seen in previous duodenal liners. Results: After further development of the device, implantation and use were feasible and safe in the porcine model. Autopsies showed that the device stayed in place and remained intact. Discussion: The new removable transduodenal bypass aims to be a removable therapeutic option for diabetes mellitus type 2 and obesity, replacing previous duodenal lining devices. Use and handling of the device, however, are yet to be tested in the human model in the future.

Endoscopic Stricturoplasty with Linear Stapler: An Efficient Alternative for the Refractory Rectal Anastomotic Stricture.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic anastomotic stricture is a rare but major complication after left-sided colorectal surgery. Hydraulic balloon dilatation is the first-line treatment in cases where the complication occurs, but 20% of patients present with refractory strictures after multiple sessions. Endoscopic stricturoplasty with the use of a linear stapler is a novel therapeutic alternative for those difficult cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients in our department who underwent endoscopic stricturoplasty with a linear stapler between 2004 and 2022. The technical, periinterventional, and follow-up data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: We identified nine patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The procedure was technically possible in eight cases, whereas in one case, the anatomy of the anastomosis did not allow for a correct placement of the stapler. All patients with a technically successful procedure were relieved from their symptoms and could have their ostomy reversed. There was no periprocedural morbidity and mortality. Two patients presented with a recurrent stricture eight and 26 months after the initial stricturoplasty, and the procedure was successfully repeated in both cases. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stricturoplasty is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of refractory anastomotic strictures in the distal colon and rectum for patients with a suitable anatomy.

Outcomes of rescue procedures in the management of locally recurrent ampullary tumors: A Pancreas 2000/EPC study.

BACKGROUND: Ampullary lesions are rare and can be locally treated either with endoscopic papillectomy or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy. Management of local recurrence after a first-line treatment has been poorly studied. METHODS: Patients with a local recurrence of an ampullary lesion initially treated with endoscopic papillectomy or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy were retrospectively included from a multi-institutional database (58 centers) between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included, 21 (20.4%) treated with redo endoscopic papillectomy, 14 (13.6%) with transduodenal surgical ampullectomy, and 68 (66%) with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Redo endoscopic papillectomy had low morbidity with 4.8% (n = 1) severe to fatal complications and a R0 rate of 81% (n = 17). Transduodenal surgical ampullectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy after a first procedure had a higher morbidity with Clavien III and more complications, respectively, 28.6% (n = 4) and 25% (n = 17); R0 resection rates were 85.7% (n = 12) and 92.6% (n = 63), both without statistically significant difference compared to endoscopic papillectomy (P = .1 and 0.2). Pancreaticoduodenectomy had 4.4% (n = 2) mortality. No deaths were registered after transduodenal surgical ampullectomy or endoscopic papillectomy. Recurrences treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy were more likely to be adenocarcinomas (79.4%, n = 54 vs 21.4%, n = 3 for transduodenal surgical ampullectomy and 4.8%, n = 1 for endoscopic papillectomy, P < .0001). Three-year overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy is appropriate for noninvasive recurrences, with resection rate and survival outcomes comparable to surgery. Surgery applies more to invasive recurrences, with transduodenal surgical ampullectomy rather for carcinoma in situ and early cancers and pancreaticoduodenectomy for more advanced tumors.

[Endoscopic management of complications in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system and the tracheobronchial tree]. / Endoskopisches Komplikationsmanagement im hepatobiliopankreatischen System und Tracheobronchialbaum.

Endoscopic methods are nowadays a priceless tool for the treatment of postoperative complications after hepatobiliary, pancreatic and thoracic surgery. Endoscopic decompression of the biliary tract is the treatment of choice for biliary duct leakage after cholecystectomy, hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Postoperative biliary duct stenosis can also be successfully treated by endoscopic balloon dilatation and implantation of various endoprostheses in most of the patients. In the case of pancreatic fistulas, especially those occurring after central or distal pancreatic resections, endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct can significantly contribute to rapid healing. Additionally, interventional endosonography provides a valuable treatment option for transgastric drainage of postoperative fluid collections, which often accompany a pancreatic fistula. Various treatment alternatives have been described for the bronchoscopic treatment of bronchopleural and tracheoesophageal fistulas, which often lead to the rapid alleviation of symptoms and often to the definitive closure of the fistula.

[Endoscopic management of complications of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract]. / Endoskopisches Komplikationsmanagement am oberen und unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt.

Even when wide-ranging measures for avoidance of complications by improved techniques, training and many other activities are undertaken, postoperative and postinterventional complications still represent a daily problem in clinical medicine. The outcome of the patient is not uncommonly decided by the management of the complications. The failure to rescue or to control complications is increasingly recognized as being decisive for the success of treatment. This article therefore provides a current overview of the endoscopic management of complications of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. It describes when endoscopy can be used to detect or exclude a complication. The most important principles of treatment including the indications, limits of performance and technique are presented.

[Management of Endoscopic Complications after Bariatric Surgery: Focus on Current Endoscopic Therapy]. / Endoskopisches Komplikationsmanagment nach bariatrischen Operationen mit dem Fokus auf die aktuellen endoskopischen Therapien.

In bariatric surgery, complications are rare. Most of the complications can be managed by endoscopy. Rare complications impose a challenge in everyday clinical work. To optimally treat the complications and to minimise the harm to the patient it is important to implement complication management. This review gives an overview of relevant bariatric complications and endoscopic therapy strategies, focusing on published literature of the last five years. This manuscript could be a starting point for complication management in the clinic.

Endoscopic papillectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary lesions: a single center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare post-operative morbidity, mortality, and completeness of resection following endoscopic vs. radical surgical resection for ampullary lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data from a surgical database for patients with ampullary lesions at our institution was performed. All consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomy (EP) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for ampullary lesions between 2007 and 2021 were eligible for this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were included of whom 42 underwent EP whereas 43 received a PD. The resected lesion was a tubulovillous adenoma in 26 patients (61.9%) in the EP cohort, and 37 patients (86.0%) in the PD cohort had adenocarcinomas. The completeness of resection was equal in both cohorts. Significantly more patients of the PD cohort had to undergo reinterventions. After a mean follow up of 36 months (EP) vs. 16 months (PD), the rate of tumor recurrence did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: Equivalently high completeness of resection rates and correspondingly low recurrence rates can be achieved after EP and PD. Our results regarding residual tumor and recurrence rates show that even large tumors can be resected endoscopically with high primary success and completeness of resection rates.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection: Are there advantages over conventional ESD?

INTRODUCTION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD) is a technique that has been recently described for the treatment of large rectal adenomas and early rectal cancer. The purpose of our study is to compare TEM-ESD with flexible endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in an experimental, ex vivo porcine model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used TEM-ESD and flexible ESD to resect a total of 100 standardized 4 × 4cm lesions in an ex vivo porcine stomach model, performing 50 resections with each technique. Total procedure time, en bloc resection rate, injuries of the muscularis propria, perforation rate and learning curve were analysed. RESULTS: TEM-ESD was associated with a significantly shorter total procedure time in comparison to ESD (19 min vs. 33 min, p < .001). The rates of en bloc resection, injury of the muscularis propria layer, and perforation were the same in both groups. The learning curve of TEM-ESD was shallower than that of ESD. CONCLUSION: TEM-ESD showed an advantage over ESD in terms of procedure time and learning curve, with similar en bloc resection rates and safety profile in our experimental model.

Colonic Wall Injuries After Endoscopic Resection: Still a Major Complication? A Retrospective Analysis of 3782 Endoscopic Resections.

BACKGROUND: Colonic wall injuries are the most feared adverse events of endoscopic resections among endoscopists. The implementation of endoscopic closure has offered a reliable way to treat such injuries and, thus, has decreased their overall morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to assess the characteristics and outcomes of colonic wall injuries after endoscopic resection, focusing on the endoscopic treatment of these injuries. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Patients treated in the Central Endoscopy Unit of the Medical Centre Mannheim were included. PATIENTS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection and snare polypectomy in our center between 2004 and 2019 and isolated the resection-related colonic wall injuries. These were divided into 3 groups: group A, endoscopically treated early colonic wall injuries; group B, nonendoscopically treated early colonic wall injuries; and group C, late perforations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Periprocedural factors and treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: Of 3782 endoscopic resections, we identified 177 cases of colonic wall injuries, of which 148 were identified and treated endoscopically (group A), 9 were identified during the procedure but could not be treated endoscopically (group B), and 20 were late perforations (group C). Endoscopic treatment with use of clips had a technical success rate of 94.3%, while the clinical success rate of technically complete endoscopic closure was 92.6%. Twenty-two percent of all colonic wall injuries required surgical treatment; the type and outcomes of surgery were similar in all groups. Overall hospital stay was significantly lower in group A. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of the study is its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic closure with the use of clips is a safe and feasible treatment for intraprocedurally identified colonic wall injuries and is associated with significantly decreased necessity of surgery, morbidity, and hospital stay. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B755. LESIONES DE PARED COLNICA POSTERIOR A RESECCIN ENDOSCPICA ES AN UNA COMPLICACIN IMPORTANTE ANLISIS RETROSPECTIVO DE RESECCIONES ENDOSCPICAS: ANTECEDENTES:Las lesiones de la pared del colon son los eventos adversos más temidos por los endoscopistas durante las resecciones endoscópicas. La implementación del cierre endoscópico ha ofrecido una forma confiable de tratar tales lesiones y, por lo tanto, disminuyendo su morbilidad y mortalidad general.OBJETIVOS:El objetivo de nuestro estudio es evaluar las características y resultados de las lesiones de la pared colónica posterior a la resección endoscópica, centrándose en su tratamiento endoscópico.DISEÑO:Es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Se incluyeron pacientes tratados en la Unidad Central de Endoscopia del Centro Médico de Mannheim.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente todos los pacientes sometidos a resección endoscópica de la mucosa y polipectomía en asa en nuestro centro entre 2004 y 2019, seleccionando las lesiones de la pared colónica relacionadas a la resección. Estas se dividieron en tres grupos: Grupo A: lesiones tempranas de la pared colónica tratadas endoscópicamente; Grupo B: lesiones tempranas de la pared colónica no tratadas endoscópicamente; y Grupo C: perforaciones tardías.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Se analizaron y compararon los factores relacionados al procedimiento y los resultados del tratamiento entre los tres grupos.RESULTADOS:De 3782 resecciones endoscópicas identificamos 177 casos de lesiones de la pared colónica, de los cuales 148 fueron identificados y tratados endoscópicamente (Grupo A), 9 fueron identificados durante el procedimiento pero no pudieron ser tratados endoscópicamente (Grupo B) y 20 fueron perforaciones tardías. (Grupo C). El tratamiento endoscópico con el uso de clips tuvo una tasa de éxito técnico del 94,3%, mientras que la tasa de éxito clínico del cierre endoscópico técnicamente completo fue del 92,6%. El veintidós por ciento de todas las lesiones de la pared colónica requirieron tratamiento quirúrgico; el tipo y los resultados de la cirugía fueron los mismos en todos los grupos. La estancia hospitalaria global fue significativamente menor en el grupo A.LIMITACIONES:La principal limitación del estudio es su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El cierre endoscópico con el uso de clips es un tratamiento seguro y factible para las lesiones de la pared colónica identificadas durante el procedimiento y se asocia con una disminución significativa de la necesidad de cirugía, morbilidad y de estancia hospitalaria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B755.

Expression of the EGFR-RAS Inhibitory Proteins DOK1 and MTMR7 and its Significance in Colorectal Adenoma and Adenoma Recurrence.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal adenomas are precursor lesions for colorectal cancer (CRC), a major cause of cancer-related death. Despite all molecular insights, there are still unknown variables in the development of CRC as well as uncertainties regarding adenoma recurrence after resection. We aimed to characterize the expression of docking protein 1 (DOK1) and myotubularin-related protein 7 (MTMR7), which share inhibiting functions on EGFR-RAS-signalling, a major oncogenic driver in CRC, and their association with clinical variables and adenoma recurrence. METHODS: This observational study is based on clinical data obtained from patients who underwent routine endoscopy and consecutive follow-up examinations. Immunohistochemistry was conducted both in dysplastic tissue and adjacent non-dysplastic mucosa followed by microscopical assessment. Recurrence was differentiated between local, segmental and distant relapse. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (23 females) gathering 96 adenomas/polyps were included. 36 patients experienced a metachronous lesion, 23 patients had simultaneous lesions in their index endoscopy. Female patients showed lower levels of MTMR7 in adenomas (p=0.0318). Adenomas of young patients showed lower DOK1 than those of older patients (p=0.0469). Big adenomas showed a higher expression of DOK1 than small lesions (p=0.0044). In serrated lesions, DOK1 was reduced (p=0.0026) and correlated with the quantity of lesions (p < 0.001). MTMR7 was significantly reduced in distant (p=0.05) and local segmental recurrence (p=0.0362), while DOK1 showed higher expression in recurrence (p=0.0291). CONCLUSIONS: We found ambivalent results regarding the role of the markers as potential tumor suppressors, implying a context-dependent function of these molecules which might change in the course of time. DOK1 may play an inhibiting role in the serrated pathway. Remarkably, molecular markers have the potential to predict recurrence, since a combined expression analysis of high DOK1 and low MTMR7 correlated with the likelihood of segmental adenoma recurrence.

Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage using endoscopic negative pressure therapy with or without protective ostomy: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is patient-oriented and requires an interdisciplinary approach. We analyzed the management of AL according to its severity and presence of ostomy and proposed a therapy algorithm. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent colorectal surgery and developed an AL in our clinic between 2012 and 2017. The management of AL was retrospectively analyzed according to the severity grade: asymptomatic (A), requesting interventional or antibiotic therapy (B), undergoing re-operation (C). The groups were compared according to the leakage characteristics, presence of ostomy, and patient clinical conditions. RESULTS: We identified 784 consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10.8% experienced an AL (A = 18%, B = 48%, and C = 34%). The rate of successful ostomy closure was 100% (A), 68% (B), and 62% (C), respectively. Within group B, 91% of the patients were treated solely by endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT), whereas 37% of the patients within group C required ENPT in addition to surgery. Seven cases within group B (17%) required no protective ostomy (nOB) during ENPT which was itself shorter and required less cycles in comparison to group B with ostomy (OB) (p = 0.017 and 0.111, respectively). Moreover, the leakage distance to anal verge was higher in the OB subgroup (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ENPT for the treatment of colorectal AL is efficient in combination with operative revision or protective ostomy. In selected patients, it is feasible also in the absence of a protective ostomy.

Preservation of Organ Function in Locally Advanced Non-Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) of the Stomach by Neoadjuvant Imatinib Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced, non-metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of stomach is recommended to downsize the tumor prompting less-extensive operations and preservation of organ function. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical-histopathological profile and oncological outcome of 55 patients (median age 58.2 years; range, 30-86 years) with biopsy-proven, cM0, gastric GIST who underwent IM therapy followed by surgery with a median follow-up of 82 months. RESULTS: Initial median tumor size was 113 mm (range, 65-330 mm) and 10 patients started with acute upper GI bleeding. After a median 10 months (range, 2-21 months) of treatment, tumor size had shrunk to 62 mm (range, 22-200 mm). According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.0 and version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), 39 (75%) patients had partial response and 14 patients had stable disease, with no progressive disease. At plateau response, 50 patients underwent surgery with an R0 resection rate of 94% and pathological complete response in 24%. In 12 cases (24%), downstaging allowed laparoscopic resection. The mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 123 months (95%CI; 99-147) and the estimated 5-year RFS was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant IM allowed stomach preservation in 96% of our patients with excellent long-term RFS, even when starting treatment during an episode of upper GI bleeding. Preservation of the stomach provides the physiological basis for the use of oral IM in the adjuvant or metastatic setting.

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for leaks with large cavities in the upper gastrointestinal tract: is it a feasible therapeutic option?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) is an increasingly popular method for the treatment of various defects of the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract and has been associated with high success rates. The largest reported series focus on intraluminal therapy of local defects, whereas larger defects connected to the abdominal or pleural cavity are still regarded as indications for surgical revision in many units. The aim of our study is to assess the efficacy and the periinterventional characteristics of ENPT applications in patients with defects with large cavities in the upper GI tract. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all cases of ENPT applications in the upper gastrointestinal tract performed in our clinic between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 and identified the patients with defects leading to large cavities with a length of at least 7 cm. The procedural characteristics, intraprocedural and late complications and overall clinical success were analysed. RESULTS: We identified 14 cases meeting our inclusion criteria. In all cases, an intracavitary or combined intracavitary and intraluminal ENPT was applied. The average duration of therapy was 47.5 days and included an average of 10.4 changes per patient in an interval of 4.5 days. Clinical success rate was 92.9%, average hospital stay was 74.5 days. In three cases, a late stenosis occurred, which could be treated endoscopically. CONCLUSION: Based on the data of our case series, we conclude that ENPT is a feasible and promising therapeutic option for upper GI defects with contact to large cavities.

ERCP in babies: Low risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis - results from a multicentre survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is rarely performed in newborns, and the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) has not been defined in this age group. We therefore performed a European multicentre analysis of PEP rates and risk factors in children aged ≤1 year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on a sample size estimation, 135 consecutive ERCPs in 126 children aged ≤1 year were evaluated from five European centres, and the first ERCP per child analysed. All ERCPs and clinical reports were reviewed manually for PEP and associated risk factors. All ERCPs were performed by endoscopists with high ERCP expertise. RESULTS: No PEP was observed (0/126, 0.0%, CI 0-2.9%) despite the formal presence of multiple risk factors and despite lack of PEP prophylaxis (except one patient having received a pancreatic duct stent). The PEP rate was significantly lower than the PEP rate expected in adults with similar risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP in children aged ≤1 year is safe in terms of PEP. The PEP risk is significantly lower in children aged ≤1 year than in adults, therefore no PEP prophylaxis seems to be needed in young children. Risk factors from adults may not apply to children under 1 year. Reluctance to perform diagnostic ERCP in suspected biliary anomalies should not be based on presumed PEP risk.

Experience with Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Esophageal Leakage in Children.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of experience with fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for the treatment of esophageal leakage particularly in infants and neonates. METHODS: Eight patients (5M, 3F) with a median age of 17 months (range, 1-135 months) who underwent treatment with SEMSs for an anastomotic leakage or perforation of the esophagus were recruited to this retrospective study. Four children were born premature. In six patients the stents were placed primarily as an emergency procedure. RESULTS: Median duration of individual stent placement was 42 days (range, 13-72 days). Six out of eight patients (75%) were treated with one stent only. In three preterm infants who had their stents inserted within the first month relative weight gain was 17% compared with 2% in five patients who were treated later in life (p=0.0986). In four cases (50%) distal migration of the stent was observed. Seven out of eight patients (88%) had their leakage resolved after stent therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of fully covered SEMSs is an alternative tool for the treatment of esophageal leakage in children and preterm infants, and successful with only one single application in selected cases. It can be used either following previous therapy or as part of an emergency procedure. Because of the absence of manufactured, age-related devices SEMSs that are originally designed for other organs can be applied.