Bleeding control improves after switching to emicizumab: Real-world experience of 177 children in the PedNet registry.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the rapid uptake of emicizumab in the paediatric haemophilia A (HA) population, real-world data on the safety and efficacy is limited. AIM: To report on bleeding and safety in paediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. METHODS: Data were extracted from the multicentre prospective observational PedNet Registry (NCT02979119). Children with haemophilia A, and ≥50 FVIII exposures or inhibitors present receiving emicizumab maintenance therapy were analysed. Data were summarized as medians with interquartile range (IQR, P25-P75). Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)), annualized (joint) bleeding rate (A(J)BR) during emicizumab and ≤2 years before emicizumab prophylaxis were modelled and compared using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Total of 177 patients started emicizumab at median 8.6 years (IQR 4.8-13.1), most had no FVIII inhibitors (64%). Follow up before emicizumab was median: 1.68 years (IQR: 1.24-1.90) and during emicizumab: 1.32 years (IQR: .94-2.11). In patients without inhibitors, mean ABR reduced after starting emicizumab from 2.41 (CI 1.98-2.95) to 1.11 (CI .90-1.36, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from.74 (CI .56-.98) to.31 (CI .21-.46, p < .001). Concordantly, in patients with inhibitors, mean ABR reduced from 5.08 (CI 4.08-6.38) to .75 (CI .56-1.01, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from 1.90 (CI 1.42-2.58) to .34 (CI .21-.56, p < .001). Five emicizumab-related adverse events were reported (3% of the cohort), including one patient with antidrug antibodies. CONCLUSION: This study showed improved bleeding control compared to previous treatment and a favourable safety profile during emicizumab therapy in paediatric haemophilia A patients.

Patient perspective on living with mild hemophilia in Germany: results from a nationwide survey.

Introduction: The disease burden and bleeding risk of patients with mild hemophilia may be underestimated. Their health-related quality of life (QoL) may be negatively impacted by insufficient treatment and bleed-related joint damage connected to a potentially delayed diagnosis. Aim: This study aims to gain information on the care reality and QoL of patients aged ≥12 years with mild hemophilia in Germany. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional patient survey using standardized questionnaires was conducted in a validated electronic patient-reported outcome system. Medical specialists, hemophilia centers, patient organizations, and support groups across Germany invited the patients. Results: A total of 43 patients (35 patients with hemophilia A, 5 patients with hemophilia B, and 3 patients for whom the information was missing) with a median age of 33 years were analyzed. The median age at diagnosis was 6.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-15.0), and the median factor activity was 14.0% (IQR 12.0-25.0). Nearly 85% of the patients received factor concentrates in the past, and the most common reasons for the treatment were surgery or joint bleeding (each 65.6%). Half of the patients who provided feedback experienced complications during bleeding episodes. Prophylactic treatment with factor concentrates was rare (10.3%). The patients had minor problems regarding their health status. Conclusion: Bleeding complications and joint bleeding, in particular, may be highly underestimated in patients with mild hemophilia, highlighting a medical need in this population. Patients with a potential benefit from prophylaxis need to be identified. Mild hemophilia has a negative impact on patients' QoL. Hemophilia centers satisfied the patients' needs. Further research is needed to address the current lack of awareness and improve adequate treatment in the future.

A post hoc analysis of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A who developed inhibitors in the PUPs A-LONG trial.

ABSTRACT: Inhibitor development is a major therapeutic complication for people with hemophilia. The phase 3 PUPs A-LONG study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, herein referred to as rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A. Male PUPs <6 years old were enrolled and received rFVIIIFc; inhibitor development was the primary end point. Post hoc analyses, including patient treatment regimen patterns and timing of inhibitor development, descriptive and Kaplan-Meier analyses of time to first inhibitor-positive test by treatment regimen and by titer, and consumption, were performed to describe patients who developed inhibitors during PUPs A-LONG. We investigated patient characteristics (eg, demographics and genotype) and nongenetic risk factors (eg, intense factor exposure and central venous access device [CVAD] placement) that may predict inhibitor development and characteristics of inhibitor development (low-titer vs high-titer inhibitor). Baseline characteristics were similarly distributed for age, race, and ethnicity across both patients who were inhibitor-positive and those who were inhibitor-negative (all P > .05). High-risk F8 variants were associated with development of high-titer inhibitors (P = .028). High-titer inhibitor development was often preceded by the presence of a low-titer inhibitor. Patients whose low-titer inhibitor progressed to a high-titer inhibitor received a higher mean dose per infusion (98.4 IU/kg, n = 5) compared with those whose low-titer inhibitor resolved spontaneously (59.2 IU/kg, n = 7; P = .033) or persisted (45.0 IU/kg, n = 5; P = .047). There was no association between CVAD placement surgery and inhibitor development. Post hoc analyses suggest that F8 genotype and dose of factor are as important as inhibitor risk factors and require further investigation. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02234323.

Determinants of bleeding before and during immune tolerance in 222 boys with severe hemophilia A and inhibitors >5 BU.

ABSTRACT: Prevention of bleeding and its consequences is the main goal of hemophilia treatment and determines treatment choices for patients who develop inhibitors. To assess bleeding before and during immune tolerance induction (ITI) and its association with ITI regimen and inhibitor titer, we selected and analyzed data on patients receiving high-titer inhibitors from the international prospective PedNet cohort study. In total, 222 patients with severe hemophilia A and inhibitor titers of >5 Bethesda units (BU) were followed from the first positive to the first negative inhibitor result (median overall follow-up, 1.7 years). Mean annual (joint) bleeding rates (AJBR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared according to treatment and inhibitor titer using multivariable negative binomial regression. Before ITI, 115 patients showed an ABR of 6.1 (5.0-7.4) and an AJBR 2.6 (2.1-3.2). Bleeding was independent of inhibitor titer. During ITI, 202 patients had an ABR of 4.4 (3.9-5.1) and an AJBR of 1.7 (1.5-2.0). AJBR during ITI increased with inhibitor titer (hazard ratio [HR] for ≥200 BU vs 5 to 39 BU [4.9; CI, 3.2-7.4]) and decreased with daily ITI infusions (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.6) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate prophylaxis (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.8), whereas ITI dose and recombinant activated factor VII prophylaxis did not independently affect bleeding. These data provide evidence for a protective effect of repeated FVIII infusions (ITI) on bleeding in patients who have developed inhibitors; these data should be used to plan ITI and/or serve as a comparator for prophylaxis with nonreplacement therapy.

Two-center validation of assays for the detection of binding and neutralizing anti-factor VIII antibodies.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with hemophilia A treated with coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) products are at risk for developing anti-FVIII antibodies. The ABIRISK Consortium aimed to provide knowledge on the formation and detection of anti-drug antibodies against biopharmaceutical products, including FVIII. Accordingly, standardized and validated assays for the detection of binding (total) and neutralizing antibodies are needed. AIM: Two-center validation of an ELISA for the detection of total FVIII-binding IgG-antibodies and Nijmegen-Bethesda assays for the quantification of FVIII-neutralizing antibodies according to consensus validation guidelines. METHODS: Validation of assays at both sites was done according to published recommendations and included preanalytics, the determination of key assay parameters, including cut-points, assay sensitivity, precision, and FVIII interference. RESULTS: The validated assays reproducibly detected FVIII-binding and -neutralizing antibodies with comparable performance in both laboratories. Floating screening cut-points were established for both assays. Determined mass-based sensitivity of both assays (all values ≤66 ng/mL) complied with the minimum sensitivity for the detection of anti-drug antibodies as recommended by the FDA (<100 ng/mL). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation did not exceed 25%. Assay validation further revealed that pre-analytical heat treatment led to potentially false-positive ELISA results, while up to 0.15 IU/mL, residual FVIII showed no significant impact. Overall, good agreement of results was found for patient samples analyzed at both study sites. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive validation of different anti-FVIII-antibody assays in two laboratories gave novel insights into the impact of pre-analytical sample treatment as well as the comparability of test results generated by the use of methodically different assays.

Dilemmas on emicizumab in children with haemophilia A: A survey of strategies from PedNet centres.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia A care has changed with the introduction of emicizumab. Experience on the youngest children is still scarce and clinical practice varies between haemophilia treatment centres. AIM: We aimed to assess the current clinical practice on emicizumab prophylaxis within PedNet, a collaborative research platform for paediatricians treating children with haemophilia. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all PedNet members (n = 32) between October 2022 and February 2023. The survey included questions on the availability of emicizumab, on the practice of initiating prophylaxis in previously untreated or minimally treated patients (PUPs or MTPs) and emicizumab use in patients with or without inhibitors. RESULTS: All but four centres (28/32; 88%) responded. Emicizumab was available in clinical practice in 25/28 centres (89%), and in 3/28 for selected patients only (e.g. with inhibitors). Emicizumab was the preferred choice for prophylaxis in PUPs or MTPs in 20/25 centres; most (85%) started emicizumab prophylaxis before 1 year of age (30% before 6 months of age) and without concomitant FVIII (16/20; 80%). After the loading dose, 13/28 centres administered the recommended dosing, while the others adjusted the interval of injections to give whole vials. In inhibitor patients, the use of emicizumab during ITI was common, with low-dose ITI being the preferred protocol. CONCLUSION: Most centres choose to initiate prophylaxis with emicizumab before 12 months of age and without concomitant FVIII. In inhibitor patients, ITI is mostly given in addition to emicizumab, but there was no common practice on how to proceed after successful ITI.

Considerations for shared decision management in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A or B.

Recent advances in therapeutics are now providing a wide range of options for adults and children living with hemophilia. Although therapeutic choices are also increasing for the youngest individuals with severe disease, challenges remain about early management decisions, as supporting data are currently limited. Parents and healthcare professionals are tasked with helping children achieve an inclusive quality of life and maintain good joint health into adulthood. Primary prophylaxis is the gold standard to optimize outcomes and is recommended to start before 2 years of age. A range of topics need to be discussed with parents to aid their understanding of the decisions they can make and how these will affect the management of their child/children. For those with a family history of hemophilia, prenatal considerations include the possibility of genetic counseling, prenatal investigations, and planning for delivery, together with monitoring of the mother and neonate, as well as diagnosis of the newborn and treatment of any birth-associated bleeding. Subsequent considerations, which are also applicable to families where infant bleeding has resulted in a new diagnosis of sporadic hemophilia, involve explaining bleed recognition and treatment options, practical aspects of initiating/continuing prophylaxis, dealing with bleeds, and ongoing aspects of treatment, including possible inhibitor development. Over time, optimizing treatment efficacy, in which individualizing therapy around activities can play a role, and long-term considerations, including retaining joint health and tolerance maintenance, become increasingly important. The evolving treatment landscape is creating a need for continually updated guidance. Multidisciplinary teams and peers from patient organizations can help provide relevant information. Easily accessible, multidisciplinary comprehensive care remains a foundation to care. Equipping parents early with the knowledge to facilitate truly informed decision-making will help achieve the best possible longer-term health equity and quality of life for the child and family living with hemophilia. Plain language summary: Points to be taken into account to help families make decisions to best care for children born with hemophilia Medical advances are providing a range of treatment options for adults and children with hemophilia. There is, however, relatively limited information about managing newborns with the condition. Doctors and nurses can help parents to understand the choices for infants born with hemophilia. We describe the various points doctors and nurses should ideally discuss with families to enable informed decision-making. We focus on infants who require early treatment to prevent spontaneous or traumatic bleeding (prophylaxis), which is recommended to start before 2 years of age. Families with a history of hemophilia may benefit from discussions before pregnancy, including how an affected child would be treated to protect against bleeds. When mothers are pregnant, doctors can explain investigations that can provide information about their unborn child, plan for the birth, and monitor mother and baby to minimize bleed risks at delivery. Testing will confirm whether the baby is affected by hemophilia. Not all infants with hemophilia will be born to families with a history of the condition. Identification of hemophilia for the first time in a family (which is 'sporadic hemophilia') occurs in previously undiagnosed infants who have bleeds requiring medical advice and possibly hospital treatment. Before any mothers and babies with hemophilia are discharged from hospital, doctors and nurses will explain to parents how to recognize bleeding and available treatment options can be discussed. Over time, ongoing discussions will help parents to make informed treatment decisions:• When and how to start, then continue, prophylaxis.• How to deal with bleeds (reinforcing previous discussions about bleed recognition and treatment) and other ongoing aspects of treatment. ○ For instance, children may develop neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to treatment they are receiving, requiring a change to the planned approach.• Ensuring treatment remains effective as their child grows, considering the varied needs and activities of their child.

Prophylaxis use of clotting factor replacement products in people with non-severe haemophilia: A review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: People with non-severe haemophilia appear to be under-treated in many countries, and this may lead to joint damage and worsen quality of life. AIM: To review literature for clotting factor replacement prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A and B (HA/HB) in relation to long-term outcomes to support clinical decision-making. METHODS: A targeted literature search was performed to identify studies published between 2000 and 2021 that included prophylaxis in people with non-severe HA/HB and long-term outcomes, including annualized bleeding rates, joint health and quality of life. RESULTS: Although eligible articles included 2737 and 2272 people with mild or moderate HA, respectively, only 22% (n = 609) and 29% (n = 668) reported treatment regimens. A total of 549 people with moderate HA were treated with factor replacement prophylaxis and were from high-income countries. On the contrary, nearly all people with mild HA received desmopressin (n = 599). Details of treatment regimens for women with haemophilia and people with HB were sparse. Three studies provided long-term outcomes for people with moderate haemophilia who received prophylaxis with factor concentrate, supporting early prophylaxis in people with a frequent bleeding phenotype regardless of their endogenous clotting factor level to preserve joint health. CONCLUSION: There remain large knowledge gaps when considering how to provide optimal treatment for people with non-severe haemophilia. Nonetheless, there is a strong rationale that prophylaxis should be considered early in life according to similar strategies as for severe haemophilia for those with a frequent severe bleeding phenotype.

The safety and efficacy of N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol) in previously untreated pediatric patients with hemophilia A.

N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol) is a recombinant, glycoPEGylated, extended half-life, factor VIII replacement product. Here, we examined the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of N8-GP in previously untreated patients (PUPs). pathfinder6 is an ongoing, open-label, phase 3 trial that enrolled PUPs with severe hemophilia A and were aged <6 years. The primary end point was the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors (≥0.6 Bethesda units [BU]). Eighty patients received ≥1 N8-GP dose and were included in this analysis; ≥50 patients had ≥50 exposure days to N8-GP. The inhibitor incidence was 29.9% (14.9% high-titer [>5 BU]). Sixty-five patients received N8-GP prophylaxis for an average of 2.17 years with a median annualized bleeding rate (interquartile range) of 1.42 (0.76; 3.13) and a 90.5% hemostatic success rate. Temporarily decreased incremental recovery (IR), defined as ≥2 consecutive measurements of IR <0.6 (IU/dL)/(IU/kg) but no inhibitors, was observed in 17 patients within 5 exposure days to N8-GP and had a strong temporal correlation with anti-polyethylene glycol immunoglobulin G antibody titers. IR returned within the expected range with continued N8-GP dosing. During the period of decreased IR, hemostatic response was similar to that of the overall trial population, and no hypersensitivity related to N8-GP or unexpected new adverse events were reported. N8-GP prophylaxis was efficacious for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in PUPs with severe hemophilia A. The inhibitor incidence was 29.9%. All patients with temporarily decreased IR continuing on N8-GP dosing returned within the expected range and had no evident lack of efficacy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02137850.

[HIV infection and exposure in children and adolescents]. / HIV-Infektion und -Exposition bei Kindern und Jugendlichen: 25 Jahre antiretrovirale Prophylaxe und Therapie: Was ist erreicht?

Background: Since 1997 an effective prevention and treatment of infections with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been available in the form of antiretroviral combination therapy. Objective: What has been achieved during this time by transmission prophylaxis and treatment of HIV infections in children in Germany? Material and methods: Presentation of the development of transmission prophylaxis and the epidemiological surveys of the Robert Koch Institute, presentation of drug development and guidelines for antiretroviral therapy in children and adolescents and presentation of surveys of the German pediatric and adolescent HIV cohort (GEPIC). Results: The introduction of HIV testing of pregnant women has made regular antiretroviral treatment of HIV positive pregnant women and the introduction of transmission-reducing measures possible. This has reduced the risk of vertical transmission from about 30% to < 1%. Currently, it is being investigated whether children exposed to HIV can be breastfed without risk. Antiretroviral therapy in children has decisively improved the survival rates and the physical and cognitive development of HIV positive children. New active substances have a more favorable side effect profile. In Germany, the World Health Organization (WHO) target of achieving complete suppression of the viral load in 90% of the children has been achieved. A delayed diagnosis in children and adolescents is still associated with severe infections. An HIV infection remains a disease with a stigma and is therefore usually kept secret from the children and their environment. Conclusion: With the transmission prophylaxis and therapy that are now available, it is possible to prevent transmission to a large extent and with a timely diagnosis to enable HIV positive children to lead a largely healthy life. The goal of children being able to know and name their disease without fear has still not been achieved.

Regulatory B cells in patients suffering from inborn errors of immunity with severe immune dysregulation.

BACKGROUND: Immune dysregulation as a result of an inborn error of immunity (IEI) leads to the complicated symptoms of refractory multi-organ immune dysregulation. B lymphocytes with immune regulatory capacity (Breg) are activated by environmental triggers and act as regulators of the immune response as observed in several autoimmune diseases. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the Breg profile and the CD21low expressing B cells of patients with LRBA deficiency (N = 6) and non-LRBA deficiency IEI (N = 13) with overlapping clinical symptoms of immune dysregulation. Normal values for Breg subpopulations were obtained from patients age-matched healthy cohorts (N = 48). Furthermore, we investigated the impact of abatacept treatment in LRBA deficient patients receiving biweekly abatacept (N = 5). METHODS: Using a flow cytometric approach with a pre-formulated antibody panel in peripheral blood samples, Breg subsets including plasmablasts (CD27+CD38hi), transitional B cells (CD24hiCD38hi), and B10 cells (CD24hiCD27+), and additionally the CD21low B cells (CD21lowCD38low) were analyzed. Breg function was assessed by the interleukin-10 expression within the CD19+ population. Additionally, B cell cytokines were measured in cell culture supernatants. RESULTS: We observe significant alterations of B cell/Breg subpopulations in the LRBA deficient cohort including a severe lack of memory B cells (P = 0.031) and B10 cells (P = 0.031) as well as a tendency towards higher CD21low B cells (P = 0.063). Within the non-LRBA deficient cohort, we observe a significant expansion of the plasmablasts (P = 0.012), and a tendency towards elevated levels of CD21low expressing B cells (P = 0.063). The treatment with abatacept ameliorated disease symptoms in the LRBA deficient cohort and led to an effective decrease in CD21low B cells over time (P = 0.021). Furthermore, there was a significantly increased level of B cell-activating factor (BAFF; P = 0.02) and lower IL-12p70 secretion upon stimulation (P = 0.020) in the LRBA cohort. CONCLUSION: Aberrant maturation of Breg subsets and the pathological expansion of CD21low B cells in patients with IEI may have therapeutic implications. Patients suffering from LRBA deficiency show a lack of memory B cells, insufficient expansion of B10 cells, increased BAFF levels as well as an increase in circulating CD21low B cells. Abatacept treatment results in a steady decrease in CD21low B cells.

Outcomes of etravirine-based antiretroviral treatment in treatment-experienced children and adolescents living with HIV in Europe and Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Etravirine (ETR) is approved as a component of second or third-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) for children living with HIV. We assessed the outcomes of ETR-based ART in children in routine care in Europe and Thailand. METHODS: Data on children aged <18 years at ETR start were pooled from 17 observational cohorts. Characteristics at ETR start, immunological and virological outcomes at 12 months, discontinuations, adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were described. Follow-up was censored at ETR discontinuation, death or last visit. RESULTS: 177 children ever received ETR. At ETR start, median [IQR] age was 15 [12,16] years, CD4 count 480 [287, 713] cells/mm3, 70% had exposure to ≥3 ART classes and 20% had viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL. 95% received ETR in combination with ≥1 potent drug class, mostly protease inhibitor-based regimens. Median time on ETR was 24 [7, 48] months. Amongst those on ETR at 12 months (n=141), 69% had VL<50 copies/mL. Median CD4 increase since ETR start (n=83) was 147 [16, 267] cells/mm3. Overall, 81 (46%) discontinued ETR by last follow-up. Median time to discontinuation was 23 [8, 47] months. Common reasons for discontinuation were treatment simplification (19%), treatment failure (16%) and toxicity (12%). Eight children (5%) had AEs causally associated with ETR, all dermatological/hypersensitivity reactions. Two were SAEs, both Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in children on regimens containing ETR and darunavir and were causally related to either drugs; both resolved following ART discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Children receiving ETR were predominantly highly treatment-experienced, over two-thirds were virally suppressed at 12 months.

Safety of intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination in patients with haemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that patients with haemophilia should preferably receive vaccination subcutaneously. COVID-19 and other vaccines, however, are only licenced for intramuscular application. AIMS: To assess the safety of intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination in patients living with haemophilia. METHODS: Part A of this prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients with haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) of all ages and severities and assessed injection site bleeding and other complications within 30 days of vaccination. Part B enrolled patients providing informed consent for detailed data collection including medication and prophylaxis around the time of vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to assess potential risk factors for bleeding. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-one patients were enrolled into part A. The primary endpoint injection site bleeding occurred in seven patients (1.5%, 95% confidence interval .7-3.1%). Comprehensive analysis of 214 patients (404 vaccinations, part B) revealed that 97% of patients with severe haemophilia had prophylaxis before vaccination, either as part of their routine prophylaxis or using additional doses. 56% and 30% of patients with moderate and mild haemophilia, respectively, received prophylaxis before vaccination. Among the seven bleeds recorded, three occurred when intramuscular vaccination was done without prophylaxis (odds ratio 12). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study reporting on the safety of intramuscular vaccination in haemophilia. The rate of injection site bleeding was low in mild haemophilia, and in moderate and severe haemophilia if patients received factor prophylaxis.

First study of extended half-life rFVIIIFc in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: PUPs A-LONG final results.

PUPs A-LONG evaluated the safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A. This open-label, phase 3 study enrolled male PUPs (<6 years) with severe hemophilia A to receive rFVIIIFc. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of inhibitor development. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleed rate (ABR). Of 103 subjects receiving ≥1 dose of rFVIIIFc, 80 (78%) were aged <1 year at the study start, 20 (19%) had a family history of inhibitors, and 82 (80%) had high-risk F8 mutations. Twenty subjects began on prophylaxis, while 81 began an on-demand regimen (69 later switched to prophylaxis). Eighty-seven (81%) subjects completed the study. Inhibitor incidence was 31.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8% to 41.7%) in subjects with ≥10 exposure days (or inhibitor); high-titer inhibitor incidence was 15.6% (95% CI, 8.8% to 24.7%). The median (range) time to high-titer inhibitor development was 9 (4-14) exposure days. Twenty-eight (27%) subjects experienced 32 rFVIIIFc treatment-related adverse events; most were inhibitor development. There was 1 nontreatment-related death due to intracranial hemorrhage (onset before the first rFVIIIFc dose). The overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) ABR was 1.49 (0.00-4.40) for subjects on variable prophylaxis dosing regimens. In this study of rFVIIIFc in pediatric PUPs with severe hemophilia A, overall inhibitor development was within the expected range, although high-titer inhibitor development was on the low end of the range reported in the literature. rFVIIIFc was well-tolerated and effective for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02234323).

Hemophilia treatment in 2021: Choosing the"optimal" treatment using an integrative, patient-oriented approach to shared decision-making between patients and clinicians.

The mainstay of hemophilia treatment is to prevent bleeding through regular long-term prophylaxis and to control acute breakthrough bleeds. Various treatment options are currently available for prophylaxis, and treatment decision-making is a challenging and multifaceted process of identifying the most appropriate option for each patient. A multidisciplinary expert panel convened to develop a practical, patient-oriented algorithm to facilitate shared treatment decision-making between clinicians and patients. Key variables were identified, and an algorithm proposed based on five variables: bleeding phenotype, musculoskeletal status, treatment adherence, venous access, and lifestyle. A complementary, patient-focused preference tool was also hypothesized, with the aim of exploring individual patients' priorities, preferences, and goals. It is hoped that the proposed algorithm and the hypothesized patient preference tool will assist in selecting a treatment for each patient that is as efficient as possible in preventing bleeds while also accounting for the patient's expectations and priorities.

Prophylaxis in children with haemophilia in an evolving treatment landscape.

INTRODUCTION: For children with haemophilia, early initiation of prophylaxis is crucial to prevent life-threatening bleeds and maintain joint health throughout life. Options for prophylaxis have recently increased from replacement therapy with standard or extended half-life coagulation factor products to include other haemostasis products, such as the non-replacement therapy emicizumab. AIM: To review key factors that determine the choice of prophylaxis in young children. METHODS: Key clinical questions on the implementation of prophylaxis for haemophilia in children were identified and PubMed was searched for evidence supporting guidance on the implementation of prophylaxis. RESULTS: The results of the literature search and the practical experience of the authors were used to build consensus on when to start prophylaxis, the pros and cons of the products available to guide the choice of product, and practical aspects of starting prophylaxis to guide the choice of regimen. CONCLUSIONS: In this era of increasing therapeutic choices, available information about the range of treatment options must be considered when initiating prophylaxis in young children. Parents or care givers must be sufficiently informed to allow informed shared decision making. Although plentiful data and clinical experience have been gathered on prophylaxis with clotting factor replacement therapy, its use in young children brings practical challenges, such as the need for intravenous administration. In contrast, our relatively brief experience and limited data with subcutaneously administered non-replacement therapy (i.e., emicizumab) in this patient group imply that starting emicizumab prophylaxis in young children requires careful consideration, despite the more convenient route of administration.

The Role of Physiotherapy in the New Treatment Landscape for Haemophilia.

The physiotherapist plays an essential role for people with haemophilia, an inherited bleeding disease responsible for musculoskeletal complications. Yet, with the advent of new and advanced therapies, the medical landscape is changing, and physiotherapy must adapt alongside. This paper considers whether there will still be a need for physiotherapy in the era of advanced therapies, and discusses ways in which services should evolve to complement emerging treatment paradigms for haemostasis in people with haemophilia. Ultimately, physiotherapy will remain an important element of care, even for people with little joint damage and low risks in the era of the new mild phenotype. However, competencies will need to evolve, and physiotherapists in both primary care and specialist treatment centres should work with haematology colleagues to develop more sensitive tools for detecting early joint changes. Physiotherapists will also play a crucial role in counselling and physically coaching, monitoring the musculoskeletal status of people with haemophilia who have transitioned to new treatments.

First observation of inhibitor development against efmoroctocog alfa in France.

In patients with severe haemophilia receiving clotting factor concentrates, the risk of immunisation against their usual treatment is still patent and feared. New haemophilia drug treatments with an extended half-life have become available over the past few years. The risk of inhibitor development to these new treatments is unclear. We report the case of a 51-year-old man with severe haemophilia A, who was previously treated with no history of inhibitor development. Soon after a switch in his treatment to efmoroctocog alfa he developed an inhibitor against this recombinant Fc fusion extended half-life FVIII (rFc-FVIII) product. The patient was on an on-demand treatment regimen and was treated for mucosal bleeding. The inhibitor was characterised as type I, with classical epitope mapping. The spontaneous evolution of this inhibitor was favourable, but an anamnestic response led to a switch in his treatment to emicizumab.