RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whipple's disease is a chronic multisystemic infectious disease that rarely presents as culture-negative endocarditis. Most patients reported with Tropheryma whipplei endocarditis involve a native valve and few describe prosthetic valve disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A patient with chronic polyarthritis and previous mitral valve replacement developed decompensated heart failure without fever. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a prosthetic mitral valve vegetation and he underwent prosthetic mitral valve replacement. Blood and prosthetic mitral valve cultures were unrevealing. Broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the extracted valve and subsequent Periodic-acid-Schiff (PAS) staining established the diagnosis of T. whipplei prosthetic valve endocarditis. CONCLUSION: Whipple's disease may present as culture-negative infective endocarditis and affect prosthetic valves. Histopathology with PAS staining and broad-range PCR of excised valves are essential for the diagnosis. Greater clinical awareness and implementation of these diagnostic procedures should result in an increased reported incidence of this rare disease.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Endocarditis Bacteriana , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Enfermedad de Whipple , Masculino , Humanos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/complicaciones , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Tropheryma , Enfermedad de Whipple/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Whipple/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Whipple/patología , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Artritis/complicacionesRESUMEN
Xenotransplantation of organs from swine in immunosuppressed human recipients poses many of the same challenges of allotransplantation relative to the risk for infection, malignancy, or graft rejection in proportion to the degree of immunosuppression and epidemiologic exposures. The unique features of xenotransplantation from pigs relative to infectious risk center on the potential for unusual organisms derived from swine causing productive infection, "xenosis" or "xenozoonosis," in the host. Based on experience in allotransplantation, the greatest hazard is due to viruses, due to the relative lack of information regarding the behavior of these potential pathogens in humans, the absence of validated serologic and molecular assays for swine-derived pathogens, and uncertainty regarding the efficacy of therapeutic agents for these organisms. Other known, potential pathogens (i.e., bacteria, fungi, parasites) tend to be comparable to those of humans. Concerns remain for unknown organisms in swine that may replicate in immunosuppressed humans. Clinical trials of genetically modified organs sourced from swine in immunosuppressed humans with organ failure are under development. Such trials require informed consent regarding potential infectious risks to the recipient, determination of breeding characteristics of swine, assessments of potential risks to the public and healthcare providers, consideration of ethical issues posed by this novel therapy, and defined strategies to monitor and address infectious episodes that may be encountered by healthcare teams. Clinical trials in xenotransplantation will allow improved definition of potential infectious risks.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones , Neoplasias , Animales , Humanos , Porcinos , Trasplante Heterólogo/efectos adversos , Infecciones/etiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Neoplasias/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinician-educator tracks improve teaching behaviors in trainees. However, detailed curriculum descriptions to fully understand, compare, and reproduce them are often lacking. We aimed to describe and evaluate a medical education curriculum for senior residents. METHODS: Based on Kolb's experiential learning model, we designed a one-month curriculum to increase teaching effectiveness. PGY 2-4 internal medicine and medicine-pediatrics residents in a university-based training program participated in the course from 2015-2019. In a pre-post design, participants completed a survey to evaluate the curriculum. Survey items related to four constructs in medical education: knowledge, confidence, skills, and importance (5-point Likert scale; 1=low, 5=high). We assessed the difference in the means for each construct before and after the curriculum. RESULTS: Thirty-nine residents completed the curriculum (19% of total residents), and 100% of participants completed the surveys. We observed an increase in the mean self-rated level of teaching knowledge (2.63 [SD 0.57] vs. 4.43 [SD 0.42], p<0.005), confidence (3.31 [SD 0.4] vs. 4.29 [SD 0.32], p<0.005), and skills (2.9 [SD 0.63] vs. 4.14 [SD 0.38], p<0.005) after completing the course. Residents consistently graded individual curricular components highly. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a one-month medical education curriculum with a strong foundation in learning theory. The curriculum is feasible and presented in sufficient detail to allow reproduction. Our findings suggest that it increases participants' self-perceptions of teaching knowledge, confidence, and skills.