Incidence, mortality and survival trends of penile cancer in Lithuania 1998-2017.

Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse trends in penile cancer incidence, mortality, and relative survival in Lithuania during the period of 1998-2017. Materials and methods: The study was based on all cases of penile cancer reported to the Lithuanian Cancer Registry between 1998 and 2017. Age-specific rates standardized rates were calculated, using the direct method (World standard population). The Joinpoint regression model was used to provide estimated average annual percentage change (AAPC). One-year and five-year relative survival estimates were calculated using period analysis. Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of the observed survival of cancer patients and the expected survival of the underlying general population. Results: During the study period, the age-standardized incidence rate of penile cancer varied between 0.72 and 1.64 per 100 000, with AAPC 0.9% (95% CI -0.8-2.7). The mortality rate of penile cancer in Lithuania during this period varied from 0.18 to 0.69 per 100 000, with AAPC of -2.6% (95% CI -5.3-0.3). Relative one-year survival of patients, diagnosed with penile cancer improved over the time from 75.84% in period 1998-2001 to 89.33% in period 2014-2017. Relative five-year survival rate of patients, diagnosed with penile cancer changed from 55.44% in period 1998-2001 to 72.90% in period 2014-2017. Conclusions: The incidence rates of penile cancer showed an increasing trend, while mortality rates were decreasing in Lithuania during 1998-2017. One-year and five-year relative survival increased, however, it does not reach the highest scores of Northern European countries.

Should Short-Course Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Be Applied for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trials.

PURPOSE: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend either long-course chemoradiation (LC) or short-course radiation (SC, 5 × 5 Gy) for rectal cancer before total mesorectal excision. However, they do not recommend SC for low-lying tumors. As early toxicity of SC is lower than that of LC, and postoperative complications as well as late toxicity are similar, the probable reason is a notion that for low-lying tumors LC may be more effective than SC in assuring local control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized trials comparing SC with LC was performed to test the hypothesis that for low-lying tumors, LC is superior to SC in reducing the risk of local failure. RESULTS: The systematic search identified 4 trials including, in total, 421 patients with tumors <5 cm from the anal verge; 221 were randomized to SC and 200 to LC. The meta-analysis showed that the difference in local failure rate between SC and LC was insignificant; the pooled odds ratio was 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 1.44, P = .59. Heterogeneity between trials was insignificant; I2 = 0.0%, P = .47. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis does not support the notion that LC given before total mesorectal excision is superior to SC in reducing the risk of local failure in low-lying tumors.

The Role of VEGFA, COX2, HUR and CUGBP2 in Predicting the Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients.

Background and objectives: The effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy, which is commonly used for stage II-III rectal cancer (RC) treatment, is limited. Genes associated with the pathogenesis of RC could determine response to this treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential predictive value of VEGFA, COX2, HUR and CUGBP2 genes and the associations between post-treatment changes in gene expression and the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy. Materials and Methods: Biopsies from RC and healthy rectal tissue of 28 RC patients were collected before neoadjuvant therapy and 6-8 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. The expression levels of VEGFA, COX2, HUR, CUGBP2 genes were evaluated using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: The results reveal a significantly higher expression of VEGFA, COX2 and HUR mRNA in RC tissue compared to healthy rectal tissue (p < 0.05), and elevated VEGFA gene expression in pre-treatment tissues was associated with a better response to neoadjuvant therapy based on T-stage downstaging (p < 0.05). The expression of VEGFA, HUR and CUGBP2 genes significantly decreased after neoadjuvant therapy (p < 0.05). Responders to treatment demonstrated a significantly stronger decrease of VEGFA and COX2 expression after neoadjuvant therapy than non-responders (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the pre-treatment VEGFA gene expression might have predictive value for the response to neoadjuvant therapy, while the post-treatment decrease in VEGFA and COX2 gene expression could indicate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy in RC patients.

Preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus short-course radiotherapy without adjuvant chemotherapy both with delayed surgery for stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: 5-Year survival data of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: At present, there are common recommendations for treatment for stage II-III resectable rectal cancer patients: preoperative conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with delayed surgery in 6-8 weeks or preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by immediate surgery. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in two treatment groups: preoperative SCRT and CRT both with delayed surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy in CRT arm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 75 to CRT (preoperative conventional CRT, 50Gy/25 fr with fluorouracil and leucovorin on the 1st and the 5th week of RT followed by TME surgery in 6-8 weeks and 4 cycles of adjuvant fluorouracil/leucovorin every 4 weeks; then follow-up) and 75 to SCRT (preoperative short-course RT, 25Gy/5 fr followed by TME surgery in 6-8 weeks; then follow-up). The data of 140 patients (72 in CRT and 68 in SCRT group) were included in statistical analysis. Primary end points were OS and DFS. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 60.5 (range, 5-108) months. The 5-year DFS was 67% in the CRT group (n=72) and 45% in the SCRT group (n=68) (P=0.013; HR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.13-3.12; P=0.015). The 5-year OS was 79% and 62% in the CRT and SCRT groups, respectively (P=0.015; HR=2.05; 95% CI, 1.13-3.70; P=0.017). The 5-year OS for intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n=150) was 78% in the CRT and 58% in the SCRT group (P=0.003; HR=2.28; 95% CI, 1.30-4.00; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year DFS and OS were significantly better in the CRT than the SCRT group. For ITT population, OS was also significantly better after CRT versus SCRT.

Preoperative conventional chemoradiotherapy versus short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery for rectal cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There still is no evidence which neoadjuvant therapy regimen for stage II-III rectal cancer is superior. The aim of this study was to compare results achieved after long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with short-term radiotherapy (RT) followed by delayed surgery. METHODS: A randomized trial was carried out between 2007-2013. One hundred fifty patients diagnosed with stage II-III rectal cancer were randomized into one of two neoadjuvant treatment arms: conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and short-term radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgery after 6-8 weeks. Primary endpoints of this trial were downstaging and pathological complete response rate. Secondary endpoints were local recurrence rate and overall survival. RESULTS: The pathological complete response was found in 3 (4.4%) cases after RT and 8 (11.1%) after CRT (P = 0.112). Downstaging (stage 0 and I) was observed in 21 (30.9%) cases in RT group vs. 27 (37.5%) cases in CRT group (P = 0.409). Median follow-up time was 39.7 (range 4.9-79.7) months. 3-years overall survival (OS) was 78% in RT group vs. 82.4% in CRT group (P = 0.145), while disease-free survival (DFS) differed significantly - 59% in RT group vs. 75.1% in CRT group (P = 0,022). Hazard ratio of cancer progression for RT patients was 1.93 (95% CI: 1.08-3.43) compared to CRT patients. CONCLUSION: Three-years disease-free survival was better in CRT group comparing with RT group with no difference in overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00597311. January 2008.

Survival of patients with testicular cancer in Lithuania during 1999-2002.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of patients with testicular cancer in Lithuania during 1998-2002 and factors that influenced the survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survival rates of testicular cancer patients were evaluated using the data of the Lithuanian Cancer Registry for 1998-2002. The survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test in order to compare the survival rates. The observed survival rates were calculated. RESULTS: The 5-year observed survival rate in Lithuania was 71.2% (95% CI, 64.4%-77.5%). The survival of testicular cancer patients depended on age at the time of diagnosis, histology of tumor, stage and extent of disease. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with testicular cancer in Lithuania was substantially lower than in other European countries. The better survival was associated with younger age and lesser extent of metastases.