Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Chonnam Med J ; 60(2): 136-137, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841611
4.
8.
Chonnam Med J ; 59(2): 140, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37303820
11.
Helicobacter ; 28(3): e12961, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36828667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some patients find it difficult to discontinue proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Unlike the 13 C-urea breath test (UBT), the stool antigen test (SAT), particularly when domestically produced kits are used, may be less likely to yield false-negative results. METHODS: This prospective study included a convenience series of 35 healthy Japanese subjects. Based on a statistical calculation, acceptable numbers of subjects were considered at least 21 and 11 with and without Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, respectively. The H. pylori infection was determined using the UBT or rapid urease test. SATs were performed with three novel domestically produced kits (the rapid immunochromatography tests Quick Navi™-H. pylori [Navi™] and Quick Chaser® H. pylori [Chaser®], and the bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay test BLEIA® 'EIKEN' H. pylori Antigen [BLEIA®]) before and after oral PPI administration (30 mg lansoprazole once daily for 14 days). For each kit, the sensitivities and specificities were calculated and compared before and after PPI administration. Furthermore, the cutoff index (COI) values of BLEIA® before and after PPI administration were compared in H. pylori-infected subjects. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was detected in 68.6% (24/35) of the included subjects. The sensitivities and specificities before versus after PPI administration were as follows: 79.2% (19/24) and 100.0% (11/11) versus 75.0% (18/24) and 100.0% (11/11) for Navi™, respectively (p = 1); 87.5% (21/24) and 100.0% (11/11) versus 75.0% (18/24) and 100.0% (11/11) for Chaser®, respectively (p = .371); 100.0% (24/24) and 100.0% (11/11) versus 95.8% (23/24) and 100.0% (11/11) for BLEIA®, respectively (p = 1). The median COI values of BLEIA® before and after PPI administration were 1389.0 and 3207.25, respectively (p = .0839). CONCLUSIONS: In stool specimens, H. pylori antigenicity is maintained even during PPI use. SAT using a bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay is particularly recommended because of its extremely high sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Lansoprazol , Antígenos Bacterianos/análisis , Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , Heces , Urea/análisis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
12.
Chonnam Med J ; 59(1): 98-99, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36794241
15.
Chonnam Med J ; 58(3): 131-132, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36245772
16.
Chonnam Med J ; 58(3): 135, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36245775
18.
Chonnam Med J ; 58(2): 87, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677949
19.
Chonnam Med J ; 58(2): 79-80, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677953
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA