RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biological similarities between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) have been described in humans and animal models suggesting a possible common genetic basis. FMF is caused by variants in the MEFV gene which encodes pyrin, an immune regulator. This study aimed to investigate the carrier rate of disease-causing MEFV variants in children of different ethnicities diagnosed with very-early-onset IBD (VEO-IBD). METHODS: The study included 23 children diagnosed with VEO-IBD who had undergone whole exome sequencing. The exomes were evaluated for MEFV monoallelic and biallelic disease-causing variants and compared to exome sequencing data of 250 probands with suspected monogenic diseases other than IBD. RESULTS: Of the 23 children diagnosed with VEO-IBD, 12 (52%) were carriers of at least one MEFV disease-causing variant, which was threefold higher than in individuals without IBD. The most frequent variants identified were p.M694V and p.E148Q (42% each). The allelic frequency of MEFV variants was found to be higher across the VEO-IBD group in 13 of 14 ethnicities compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that disease-causing variants in the MEFV gene should be sought in cases of VEO-IBD. However, the clinical importance of this finding is yet to be defined. IMPACT: There are biological similarities between inflammatory bowel disease and familial Mediterranean fever, suggesting a possible genetic relationship. Children less than 6 years old clinically diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease have a threefold higher rate of disease-causing variants in the MEFV gene than controls. Monogenic testing in children with very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease should include a search for MEFV variants.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: While the spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in the Israeli Jewish population has been extensively studied, there is a paucity of data pertaining to Israeli Arab high-risk cases. METHODS: Consecutive Israeli Arab breast and/or ovarian cancer patients were recruited using an ethically approved protocol from January 2012 to February 2019. All ovarian cancer cases were referred for BRCA genotyping. Breast cancer patients were offered BRCA sequencing and deletion/duplication analysis after genetic counseling, if the calculated risk for carrying a BRCA mutation by risk prediction algorithms was ≥10%. RESULTS: Overall, 188 patients participated; 150 breast cancer cases (median age at diagnosis: 40 years, range 22-67) and 38 had ovarian cancer (median age at diagnosis: 52.5 years, range 26-79). Of genotyped cases, 18 (10%) carried one of 12 pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants, 12 in BRCA1, 6 in BRCA2. Only one was a rearrangement. Three variants recurred in more than one case; one was detected in five seemingly unrelated families. The detection rate for all breast cancer cases was 4%, 5% in bilateral breast cancer cases and 3% if breast cancer was diagnosed < 40 years. Of patients with ovarian cancer, 12/38 (32%) were carriers; the detection rate reached 75% (3/4) among patients diagnosed with both breast and ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The overall yield of comprehensive BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk Israeli Arab individuals is low in breast cancer patients, and much higher in ovarian cancer patients. These results may guide optimal cancer susceptibility testing strategy in the Arab-Israeli population.
Asunto(s)
Árabes/genética , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Genotipaje/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Variación Genética , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Humanos , Israel/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 genotyping results have clinical implications for cancer risk assessment and targeted therapy. Current practice in Israel is to genotype for the predominant BRCA1/2 mutations first, followed by full gene analysis in eligible mutation-negative individuals. This work assessed the rate of non-predominant mutations in BRCA1/2 in ethnically diverse high-risk cases. METHODS: Breast and/or ovarian cancer patients who tested negative for the predominant BRCA1/2 mutations were referred for comprehensive BRCA1/2 genotyping if calculated risk for carrying a BRCA mutation was ≥ 10%. RESULTS: Of 1258 eligible patients, 41 (3.3%) carried one of 38 mutations: 3% of Ashkenazi Jews and 3.4% of mixed ethnicities. Detection rate was < 5% among patients diagnosed with cancer younger than 40 or with bilateral breast cancer, and was 5.5% of ovarian cancer patients. Three of the carriers (7.3%) carried gene rearrangements. Three mutations were reported in more than one case. CONCLUSIONS: The overall yield of comprehensive BRCA1/2 testing in ethnically diverse high-risk Israeli individuals is 3.3%. This is lower than expected by probability models. A slightly higher rate of BRCA1/2 carriers was seen among ovarian cancer cases. These data should guide BRCA1/2 optimal testing strategy in Israel.