Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(8): e073682, 2023 08 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550030

BACKGROUND: Although different educational interventions have been widely used to manage and treat hypertension, alone or in combination with other interventions, there is a significant variation in their claimed effectiveness. REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this umbrella review is to determine the effectiveness of educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, for improving blood pressure control and self-management practices among hypertensive patients. The review question is: Do educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, improve self-management practices among patients with hypertension? METHODS: We will conduct a review of systematic reviews involving studies that implemented educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, designed to change self-care practices among hypertensive patients who are 18 years and above, regardless of their sex and ethnicity. Following the guidelines set forth in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement, a comprehensive literature search will be conducted from September to December 2023 on six electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar. Search terms will be developed using database-specific indexed terms and text words derived from the review aim. We will present the effects of the educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, on hypertension self-management practices. We will report the outcome data with 95% CIs for each study. Relative risk, mean differences or ORs will be used, depending on the measuring indices in each study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this study will use aggregated data from previously published systematic reviews. However, we have registered the protocol in PROSPERO. We confirm that all methods will be performed following the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The findings from this study will be disseminated through presentations at academic conferences and publication in peer-reviewed international journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022375581.


Hypertension , Self-Management , Text Messaging , Humans , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Hypertension/therapy , Blood Pressure , Research Design , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Review Literature as Topic
2.
J West Afr Coll Surg ; 12(3): 89-95, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36388732

Introduction: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) is usually clear cut but sometimes there is atypical presentation of this condition in children. There is a need to determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of these three pre-operative diagnostic modalities: Paediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), abdominal ultrasonographic scan (USS) findings, and serum C-reactive proteins (CRPs). The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the three diagnostic modalities and to compare each diagnostic test result with the histopathological results of the appendix specimens. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study that involved children aged 4-15 years with suspected AA who presented at the emergency paediatric unit of a tertiary health care hospital in North Central, Nigeria. The PAS, quantitative serum CRP, and abdominal USS were performed for all eligible patients. Results: A total of 43 patients were included in this study. Forty appendicectomy specimens (93%) were histologically confirmed to be AA and three appendicectomy specimens (7%) were normal appendix. The diagnostic accuracy values of PAS, abdominal USS, and CRP were 95.3%, 93.0%, and 90.7%, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that PAS, abdominal USS, and serum CRP provided useful diagnostic accuracy for AA in children.

3.
J West Afr Coll Surg ; 12(3): 96-103, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36388745

Introduction: There is a paucity of studies in the West African sub-region which have compared both the intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects of caudal block and inguinal field block using plain bupivacaine in groin surgeries in children. The study aimed to compare the duration of analgesia and complications of caudal block and inguinal field block in pediatric groin surgeries. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind randomized study conducted at a tertiary health institution in North Central, Nigeria, over a period of 6 months. A total of 74 children scheduled for day case groin surgeries for inguinal hernia, hydrocoele and palpable undescended testis were recruited into the study. The effectiveness of the analgesic effect was assessed by measuring serum cortisol levels before surgery (i.e. baseline at 8am), 5minutes after caudal block or inguinal field block, and 1-hour after surgery. Post-operative pain was determined using FLACC score (Face, Legs, Activity, Crying and Consolability) every 15 minutes till 6 hours after surgery when the patients were discharged home and the caregivers measured the patients' pain scores using the FLACC score every 1 hour to a maximum duration of 10 hours after surgery. Data obtained from the study was entered into the study proforma and analysed using IBM SPSS version 21.0. The P value was considered statistically significant at <0.05. Results: A total of 74 patients were recruited for this study, with 68 males (91.9%) and 6 females (8.1%). The children's age range was 6 months to 7 years, with a mean age of 3.35 ± 1.90 years. The mean basal serum cortisol levels of the caudal block group and inguinal block group were 11.15 ± 5.38 µg/dL and 10.79 ± 4.92µg/d respectively (p-value = 0.767). Five minutes after caudal block, the mean serum cortisol level was 10.50 ± 5.39µg/dL while inguinal field block was 10.63 ± 4.68µg/dL (p-value = 0.288). The mean serum cortisol level obtained one hour after each procedure was 9.34 ± 4.05 µg/dL for the caudal block group and 10.00 ± 3.56 µg/dL in the inguinal field block group with p-value = 0.275.Using the FLACC score, the mean duration of analgesia in caudal block group was 372.00 ± 71.55 minutes and was inguinal field block group was 387.43 ± 62.65 minutes with a p-value = 0.116. There was no anaesthetic technique related complications that was recorded in both caudal block group and inguinal group during the study period. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that caudal block and inguinal field block using plain bupivacaine provided comparable duration of analgesia in paediatric groin surgeries. Therefore, caudal block or inguinal field block using plain bupivacaine should be recommended for both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in elective paediatric groin surgeries.

...