Analysis of the location and trajectory of the Kirschner wires in the fixation of extension-type supracondylar fracture of the humerus by 3D computational simulation.

BACKGROUND: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is still a preference for the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. However, no reports have shown the pin trajectory and the characteristics of the entry point so far. So we established a computational simulation model of the elbow to observe the trajectory of pinning for supracondylar humerus fractures. METHODS: We reconstructed an adult elbow computationally and simulated pin placement through lateral and medial pinning. Pin trajectories were traced after placement and after the addition of the skin profile; the relative entry points of the pins were determined. We used the center of the dorsal olecranon inflection as an anatomic reference for the entry points of lateral pinning. Four quadrants were established based on the center of the dorsal olecranon inflection: upper medial quadrant, upper lateral quadrant, lower medial quadrant, and lower lateral quadrant (LLQ). RESULTS: The maximum angle of pinning through the lateral column was 64° ± 3°. The minimum angles of pinning through the lateral column and middle column were 37° ± 3° and 20° ± 2°, respectively. The range of safe angle pinning through the medial column was between 18° ± 2° and 57° ± 3° to avoid penetration of the olecranon fossa and the cortex of the medial column. The entry points of lateral pinning were within the lateral half of the LLQ, and the lateral one-third of the LLQ contained all entry points of the pins through the lateral column and minor points of the pins through the middle column. The exit points of the medial pinning were within the lateral fringe of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction region; entering from the inferior two-thirds of the medial epicondyle could lead to the exit points in the proximal half of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction region laterally. DISCUSSION: For lateral pinning, the entry points would be within the lateral half of the LLQ. For the pins through the lateral column, the entry points should be within the lateral one-third of the LLQ. For medial pinning, entering from the inferior two-thirds of the medial epicondyle would lead to a more proximal exit.

The most stable pinning configurations in transverse supracondylar humerus fracture fixation in children: A novel three-dimensional finite element analysis of a pediatric bone model.

PURPOSE: This study aimed at finding out the effect of exit height, trajectory and number of pins on the stability of cross and divergent-lateral pins used in the fixation of extension-type, transverse supracondylar humerus fracture (SHF) in children, based on finite element analysis. METHODS: Distal humerus model consisting of the ossific nucleus of the capitellum (ONC) and distal cartilage of a 6-year-old boy was developed via three-dimensional finite modeling. Various cross and divergent-lateral pinning models with either two or three pins were simulated on an extension-type, transverse SHF and tested in six loading directions. RESULTS: Two-cross pins and 2-divergent-lateral pins were more stable against torsional and translation forces respectively, while 3-cross pins were the most stable against all forces. The cross pins exiting at the upper border of the distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) had the best stiffness among the 2-cross pins, while the lateral pins with a middle third ONC distal pin provided the best stiffness among the 2-lateral pins. A third olecranon fossa pin greatly enhanced stability of the 2-lateral pins. CONCLUSION: For typical transverse fractures, 2-cross pins are found to be superior to 2-divergent lateral pins only against torsional forces. Pins exiting at the upper border of the MDJ provides the best mechanical stability with 2-cross pins. Two-divergent-lateral pins with a distal pin going through the middle third of the ONC provides the best mechanical stability against translation forces for these transverse fractures. Three-cross pins however offer the best mechanical stability against both translation and torsional forces. This study offers important clues in the preoperative evaluation and management of extension-type supracondylar fractures in children.

Biomechanical study of C1 posterior arch crossing screw and C2 lamina screw fixations for atlantoaxial joint instability.

BACKGROUND: The biomechanics of C1 posterior arch screw and C2 vertebral lamina screw techniques has not been well studied, and the biomechanical performance of the constructs cannot be explained only by cadaver testing. METHODS: From computed tomography images, a nonlinear intact three-dimensional C1-2 finite element model was developed and validated. And on this basis, models for the odontoid fractures and the three posterior internal fixation techniques were developed. The range of motion (ROM) and stress distribution of the implants were analyzed and compared under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. RESULTS: All three kinds of fixation techniques completely restricted the range of motion (ROM) at the C1-2 operative level. The C1-2 pedicle screw fixation technique showed lower and stable stress peak on implants. The C1 posterior arch screw + C2 pedicle screw and C1 pedicle screw + C2 lamina screw fixation techniques showed higher stress peaks on implants in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. CONCLUSIONS: As asymmetrical fixations, C1 posterior arch screw + C2 pedicle screw and C1 pedicle screw + C2 lamina screw fixations may offer better stability in lateral bending and axial rotation, but symmetrical fixation C1-2 pedicle screw can put the implants in a position of mechanical advantage.

Mechanical stability study of three techniques used in the fixation of transverse and oblique metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the distal humerus in children: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Management of distal humerus metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) region fractures can be very challenging mainly because of the higher location and characteristics of the fracture lines. Loss of reduction is relatively higher in MDJ fractures treated with classical supracondylar humerus fractures (SHFs) fixation techniques. METHODS: Three different fracture patterns including transverse, medial oblique and lateral oblique fractures were computationally simulated in the coronal plane in the distal MDJ region of a pediatric humerus and fixated with Kirschner Wires (K-wires), elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN), and lateral external fixation system (EF). Stiffness values in flexion, extension, valgus, varus, internal, and external rotations for each fixation technique were calculated. RESULTS: In the transverse fracture model, 3C (1-medial, 2-lateral K-wires) had the best stiffness in flexion, varus, internal, and external rotations, while 3L (3-divergent lateral K-wires) was the most stable in extension and valgus. In the medial oblique fracture model, EF had the best stiffness in flexion, extension, valgus, and varus loadings, while the best stiffness in internal and external rotations was generated by 3MC (2-medial, 1-lateral K-wires). In the lateral oblique fracture model, 3C (1-medial, 2-lateral K-wires) had the best stiffness in flexion and internal and external rotations, while ESIN had the best stiffness in extension and valgus and varus loadings. CONCLUSION: The best stability against translational forces in lateral oblique, medial oblique, and transverse MDJ fractures would be provided by ESIN, EF, and K-wires, respectively. K-wires are however superior to both ESIN and EF in stabilizing all three fracture types against torsional forces, with both 2-crossed and 3-crossed K-wires having comparable stability. Depending on the fracture pattern, a 3-crossed configuration with either 2-divergent lateral and 1-medial K-wires or 2-medial and 1-lateral K-wires may offer the best stability.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of Kirschner wire fixation configuration for supracondylar fracture of humerus fracture in children / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To establish a new mechanical model of distal humerus in children with epiphysial cartilage, stimulate supracondylar humerus fracture and perform three dimensional finite elements, and study effect of pins numbers, pin tract, outlet height and pin configurations on stability of fixation.@*METHODS@#Three dimensional computed tomography (CT) data of 6-year-old boy with distal humerus was downloaded from picture archiving and communications systems software (PACS), the data of picture was imported into Simpleware and SolidWorks 2016 software to establish distal humerus fracture in children contained ossific nucleus of the capitellum (ONC) and distal cartilage. Normal extense supracondylar humerus fracture model was established to stimulate configurations of crossed and lateral pinning fixation, 30 N was added on the direction of flexion extension and varus valgus, while 50 N was added on the direction of internal and external turning. Stability was analyzed by displacement degree of distal fracture.@*RESULTS@#Among 2-pin configurations, 2-crossed pins were more stable against rotation forces which could resist rotation stress over 2 585 Nmm/ °, while low position through ONC of 2-divergent lateral pins were more stable, which could resist stress of 45 N /mm and 190 N /mm during the test of resistant strains and varus-valgus stress. The third pins was added into the more stable lateral 2-pins, the stability in all directions were increased obviously, and 3 crossed pins is the most stable, stress of flexion-extension, varus-valgus and internal-external turning were 198 N /mm, 395 N /mm and 6 251 Nmm/ °.@*CONCLUSION@#Two-divergent lateral pins could provide enough stability for supracondylar humerus fracture in children. In two-crossed pins, the upper border of MDJ could provide the best stability. Three-crossed pins could offer the best stability against both translation and rotation forces.

A two-stage retrospective analysis to determine the effect of entry point on higher exit of proximal pins in lateral pinning of supracondylar humerus fracture in children.

BACKGROUND: Kirschner wire fixation remains to be the mainstream treatment modality in unstable or displaced supracondylar humerus fracture in children, with divergent lateral pins being the most preferred due to their sufficient stability and decreased risk of ulnar nerve injury. However, the entry point at which the proximal lateral pin can be inserted to achieve a more proximal exit and maximum divergence has not been reported. This study retrospectively analyzed the characteristics and factors influencing the entry and exit points of the proximal lateral pins. METHODS: The study was divided into two stages. In stage one, the entry and exit points of the proximal pins of lateral pinning configuration were analyzed from intra-operative radiographs of children treated for extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures. The coronal and sagittal pin angles formed by the proximal pins were also measured. Using the findings of stage one, we intentionally tried to achieve a more proximal exit with the proximal pins in stage two. Comparisons between groups of patients treated by random and intentional pinnings were done statistically. RESULTS: In the first stage, 47 (29.2%) of the 161 proximal pins exited above the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) region. Of these, 85.1% entered from lateral and posterior to the ossific nucleus of the capitellum (ONC). The pin angles averaged 58.4° and 90.5° in the coronal and sagittal planes respectively. In the second stage, 47 (65.3%) proximal pins in the intended group exited above the MDJ region, while only 32 (36%) in the random group exited above the MDJ region. CONCLUSION: While aiming at the upper border of the distal MDJ during pinning, lateral pins can easily achieve a higher, proximal exit above the MDJ if inserted from lateral and posterior to the ONC and parallel to the humeral shaft in the sagittal plane. Higher exit can also be easily achieved in younger patients and patients fixated with smaller diameter pins.

A comparative biomechanical study on different fixation techniques in the management of transverse metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the distal humerus in children.

BACKGROUND: Metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures of the distal humerus are problematic to reduce and more susceptible to post-operative complications. This biomechanical study was designed to compare Kirschner wires (KW), lateral external fixation, and elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN) in simulated transverse MDJ fractures of various heights. METHOD: Sagittally oblique, transverse MDJ fractures were created in fourth-generation composite bone models at three levels: high, mid, and low fractures, respectively, and then fixed with either Kirschner wires, lateral external fixation (EF), or ESIN respectively and tested in extension, flexion, valgus, varus, internal, and external rotations. RESULTS: In the high fractures, ESIN had better overall stiffness than the other techniques. In the mid groups, three crossed pinning (1-medial and 2-lateral pins) had the best overall stiffness, followed by two crossed pinning (1-medial and 1-lateral pins). In the low fractures, three crossed pinning was superior to all other techniques. Two crossed pinning and three -lateral pinning techniques yielded comparable stiffness in the low fracture model. CONCLUSIONS: From a biomechanical perspective, ESIN provides the best overall stability for fractures located in the upper region of the MDJ, while percutaneous pinning is superior in stabilizing fractures of the lower region. Two lateral and one medial pins make the most stable crossed pinning construct for these fractures.

Investigation into the biomechanics of lumbar spine micro-dynamic pedicle screw.

BACKGROUND: Numerous reports have shown that rigid spinal fixation contributes to a series of unwanted complications in lumbar fusion procedure. This innovative micro-dynamic pedicle screw study was designed to investigate the biomechanical performance of lumbar implants using numerical simulation technique and biomechanical experiment. METHODS: Instrumented finite element models of three configurations (dynamic fixation, rigid fixation and hybrid fixation) using a functional L3-L4 lumbar unit were developed, to compare the range of motion of the lumbar spine and stress values on the endplate and implants. An in vitro experiment was simultaneously conducted using 18 intact porcine lumbar spines and segmental motion analyses were performed as well. RESULTS: Simulation results indicated that the dynamic fixation and the hybrid fixation models respectively increased the range of motion of the lumbar spine by 95 and 60% in flexion and by 83 and 55% in extension, compared with the rigid fixation model. The use of micro-dynamic pedicle screw led to higher stress on endplates and lower stress on pedicle screws. The outcome of the in vitro experiment demonstrated that the micro-dynamic pedicle screw could provide better range of motion at the instrumented segments than a rigid fixation. CONCLUSION: The micro-dynamic pedicle screw has the advantage of providing better range of motion than conventional pedicle screw in flexion-extension, without compromising stabilization, and has the potential of bringing the load transfer behavior of fusional segment closer to normal and also lowers the stress values of pedicle screws.