A Comparison of Patient- and Clinician-Reported Acute Toxic Effects During Radiation Therapy for Primary Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that cancer treatment-related toxic effects are underreported by clinicians. We sought to compare patient- and clinician-reported acute toxic effects among patients undergoing radiation therapy for primary breast cancer and to determine factors associated with patient-clinician discordance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient responses from a weekly Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events based assessment were matched to clinician assessments of acute toxic effects during treatment. Weighted κ statistics were used to evaluate agreement between patient and clinician assessments. Linear regression, logistic regression, and generalized estimating equation models were used to identify covariates associated with discordance. RESULTS: Overall, 842 patient-clinician assessment pairs from 376 unique patients were analyzed. Total symptom burden score was higher for patients than clinicians (4.7 vs 2.3, P < .01). Dermatitis, pruritis, pain, and edema items were classified as having minimal agreement (κ of 0.25, 0.23, 0.20, and 0.25, respectively). Fatigue (κ 0.17) and psychosocial (0.03) patient-clinician pairs were found to have no agreement. The linear regression demonstrated that assessments by patients who identified as Black or African American were associated with a 0.13-point decrease in discordance (95% confidence interval, -0.25 to -0.01), while time from the start of treatment was associated with increased discordance (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.12). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing breast radiation therapy, discordance in patient and clinician symptom reporting is high and increases as treatment progresses. The mechanism of reduced discordance among Black or African American patients warrants further investigation. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether interventions for lower severity symptoms, which are commonly overlooked by clinicians, can reduce symptom burden and improve patient quality of life during radiation therapy.

High-Dose-Rate Monotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Results.

PURPOSE: High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy was originally used with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to increase the dose to the prostate without injuring the bladder or rectum. Numerous studies have reported HDR brachytherapy is safe and effective. We adapted it for use without EBRT for cases not requiring lymph node treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We entered the patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment parameters into a prospective registry and serially added follow-up data for 448 men with low-risk (n=288) and intermediate-risk (n=160) prostate cancer treated from 1996 to 2009. Their median age was 64 years (range 42-90). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 6.0 ng/mL (range 0.2-18.2). The Gleason score was ≤6 in 76% and 7 in 24%. The median dose was 43.5 Gy in 6 fractions. The clinical and biochemical disease control and survival rates were calculated. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of Adverse Events. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 6.5 years (range 0.3-15.3). The actuarial 6- and 10-year PSA progression-free survival was 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.9%-99.4%) and 97.8% (95% CI 95.5%-98.9%). Overall survival at 10 years was 76.7% (95% CI 69.9%-82.2%). The local control, distant metastasis-free survival, and cause-specific survival were 99.7% (95% CI 97.9%-99.9%), 98.9% (95% CI 96.3%-99.7%), and 99.1% (95% CI 95.8%-99.8%). T stage, initial PSA level, Gleason score, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, patient age, and androgen deprivation therapy did not significantly correlate with disease control or survival. No late grade 3 to 4 rectal toxicities developed. Late grade 3 to 4 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 4.9% (grade 3 in 4.7%). CONCLUSIONS: HDR monotherapy is a safe and highly effective treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Ureteral stent insertion for gynecologic interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of ureteral stents in interstitial gynecological brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed 289 patients with cervix cancer treated with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy who did not have pretreatment hydronephrosis to determine the relative incidence of benign ureteral strictures after treatment. We also did comparative dosimetry analysis in five cases of high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Bilateral ureteral stents were placed during the procedure. Three dosimetry plans were created to determine the impact of modifying clinical target volume (CTV) and applying ureteral dose constraints. In Plan 1, the ureters were contoured and excluded from the CTV and 120% dose constraints were applied. In Plan 2, the ureters were contoured and excluded, but no dose constraints were applied to the ureter. In Plan 3, the CTV was created as if the location of the ureters was unknown and then ureteral dose was determined. RESULTS: There were 11 ureteral strictures observed in 255 nonstented cases and 0 ureteral strictures in 34 stented cases. Plan 1 reduced the ureter dose (D(0.1cc)) by a median 22% (7.0-53.8%) compared with Plan 2 and by a median of 30.9% (12.3-65%). compared with Plan 3. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of stents and ureteral dose constraints facilitates dosimetry and reduces the dose to ureters. Temporary ureteral stents prevent obstruction during interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy and allows the ureters to be addressed as an organ at risk.

High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy consistently results in high quality dosimetry.

PURPOSE: We performed a dosimetry analysis to determine how well the goals for clinical target volume coverage, dose homogeneity, and normal tissue dose constraints were achieved with high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cumulative dose-volume histograms for 208 consecutively treated HDR prostate brachytherapy implants were analyzed. Planning was based on ultrasound-guided catheter insertion and postoperative CT imaging; the contoured clinical target volume (CTV) was the prostate, a small margin, and the proximal seminal vesicles. Dosimetric parameters analyzed for the CTV were D90, V90, V100, V150, and V200. Dose to the urethra, bladder, bladder balloon, and rectum were evaluated by the dose to 0.1 cm(3), 1 cm(3), and 2 cm(3) of each organ, expressed as a percentage of the prescribed dose. Analysis was stratified according to prostate size. RESULTS: The mean prostate ultrasound volume was 38.7 ± 13.4 cm(3) (range: 11.7-108.6 cm(3)). The mean CTV was 75.1 ± 20.6 cm(3) (range: 33.4-156.5 cm(3)). The mean D90 was 109.2% ± 2.6% (range: 102.3%-118.4%). Ninety-three percent of observed D90 values were between 105 and 115%. The mean V90, V100, V150, and V200 were 99.9% ± 0.05%, 99.5% ± 0.8%, 25.4% ± 4.2%, and 7.8% ± 1.4%. The mean dose to 0.1 cm(3), 1 cm(3), and 2 cm(3) for organs at risk were: Urethra: 107.3% ± 3.0%, 101.1% ± 14.6%, and 47.9% ± 34.8%; bladder wall: 79.5% ± 5.1%, 69.8% ± 4.9%, and 64.3% ± 5.0%; bladder balloon: 70.3% ± 6.8%, 59.1% ± 6.6%, and 52.3% ± 6.2%; rectum: 76.3% ± 2.5%, 70.2% ± 3.3%, and 66.3% ± 3.8%. There was no significant difference between D90 and V100 when stratified by prostate size. CONCLUSIONS: HDR brachytherapy allows the physician to consistently achieve complete prostate target coverage and maintain normal tissue dose constraints for organs at risk over a wide range of target volumes.

Brachytherapy catheter spacing and stabilization technique.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To facilitate catheter spacing, implant stability, and patient comfort during multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Uniform and consistent spacing of multiple interstitial implant catheters can be difficult because individual catheters may become displaced during the course of treatment. The authors have developed a brachytherapy catheter fixation method using Jackson-Pratt (JP) drains that can be used within wounds to maintain catheter spacing or on the skin surface for applicator fixation. JP drains are threaded over the implant needles to space and stabilize the implant geometry. The needles are then replaced with the usual brachytherapy catheters. RESULTS: Surgically directed ("open") placement of implant catheters is less prone to displacement when a drain connects and spaces the catheters in the wound. Fixation on the skin surface can also be achieved with the JP drains, which make the friction buttons optional. The soft drain material helps avoid discomfort and pressure injury sometimes associated with hard plastic buttons. Small (10 French) round JP drains are suitable for breast, and head and neck sites and larger 7×10-mm flat JP drains for extremity sarcomas, abdominal, or thoracic tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The complex brachytherapy devices fashioned from widely available surgical drains effectively guide and maintain geometry for multicatheter interstitial implants. Stable implant geometry leads to more reliable implementation of brachytherapy dosimetry. Patient comfort is improved and soft tissue injury from hard-edged buttons is avoided.