Allosteric inhibition of phosphodiesterase 4D induces biphasic memory-enhancing effects associated with learning-activated signaling pathways.

RATIONALE: Phosphodiesterase 4D negative allosteric modulators (PDE4D NAMs) enhance memory and cognitive function in animal models without emetic-like side effects. However, the relationship between increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling and the effects of PDE4D NAM remains elusive. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the roles of hippocampal cAMP metabolism and synaptic activation in the effects of D159687, a PDE4D NAM, under baseline and learning-stimulated conditions. RESULTS: At 3 mg/kg, D159687 enhanced memory formation and consolidation in contextual fear conditioning; however, neither lower (0.3 mg/kg) nor higher (30 mg/kg) doses induced memory-enhancing effects. A biphasic (bell-shaped) dose-response effect was also observed in a scopolamine-induced model of amnesia in the Y-maze, whereas D159687 dose-dependently caused an emetic-like effect in the xylazine/ketamine anesthesia test. At 3 mg/kg, D159687 increased cAMP levels in the hippocampal CA1 region after conditioning in the fear conditioning test, but not in the home-cage or conditioning cage (i.e., context only). By contrast, 30 mg/kg of D159687 increased hippocampal cAMP levels under all conditions. Although both 3 and 30 mg/kg of D159687 upregulated learning-induced Fos expression in the hippocampal CA1 30 min after conditioning, 3 mg/kg, but not 30 mg/kg, of D159687 induced phosphorylation of synaptic plasticity-related proteins such as cAMP-responsive element-binding protein, synaptosomal-associated protein 25 kDa, and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR2A. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that learning-stimulated conditions can alter the effects of a PDE4D NAM on hippocampal cAMP levels and imply that a PDE4D NAM exerts biphasic memory-enhancing effects associated with synaptic plasticity-related signaling activation.

Enhanced GABAergic synaptic transmission at VLPAG neurons and potent modulation by oxycodone in a bone cancer pain model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We demonstrated previously that oxycodone has potent antinociceptive effects at supraspinal sites. In this study, we investigated changes in neuronal function and antinociceptive mechanisms of oxycodone at ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (VLPAG) neurons, which are a major site of opioid action, in a femur bone cancer (FBC) model with bone cancer-related pain. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We characterized the supraspinal antinociceptive profiles of oxycodone and morphine on mechanical hypersensitivity in the FBC model. Based on the disinhibition mechanism underlying supraspinal opioid antinociception, the effects of oxycodone and morphine on GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in VLPAG neurons were evaluated in slices from the FBC model. KEY RESULTS: The supraspinal antinociceptive effects of oxycodone, but not morphine, were abolished by blocking G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium1 (Kir 3.1) channels. In slices from the FBC model, GABAergic synaptic transmission at VLPAG neurons was enhanced, as indicated by a leftward shift of the input-output relationship curve of evoked IPSCs, the increased paired-pulse facilitation and the enhancement of miniature IPSC frequency. Following treatment with oxycodone and morphine, IPSCs were reduced in the FBC model, and the inhibition of presynaptic GABA release by oxycodone, but not morphine was enhanced and dependent on Kir 3.1 channels. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results demonstrate that Kir 3.1 channels are important for supraspinal antinociception and presynaptic GABA release inhibition by oxycodone in the FBC model. Enhanced GABAergic synaptic transmission at VLPAG neurons in the FBC model is an important site of supraspinal antinociception by oxycodone via Kir 3.1 channel activation.

The contribution of Gi/o protein to opioid antinociception in an oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy rat model.

Oxaliplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent that induces chronic refractory neuropathy. To determine whether opioids effectively relieve this chronic neuropathy, we investigated the efficacies of morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl, and the mechanisms underlying opioid antinociception, in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in rats. Rats exhibited significant mechanical allodynia following 2 weeks of chronic oxaliplatin administration. Within the range of doses that did not induce sedation and/or muscle rigidity, morphine (3 mg/kg, subcutaneously, s.c.) and oxycodone (0.3-0.56 mg/kg, s.c.) completely reversed oxaliplatin-induced mechanical allodynia, whereas fentanyl (0.017-0.03 mg/kg, s.c.) showed partial antinociception. The antinociception of the optimal doses of morphine and oxycodone were completely inhibited by pertussis toxin (PTX; 0.5 µg/rat, i.c.v.), a Gi/o protein inhibitor, while the partial effect of fentanyl was not affected in the oxaliplatin model. In the [(35)S]-GTPγS binding assay, activation of µ-opioid receptor by fentanyl, but not by morphine or oxycodone, in the mediodorsal thalamus was significantly reduced in oxaliplatin-treated rats. These results indicate that the lower antinociceptive potency of fentanyl in the oxaliplatin model might in part result from the loss of PTX-sensitive Gi/o protein activation, and the degree of Gi/o protein activation might be related to the potency of antinociception by opioids in this model.

Morphine and oxycodone, but not fentanyl, exhibit antinociceptive effects mediated by G-protein inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels in an oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy rat model.

It has begun to be understood that µ-opioid receptor (MOR) produces ligand-biased agonism, which contributes to differential physiological functions of MOR agonists. We previously demonstrated that in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in rats, morphine and oxycodone exhibited antinociceptive effects while antinociception of fentanyl was partial, and such different efficacies might result from the different level of Gi/o protein activation. Based on our background, to reveal further mechanism, we focused on the role of Gi/o protein-related downstream signaling, the G-protein inwardly rectifying K(+)1 (GIRK1) channel. The GIRK1 channel blocker tertiapin-Q (30pmol) was intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) or intrathecally (i.t.) administered to rats with oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. The antinociception of systemic morphine (3mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)) was suppressed only by pretreatment of i.t. tertiapin-Q, while supraspinal tertiapin-Q suppressed only the antinociception of systemic oxycodone (0.56mg/kg, s.c.). Partial antinocicpetion of fentanyl (0.017mg/kg, s.c.) was neither affected by i.c.v nor i.t. tertiapin-Q. These results demonstrated that GIRK1 channels differentially contribute to antinociceptive effects of MOR agonists, and that action site of GIRK1 channels is also different between morphine and oxycodone in oxaliplatin model. This study suggests the possibility that GIRK1 channels have a crucial role for antinociception of MOR agonists in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy.

Establishment of opioid-induced rewarding effects under oxaliplatin- and Paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in rats.

The rewarding effects of µ-receptor agonists can be suppressed under several pain conditions. We recently showed that clinically used µ-receptor agonists possess efficacies for relieving the neuropathic pain induced by chemotherapeutic drug in rats; however, it is possible that the use of µ-receptor agonists may trigger the rewarding effects even under chemotherapeutic drug-induced neuropathic pain. Nevertheless, no information is available regarding whether µ-receptor agonists produce psychological dependence under chemotherapeutic drug-induced neuropathic pain. Therefore, we examined the effects of neuropathy induced by chemotherapeutic drugs on the rewarding effects of morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl in rats. Repeated treatment with oxaliplatin or paclitaxel produced neuropathy as measured by the von Frey test. Rewarding effects produced by antinociceptive doses of µ-receptor agonists were not suppressed under oxaliplatin- or paclitaxel-induced neuropathy. Furthermore, the morphine-induced increase in the release of dopamine from the nucleus accumbens, which is a critical step in the rewarding effects of µ-receptor agonists, was not altered in paclitaxel-treated rats. These results suggest that the rewarding effects of µ-receptor agonists can still be established under oxaliplatin- or paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. Therefore, patients should be carefully monitored for psychological dependence on µ-receptor agonists when they are used to control chemotherapeutic drug-induced neuropathic pain.

Effect of the norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibition on µ-opioid receptor (MOR)-induced anti-nociception in a bone cancer pain model.

Although norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibition has an additional effect on µ-opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated anti-nociception in inflammatory and neuropathic pain, its effect on cancer pain is not well characterized. We investigated the additional effect of NET inhibition on MOR activation using a mouse femur bone cancer (FBC) pain model by comparing the anti-nociceptive effect of the dual-acting opioids tramadol and tapentadol and the clinically used MOR-targeted opioids oxycodone and morphine. The anti-nociceptive effects of subcutaneously administered opioids were assessed using the von-Frey filament test. Oxycodone (1 - 10 mg/kg) and morphine (5 - 50 mg/kg) dose-dependently exhibited potent anti-nociceptive effects, whereas tramadol (10 - 56 mg/kg) and tapentadol (10 - 30 mg/kg) exhibited partial effects. Rota-rod analyses of tapentadol at a higher dose (> 30 mg/kg) showed a significant decrease in motor coordination, which was partially recovered by pretreatment with MOR or α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists. The partial anti-nociceptive effect of tapentadol (30 mg/kg) was completely suppressed by a MOR antagonist, but not by α(1)- or α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists, suggesting that neither α(1)-adrenoceptor- nor α(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated pathways are involved in anti-nociception in the FBC model. We conclude that addition of NET inhibition does not contribute to MOR-mediated anti-nociception in bone cancer pain.

G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (KIR3) channels play a primary role in the antinociceptive effect of oxycodone, but not morphine, at supraspinal sites.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Oxycodone and morphine are µ-opioid receptor agonists prescribed to control moderate-to-severe pain. Previous studies suggested that these opioids exhibit different analgesic profiles. We hypothesized that distinct mechanisms mediate the differential effects of these two opioids and investigated the role of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (K(IR)3 also known as GIRK) channels in their antinociceptive effects. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Opioid-induced antinociceptive effects were assessed in mice, using the tail-flick test, by i.c.v. and intrathecal (i.t.) administration of morphine and oxycodone, alone and following inhibition of K(IR)3.1 channels with tertiapin-Q (30 pmol per mouse, i.c.v. and i.t.) and K(IR)3.1-specific siRNA. The antinociceptive effects of oxycodone and morphine were also examined after tertiapin-Q administration in the mouse femur bone cancer and neuropathic pain models. KEY RESULTS: The antinociceptive effects of oxycodone, after both i.c.v. and i.t. administrations, were markedly attenuated by K(IR)3.1 channel inhibition. In contrast, the antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. morphine were unaffected, whereas those induced by i.t. morphine were attenuated, by K(IR)3.1 channel inhibition. In the two chronic pain models, the antinociceptive effects of s.c. oxycodone, but not morphine, were inhibited by supraspinal administration of tertiapin-Q. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate that K(IR)3.1 channels play a primary role in the antinociceptive effects of oxycodone, but not those of morphine, at supraspinal sites and suggest that supraspinal K(IR)3.1 channels are responsible for the unique analgesic profile of oxycodone.

Differential activation of the µ-opioid receptor by oxycodone and morphine in pain-related brain regions in a bone cancer pain model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bone cancer pain is chronic and often difficult to control with opioids. However, recent studies have shown that several opioids have distinct analgesic profiles in chronic pain. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: To clarify the mechanisms underlying these distinct analgesic profiles, functional changes in the µ-opioid receptor were examined using a mouse femur bone cancer (FBC) model. KEY RESULTS: In the FBC model, the B(max) of [(3) H]-DAMGO binding was reduced by 15-45% in the periaqueductal grey matter (PAG), region ventral to the PAG (vPAG), mediodorsal thalamus (mTH), ventral thalamus and spinal cord. Oxycodone (10(-8) -10(-5) M) and morphine (10(-8) -10(-5) M) activated [(35) S]-GTPγS binding, but the activation was significantly attenuated in the PAG, vPAG, mTH and spinal cord in the FBC model. Interestingly, the attenuation of oxycodone-induced [(35) S]-GTPγS binding was quite limited (9-26%) in comparison with that of morphine (46-65%) in the PAG, vPAG and mTH, but not in the spinal cord. Furthermore, i.c.v. oxycodone at doses of 0.02-1.0 µg per mouse clearly inhibited pain-related behaviours, such as guarding, limb-use abnormalities and allodynia-like behaviour in the FBC model mice, while i.c.v. morphine (0.05-2.0 µg per mouse) had only partial or little analgesic effect on limb-use abnormalities and allodynia-like behaviour. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These results show that µ-opioid receptor functions are attenuated in several pain-related regions in bone cancer in an agonist-dependent manner, and suggest that modification of the µ-opioid receptor is responsible for the distinct analgesic effect of oxycodone and morphine.